Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 1:32 am



Reply to topic  [ 871 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 35  Next
 Walk the Line Will Surpass 100 Million! DING DING DING!!! 
Author Message
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
For the record, Walk the Line is currently at 80%.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/walk_the_line/

Reviews counted: 35
Fresh: 28 Rotten: 7
Average Rating: 7.3/10

80%


Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:11 pm
Profile
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
revolutions wrote:
lmao u know what would be freaking hillarious. :tongue: if a sorry movie like Get Rich or Die Tryin' :lol:
makes more then Walk the Line.


It will.


I have time for one little jab before I go.

The only question that remains is if Walk the Line will already be passed it after it's opening weekend, and we all know it will. :giggle:

[table][col]Get Rich or Die Tryin'[col]Par.[col]$534,493 [col]-17%[col]-85%[col]1,652[col]$324 [col]$19,642,722 [/table]


Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:32 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Is it only a matter of time, Mav till you say that I predicted GRDT to make more than Walk the Line as well? ;)

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Nov 17, 2005 5:50 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Looks like Walk the Line will end up with a little worse review than Ray. What's more telling is that at metacritic, it only has a score of 65 with 19 reviews counted, and here are some comparison between it and Ray, thanks of OW forum:

WTL Metacritic Reviews
3 80-90
9 70-80
3 60-70
4 less than 60

Ray Reviews
4 100s
3 90-100
10 80-90
7 70-80
10 60-70
6 less than 60

Walk the Line hasn't received a single score above 90 yet, and that's worrisome. Also, as ~du pointed out, "7 reviews for Walk the Line are by publications that liked Ray more (Ebert, EW, Chicago Tribune, Variety, Washington Post, The New Yorker, and NY Times). 4 publications liked it more (Austin Chronicle, ReelViews, LA Weekly, and Hollywood Reporter). And 7 give it the same score (Travers, Christian Sciene Monitor, L.A. Times, New York Magazine, The Onion, Village Voice, and Dallas Observer) And one reviewer didn't review Ray (Slate)."


Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:28 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm
Posts: 12193
Post 
The strong showing on Wednesday for the Cash special, and the strong CMA's, give me great confidence that it will do well this weekend. But of course superb reviews would help, but I think the fanbase will come regardless, because they have been responding well to the film.


Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:31 pm
Profile WWW
Full Fledged Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:04 am
Posts: 63
Post 
Joaquin and Reese are on the cover of EW's November 25 issue. Just thought I'd post, because they look really great. :biggrin:

Image

_________________
"Joaquin Phoenix has the Cash quaver down, and the Academy may as well just give Reese Witherspoon the Best Actress Oscar right now: No young actress is more tinglingly alive than she is as June Carter." - New York Metro


Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:46 pm
Profile WWW
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
Joaquin looks angry :biggrin:


Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:49 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
They look great.

Hmm, that probably means they won't be on the cover of EW's Oscar issue.

Reviews won't affect its opening. Nor will they affect its Best Picture nomination, because I believe they are strong enough to secure one. However, the lack of super-outstanding reviews could limit the total number of nominations it gets as well as citations from critic groups, and thus will make a difference in its potential of both winning BP and crossing $100M.


Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:58 pm
Profile WWW
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
I bet EW's oscar cover is Depp.


Thu Nov 17, 2005 10:12 pm
Profile WWW
Full Fledged Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 2:04 am
Posts: 63
Post 
xiayun wrote:
Walk the Line hasn't received a single score above 90 yet, and that's worrisome.


It's got a 90 from Wall Street Journal now. Not above 90, but it's something. I wish Metacritic would average the score properly. WTL should by on 71 now. Two behind what Ray ended up with.

_________________
"Joaquin Phoenix has the Cash quaver down, and the Academy may as well just give Reese Witherspoon the Best Actress Oscar right now: No young actress is more tinglingly alive than she is as June Carter." - New York Metro


Thu Nov 17, 2005 10:39 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15497
Location: Everywhere
Post 
andaroo wrote:
Well, fill in A Beautiful Mind with any other film actually. There is no law says that Walk the Line has to perform exactly like Ray. Ray was released at a different time and it's model does NOT apply to Walk the Line.


Fair enough. In terms of legs I think this comparision has limited usefulness.

Quote:
DP07 wrote:
WTL will simply not have the same young audience

The same, cheast beating young male studs? Probably not.


Call the audience what you like, but it can produce a nice opening weekend.

Quote:
But maybe some of them?


Few

Quote:
More female? Obviously.


I actually think Jarhead will end up with much more of a young female audience on opening weekend then Walk the Line. Jarhead skewed male, but unlike Doom it also appealed enough to females for them to make up 43% of the audience. Sure WTL might have a higher percentage, as almost any non-action film will, but in terms of sheer numbers I expect WTL to skew strongly towards seniors.

Quote:
You gain an audience, you lose one.


Yeah, exactly. Except you should look at 2 Fast 2 Furious and Seabiscuit. Each skewed strongly to a specific audience, and each did well with it. However on opening weekend the results were very different; each film ended up in the same range, but they had different way of getting there. Jarhead was able to open like it did largely because its audience was the type to show up on opening weekend. WTL might end up with a similar total, but take a different path (BTW, I do expect WTL to make more overall).

