Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 5:50 pm



Reply to topic  [ 507 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 21  Next
 The New World 

What grade would you give this film?
A 55%  55%  [ 24 ]
B 16%  16%  [ 7 ]
C 18%  18%  [ 8 ]
D 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
F 9%  9%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 44

 The New World 
Author Message
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Um...Zingy already gave it a try...

and walked out after an hour.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:03 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
lennier wrote:
All I gotta say: bullshit.

Yeah, okay. Because, you know, it's not common for humans to feel intimidated by those who act smarter? I mean, are you one to talk back to the kid in your Physics class who proves your professor wrong?!

lennier wrote:
So be it if I like movies like Bad Education, Blue, and now The New World. It's got nothing to do with appeasing "queen galia". The only thing she did was encourage me to try something new.

I think you missed my point, so maybe I didn't explain it well. I'm thinking some people (no names) are giving The New World A+/A/A- grades because they don't dare challenge those who initially gave the movie A+/A/A- grades. This has nothing to do with making Galia feel satisfied. Frankly, I think one would appease Galia more by challenging her views. I'm sure she feels good when she gets a challenger to realize one of her refutations!

lennier wrote:
Considering everyone who has seen this movie so far all seem to have different tastes in movie and are NOT clueless about film, I think you can shove your theory elsewhere. :smile:

What does everyone's diverse tastes have to do with feeling intimidated by a few people who know a lot about film?

lennier wrote:
And if you don't mean to be as obnoxious and presumptuous as you sound, sorry...?

I can't comment on how I write, really.

But thanks for telling me I sound obnoxious, I guess.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:07 pm
Profile
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
Anyone else download that link to Wagner's prelude that benny gave us on page 5? I'm just listening to it on my ipod now. Nice.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:08 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
da torri wrote:
It's the a-couple-people-smarter-than-me-loved-this-movie-so-i-have-to-love-it-too effect.

Munich, Million Dollar Baby, and now The New World. Maybe it isn't so strange that the ten or so people here who have seen it have all loved it, but I'm suspicious because the general audience response isn't good. At all.

I might be assuming this, but I'm thinking some of you are afraid to explain yourself to dolce when she asks you why you gave The New World a D+. You know she knows more about cinema than you, and you don't want to be owned. So, you force yourself into liking a movie. I did it with Million Dollar Baby. I'll admit it.

So, maybe I'm wrong in this case, and I'm jumping to some unfair conclusions, in which case - I'm glad you all loved The New World! But if I'm right, try judging future movies individually, without giving in to Sir Mehnert or Queen Galia.


I'm torn between Ross and Galia!!! What shall I do!?!

*spontaneously combusts*


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:10 pm
Profile WWW
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
da torri wrote:
lennier wrote:
All I gotta say: bullshit.

Yeah, okay. Because, you know, it's not common for humans to feel intimidated by those who act smarter? I mean, are you one to talk back to the kid in your Physics class who proves your professor wrong?!

That's interesting, but hardly true. Those who've posted thus far in the thread are some of the most articulate fans of film I have ever come across. I can't think of any reason why they would be intimidated; Galia is simply better reviewing- and more power to her! KJ is a comfortable place; I doubt anyone is scared of someone else's opinion.

lennier wrote:
So be it if I like movies like Bad Education, Blue, and now The New World. It's got nothing to do with appeasing "queen galia". The only thing she did was encourage me to try something new.

I think you missed my point, so maybe I didn't explain it well. I'm thinking some people (no names) are giving The New World A+/A/A- grades because they don't dare challenge those who initially gave the movie A+/A/A- grades. This has nothing to do with making Galia feel satisfied. Frankly, I think one would appease Galia more by challenging her views. I'm sure she feels good when she gets a challenger to realize one of her refutations!

Do you question anyone that gives Titanic an A? Or, how about something different, like This is Spinal Tap? (A very popular movie amongst some members here, but not a soul questions their opinion...)

Great, I'm glad we've separated Galia and loyal from this. Then again, I don't see why one would bring them into this to begin with, or even question a legit opinion. Interesting. Enlighten me, what does my opinion have to do with anyone else's? I must be a conformist, thats it. And kypade, neostorm, benny- them too!


lennier wrote:
Considering everyone who has seen this movie so far all seem to have different tastes in movie and are NOT clueless about film, I think you can shove your theory elsewhere. :smile:

What does everyone's diverse tastes have to do with feeling intimidated by a few people who know a lot about film?

lennier wrote:
And if you don't mean to be as obnoxious and presumptuous as you sound, sorry...?

