The WoKJ MPA's Nomination Ceremony (Results on 1st page)
| Author |
Message |
|
BallotPM
|
BallotPM wrote: makeshift wrote: Good group. YAY STEVEN I'll leave the counts the same. Eat it, Ross.  Yeah, leave it the same. It's better. torrino is a retard. You the retard.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:09 pm |
|
|
|
dolcevita
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Cotton wrote:
I'd be opposed to revealing the point total for the nominations actually, as it could possibly handicap the voting process. Revealing the point total among those who weren't nominated would be fine though. At least in my opinion.
I second that.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:09 pm |
|
|
|
android
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 2913
Location: Portugal
|
forgot about Clooney and Howard...
Howard might get like 5 noms at this rate (Breakthrough, Entertainer, Crash Ensemble, Actor, Sup. Actor).. 
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:09 pm |
|
|
|
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Yea, Carell being there is weird. He was in Bewitched, but... 
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:10 pm |
|
|
|
BallotPM
|
Cotton wrote: Cotton wrote: da torri wrote: Great choices for Breakout! I can't fault you guys for overlooking McAdams though, as I forgot to put her there too  She was close. We'll reveal that stuff later. I'd be opposed to revealing the point total for the nominations actually, as it could possibly handicap the voting process. Revealing the point total among those who weren't nominated would be fine though. At least in my opinion. We won't reveal the top 5 votes, only how close the rest of the field got for each category, so it'll be something like
5. - 40
6. Batman Begins - 35
7. GNAGL - 32
8. Munich - 30
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:10 pm |
|
|
|
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
|
Chris wrote: Yea, Carell being there is weird. He was in Bewitched, but... That almost cancels out The Office.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:10 pm |
|
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
|
Mr. X wrote: Why Steve, though? He was great, but I took Entertainer as people with multiple films. Didn't he have just the one? Whereas Rachel had three, Spielberg had two, Clooney had two, and Howard had eighty-three. 
I think most were including Steve's wonderful work on The Office.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:10 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Mr. X wrote: Why Steve, though? He was great, but I took Entertainer as people with multiple films. Didn't he have just the one? Whereas Rachel had three, Spielberg had two, Clooney had two, and Howard had eighty-three. Um ....Spielberg delivered War of the Worlds and Munich in one year. That is an achievement that can be barely topped. It's quality, not quantity, X!!! _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:11 pm |
|
|
|
BallotPM
|
Now it's the all important Editing category.
Last edited by BallotPM on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:11 pm |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
Chris wrote: Yea, Carell being there is weird. He was in Bewitched, but... Does it really have to be based only on people who were in more than one movie?
I mean, it is entertainer of the year. I had more fun in T40YOV than any other movie this year except maybe Wedding Crashers, and seeing how Carell MAKES T40YOV, I don't think he's a bad choice...
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:11 pm |
|
|
|
android
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 2913
Location: Portugal
|
yeah, but these are MOVIE awards.. 
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:11 pm |
|
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Mr. X wrote: Why Steve, though? He was great, but I took Entertainer as people with multiple films. Didn't he have just the one? Whereas Rachel had three, Spielberg had two, Clooney had two, and Howard had eighty-three. Um ....Spielberg delivered War of the Worlds and Munich in one year. That is an achievement that can be barely topped. It's quality, not quantity, X!!! I think he was talking about the other Steve (Carell).
Spielberg should win this one, though.
Last edited by makeshift on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:12 pm |
|
|
|
BallotPM
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Mr. X wrote: Why Steve, though? He was great, but I took Entertainer as people with multiple films. Didn't he have just the one? Whereas Rachel had three, Spielberg had two, Clooney had two, and Howard had eighty-three. Um ....Spielberg delivered War of the Worlds and Munich in one year. That is an achievement that can be barely topped. It's quality, not quantity, X!!! He was talking about Steve Carell.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:12 pm |
|
|
|
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm
Posts: 6480
Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
da torri wrote: Chris wrote: Yea, Carell being there is weird. He was in Bewitched, but... Does it really have to be based only on people who were in more than one movie? I mean, it is entertainer of the year. I had more fun in T40YOV than any other movie this year except maybe Wedding Crashers, and seeing how Carell MAKES T40YOV, I don't think he's a bad choice... Nah, he's not a bad choice, just weird. Vince Vaughn would have been better, though.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:13 pm |
|
|
|
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
|
Brokeback better not be nominated for Editing; it's editing was atrocious and choppy.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:13 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Okay, okay, I'm embarassed enough now 
Carell deserved the nom, but ya know, Bewitched really should have cancelled it out, hehe. _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
|
|
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Yeah, Steve Carell. If people are including his great work on "The Office", then I hope they also nominate him for Best Actor in a Comedy Series at this year's WOKJ Television Awards in May, hopefully hosted by yours truly. If I don't host, then nominate him anyway.
_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
Last edited by Mister Ecks on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
|
|
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
|
Neostorm wrote: Brokeback better not be nominated for Editing; it's editing was atrocious and choppy. You're atrocious and choppy.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
|
|
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
|
android wrote: yeah, but these are MOVIE awards.. Meh. Bygones.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Chris wrote: da torri wrote: Chris wrote: Yea, Carell being there is weird. He was in Bewitched, but... Does it really have to be based only on people who were in more than one movie? I mean, it is entertainer of the year. I had more fun in T40YOV than any other movie this year except maybe Wedding Crashers, and seeing how Carell MAKES T40YOV, I don't think he's a bad choice... Nah, he's not a bad choice, just weird. Vince Vaughn would have been better, though. I second that. _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
|
|
android
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am
Posts: 2913
Location: Portugal
|
My picks:
- Brokeback
- A History of Violence
- War of the Worlds
- Red Eye
- Sin City
I'm guessing:
- Kong
- Crash
- Brokeback
- Sin City
- Red Eye (as a spoiler?)
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
I picked:
1. Munich
2. Domino
3. Batman Begins
4. Crash
5. King Kong
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:15 pm |
|
|
|
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
|
Brokeback's editing was 'choppy'? I'll take 'languorous', but 'choppy' is crazy.
_________________
k
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:15 pm |
|
|
|
BallotPM
|
Vince Vaughn only had one film in '05 as well. I don't see why he'd be the better choice.
STEVE CARELL FOR LIFE.
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:15 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
makeshift wrote: Neostorm wrote: Brokeback better not be nominated for Editing; it's editing was atrocious and choppy. You're atrocious and choppy. Not sure about BBM, but Ang Lee's films are usually atrociously edited. _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:15 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
