World of KJ - View topic - Superman Returns

Page 7 of 13

[ 315 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 13 Next

Superman Returns

What grade would you give this film?

A	32%	[ 27 ]
B	36%	[ 31 ]
C	16%	[ 14 ]
D	8%	[ 7 ]
F	4%	[ 3 ]
I don't plan on seeing this film	4%	[ 3 ]

Total votes : 85

Superman Returns

Author	Message
jb007 Veteran Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm Posts: 3917 Location: Las Vegas	excel wrote: my fav scene was the opening credits. those were easily the best credit sequence a big movie has had in a long time. routh was really good; i cannot believe hpow good he was with the drama, especially at the end. thje kid was kid too. hell everybody was good. bosworthhad great chemistry with both routh and marsden, making the relationships much more believeable. Agree. I also loved the fact that Singer did not make Marsden a jerk or a bad person. _________________ Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006 The Greatest Actor Ever. Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.
Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:50 pm

neo_wolf Extraordinary Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11033	Movie:Superman returns is a good film, not great, i would put it on the same level as x-men 1 and spidey 1.The actors were all fine and routh did a good job.Not as much action as i thought it would have but the action it has is great, especially the plane/space shuddle sequence, that is grade A action.Hopefully the next film will center more around superman, this film mostly centered around Lois and Lex, and hopefully there will be other villians brought into the mix, i would like to see Brainiac or someone else that can challenge superman blow to blow like in the second film, all in all it was a good restart to the ranchise that can hopefully build up to bigger things like spidey 2 and x2 did. My grade: * out of ** or a B in wokj grade system. Last edited by neo_wolf on Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:06 am

BennyBlanco Indiana Jones IV Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 3:51 pm Posts: 1102 Location: The Bronx	Superman Returns was an excellent super-hero movie. All the footage I had seen up until its release seemed awkward and cheap and my expectations were that it would probably end up being a decent flick, but it managed to surpass those and turned out to be equal parts thrilling spectacle, touching drama and quirky fun. The three leads (Spacey, Routh and Bosworth) were uniformly excellent. Brandon managed to convincingly present two personalities (especially funny was his bumbling Clark Kent with all the right facial ticks and mannerisms that we've come to love) and I thought his Superman was a commanding and charismatic presence. The chemistry between Routh and Bosworth is quite palpable and the whole sequence on top of the Bugle and the night flight was pure cinematic magic. I loved how Spacey was equal parts sadistic (near the end) and quirky and his right hand gal (Posey) was a real treat. They walked a fine line, but I always thought their interaction worked and it brought a smile to my face. It's an over-the-top level of villiany that just seems so appropriate in this movie and in that world. Lex's plot for world domination was brilliantly ridiculous and created an opportunity to present some incredibly fantastic set pieces, ripe with some truly impressive visual effects work. The film may not be action packed, but what is presented is inspired visually and consistently enthralling. You could see the passion that Brian Singer had for this material and he, along with his dp and visual effects guys, have created some truly iconic imagery here that is worthy of remembrance. The movie was the perfect length and I thought they earned the moments that came after Supermans "death". Now I must admit that I can barely recall the first or second Superman movies (though I know for a fact that I've seen both more than a few times back when I was a kid), but when that music hit and the title cards zoomed out in 3d, it brought a tear of nostalgia to my eye. Really good stuff. I hope good word of mouth and some Batman Begins type legs will kick in for this and propel it past $200 million (even though I am a member of the under $200 club), because it bloody well deserves it. A
Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:13 am

Johnny Dollar The Lubitsch Touch Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019	When the credits began and the John Williams theme began blaring, I really thought I was gonna love the film. Not so. I was pretty disappointed; this is a real missed opportunity. The movie died pretty much every time the villains were on screen. I really liked Routh and Bosworth, however. All the ingredients were there, but the movie just never comes to life. The plotting is beyond goofy as well. I liked the unspectacular X3 better. Nevertheless, I really hope we get a sequel, done well. _________________ k
Sat Jul 01, 2006 12:13 am

ashwani Wall-E Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 10:18 am Posts: 813	I finally watched the movie and I will give it a solid B. Had some really good moments, some funny liners but i was expecting more and was kinda dissapointed that there was less action
Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:15 am