I can't comment on how I write, really.

But thanks for telling me I sound obnoxious, I guess.


Yeah, thought I would remind you...


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:17 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
Ross go see the movie, it really is great :D


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:19 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
Uh. I'm the only one to date, in this thread, whose consistently voiced opposition to some of the content. :blink: Maybe the few people who have seen it so far have actually liked it? I probably gave it the lowest grade (B+) out of everyone here!

I mentioned in my first post that I could be jumping to conclusions. It's a weird trend, but it's something I've done. I don't think it's an unreasonable point, especially when dealing with a Malick movie that everyone seems to love.

The movie was still on your Top 12 list and on your FYC posts in the thread. I'm not saying that you're the key here; I think loyal had a bit to do with it, too.

dolcevita wrote:
I think anyone who said they liked it did, and that probably everyone else just hasn't bothered watching it, since they might have been turned off from the onset. When 50 people watch it (please watch this weekend, thanks) then I think we'll see a few more people like Zingy and Animosity Reigns that didn't like the movie.

I might try to see it this weekend. Just to let you know, I didn't post because of a particular aversion to Malick, Ferell, or anyone involved. This has been bugging me for a while.

More people might be a better indication, but I don't think that changes my point that some of us are intimidated, and will choose the easy way out like lennier did by simply saying "Wow, Beautiful. A+" and leaving the thread.

dolcevita wrote:
You have to realize there's only about 8 people in this thread, two of which I didn't even know enough to coerce, and the other four who have very similar tastes and whom went on recommendations because they have similar tastes. As for Loyal, I have no idea why he liked it, as we actually don't agree on films all that much, and I know after our last scuffle that he's certainly not intimidated by me.

Again, I said I might be assuming a little bit here.

I mentioned earlier, AGAIN (!) - loyal is a person people are intimidated by. It's not just you, dolce. Same with Ripper, Libs, makeshift, andaroo, and Dr. Lecter. They know film and they aren't afraid to bite back. It's intimidating, really. I think that's why I respect Zingaling a lot, even if Duffster is right in that he only watches crap (:P). He thinks individually. Same with bradley, as you pointed out!


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:19 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
Dolce built up the suspense and Loyal's comment through me off the edge :D They had a huge influence in me seeing it when I did (the day after). But, usually with me hype kills the movie (i'm looking for something wonderful bc everyone has been talking about it), so I was doubtful of my experience because of the hype (I posted somehting about it). But the movie, and especially Kilcher's performance, was extremely good :)

I hope you don't feel antogonized and feel that you have to hate the movie after watching it.. Try to go tabla rasa if you can :)


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:23 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post 
dolcevita wrote:
If there's one person here who I'm positive judges movies on his own, its you, mister 40YOV and Crash get 5 out of 5. And didn't you respond warmly to New World as well? :tongue:

Yes, I did thoroughly enjoy The New World, but the effect that da torri was describing is quite common here in the forum (and in the outside world, too) . People often follow the flock, which is okay - we are social animals after all.

And, I certainly don't blame you, dv - I enjoy reading your opinions because you do speak your mind. You are not responsible if others hear the voice of the shepherdess...


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:25 pm
Profile
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
da torri wrote:

More people might be a better indication, but I don't think that changes my point that some of us are intimidated, and will choose the easy way out like lennier did by simply saying "Wow, Beautiful. A+" and leaving the thread.

!
.

Strange, I seem to remember making as many points as loyal about the movie. I've got, what, 20 posts in this thread? Who would deliberately put themselves in an intimidating situation twenty times?

Oh yea, because I saw a masterpiece and I'm having a fine time chatting about it. As per usual, you push for a book report instead of excepting a few scattered comments. I'm not the type to talk about every detail and I refuse to satiate your obsession with lengthy review like Galia might give.

My casualness has nothing to do with intimidation nor lack of intelligence nor anything you might want to associate with.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:27 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
da torri wrote:
I mentioned in my first post that I could be jumping to conclusions. It's a weird trend, but it's something I've done. I don't think it's an unreasonable point, especially when dealing with a Malick movie that everyone seems to love.

The movie was still on your Top 12 list and on your FYC posts in the thread. I'm not saying that you're the key here...


