Author |
Message |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Hubby is having a guys' night out (heh) so my girlfriend is coming and we are so watching The Notebook again tonight. I just looooove it so much, heh.
|
Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:08 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Libs wrote: Hubby is having a guys' night out (heh) so my girlfriend is coming and we are so watching The Notebook again tonight. I just looooove it so much, heh.
It'd be funny if his 'guys' night out' was him and his friends watching The Notebook, heh.
Have you forced him to watch it yet?

|
Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:10 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Zingaling wrote: Libs wrote: Hubby is having a guys' night out (heh) so my girlfriend is coming and we are so watching The Notebook again tonight. I just looooove it so much, heh. It'd be funny if his 'guys' night out' was him and his friends watching The Notebook, heh. Have you forced him to watch it yet? 
Psh, of course.
|
Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:12 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Ultra-Romance!
This one is fantastic. A pearl amongst it's genre (i.e.: romance) - I loved it!
If you consider yourself to have at least one romantic bone in your body/lifetime, then you owe it to yourself to see The Notebook - the writer(s) have clearly studied all the emotional dynamics and story elements of the classic romance and woven them all together into this totally amped-out ultra-romance. If this one doesn't make you cry like a baby, you are one seriously too serious human unit.
One review I read described it as "Titanic without the boat" and I suppose that isn't far off, and I'd wager that this film will become an all-time romantic classic!
Go see it with someone you love. Go see it. Go!
5 out of 5.
|
Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:20 am |
|
 |
tombraider17
Mr. and Mrs. Smith
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:21 pm Posts: 457
|
Poignant, beautiful, and excellent performances all-around (Rachel McAdams deserved at least a Golden Globe nom). It's a genuine crowd-pleaser.
A
_________________
The Skeleton Key: Best Horror Thriller of the Year
|
Sat Aug 20, 2005 5:56 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
D
I almost suffocated from all the syrup. When I wasn't laughing, that is. Rachel McAdams gave an awfully sweet, down-to-earth performance though; she deserves better.
_________________ k
|
Sat Aug 20, 2005 6:02 pm |
|
 |
Maximus
Hot Fuss
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am Posts: 8427 Location: floridaaa
|
Very good movie. Had me close to tears
B+
|
Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:20 pm |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
Great movie with strong performances all the way around. Rachel McAdams is the real deal, but Ryan Gosling was quite good as well. Joan Allen remains one of the most underrated actresses working today. She can take a small throwaway role and make it memorable. My grade: A-.
|
Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:09 am |
|
 |
Renton
Iron Man
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 9:15 pm Posts: 622
|
Rachel McAdams shines in this epic romance. It was a very touching and romantic movie. All other performances are solid as well. But I think it had a little too much syrup. Otherwise, this is one very solid movie. B
|
Fri Sep 30, 2005 9:33 am |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
Unlike, say, Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood, I don't think the film did so great of a job drawing connections between the old characters of the present and the young characters of the past. I never really saw any of Ryan Gosling's character reflected in James Garner's performance and same for McAdams/Rowlands. I'm not going to fault the acting for that, though; that should have been taken care of in the writing department. I was also not a big fan of the ending, which I found to be very reminiscent of those chain e-mails people send to each other about the old man who never told the terminally ill woman he loved her until with her on her deathbed.
It still got to me, though.
And though contrary to what I expected, I was much more interested in the McAdams/Gosling flashbacks than the Garner/Rowlands scenes. I even thought the younger two did an even better acting job than the former two (Gena Rowlands never had me convinced with her performance, and I remember there being a couple scenes in the nursing home that were just kind of ridiculous).
Really pretty camera work, too.
B+
|
Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:18 pm |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
DK, I think the young performers probably tried not to reflect the older performers in their performances and vise-versa because the audience really wasn't supposed to be sure who they really were. It's pretty obvious, but I still had a slight bit of doubt until I found out who McAdams' character chose at the end. I agree that Rowlands wasn't that great but I guess when your the director's mother you can get by with a little.
|
Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:02 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Dkmuto wrote: Unlike, say, Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood, I don't think the film did so great of a job drawing connections between the old characters of the present and the young characters of the past. I never really saw any of Ryan Gosling's character reflected in James Garner's performance and same for McAdams/Rowlands. I'm not going to fault the acting for that, though; that should have been taken care of in the writing department. I was also not a big fan of the ending, which I found to be very reminiscent of those chain e-mails people send to each other about the old man who never told the terminally ill woman he loved her until with her on her deathbed.
It still got to me, though.
And though contrary to what I expected, I was much more interested in the McAdams/Gosling flashbacks than the Garner/Rowlands scenes. I even thought the younger two did an even better acting job than the former two (Gena Rowlands never had me convinced with her performance, and I remember there being a couple scenes in the nursing home that were just kind of ridiculous).