STEVE ROGERS The Greatest Avenger EVER Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501	excel wrote: saw it today. wow. loved it. the one thing that preturbed me was they heavily edited down the earthquake to make room for the action on new krypton, which i found less exciting. that said, routh was incredible. bosworth was amazing. lexwas great. but marsden, posey, hunting, n the kid all held their own if not stole their scenes. the kid was so cool! I'm, I'm shocked.. You liked the movie.. No kidding.. I'd say that was a forgone conclusion that you would for as much as you've whored this movie, but in the end, I'm just as bad when it came to AVP so I won't say another word about it..
Sat Jul 01, 2006 1:24 am

STEVE ROGERS The Greatest Avenger EVER Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501	RAWSAW wrote: Well I went to see SR last night. I must say I'm having a hard time grading this film. As I left the theater I felt like something just wasn't right and I knew what it was... This film should've followed in the footsteps of Batman Begins and started the series over again. A fresh new start and retelling of the story for todays youth. My teenage daughter thought it was just 'ok' and her reason was that she just didn't understand all of it. She never had seen the originals and I guess I didn't explain enough to her before going last night... Much of the film borrowed from the original, heck the plot with Lex and his realestate felt copied. I kept noticing similarities between them. The flight with Lois through the city. Kitty and Miss Teschmacher both feeling attracted/sorry for Superman. I guess I felt that Singer would have done better just restarting the series....Now, what did grab me??? Routh! I think he was the perfect choice. Now BKB has touted that no one could fill Reeves shoes, and hey I was there at the same time growing up so I agree to an extent. But that was then and this is now. They're not Reeves shoes to fill anymore and they fit Routh to a tee. Physically lets not kid ourselves Routh is in much better shape the Reeve. I think both were equal in acting. Revee did have a more chiseled face but Routh and the better physique. I think Routh (or Singer new how to) had a more natural feel for the powers of Superman. His motions looked more fluid and gentle... I think it goes without saying that the effects were great. Again you just couldn't do justice to the character back in '78' with the technology of the time. I also like the way Singer threw in references to the gods. The piece of art work on the wall of the ship. Superman catching the Daily Bugles globe reminded me of Atlas with the world on his shoulders. As he looked down at earth from the edge of space, listening, watching, as if it was his to protect and care for... I think Bosworth was miscast. She just hit me as a little too young. She did a fine job but just never felt right. I gotta say I never liked Kidder either. Between her scratch voice and 'ok' looks I felt Superman just deserved better (lol)... Luther,,,Spacey was great, better then Hackman who also did a very good job. I think his crazy side was just more vicious then Hackmans and I liked that... I liked the twist with his son, it opens up the doors for anything down the road. So, where does this all leave me? I'm leaning toward a B, B+. I think if Singer just didn't shit around and made this a totally new Superman from the start it could have easily been an A. Donner told the better story, it was after all a beginning. No matter how I look at it I'm glad to see that Superman is back. My opinions to the side it was a solid restart to a classic hero. I think the story Singer told will lead to bigger and better things in the next film....Its gonna go up, up and away from here. For reference, a few of my rankings of other superhero films Batman Begins A Superman 2 A- Spiderman 2 B+ Superman B+ Superman returns B/B+ Spiderman B/B+ X2 B X-Men B- Batman B- Batman returns C Hulk C-/D+ I can truly appreciate what your saying and maybe through the course of time, I'll learn to accept Routh(Pronounced like your saying "SOUTH") and not cling on to the Past so much, but right now, I think Reeve had the Big Barrel Chest which helped and didn't require shoulder pads or 4 inch heels on his boots like a Model.. If today's generation is satisfied with having a boy toy model for SUPERMAN, then you have my blessing.. For now between this and the time a sequel comes up, I'd be hitting the Gym hard to improve in these areas I mentioned and for the Love of God: Go back to the RED CAPE.. GET IT SINGER: RED CAPE, Not MAROON.. Also, where's X3 on your list???
Sat Jul 01, 2006 7:47 am