I hope I am, actually. Not for people to like it, but at least to give it a chance. That's afterall, why I even review movies. To try and draw attention to ones I want to support, and detract attention from garbage. :-) But after that point, its still up to who saw it to say if they liked it or not. But yeah, I'm happy if some people who know my tatses checked it out. I hope I don't disappoint those people. I was sad when andaroo didn't like The Holy Girl. :sad:

I'd love to say i have the power to influence someone's grade selection, but I've seen no proof of it to date. I'm just happy getting them to consider something I think should get more attention.

Quote:
I might try to see it this weekend. Just to let you know, I didn't post because of a particular aversion to Malick, Ferell, or anyone involved. This has been bugging me for a while.

More people might be a better indication, but I don't think that changes my point that some of us are intimidated, and will choose the easy way out like lennier did by simply saying "Wow, Beautiful. A+" and leaving the thread.


Yeah, but look at his other reviews. Alot of them are like that. That's just how he posts. :tongue: (still love ya' Zach)

Quote:
Again, I said I might be assuming a little bit here.


I only mention this because it might be the first time in my life I've talked to Benny, Cleric, and Gunslinger. I doubt either of us is even really aware of the other until now. And termi never listens to me. if anything, I listen to him when he suggests horror movies, thats about it.

Anyways, I'm glad you're going to check it out. Let us know what you thought.

Quote:
I mentioned earlier, AGAIN (!) - loyal is a person people are intimidated by. It's not just you, dolce. ;)


Not that many people ended up loving Sith, or hating Crash!


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:28 pm
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
lennier wrote:
da torri wrote:
Yeah, okay. Because, you know, it's not common for humans to feel intimidated by those who act smarter? I mean, are you one to talk back to the kid in your Physics class who proves your professor wrong?!

That's interesting, but hardly true. Those who've posted thus far in the thread are some of the most articulate fans of film I have ever come across. I can't think of any reason why they would be intimidated; Galia is simply better reviewing- and more power to her! KJ is a comfortable place; I doubt anyone is scared of someone else's opinion.

Again, I ask: Do you feel intimidated by "smarter" people in your class, and are you likely to talk back to them?

My point's legitimate; it's natural for many people to hide what they feel because of feeling intimidated (god, I'm in desperate need of a synonym here!). If you can't agree with that, there's no point responding to your posts.

I'm trying not to accuse anyone here. neostorm brings up a good point that people look for something wonderful in The New World because people here were talking about the wonderful things in the flick. I'm solely commenting on the intimidation part. I'll post more on neo's point in a bit.

lennier wrote:
Do you question anyone that gives Titanic an A? Or, how about something different, like This is Spinal Tap? (A very popular movie amongst some members here, but not a soul questions their opinion...)

Great, I'm glad we've separated Galia and loyal from this. Then again, I don't see why one would bring them into this to begin with, or even question a legit opinion. Interesting. Enlighten me, what does my opinion have to do with anyone else's? I must be a conformist, thats it. And kypade, neostorm, benny- them too!

The grades on both Titanic and This is Spinal Tap are very, very varied.

It's not about being a conformist, it's about intimidation and feeling like you're supposed to like something because others did. I can't detect this, so you can go ahead and talk all you want about how legit. all the opinions are. Maybe you're right!

But, ya know, thanks for responding to the part about appeasing Galia.

lennier wrote:
da torri wrote:
lennier wrote:
And if you don't mean to be as obnoxious and presumptuous as you sound, sorry...?

I can't comment on how I write, really.

But thanks for telling me I sound obnoxious, I guess.

Yeah, thought I would remind you...

Nah, I don't think that's what you were aiming for. From my perspective, it looks like you were trying to make me feel insulted...

No cigar, though.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:40 pm
Profile
Post 
dolcevita wrote:

da torri wrote:
I mentioned earlier, AGAIN (!) - loyal is a person people are intimidated by. It's not just you, dolce. ;)


Not that many people ended up loving Sith, or hating Crash!


Oh, they're out there Dolce.

I feel like Zeus. If I could only convince everyone to purchase Grizzly Man.

Look into my eyes...


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:41 pm
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
lennier, torri's arguement is very legit considering that The New World's not getting the "masterpiece" title outside of this forum (don't misquote and think I'm saying it has bad WOM, though). And, until just a week ago, not that many people had interest in this film at all. Half the people who have seen it in the past week went because of dolce and loyal.