Really pretty camera work, too.
B+
What, you actually liked Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood more than this one? Ew.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Sep 30, 2005 8:34 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Dkmuto wrote: Unlike, say, Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood, I don't think the film did so great of a job drawing connections between the old characters of the present and the young characters of the past. I never really saw any of Ryan Gosling's character reflected in James Garner's performance and same for McAdams/Rowlands. I'm not going to fault the acting for that, though; that should have been taken care of in the writing department. I was also not a big fan of the ending, which I found to be very reminiscent of those chain e-mails people send to each other about the old man who never told the terminally ill woman he loved her until with her on her deathbed.
It still got to me, though.
And though contrary to what I expected, I was much more interested in the McAdams/Gosling flashbacks than the Garner/Rowlands scenes. I even thought the younger two did an even better acting job than the former two (Gena Rowlands never had me convinced with her performance, and I remember there being a couple scenes in the nursing home that were just kind of ridiculous).
Really pretty camera work, too.
B+ What, you actually liked Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood more than this one? Ew.
No, actually, I didn't. Was just saying I thought it did a better job in the characterization department (in tying flashbacks and present day scenes together).
|
Fri Sep 30, 2005 8:47 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
It was just on Encore.
Even though I kind of own it, I can never pass up the urge to watch at least part of it.
THE NOTEBOOK FOR LIFE.
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:27 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
I'm surprised at just how big of a seller it was on video.
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:34 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Libs wrote: It was just on Encore.
Even though I kind of own it, I can never pass up the urge to watch at least part of it.
THE NOTEBOOK FOR LIFE.
wondering how you kind of own it??? do you share it with someone.
also wondering if
- any word on if they are still dating, engaged or married
and
whether RM has agreed on her next movie yet.
*******************************************
and on the Notebook, it was a nice movie.
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:36 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Maverikk wrote: I'm surprised at just how big of a seller it was on video.
...girls love this movie. and probably guys like it.....
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:38 pm |
|
 |
haerpinot
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 1051
|
Waaaaaay too maudlin and melodramatic for my tastes, I can't possibly count how many times I was rolling my eyes at the sappy, obvious plot developments during the movie. grade - C
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:06 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
Ryan Gosling goes to my school gym regularly and Rachel McAdams has been there twice with him.. I've seen him only once though. Just said that in case any hardcore Toronto fan wants to stalk
But this movie was really good, the ending though it was kind of corny was tastefully done. A-
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:10 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
I was finally forced to see this not too long ago, or "I was notebooked" as my girlfriend says (I'm pretty sure no one else uses that phrase, or do they?), and it was really good. All 4 "leads" were great, especially Garner and McAdams. McAdams is the next Julia Roberts.
A
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:48 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Goldie wrote: Libs wrote: It was just on Encore.
Even though I kind of own it, I can never pass up the urge to watch at least part of it.
THE NOTEBOOK FOR LIFE. wondering how you kind of own it??? do you share it with someone. also wondering if - any word on if they are still dating, engaged or married and whether RM has agreed on her next movie yet. ******************************************* and on the Notebook, it was a nice movie.
Wha?
Haha, no, I own it.
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:57 pm |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
I've never seen this before...
It's on some movie channel right now...
My god, it's terrible.
"MONEY!!!!!! HE'S GOTS LOTS OF MONEY!!!!!!!"
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:58 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
makeshift wrote: I've never seen this before...
It's on some movie channel right now...
My god, it's terrible.
"MONEY!!!!!! HE'S GOTS LOTS OF MONEY!!!!!!!"
Excuse me?
No.
Retract any negative comments said about this movie. 
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 7:35 pm |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
Libs wrote: makeshift wrote: I've never seen this before...
It's on some movie channel right now...
My god, it's terrible.
"MONEY!!!!!! HE'S GOTS LOTS OF MONEY!!!!!!!" Excuse me? No. Retract any negative comments said about this movie. 
Never.
Seriously, it's bad. The acting is just... atrocious. Or maybe it's just the completely inept screenplay/dialogue. Either way, I was laughing about 90% of the time.
Sorry Libs.
|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 7:46 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
makeshift wrote: Libs wrote: makeshift wrote: I've never seen this before...
It's on some movie channel right now...
My god, it's terrible.
"MONEY!!!!!! HE'S GOTS LOTS OF MONEY!!!!!!!" Excuse me? No. Retract any negative comments said about this movie.  Never. Seriously, it's bad. The acting is just... atrocious. Or maybe it's just the completely inept screenplay/dialogue. Either way, I was laughing about 90% of the time. Sorry Libs.
Try watching it again in 35 years...

|
Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:52 pm |
|
|