RAWSAW Wall-E Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 3:15 am Posts: 810 Location: Somewhere	LEX_BKB wrote: RAWSAW wrote: Well I went to see SR last night. I must say I'm having a hard time grading this film. As I left the theater I felt like something just wasn't right and I knew what it was... This film should've followed in the footsteps of Batman Begins and started the series over again. A fresh new start and retelling of the story for todays youth. My teenage daughter thought it was just 'ok' and her reason was that she just didn't understand all of it. She never had seen the originals and I guess I didn't explain enough to her before going last night... Much of the film borrowed from the original, heck the plot with Lex and his realestate felt copied. I kept noticing similarities between them. The flight with Lois through the city. Kitty and Miss Teschmacher both feeling attracted/sorry for Superman. I guess I felt that Singer would have done better just restarting the series....Now, what did grab me??? Routh! I think he was the perfect choice. Now BKB has touted that no one could fill Reeves shoes, and hey I was there at the same time growing up so I agree to an extent. But that was then and this is now. They're not Reeves shoes to fill anymore and they fit Routh to a tee. Physically lets not kid ourselves Routh is in much better shape the Reeve. I think both were equal in acting. Revee did have a more chiseled face but Routh and the better physique. I think Routh (or Singer new how to) had a more natural feel for the powers of Superman. His motions looked more fluid and gentle... I think it goes without saying that the effects were great. Again you just couldn't do justice to the character back in '78' with the technology of the time. I also like the way Singer threw in references to the gods. The piece of art work on the wall of the ship. Superman catching the Daily Bugles globe reminded me of Atlas with the world on his shoulders. As he looked down at earth from the edge of space, listening, watching, as if it was his to protect and care for... I think Bosworth was miscast. She just hit me as a little too young. She did a fine job but just never felt right. I gotta say I never liked Kidder either. Between her scratch voice and 'ok' looks I felt Superman just deserved better (lol)... Luther,,,Spacey was great, better then Hackman who also did a very good job. I think his crazy side was just more vicious then Hackmans and I liked that... I liked the twist with his son, it opens up the doors for anything down the road. So, where does this all leave me? I'm leaning toward a B, B+. I think if Singer just didn't shit around and made this a totally new Superman from the start it could have easily been an A. Donner told the better story, it was after all a beginning. No matter how I look at it I'm glad to see that Superman is back. My opinions to the side it was a solid restart to a classic hero. I think the story Singer told will lead to bigger and better things in the next film....Its gonna go up, up and away from here. For reference, a few of my rankings of other superhero films Batman Begins A Superman 2 A- Spiderman 2 B+ Superman B+ Superman returns B/B+ Spiderman B/B+ X2 B X-Men B- Batman B- Batman returns C Hulk C-/D+ I can truly appreciate what your saying and maybe through the course of time, I'll learn to accept Routh(Pronounced like your saying "SOUTH") and not cling on to the Past so much, but right now, I think Reeve had the Big Barrel Chest which helped and didn't require shoulder pads or 4 inch heels on his boots like a Model.. If today's generation is satisfied with having a boy toy model for SUPERMAN, then you have my blessing.. For now between this and the time a sequel comes up, I'd be hitting the Gym hard to improve in these areas I mentioned and for the Love of God: Go back to the RED CAPE.. GET IT SINGER: RED CAPE, Not MAROON.. Also, where's X3 on your list??? I really understand where you're coming from. I do. Let me tell you something I've noticed.I have the first 2 Superman's here on dvd. About maybe a year ago I was in the mood to watch them. My daughters friend was sleeping over so we settled in for a night of movies. About 20-30 mins. into the original I noticed my daughter sleeping, about 1/2hr later her friend was out like a light and so was my wife. Now those two teens are night owls and I don't recall it being very late. Over the year they never got around to watching them to my knowledge. Wednesday I suggested we all watch the original again just to refresh our memories before going to the Thursday show. Well my god those two acted like it was the plague. Both of them agreed, even though they only saw a short amount of the first film, that it 'sucked' and was 'boring'.... My point is you cant argue with teenagers about what 'they' should like. To me those two probably represent much of the average teens in America. They don't care about Revee. They will pick on the '70's crappy' effects. I cant win. Are they spoiled at the new world of technology that Hollywood has created? No, its their time, its all they know...When we walked out of SR and I asked their opinions I got one: ' It was good but I didn't understand it' and two: ' It was ok but it didn't make any sense that Superman was beat up by those 3 thugs'...They needed to watch the original fully to appreciate and understand the new one. They just didn't care to. They needed a remake of the original, no doubt in my mind. Now I agree with everything you've said about Revee. Lets go back to the 50's TV show. For the time, George Revees was the perfect Superman. A powerful looking man with distinct features and a strong presence. Fast forward to '78'. There were still men out there that looked like the original Revees but that look wasn't up with the times. So they found an unknown with a different look (but barely different name lol) in Revee. They sent him to the gym, he put on some more muscle and he fit the 'new' Superman of the times perfectly. Here we are today, a new time, not our time. Singer found what he thought would be the best Superman for today. A strong but sleeker looking man. With good looks but a youthfulness about him. Size wise he fit the part well, 6'3'' and 225lbs. Was he better then Revee? Hell no,,just different and great in his way... I'm putting my opinions of Revee to the side. I'm giving Singer and Routh the benefit of the doubt. Through my child's eyes I'm looking with untainted eyes. Was Routh a good Superman? I have to say yes, he did a excellent job. I think he fit the times perfectly. Ooo, about X3, I've been so busy with work the last few weeks I just never got to see it. But I'm on vacation this week and plan on going to a matinee. My buddies know how I am and have been busting my ass that they've seen it and I havent... _________________ You get what you give
Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:24 am