I'm gonna use Jeff as an example. I could be wrong (but you can consider this revenge for the "you need to appreciate art" comment Jeff left me a week ago, heh), though. But, his initial reaction was a little weaker than his feeling on the film now, after so many people have shown great love for the film. But, yeah, it also could have grown on him, so I won't judge.

And? It's natural. Hell, I'll admit to being a little kind on a film that was well-loved in this forum, despite not liking it much at all. But, then again, I was younger, less argumentative, and an easier grader.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:47 pm
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
lennier wrote:
da torri wrote:

More people might be a better indication, but I don't think that changes my point that some of us are intimidated, and will choose the easy way out like lennier did by simply saying "Wow, Beautiful. A+" and leaving the thread.

!


Strange, I seem to remember making as many points as loyal about the movie. I've got, what, 20 posts in this thread? Who would deliberately put themselves in an intimidating situation twenty times?

Oh yea, because I saw a masterpiece and I'm having a fine time chatting about it. As per usual, you push for a book report instead of excepting a few scattered comments. I'm not the type to talk about every detail and I refuse to satiate your obsession with lengthy review like Galia might give.

My casualness has nothing to do with intimidation nor lack of intelligence nor anything you might want to associate with.

Again, zach: I cannot prove whether or not you fell for this or didn't. You know what you did, I don't.

The number of posts you've made proves nothing to me, though. You're jumping on a bandwagon that others have started, and you aren't saying anything new! However, the intimidation refers to the basic approval/disapproval. loyal's not going to bash you for giving the movie a B. He might, however, if you gave it a D, you know?

Read closely - my point is, people here, I believe, are intimidated and swayed into liking movies by others who bite back. They force themselves to believe that they're watching and experiencing something good.

You might be unconsciously accepting The New World as an A film because internally you're unwilling to say anything against it. At the theater, you may have had the same feeling. You may have accepted the slow parts and focused on only the good, because you knew that people you respected and considered bright liked most aspects of the film. As I said, I'm guilty of this with Million Dollar Baby.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:52 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Then again, it might just be a fluke. Yousee, in that A.I. thread, if you read it, you'd think the movie had great WoM. In fact, it's WoM was mediocre at best (shown by its legs) and the IMDB score in the worst for a Spielberg film in a while.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:53 pm
Profile WWW
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
da torri wrote:
lennier wrote:
da torri wrote:
Yeah, okay. Because, you know, it's not common for humans to feel intimidated by those who act smarter? I mean, are you one to talk back to the kid in your Physics class who proves your professor wrong?!

That's interesting, but hardly true. Those who've posted thus far in the thread are some of the most articulate fans of film I have ever come across. I can't think of any reason why they would be intimidated; Galia is simply better reviewing- and more power to her! KJ is a comfortable place; I doubt anyone is scared of someone else's opinion.

Again, I ask: Do you feel intimidated by "smarter" people in your class, and are you likely to talk back to them?

No, I've never been in that situation. I'm usually one of the smartest in a room, or in a group of equally intelligent people. I'm extremely comfortable with myself in school. I'm also the talkative class clown type, so it might be others that are intimidated by me. I don't know or care

My point's legitimate; it's natural for many people to hide what they feel because of feeling intimidated (god, I'm in desperate need of a synonym here!). If you can't agree with that, there's no point responding to your posts.

Oh, I understand human nature. I just think you've placed too much emphasis on "voter intimidation" instead of considering the worth of the posters and the film

I'm trying not to accuse anyone here. neostorm brings up a good point that people look for something wonderful in The New World because people here were talking about the wonderful things in the flick. I'm solely commenting on the intimidation part. I'll post more on neo's point in a bit.

lennier wrote:
Do you question anyone that gives Titanic an A? Or, how about something different, like This is Spinal Tap? (A very popular movie amongst some members here, but not a soul questions their opinion...)

Great, I'm glad we've separated Galia and loyal from this. Then again, I don't see why one would bring them into this to begin with, or even question a legit opinion. Interesting. Enlighten me, what does my opinion have to do with anyone else's? I must be a conformist, thats it. And kypade, neostorm, benny- them too!

The grades on both Titanic and This is Spinal Tap are very, very varied.

It's not about being a conformist, it's about intimidation and feeling like you're supposed to like something because others did. I can't detect this, so you can go ahead and talk all you want about how legit. all the opinions are. Maybe you're right!

