Author |
Message |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11028
|
 Monster House, clear front runner for animated oscar?
I just saw ebert and roeper and they both said monster house is by far the best animated film of the year so far and the clear front runner for the animated oscar, With cars getting average reviews it looks like this one is the animated film to beat.
|
Sat Jul 01, 2006 7:53 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40262
|
Hmm, I wasn't thinking about this one actually. Not too surprising if the reviews are good, considering it's friggin Speilberg and Zemecks producing. Could be.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:09 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
Yeah, but it came from Ebert & Roeper....
_________________ k
|
Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:25 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
HR gave it a negative review.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:46 pm |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
Happy Feet!!!!..... 
|
Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:49 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
I think it's still Cars.
|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:12 am |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
Happy Feet.
George Miller, man.
|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:19 am |
|
 |
O
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm Posts: 12193
|
I think Ant Bully has a strong chance.
|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:32 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
Ant Bully and Barnyard are both gonna be big stinking piles of shit. Monster House will have previews the weekend before to boost WOM, and Harry Knowles said it's like the best movie of the year so far. I think it'll be a surprisingly big hit if Sony doesn't fuck up the marketing Zathura style.
|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 3:58 am |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
Wow. I actually thought this one looked to be a bit crap, but maybe not.
Even though they're off sometimes (sometimes simultaneously), if both E&R are saying that this is the best animated film so far this year...
I think it just cemented itself as a contender.
|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:10 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
I'll reserve my opinion till I've seen it, plus: Ant Bully, Happy Feet, & Flushed Away - from the ecstatic audience response to both of the Happy Feet trailers, Aardman's win last year, and the cool story of Ant Bully, I'm far from counting any of them out.
And so far this year, the clear leader is Over the Hedge - much more entertaining than the stodgy Cars...
|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:05 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
I just saw the review..and E&R kept comparing it to Polar Express quality-wise, another movie they splooged over. Considering how awful Polar Express was, not only do I doubt that Monster House is an Oscar frontrunner, I doubt it's even watchable.
I think we can now officially add motion capture to a list of Ebert's fetishes, along with Angelina Jolie and a score of others.
_________________ k
|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:30 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
Save this post:
"Flushed Away" will win Best Picture Oscar.
Thank you.
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:56 pm |
|
 |
liesse00
Commander Coo Coo Bananas
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 10:45 am Posts: 585 Location: North Central Illinois
|
yoshue wrote: I just saw the review..and E&R kept comparing it to Polar Express quality-wise, another movie they splooged over. Considering how awful Polar Express was, not only do I doubt that Monster House is an Oscar frontrunner, I doubt it's even watchable.
I think we can now officially add motion capture to a list of Ebert's fetishes, along with Angelina Jolie and a score of others.
Polar Express and Monster House were made the same way so thats not a suprise.
_________________Last FMTwitter
|
Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:02 pm |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
yoshue wrote: I just saw the review..and E&R kept comparing it to Polar Express quality-wise, another movie they splooged over. Considering how awful Polar Express was, not only do I doubt that Monster House is an Oscar frontrunner, I doubt it's even watchable.
I think we can now officially add motion capture to a list of Ebert's fetishes, along with Angelina Jolie and a score of others.
Anything Exotic is another big one, through a foreign director (The Cell) and suddenly Ebert has positive things to say about very mediocre films.
Ebert reviews are well written, but there is little rhyme to his reviews. Normally you pick out a person's tastes, but with Ebert you can never tell when he randomly going to like crap and dislike a perfectly good film.
|
Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:42 pm |
|
 |
misutaa
je vois l'avenir
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:33 pm Posts: 3841 Location: Hollywood/Berkeley, CA
|
I still think that Flushed Away will win.
|
Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:05 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Groucho wrote: Save this post:
"Flushed Away" will win Best Picture Oscar.
Thank you.
Saved.
I think this year Pixar will claim it's crown from Aardman.