baumer72 Mod Team Leader Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake	I understand what you're saying Rich. Kids now a days, and my step son falls in this category, think the original is so fake looking. This happened when we watched The Omen together, and, this pains me to say, JAWS also. I guess I can't fault him for feeling that way, as I feel much the same about most films pre 1960. But I guess it's not the spfx that i liked about the originals, its the story. The story in this one is lame. The continuity is lame. And that makes a lame overall experience. _________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident. Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:52 am

RAWSAW Wall-E Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 3:15 am Posts: 810 Location: Somewhere	baumer72 wrote: I understand what you're saying Rich. Kids now a days, and my step son falls in this category, think the original is so fake looking. This happened when we watched The Omen together, and, this pains me to say, JAWS also. I guess I can't fault him for feeling that way, as I feel much the same about most films pre 1960. But I guess it's not the spfx that i liked about the originals, its the story. The story in this one is lame. The continuity is lame. And that makes a lame overall experience. O yes, if you read my review, I agree that the story was better in the original. I felt Singer tried to touch upon much of what Donner had done. I think it was a mistake. Singer should have started from scratch and retold the story the way he wanted to. I get the feeling the the industry as a whole felt they were walking on egg shells with this movie between Revee and Donner... I think they should have taken a chance and went full tilt with this film in a new direction (BB). A whole new Superman for a new millennium. Routh is the high point, after all to me its all about Superman anyway. I'm hoping that the next film will focus on him more (ala Superman 2). _________________ You get what you give
Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:10 am

