Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 4:37 am



Reply to topic  [ 213 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 POTC under 310 mill club? (no!! I'm pwned) 
Author Message
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
I have a very unscientific analysis of this prediction.

When you think you have the box office figured out, you don't. This happens so often. I know we are blessed at this site with some of the sharpest box office prognosticating minds anywhere...we really do. There are so many people here who can analyse grosses down to % points. But most of the films that made piles of money are films that no one saw coming. Titanic, Star Wars, Shrek 2, ET, Passion, Jurassic Park and even Spiderman. No one could predict this kind of gross. Now predicting that Pirates will make between 280-320 is pretty standard stuff. But because everyone thinks it will make a shit load more, it more than likely will not. The law of probability says so.

:tongue:

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 7:55 pm
Profile WWW
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23386
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post 
Totally agree Baumer. Hence why those huge predictions are silly :)

Right now there are only two active franchises that can command MEGA grosses ($350m+) and they are Shrek and Spiderman. The jury is still out on POTC. Its a contended. But so was Reloaded.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:10 pm
Profile
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Reloaded was over 60% male, didn't have families or teens, didn't have comedy, and didn't have old people. It had nothing on POTC.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:12 pm
Profile ICQ
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23386
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post 
POTC2 will beat Reloaded no doubt. It has a wider audience - but not as wide as Shrek's. Reloaded has more hype and build up though. It created its own philosophy. It did capture teens too. One thing they do have in common is the "cliffhanger" ending. Lets see how that pans out - especially for POTC3.

Regardless - I have more faith in Disney than I do WB - so POTC has that benefit.

So having said all that - Reloaded will have the better opening (4day vs 4day) but POTC2 will have the better final gross.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:22 pm
Profile
I just lost the game
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 pm
Posts: 5868
Post 
MadGez wrote:
One thing they do have in common is the "cliffhanger" ending. Lets see how that pans out - especially for POTC3.


I think the cliffhanger won't work in the same way as the MR cliffhanger did. While it did have a cliffhanger, Dead Man's Chest most definitely could have been a standalone film, albeit with a few moderations to the ending. Not to say that the cliffhanger felt forced or tacky. It's not as...pressing...as Matrix or Back to the Future. I got a Fellowship of the Ring vibe to it.

_________________
Image


Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:03 am
Profile
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
I have always thought that the film would have a huge OD and a pretty big (107.5) OW, but that is not and never was the question. I just don't think it will sustain the pace and it will drop like every other blockbuster and it will settle with just less than 3 10.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:09 am
Profile WWW
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
And unless this film blows everyone away, it could suffer the same fate as Jurassic Park. Huge first film, massive OW for the sequel, but down in gross. It happened once, it will happen again, just a matter of time.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:38 am
Profile WWW
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23386
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post 
insomniacdude wrote:
MadGez wrote:
One thing they do have in common is the "cliffhanger" ending. Lets see how that pans out - especially for POTC3.


I think the cliffhanger won't work in the same way as the MR cliffhanger did. While it did have a cliffhanger, Dead Man's Chest most definitely could have been a standalone film, albeit with a few moderations to the ending. Not to say that the cliffhanger felt forced or tacky. It's not as...pressing...as Matrix or Back to the Future. I got a Fellowship of the Ring vibe to it.


Having now seen the film - I dont see the ending hurting it at all. It works well, is light hearted and not "pressing" as you said. It can be a standalone but will work as a trilogy. I thought the ending was handled very well actually.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:54 am
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
Ths thread will BURN!! ! ! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! :twisted:

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:54 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
Worst thread ever.

Pirates WILL get over $120 mil this weekend... then at LEAST $60 mil the next... and then at LEAST another $30 mil... and then at LEAST $15 mil... and then at LEAST $8 mil... and then at LEAST $4 mil... then $2 mil... then $1 mil...

That's $240 mil on weekends ALONE.

It will average at LEAST $5 mil in it's first 10 weekDAYS... that's at LEAST another $50 mil... to $290 mil...

Is it gonna fall off the face of the planet or something?

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:45 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
This club is just as impossible as BJ's.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 12:58 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:17 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: Berlin, Germania
Post 
hell, after all these bad reviews, i am more confident than ever that this will fall short of 310m. i'm in, baumer!


Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:15 pm
Profile ICQ
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 9:40 am
Posts: 1527
Location: Emyn Arnen
Post 
baumer72 wrote:

Return of the King did 380, you think Pirates will beat it? Good luck. :tongue:

No you silly goose. :bang: I don't think Pirates will beat RotK. I said that if PotC had great WOM, it would battle RotK. PotC2 does not have that WOM, so it will not battle RotK. It should fall between FotR and TTT. And hey I like my loonie comparisons. :blush:

But may I suggest that we stop all the talk about sequel rules. There are too many types of franshices and sequels now. You can't predict a movie on the basis of its sequelness anymore.

_________________
I'm not around much anymore because I don't have time (or permission, probably) to surf the 'net from my new job.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:50 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
Erendis wrote:
baumer72 wrote:

Return of the King did 380, you think Pirates will beat it? Good luck. :tongue:

No you silly goose. :bang: I don't think Pirates will beat RotK. I said that if PotC had great WOM, it would battle RotK. PotC2 does not have that WOM, so it will not battle RotK. It should fall between FotR and TTT. And hey I like my loonie comparisons. :blush:

But may I suggest that we stop all the talk about sequel rules. There are too many types of franshices and sequels now. You can't predict a movie on the basis of its sequelness anymore.


Where the hell did you get that assinine statement from?

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:52 pm
Profile
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
This club is just as impossible as BJ's.


It's not impossible. I have given reasons why i think it will happen.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:00 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
baumer72 wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
This club is just as impossible as BJ's.


It's not impossible. I have given reasons why i think it will happen.


And BJ has given his.

Us PoTC supporters have FAR more reasons why it will make more than you doubters have why it will make less.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:02 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
baumer72 wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
This club is just as impossible as BJ's.


It's not impossible. I have given reasons why i think it will happen.


DP07 has given a full thread of reasons (see "Why POTC2 will beat Shrek 2" thread) and he's predicting $550 million total. I don't think that's even possible, but so far, early reports are reporting the exact opposite of what's happening here.

I'll admit it isn't impossible, but it's extremely unlikely.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 pm
Profile
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
ChipMunky wrote:
baumer72 wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
This club is just as impossible as BJ's.


It's not impossible. I have given reasons why i think it will happen.


And BJ has given his.

Us PoTC supporters have FAR more reasons why it will make more than you doubters have why it will make less.


I'm not a doubter. I'm predicting 307 mill. That is massive. I'm also not delusional.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 pm
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 9:40 am
Posts: 1527
Location: Emyn Arnen
Post 
ChipMunky wrote:
Erendis wrote:
PotC2 does not have that WOM


Where the hell did you get that assinine statement from?

I deduced it from the RT reviews. I don't think the WOM will be Reloaded-terrible, but I just don't see it having WOM on par with RotK numbers (or maybe not even TTT numbers).

_________________
I'm not around much anymore because I don't have time (or permission, probably) to surf the 'net from my new job.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:04 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
Erendis wrote:
ChipMunky wrote:
Erendis wrote:
PotC2 does not have that WOM


Where the hell did you get that assinine statement from?

I deduced it from the RT reviews. I don't think the WOM will be Reloaded-terrible, but I just don't see it having WOM on par with RotK numbers (or maybe not even TTT numbers).


RT is critics... RT scores are only occasionaly right on with WOM...

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:07 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
Erendis wrote:
ChipMunky wrote:
Erendis wrote:
PotC2 does not have that WOM


Where the hell did you get that assinine statement from?

I deduced it from the RT reviews. I don't think the WOM will be Reloaded-terrible, but I just don't see it having WOM on par with RotK numbers (or maybe not even TTT numbers).

You cannot determine WOM from RT reviews. Plain and simple. Critics so rarely are in line with what audiences enjoy. Based on the crowd reports thus far, I'd say that WOM is pretty good. Not as good as the first, or the LOTR films, but definitely better than Shrek 2. And we all saw how that turned out...

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:08 pm
Profile
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
This weekend will be huge, no doubt, but the coming weeks will tell the story.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:43 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
baumer72 wrote:
ChipMunky wrote:
baumer72 wrote:
Zingaling wrote:
This club is just as impossible as BJ's.


It's not impossible. I have given reasons why i think it will happen.


And BJ has given his.

Us PoTC supporters have FAR more reasons why it will make more than you doubters have why it will make less.


I'm not a doubter. I'm predicting 307 mill. That is massive. I'm also not delusional.


Everyone under 400m is a doubter. Under 350m you only have haters. :tongue: j/k


Fri Jul 07, 2006 5:05 pm
Profile ICQ
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
I am even more convinced now that this film will make less. The weekend will be huge, but with wOM, it might just kill it.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:01 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
And you're getting the idea that it has bad WOM from...? I haven't seen a single indication of that.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:02 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 213 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.