Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 4:29 pm



Reply to topic  [ 213 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 POTC under 310 mill club? (no!! I'm pwned) 
Author Message
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
O wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Well, all I can say is that sometimes box-office goes unpredictable ways...but something like DP07 suggests is pretty much unprecedented. No movie ever rose from a $300+ million gross by another $100+ million.

I am still wondering why Jurassic Park: The Lost World failed to even approach the original. I am very sure the original had very good WoM. Also, what about MiB?


MIB 2 was unwanted. It came out 5 years after the original. It was too long a time, and too different a market place. Ie imo 90% of the gross of MIB came from the ID4 bump up, as well as the MIB song.


The original was still well-liked and 5 years is not much.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Jul 05, 2006 8:53 am
Profile WWW
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
And if you look at JP2, again, massive opening, but wOM killed it. If POTC lacks and is missing that lightning in the bottle that the first had, it might go the way of Temple of Doom, AOTC and JP2 and BTTF2.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Wed Jul 05, 2006 9:57 am
Profile WWW
Wall-E

Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 3:15 am
Posts: 810
Location: Somewhere
Post 
baumer72 wrote:
And if you look at JP2, again, massive opening, but wOM killed it. If POTC lacks and is missing that lightning in the bottle that the first had, it might go the way of Temple of Doom, AOTC and JP2 and BTTF2.


This is all true. I also wouldnt want to write off Superman just yet. It will put in a dent just big enough. If we had a 2 week break between the two I'd be thinking POTC2 would pull out a 100mil+ opening. I'm thinking a bit lower in and around 85mil. I'm still thinking it will earn right around what the first did...

_________________
You get what you give


Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:50 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post 
100 million is possibile because there a lot of people wanting to see this film and Superman will only be around 23 million on its 2nd weekend.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:04 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
O wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Well, all I can say is that sometimes box-office goes unpredictable ways...but something like DP07 suggests is pretty much unprecedented. No movie ever rose from a $300+ million gross by another $100+ million.

I am still wondering why Jurassic Park: The Lost World failed to even approach the original. I am very sure the original had very good WoM. Also, what about MiB?


MIB 2 was unwanted. It came out 5 years after the original. It was too long a time, and too different a market place. Ie imo 90% of the gross of MIB came from the ID4 bump up, as well as the MIB song.


The original was still well-liked and 5 years is not much.


B+ Cinemascore and B at Yahoo. That's mediocre, and actually below average for a blockbuster. You need at least an A- at Cinemascore and a B+ at Yahoo to expect an increase for a sequel (although a minority do it even with MIB reactions). Plus, MIB was a hyped blockbuster before DVD, so few waited to see it.

The thing people don't take into consideration is that POTC's 305m gross means it would have earned 500m if things worked as they did from 85-99 and 600m if 75-84. The 305m is just what's left for an original movie when many wait for DVD.

What you guys predict is unprecedented: for an original movie with great WOM in the DVD era to have less then a 30% increase for the sequel. There is nothing to indicate that franchises earning over 300m have more trouble increasing. Before DVDs sequels of all sizes tended to decrease.

Anyway, JP was from a different era, it was a hyped movie that set the OW record, and WOM was much weaker then POTC. Cinemascore was the same, but it only has a low B+ at yahoo.


Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:16 pm
Profile ICQ
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
DP07 wrote:
I won't call anything a disappointment. It won't happen though.


Care to make a bet on that? Over/under $140m? ;)


135m?


Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:17 pm
Profile ICQ
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post 
DP07 wrote:
Anyway, JP was from a different era, it was a hyped movie that set the OW record, and WOM was much weaker then POTC. Cinemascore was the same, but it only has a low B+ at yahoo.

Here we go again...

You can show me all evidence there is, never ever will you convince me that WOM was "much weaker" than POTC's.

JP2 got the OW record (a sign of great WOM of JP), yet droped in total because it was a weaker movie (expectations played a role here, too) and more importantly, didn't have the novelty factor (more of the same vibe), all that could play against POTC2 as well.

_________________
Image


Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:25 pm
Profile
The Incredible Hulk
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:50 am
Posts: 514
Post 
JP2 was supposed to be the big box office film of the year. It was the first sequel to the original JP which made almost $1 bil worldwide. Instead of being the biggest film of the year JP2 wasn't even the biggest film of the summer.It ended up a distant third to Titanic with MIB finishing second.


Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:42 pm
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
You cannot use Yahoo! to determine grades and scores for movies older than the system itself (older than by like 5 years). It's like using Rotten Tomatoes to find the "grade" for Empire Strikes Back. It's tainted (positively and negatively) by movie history, fads, dated special effects, etc.