baumer72 Mod Team Leader Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake	I'm on break right now, pm me your home phone number. I'll call you for a minute. _________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident. Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:12 am

baumer72 Mod Team Leader Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake	RAWSAW wrote: baumer72 wrote: I understand what you're saying Rich. Kids now a days, and my step son falls in this category, think the original is so fake looking. This happened when we watched The Omen together, and, this pains me to say, JAWS also. I guess I can't fault him for feeling that way, as I feel much the same about most films pre 1960. But I guess it's not the spfx that i liked about the originals, its the story. The story in this one is lame. The continuity is lame. And that makes a lame overall experience. O yes, if you read my review, I agree that the story was better in the original. I felt Singer tried to touch upon much of what Donner had done. I think it was a mistake. Singer should have started from scratch and retold the story the way he wanted to. I get the feeling the the industry as a whole felt they were walking on egg shells with this movie between Revee and Donner... I think they should have taken a chance and went full tilt with this film in a new direction (BB). A whole new Superman for a new millennium. Routh is the high point, after all to me its all about Superman anyway. I'm hoping that the next film will focus on him more (ala Superman 2). I agree. And I also agree that Routh was the high point of the film. He was fantastic. I also hope that the next sotry is better. We need a better challenge for Supes as well. _________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident. Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:13 am

zennier htm Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley	yoshue wrote: When the credits began and the John Williams theme began blaring, I really thought I was gonna love the film. Not so. I was pretty disappointed; this is a real missed opportunity. The movie died pretty much every time the villains were on screen. I really liked Routh and Bosworth, however. All the ingredients were there, but the movie just never comes to life. The plotting is beyond goofy as well. I liked the unspectacular X3 better. Nevertheless, I really hope we get a sequel, done well. I agree, but am more lenient. I guess I really, really liked Routh and those opening credits. And the art design. I wouldn't go so far as to say X3 was better..... vomits a bit
Sat Jul 01, 2006 2:20 pm

andaroo1 Lord of filth Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566	baumer72 wrote: But I guess it's not the spfx that i liked about the originals, its the story. The story in this one is lame. The continuity is lame. And that makes a lame overall experience. The thing I loved about the first Superman were the long, pastoral Kanasas settings, the funeral of Clark's "father", the whole general flow of the movie, Reeves screaming when he finds Lois dead, etc. There are a lot of little moments in those films which overcome the special effects.
Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:16 pm

Excel Superfreak Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22210 Location: Places	i just thinks its funny the parts i expected to hate-the stuff with kids, the long slow things with lois-turned out to be some of the films strongest stuff. thart kid is so funy. from his voice n weezing sound to his little looks at supes n clark to walking around with a trashcan on his head going "rawr!" to say "BUUURRRRRWWWWIIITTTOOSSSS!"...I thought th was my funny n my girlfriend thought he was a dorable. this is one time where adding a kid def. worked.
Sat Jul 01, 2006 7:19 pm

nghtvsn Extraordinary Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm Posts: 11016 Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma	SUPERMAN RETURNS Where: Harkins OKC When: 070106@1900 Size/Occ: 500+/90% Trailers: missed them while getting popcorn and drinks Film: I really enjoyed this film alot and I don't know if it was because of lowered expectations of which mine weren't even that high to begin with. I liked the pace of the film and didn't find it overly long or even slow. In fact, I was pretty glued to the film from start to finish. The story with Luther was okay as he wasn't that big of a villain in this film but he did make you wanna hate him that's for sure. I liked Bosworth as Lois and enjoyed the interaction between she and Routh. I found Routh to be a great find and pleasant surprise. He really reminds/looks like C. Reeve. I didn't find the dialogue weak either. I had heard some conservatives complaining that Superman was losing his meaning/purpose as to what he stood for when for example, the editor asks if Sman still stands for truth justice and all the other stuff. I think it would have been nice if he said the American way but considering the Daily Planet is like the NY Times one can see why that entertainment news liberal editor would say it like that. I liked the varying displays of Sman's powers in the film. Him detatching that hugh block of earth was slightly over the top but I can let that slide since it's the first film. I also found it funny when the news was mentioning a whole list of cities and one blurb said Gotham. I thought that was cute. Overall, I completely enjoyed the film and am looking very much forward to the next one. Grade - A _________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:30 am