But then again... BOTH could lose... which would be UNBELIEVABLE
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:23 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Saw the sneak preview tonight of Monster House with 15 other people in a 450 seat theatre, and I can assure you that it is in no danger of scooping the animated Oscar for 2006.
Boy, it was sloooow. The main story, when they finally got around to it, was a strange and melancholy one. But before that the set-up with the babysitter and then the videogame guru were drawn out and pointless. The finale was kinda fun, but this movie seemed boringly long at 91 minutes. It might have made a good hour-long Twilight Zone episode with a 46 minute running time plus commercials. As it is, I can't imagine who's going to be lining up to see this one...
2 out of 5.
|
Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:33 pm |
|
 |
Alex Y.
Top Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm Posts: 5812
|
bradley witherberry wrote: Saw the sneak preview tonight of Monster House with 15 other people in a 450 seat theatre, and I can assure you that it is in no danger of scooping the animated Oscar for 2006.
Boy, it was sloooow. The main story, when they finally got around to it, was a strange and melancholy one. But before that the set-up with the babysitter and then the videogame guru were drawn out and pointless. The finale was kinda fun, but this movie seemed boringly long at 91 minutes. It might have made a good hour-long Twilight Zone episode with a 46 minute running time plus commercials. As it is, I can't imagine who's going to be lining up to see this one...
2 out of 5.
How does it compare to Cars, (which you also give 2 out of 5 to)? Which one was slower? Was any aspect of this movie better than Cars?
|
Sun Jul 16, 2006 1:14 am |
|
 |
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm Posts: 25035 Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
save this post
HAPPY FEET WILL OWN!
best pick easily
_________________The Force Awakens
|
Sun Jul 16, 2006 4:59 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
alex young wrote: bradley witherberry wrote: Saw the sneak preview tonight of Monster House with 15 other people in a 450 seat theatre, and I can assure you that it is in no danger of scooping the animated Oscar for 2006.
Boy, it was sloooow. The main story, when they finally got around to it, was a strange and melancholy one. But before that the set-up with the babysitter and then the videogame guru were drawn out and pointless. The finale was kinda fun, but this movie seemed boringly long at 91 minutes. It might have made a good hour-long Twilight Zone episode with a 46 minute running time plus commercials. As it is, I can't imagine who's going to be lining up to see this one...
2 out of 5. How does it compare to Cars, (which you also give 2 out of 5 to)? Which one was slower? Was any aspect of this movie better than Cars?
They both approached their use of boredom as a story device in different ways, but with the same yawn inducing results. Both would have been much better movies if they were 25% shorter.
BO-wise, at least Cars might appeal more to younger kids...
|
Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:19 pm |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Must be good if bradley didnt like it. Okay, now it has a chance at winning best animated.
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:09 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Killuminati510 wrote: Must be good if bradley didnt like it. Okay, now it has a chance at winning best animated.
Heh! Can't wait to hear the general reviews next week, and see how the WOM and BO pan out.
Let's see if I really do live in Bizarroland...
|
Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:05 am |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
Killuminati510 wrote: Must be good if bradley didnt like it. Okay, now it has a chance at winning best animated.
He also hated Cars. Now he just has to hate Flushed Away or Happy Feet (Not both), and we'll have our catagory!
However, Motion Capture = Big no-no if you wanna be an Animated Feature contender. Waking Life was considered a near lock in the catagory's first year (Behind Shrek and Monsters, Inc.), but got snubbed for Jimmy Neutron. In 2004, THe Polar Express was also thought to be a near lock (After two more Pixar and Shrek movies), only to get shot down by the critically panned Shark Tale. I think the animation branch doesn't like the format because its not "true" animation. So, I'd count this and Scanner Darkly out easily.
|
Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:11 am |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
bradley witherberry wrote: BO-wise, at least Cars might appeal more to younger kids...
Question (since I haven't seen either) is Cars more generic and broad? It's Pixar, so I'm assuming it's "safe" comedy.
|
Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:00 pm |
|
|