Quote:
There is nothing to indicate that franchises earning over 300m have more trouble increasing.

Attack of the Clones?
Harry Potter?

Quote:
Before DVDs sequels of all sizes tended to decrease.

This exception is still more rare than not, and aside from the Lord of the Rings, Shrek, X2, Matrix Reloaded, Saw this tends to still be the general trend. I can't think of a smaller sequel that has grossed more than the original off the top of my head (other than Saw). They are still pretty rare. Even the biggies like Spider-Man 2 decreased.

I mean it may happen to maybe 1 or 2 sequels a year out of the 15 or so? That's not something to hold on to too tightly.


Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:37 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post 
DP07 wrote:
B+ Cinemascore and B at Yahoo. That's mediocre, and actually below average for a blockbuster. You need at least an A- at Cinemascore and a B+ at Yahoo to expect an increase for a sequel (although a minority do it even with MIB reactions). Plus, MIB was a hyped blockbuster before DVD, so few waited to see it.


Weren't you the guy arguing that The Ring had mediocre WOM because of its Cinemascore rating?


Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:11 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post 
http://www.boxofficereport.com/wbon/forecast.shtml

they have pirates at 120 million, Very interesting!

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:23 pm
Profile WWW
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
Post 
http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/Predictions.php

Lee's Movie Info has Pirates at $130.5 million. The battle begins!

_________________
(hitokiri battousai)


Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:28 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post 
hmm if the perdict that high can they really be wrong by more then 15-20 million dollars??

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:30 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
DP07 wrote:
B+ Cinemascore and B at Yahoo. That's mediocre, and actually below average for a blockbuster. You need at least an A- at Cinemascore and a B+ at Yahoo to expect an increase for a sequel (although a minority do it even with MIB reactions). Plus, MIB was a hyped blockbuster before DVD, so few waited to see it.


Weren't you the guy arguing that The Ring had mediocre WOM because of its Cinemascore rating?


Because of Yahoo, Cinemascore, and Netflix.

But, what's your point?


Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:48 pm
Profile ICQ
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
I have a quesiton, if POTC grosses 130-150 this weekend, does that leave any room for other films? Really, does it?

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 7:00 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post 
DP07 wrote:
Because of Yahoo, Cinemascore, and Netflix.

But, what's your point?


That Yahoo, Cinemascore, and Netflix aren't particularly reliable when said "mediocre WOM" flick manages a nearly 10x multiplier, something that's not just unheard of, but basically impossible for a horror flick in wide release.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:19 am
Profile
Post 
'Some movie under some $' club? I'm in by default.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:37 am
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
The more I think of it, I should have stayed with my 6% drop. But 307 sounds good.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:54 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
The Dark Shape wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Because of Yahoo, Cinemascore, and Netflix.

But, what's your point?


That Yahoo, Cinemascore, and Netflix aren't particularly reliable when said "mediocre WOM" flick manages a nearly 10x multiplier, something that's not just unheard of, but basically impossible for a horror flick in wide release.


Indeed. I mean its third weekend was bigger than its first!

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:04 am
Profile WWW
Star Trek XI
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:04 pm
Posts: 349
Location: Miami, FL
Post 
I still don't see the allure of POTC. Yeah, the original was an OK time at the movies. But that's it. I don't understand the great WOM or how it got to $300m.

Anyway, the above may be coloring my prediction, but I don't see this passing $300 million.

_________________
Trust me.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:33 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
400m in less than 20 days

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:47 pm
Profile WWW
Star Trek XI
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:04 pm
Posts: 349
Location: Miami, FL
Post 
BJ wrote:
400m in less than 20 days


:lol:


I mean, that was a joke right? :unsure:

_________________
Trust me.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:50 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
Rogue wrote:
BJ wrote:
400m in less than 20 days


:lol:


I mean, that was a joke right? :unsure:


18 days to 400m
24 days to 450m
32 days to 500m
50 days to 550m

:shades:

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Thu Jul 06, 2006 2:54 pm
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:08 am
Posts: 1879
Post 
BJ wrote:
Rogue wrote:
BJ wrote:
400m in less than 20 days


:lol:


I mean, that was a joke right? :unsure:


18 days to 400m
24 days to 450m
32 days to 500m
50 days to 550m

:shades:

here let me update this for you

18 days to 235 million
24 days to 285 million
32 days to 300 million
50 days to DVD

_________________
Cromulent!


Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:12 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post 
baumer72 wrote:
And if you look at JP2, again, massive opening, but wOM killed it. If POTC lacks and is missing that lightning in the bottle that the first had, it might go the way of Temple of Doom, AOTC and JP2 and BTTF2.


also note not of those won their respective years either.


Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:26 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 213 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Shack and 111 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.