WOKJ "BP Nominees" Club Pick 1: Dangerous Liaisons
Author |
Message |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
I borrowed Dangerous Liaisons on VHS from the library today as well, since it was not at my video store. While I was at it, I borrowed several other classics as well, heh.
I'll try to watch DL on Wednesday.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Apr 10, 2006 1:05 pm |
|
 |
android
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am Posts: 2913 Location: Portugal
|
It's one of the most deserving BP nominees of the 80's and my personal winner from that lot of BP nominees that year. Like an onion (and like Shrek  ), it has multiple layers and it works either as a social commentary of that period or as a tragic love story. Michelle Pffeifer, Glenn Close and John Malkovich are all brilliant (when do these three win an Oscar?). Keanu Reeves doesn't suck in a non-action movie and Uma Thurman shows early potential. The last scene is unforgettable. I honestly can't believe how anyone can prefer the remake with Sarah Michelle Gellar and Reese Witherspoon, even though that one has its share of (guilty) pleasures... I haven't seen Valmont yet (or I don't remeber seeing it), so I won't make any comments about that one.
A
_________________
|
Mon Apr 10, 2006 1:53 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Oscar background for Dangerous Liaisons:
Lost Best Picture to Rain Man
NOT even nominated for Director
Glenn Close lost Best Actress of Jodie Foster in The Accused
Michelle Pfeiffer lost Best Supporting Actress to Geena Davis in The Accidental Tourist
Won Adapted Screenplay
Won Art Direction
Won Costume Design
Lost Original Score to The Milagro Beanfield War (  )
Interesting year as well: like the most recent Oscars, only 2 movies nominated for Best Picture got in for Film Editing (Who Framed Roger Rabbit? won) and only 3 songs were nominated for Original Song. A non-Best Pic nominated film dominated the Tech categories as well (Who Framed Roger Rabbit?)
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:08 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Frankly...Who Framed Roger Rabbit? should have been nominated for Best Picture anyway!
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:11 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Frankly...Who Framed Roger Rabbit? should have been nominated for Best Picture anyway!
YES!!!
Six nominations/Four wins for a movie like this is impressive.
Will watch DL soon.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:14 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Dangerous Liasions didn't get a single Golden Globes nod. I assume that's because it's somehow ineligible? I was checking IMDb for what other awards the film won or nominated besides Oscar, and I was surprised to see besides BAFTA and a bunch of foreign film awards from non-English countries, WGA is basically the only domestically one it won.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Tue Apr 11, 2006 2:41 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
I watched it yesterday, and I have to say that I remember it being better than it was. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't fantastic. Michelle Pfeiffer deserved to win the damn Oscar though...Davis was good, but come on...Pfeiffer was great. I'll elaborate a lot more tomorrow, but I think I'll give it a B.
|
Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:31 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11028
|
i Just got it from blockbuster,$2.99 for 5 nights.I will watch it later tonight or Tomorrow.
|
Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:35 pm |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
http://www.worldofkj.com/articles/Other/Top10I.php
Quote: <img src="http://www.worldofkj.com/Pictures/liaisons.JPG" hspace="5" vspace="1" border="1" align="left"> <i><b>Dangerous Liaisons</b> (1989)</i>: The Marquise Isabelle de Merteuil is one of the most unforgettable characters in film history. She is bitter, she is bored, she is manipulative, and she is ultimately desperate to maintain a sense of power within aristocratic French society. The story of the wealthy sister and brother duo that wreck havoc on their equals and abuse naive youths and lower classes is an oft visited plot. But Stephen Frears’ <i>Liaisons</i> is more lavish, more conniving, and more upsetting than the rest. The Marquise (Glenn Close) and her brother Sébastien de Valmont (John Malkovich) attempt to lure the fresh-eyed Marie (Michelle Pfeiffer) to a broken heart. The high-stakes bet follows on the heels of an embarrassingly perfect match between Cecil and Raphael. It hurts to watch the jaded Isabelle lose what she never had in the first place.