Mr. Reynolds Confessing on a Dance Floor Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown	ok, so what was the point of making this movie? it was blah. can't give it an F because it wasn't horrible but that doesn't say much. my review will be a report on the crowd reaction at the AMC 25 in Times Square (1 am showing): -tons of laughing AT the movie -a "yeah! for child support" comment yelled out when lois asks superman if he will be around at then of the movie -chatter all through the last 30 minutes C-
Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:06 am

nghtvsn Extraordinary Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm Posts: 11016 Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma	Clearly you watched the movie with a disrepectful audience that never learned theatre etiquette. Laughing at the movie? This isn't Scary movie 4 or Wolf Crap here. Talking throughout the last 30 min? Sounds like a bunch of college aged liberals and a late night showing. The "yeah, for child support" comment sounds like it came from a dumb white kid or dumb black girl. Pray tell. . . _________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:50 am

Ripper 2.71828183 Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me	nghtvsn wrote: Clearly you watched the movie with a disrepectful audience that never learned theatre etiquette. Laughing at the movie? This isn't Scary movie 4 or Wolf Crap here. Talking throughout the last 30 min? Sounds like a bunch of college aged liberals and a late night showing. The "yeah, for child support" comment sounds like it came from a dumb white kid or dumb black girl. Pray tell. . . Thanks for the steoreotypes, next time I need to sum up the population I'll be sure to ask you.
Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:18 am

Bradley Witherberry Extraordinary Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar	I forgot to mention that on my second viewing, I noticed that Kal Penn (Harold and Kumar, Van Wilder) was one of Lex's henchmen. I'm not surprised I didn't notice him the first time round, as his part is absolutely miniscule! What a waste - even the henchman with the video camera got more laughs. BTW, notice how after Superboy murdered the one British henchman, it left just the three brown dudes to get squished by the falling crystal at the end. Middle Eastern/Indian types are the hot new war-on-terror bad guys, but I miss the cold war Russian villains...
Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:39 am

baumer72 Mod Team Leader Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake	Ripper wrote: nghtvsn wrote: Clearly you watched the movie with a disrepectful audience that never learned theatre etiquette. Laughing at the movie? This isn't Scary movie 4 or Wolf Crap here. Talking throughout the last 30 min? Sounds like a bunch of college aged liberals and a late night showing. The "yeah, for child support" comment sounds like it came from a dumb white kid or dumb black girl. Pray tell. . . Thanks for the steoreotypes, next time I need to sum up the population I'll be sure to ask you. I can't believe someone actually wrote that. _________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident. Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
Sun Jul 02, 2006 7:49 am

Anonymous	Zingaling wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: I watched it Tuesday night at the local philly IMAX. Not as good as I hoped but a solid start. B King of Prussia or Franklin Institute?! Prussia has been sold out day after day. Franklin's domed screen didnt help Supes.
Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:40 pm

Anita Hussein Briem Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 3290 Location: Houston	The movie spends more time contemplating than a Buddhist monk. Second worst sleep-inducer, after Stuart Little 2. C _________________ ~~(hitokiri battousai)~~
Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:24 pm

Excel Superfreak Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22210 Location: Places	i still say batmanbegins is greatest super hero movie ever. but without a doubt when the superman returns director cut is released, this will over take it. such an absurd amount of stuff was edited out.
Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:39 pm

Joker's Thug #3 Extraordinary Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass	Make a movie thats already absurdly long even longer? Yeeeeah thats not gonna help. _________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:49 pm
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Page 7 of 13

[ 315 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 13 Next

Superman Returns

Who is online