But, ya know, thanks for responding to the part about appeasing Galia.

lennier wrote:
da torri wrote:
lennier wrote:
And if you don't mean to be as obnoxious and presumptuous as you sound, sorry...?

I can't comment on how I write, really.

But thanks for telling me I sound obnoxious, I guess.

Yeah, thought I would remind you...

Nah, I don't think that's what you were aiming for. From my perspective, it looks like you were trying to make me feel insulted...

I'm not trying to debase you. If anything, I wanted to sort of add a bit of a joke when responding because it is, after all, a fallacy to attack the character of an opponent, right?

No cigar, though.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:55 pm
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Then again, it might just be a fluke. Yousee, in that A.I. thread, if you read it, you'd think the movie had great WoM. In fact, it's WoM was mediocre at best (shown by its legs) and the IMDB score in the worst for a Spielberg film in a while.

I said that was possible in my first post. ;)

I'm talking about in general.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:55 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
Ohh i completely disagree with you on that one Ross, high expecations kill movies for me I'm not concentrating on the good parts but instead keep looking for an AMAZING experience that normally does not happen.. this is why i normally always hate Oscar nominated movies, I keep looking for something that I cannot find, or when I do find it, I'm like "was that it?"

This is just me personally... And if you want to see how "original" I am (now that i feel i have to prove myself) ask Loyal to post my nominations for the website awards :P


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:56 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Oh and as flattering as it is (heh), I doubt anyone is..eh..intimidated by my choices of movies, hehe.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:58 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Oh and this thread will set a record. The biggest ratio between the number of posts and the people who saw the film, hehehe.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Last edited by Dr. Lecter on Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:59 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post 
Neostorm wrote:
Ohh i completely disagree with you on that one Ross, high expecations kill movies for me I'm not concentrating on the good parts but instead keep looking for an AMAZING experience that normally does not happen.. this is why i normally always hate Oscar nominated movies, I keep looking for something that I cannot find, or when I do find it, I'm like "was that it?"

This is just me personally... And if you want to see how "original" I am (now that i feel i have to prove myself) ask Loyal to post my nominations for the website awards :P

I'm not asking for any of you to prove the validity of your points.

I'm so not explaining myself here, I can feel it. Heh.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:59 pm
Profile
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
lennier, torri's arguement is very legit considering that The New World's not getting the "masterpiece" title outside of this forum (don't misquote and think I'm saying it has bad WOM, though). And, until just a week ago, not that many people had interest in this film at all. Half the people who have seen it in the past week went because of dolce and loyal.

I'm gonna use Jeff as an example. I could be wrong (but you can consider this revenge for the "you need to appreciate art" comment Jeff left me a week ago, heh), though. But, his initial reaction was a little weaker than his feeling on the film now, after so many people have shown great love for the film. But, yeah, it also could have grown on him, so I won't judge.

And? It's natural. Hell, I'll admit to being a little kind on a film that was well-loved in this forum, despite not liking it much at all. But, then again, I was younger, less argumentative, and an easier grader.


No doubt, his point makes sense. I thought I conceded that some might be intimidated, but not this time. Pretty much everyone that has posted seems particularly articulate to me (much like I hope to be some day), and so, I disagree with the notion that they are being pushed into giving it a better grade for whatever reason.

There is no doubt dolce and loyal influenced me to go see this. They pointed out a tremendous amount of those little elements I probably would have missed out on. That's much different from intimidating me, though. Not at all. :)


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:59 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Oh and as flattering as it is (heh), I doubt anyone is..eh..intimidated by my choices of movies, hehe.


Your avatar shows otherwise... damn you and your pack of hypnotist schoolgirls.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:59 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
Neostorm wrote:
Ohh i completely disagree with you on that one Ross, high expecations kill movies for me I'm not concentrating on the good parts but instead keep looking for an AMAZING experience that normally does not happen.. this is why i normally always hate Oscar nominated movies, I keep looking for something that I cannot find, or when I do find it, I'm like "was that it?"

This is just me personally... And if you want to see how "original" I am (now that i feel i have to prove myself) ask Loyal to post my nominations for the website awards :P


<adopts crusty sea captain persona>

Argh, the man speaks the truth. Never I've seen a more original list of nominees. Argh.


Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:00 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 507 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 21  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.