Last edited by dolcevita on Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:19 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
dolcevita wrote: http://www.worldofkj.com/articles/Other/Top10I.php 
Good article, but I have just seen half of the list or so, heh. Makes me all the more excited about Dangerous Liaisons. A Few Good Men should definitely be up there, it'd probably be the top pick of that year for me as well. The Piano, however, I consider very overrated.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:46 am |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: dolcevita wrote: http://www.worldofkj.com/articles/Other/Top10I.php  Good article, but I have just seen half of the list or so, heh. Makes me all the more excited about Dangerous Liaisons. A Few Good Men should definitely be up there, it'd probably be the top pick of that year for me as well. The Piano, however, I consider very overrated.
Well, I love Ibsen's plays, and the novel The Awakening (Kate Chopin), and I really feel The Piano was like those books. I will talk about it more, later, when you guys actually view it. I don't want to detract from the current coverage.
Speaking of which, for anyone that has read Ibsen, I always thought Hedda and Isabelle were very similar characters. I also find it interesting that the British version was named after Valmont, as I always thought Liaisons being primarily about the Marquise.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:02 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
I've only read six of Ibsen's plays (Hedda Gabler, The Master Builder, An Enemy of the People [saw the PBS presentation also haha], A Doll's House, Ghosts, and The Wild Duck) so I'll make sure to check out Hedda Gabler again after watching DL.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 12:15 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Great article, Dolce. I still have yet to see Kiss of the Spider Woman, even though the book was great.
I agree entirely with your comments about the character of Marquise Isabelle de Merteuil. She was wicked, conniving, and indeed manipulative. The ending scene was brilliant, which was mostly due to the brilliant acting from Close. You could feel the pain and embarrassment she must have been going through. The movie did drag in parts, I will admit, but that closing scene brought everything together.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 6:07 pm |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
I actually found this today after scouring my local video store. I can't believe I've never seen this. I'll watch it in the next couple of days.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:45 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
It's in the queue. It should be sent out by tomorrow, hopefully.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:51 pm |
|
 |
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm Posts: 16061 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Chris wrote: Great article, Dolce. I still have yet to see Kiss of the Spider Woman, even though the book was great.  Love Spider Woman. And since you liked the book (thanks for being the only one who read it that month during the book club), I think you'll be pleasantly surprised by its adaptation to the screen. Quote: I agree entirely with your comments about the character of Marquise Isabelle de Merteuil. She was wicked, conniving, and indeed manipulative. The ending scene was brilliant, which was mostly due to the brilliant acting from Close. You could feel the pain and embarrassment she must have been going through. The movie did drag in parts, I will admit, but that closing scene brought everything together.
Not to bring up the "teenage" remake, but the one thing I couldn't relate to in Cruel Intentions was the social confines of women. Gellar's Kathryn was wealthy, true, but in the modern era her dabblings came off as vicious, rather than desperate, because she had much more flexibility as a woman than Isabelle would have had in her day. Because of that, the former's actions seem to just b selfish, while I always found Isabelle (and Close was divine in this role) slowly suffocating while still really trying to gasp for air. Not one minute of Dangerous Liaisons didn't have me rivetted.
I expect (and lt me know if its true or not) that people that already saw Cruel Intentions first would find parts slower, because they knew what would happen to Cecil and Raphael, and also to Sebastien and Marie. Th first time I saw it, however, I had no idea, and every turn was new.
Close's failure to win that year still hurts. :-(
Last edited by dolcevita on Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:51 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
Atoddr wrote: I actually found this today after scouring my local video store. I can't believe I've never seen this. I'll watch it in the next couple of days.
You're a big Glenn Close fan, right? She's fantastic in this.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:54 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
The year before, Glenn Close was nominated for Fatal Attraction, which was a different kind of crazy than her role in DL. I'm still baffled how she lost to such a weak Jodie performance. I guess since Jodie in The Accused was the quintessential role of the wronged damsel (baity!), while Close's Isabelle is the stronger, dominant, manipulative one (which almost always loses - see Sigourney Weaver). A couple of years later, Kathy Bates becomes one of the few exceptions when she won for Misery.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:05 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Damn, I was just about to watch it when realizing the disk is completely damaged. Now I have to wait for the replacement. Will switch to Netflix after this month.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:08 am |
|
 |
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 19369 Location: San Diego
|
It came in from Netflix this afternoon.
