| Author |
Message |
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Hmmm....well...at least it's Pixar.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 6:50 am |
 
|
|
|
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
yes but not a project pixar neccessarily wants to do.
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 6:52 am |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
bABA wrote: yes but not a project pixar neccessarily wants to do. I am saying that it could have been worse. _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 7:00 am |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
As long as they do away with the recall storyline, I'm happy.
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 7:07 am |
|
|
|
Heinrich Himmler
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:17 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: Berlin, Germania
|
not a good idea, i thought that part 2 already suffered from a lack of freshness. those uncreative bastards from disney only have quick cash in mind. i'm afraid disney is going to ruin pixar, 20 years from now we can look forward to straight to video productions like a bugs life 3 and nemo vs. pinocchio.
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 7:16 am |
|
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
TS2 was a great sequel to an all-time classic animated movie. I retain hope that the second sequel will also be great. And I'd love to see all the secondary characters again...
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 7:48 am |
|
|
|
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Magnus101 wrote: bABA wrote: yes but not a project pixar neccessarily wants to do. Don't think its going to matter. Pixar has a name to keep and I doubt they are going to be like, "eh we don't want to do this so we're jsut going to make a sub-par movie." I mean, yes it is kind of an unnecessary sequel but it is one I will welcome openly because its the sequel to the greatest CGI film ever made. doesn't matter. the thing about pixar is that they've always kept creative control. they make films when they want to, about what they want to .. otherwise they don't make them. this won't be the case with TS3. This time, they're forced to go out and look for a story instead of their being one in the first place.
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 8:07 am |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Joseba B-Loki wrote: nemo vs. pinocchio.  _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 9:24 am |
|
|
|
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
If Pixar is overseeing it, I am all for it.
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 10:10 am |
|
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
 bABA wrote: Magnus101 wrote: bABA wrote: yes but not a project pixar neccessarily wants to do. Don't think its going to matter. Pixar has a name to keep and I doubt they are going to be like, "eh we don't want to do this so we're jsut going to make a sub-par movie." I mean, yes it is kind of an unnecessary sequel but it is one I will welcome openly because its the sequel to the greatest CGI film ever made. doesn't matter. the thing about pixar is that they've always kept creative control. they make films when they want to, about what they want to .. otherwise they don't make them. this won't be the case with TS3. This time, they're forced to go out and look for a story instead of their being one in the first place. Here's a sneak peek @ Pixar's "forced to" TS3 script:
Buzz is so strung out on crack that he accidentally kills Jesse during an extended lovemaking session. Woody steps in as his lawyer (a la Jimmy Stewart in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington), and through a stirring closing argument, succeeds in saving Buzz from the electric chair and gets him committed to the toy asylum. Further wackiness ensues as the other toys try to help him escape...
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 11:12 am |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
bradley witherberry wrote: bABA wrote: Magnus101 wrote: bABA wrote: yes but not a project pixar neccessarily wants to do. Don't think its going to matter. Pixar has a name to keep and I doubt they are going to be like, "eh we don't want to do this so we're jsut going to make a sub-par movie." I mean, yes it is kind of an unnecessary sequel but it is one I will welcome openly because its the sequel to the greatest CGI film ever made. doesn't matter. the thing about pixar is that they've always kept creative control. they make films when they want to, about what they want to .. otherwise they don't make them. this won't be the case with TS3. This time, they're forced to go out and look for a story instead of their being one in the first place. Here's a sneak peek @ Pixar's "forced to" TS3 script: Buzz is so strung out on crack that he accidentally kills Jesse during an extended lovemaking session. Woody steps in as his lawyer (a la Jimmy Stewart in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington), and through a stirring closing argument, succeeds in saving Buzz from the electric chair and gets him committed to the toy asylum. Further wackiness ensues as the other toys try to help him escape... Can you say "Best Movie EVER" _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 1:10 pm |
|
|
|
HiltonLohan2005
Speed Racer
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:09 pm
Posts: 111
Location: sitting roasty toasty in a beautiful apartment in Paris, and no thats not me in the picture
|
wow, such flip floppy decisions we have today. i don't know whether to be excited, or not excited, or just plain confused.
_________________It's all fun and games til someone spills the mayonaise
My Website!!!
Facebook Me!!!
My Movie Reviews!!!
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 6:07 pm |
|
|
|
Quint
Baaaaa!
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 10:31 am
Posts: 1011
Location: Lookin for mah bukkit
|
Hey, it's Pixar, so I can't imagine it could be too bad. I'm all for it as long as it isn't just a quick cash-in on the series.
_________________
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 6:19 pm |
|
|
|
paper
Artie the One-Man Party
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 2:53 pm
Posts: 4632
|
Joseba B-Loki wrote: not a good idea, i thought that part 2 already suffered from a lack of freshness. those uncreative bastards from disney only have quick cash in mind. i'm afraid disney is going to ruin pixar, 20 years from now we can look forward to straight to video productions like a bugs life 3 and nemo vs. pinocchio. I know you're half joking, but I remember a while back the head of either Pixar or Disney (or both?) saying no way in hell will Pixar stoop to that level when it comes to its movies.
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 8:22 pm |
|
|
|
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
So Tim Allen and Tom Hanks are coming back?
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 8:33 pm |
|
|
|
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm
Posts: 10266
Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
1. Pixar rocks.
2. Toy Story (as a series) rocks.
3. Therefore, Toy Story 3 will rock.
There's some damn good deductive reasoning there (I hope).
PEACE, Mike.
|
| Wed May 10, 2006 8:52 pm |
|
|
|
D-MONEY
Newbie
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:49 pm
Posts: 6
Location: Chicago
|
? any word on what the story will be
_________________
D-MONEY FO LIFE
|
| Thu May 11, 2006 8:16 pm |
|
|