I'll try to watch it tomorrow night.
|
Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:31 am |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
dolcevita wrote: Chris wrote: Great article, Dolce. I still have yet to see Kiss of the Spider Woman, even though the book was great.  Love Spider Woman. And since you liked the book (thanks for being the only one who read it that month during the book club), I think you'll be pleasantly surprised by its adaptation to the screen. Quote: I agree entirely with your comments about the character of Marquise Isabelle de Merteuil. She was wicked, conniving, and indeed manipulative. The ending scene was brilliant, which was mostly due to the brilliant acting from Close. You could feel the pain and embarrassment she must have been going through. The movie did drag in parts, I will admit, but that closing scene brought everything together. Not to bring up the "teenage" remake, but the one thing I couldn't relate to in Cruel Intentions was the social confines of women. Gellar's Kathryn was wealthy, true, but in the modern era her dabblings came off as vicious, rather than desperate, because she had much more flexibility as a woman than Isabelle would have had in her day. Because of that, the former's actions seem to just b selfish, while I always found Isabelle (and Close was divine in this role) slowly suffocating while still really trying to gasp for air. Not one minute of Dangerous Liaisons didn't have me rivetted. I expect (and lt me know if its true or not) that people that already saw Cruel Intentions first would find parts slower, because they knew what would happen to Cecil and Raphael, and also to Sebastien and Marie. Th first time I saw it, however, I had no idea, and every turn was new. Close's failure to win that year still hurts. :-(
I've never seen Cruel Intentions, so I guess that doesn't really apply to me. It wasn't like it was extremely dragged out, just a tad slow in parts. However, I don't remember it being like that the first time I saw it, so the repeat viewing may have had something to do with it.
|
Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:01 am |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Netflix is probably wondering, why the sudden mini-burst for DL rentals? 
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:45 am |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
Dkmuto wrote: Atoddr wrote: I actually found this today after scouring my local video store. I can't believe I've never seen this. I'll watch it in the next couple of days. You're a big Glenn Close fan, right? She's fantastic in this.
Nah, not really a big Close fan though I think she's a good actress. I am a huge fan of another actress in this movie. She's perhaps my all-time favorite, and no, it's not Uma Thurman. Or Swoosie Kurtz, but rather Michelle Pfeiffer. She deserved an Oscar nomination for this, if for no other reason than to act like John Malkovich was actually attractive.
Which brings me to my major complaint about this. How can two people as unattractive as Malkovich and Glenn Close be so irresistable? I know looks weren't everything and much of their game revolved control, manipulation, and deception, but some physical attraction should be included. I've never seen Valmont, the other screen version of this, but wasn't Annette Bening cast in the Glenn Close role? I think that's much better casting. And my minor quibble isn't to take away from the performances which I thought were excellent. But Jodi Foster is far better in The Accused IMHO than Close is in this. Foster may be a victim, it's true, but she's certainly not a likeable one.
I did like this though, esp. that great opening sequence and the last 5 or 10 minutes. I would grade it in the B+/A- range.
One question: Did anyone else think the Uma Thurman character was going to be revealed to be Malkovich's daughter?! When he was telling her about his relationship with her mother, I thought that would be shockingly revealed later. Maybe the audience was meant to infer that. That would have been truly twisted.
|
Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:21 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
Man, it still hasn't come yet in the mail!!!
I'm kind of upset.
If you guys move on to the second pic, can we keep this thread open for continuing discussion for a week or two longer? Thanks.
|
Thu Apr 13, 2006 7:46 pm |
|
 |
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 19369 Location: San Diego
|
I just finished watching it...
It's an excellent film. I thought the final scene was brilliant. I haven't seen much of Glenn Close's work so I was really impressed. Same with Michelle Pfeiffer.
Sorta makes me want to watch Cruel Intentions sometime in the near future. 
|
Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:31 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|