Quote:
I have seen no evidence anywhere that the "young audience" will not come see this movie.


I see it the other way around. The burden of proof is on the side making the claim. People will never spend their money and time on a movie simply by default. So I ask, what's the evidence that the young audience will come see the movie.

Quote:
Regardless the "If it's not targeted at teenagers directly it can't be a success argument" is absolutely a bullshit one.


Yes, a movie can succeed without every demographic. However, it's no coincidence that nearly every major blockbuster tends to appeal to an extremely wide audience. Except for a few family films, you really only have The Matrix Reloaded among the ones over 200m in recent years. A film without the families and without a large audience under 30 faces a greater challenge then others. Not to mention that it lacks the fans of comedy and action that, like it or not, are among the top consumers of Hollywood product.

Quote:
Quote:
and older audiences certainly don't frontload on opening weekend, so it would take a whole lot to open at 30m.

Master & Commander?
Ocean's Twelve?
National Treasure?
Oceans Eleven?
Vanilla Sky?
What Women Want?

All are adult targeted movies that opened within the 2 week period of Walk the Line. Most of those opened 30+. Which Walk the Line doesn't necessarily NEED (26ish million would be fine).


Only 4 of those opened with 30m, and none over 40m. They also tend to have big stars (which seems to matter more to older audiences then younger ones). However, most importantly none of them were dramas, or at least they were not advertised as such. M&C was marketed as an adventure film in the TV spots (with music from POTC). Action/adventures, romantic comedies, and thrillers etc, all sell better then dramas even among older audiences. Is it any coincidence that most of the top films for the audience in recent years have been action movies? Gladiator, The Last Samurai, Collateral, National Treasure, Bourne Identity and Supremacy, The Sum of all Fears, etc. Otherwise, you have some like Chicago and ABM that earned their money due to huge awards buzz, and I guess Seabiscuit and F 9/11.

This goes into the point I was making earlier: drama is a difficult sell.

Quote:
Even The Jackal, a hard rated R thriller opened to 15 million (in 1997!) in 800 fewer theaters than Walk the Line.


Action/thriller.

Quote:
Quote:
Sigh, you act as if 30m is suddenly nothing because of Jarhead.

Because Jarhead could have done SO much more if it had been better recieved. I fully expect reviews play a signifcant part in the opening and the legs of movies like this... it is part of the basic appeal.


Based on what do you say this? Did Mystic River open with huge numbers? Insert about any other critically praised drama or indie from recent years. Good marketing is much more important, and polls prove this as far more moviegoers base their decisions on ads then critics.

In any case the audience reaction to Jarhead seems to be mixed, but certainly not poor. The drop shouldn’t be too surprising with the young male action seeking audience it had.

Quote:
I see absolutely no reason to assume that a younger audience isn't interested in a Joaquin Pheonix or Reece Witherspoon film.


I say what I said above. The audience needs a reason to see it, not a reason not to avoid seeing it.

Quote:
In fact, every audience that I go see this trailer with (that has teenagers in it) confirms that there IS interest.
Quote:

Um…..just how does the audience respond? No offense, but in general with the exception of comedies it’s tough to say how well received a trailer is, and from what I’ve seen in crowd reports the supposed audience reaction tend to reflect the views own feelings.

Quote:
I see no reason that, if Ladder 49 can open to 22+ on October 1st that a more acclaimed Pheonix film can't open to more on one of the strongest weekends of the year.


L 49 had good special effects, and it played up on the whole hero aspect of the story. That might sound dumb, but those can each make a huge difference.

Quote:
It doesn't mean it HAS to, but I honestly if you drop pour incredibly crappy numbers into a drop pattern that's the same as Rays, even if you don't count Ray's first three weeks the lowest the film can make is like $65 million... That could definately be it's low end (I think it's low end is $75) but there is a LOT of potential for this to break out.


I don’t see how something near 20m opening weekend would be incredibly crappy.

Quote:
No, it won't run like A Beautiful Mind, but it is ENTIRELY possible that if any fall non-Potter/Kong/Narnia film breaks out it will be this one.


I’d give others like Fun with Dick and Jane a much better shot. In fact, I don’t see how it can get far past 100m unless it is not released on DVD in Feb, and it does extremely well at the Oscars (winning best pic).


Thu Nov 17, 2005 11:03 pm
Profile ICQ
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40267
Post 
With the 79%-ish rating, around Ray, I think the legs will be cut short a bit here. I think it'll need 24-25 mil to have a shot at 100 total.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:13 am
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
New Prediction:

28m / 154m

this is with a best pic nom, but not hte win.

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:26 am
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
DP07 wrote:
Yeah, exactly. Except you should look at 2 Fast 2 Furious and Seabiscuit. Each skewed strongly to a specific audience, and each did well with it. However on opening weekend the results were very different; each film ended up in the same range, but they had different way of getting there. Jarhead was able to open like it did largely because its audience was the type to show up on opening weekend. WTL might end up with a similar total, but take a different path (BTW, I do expect WTL to make more overall).

I strongly disagree with this. The audiences for Jarhead and Walk the Line are not vastly different, and I think they share the same core of adult "drama" fans.

Quote:
I see it the other way around. The burden of proof is on the side making the claim.

The claim was made in this thread that Walk the Line has no teenage appeal, so in this case, the case hasn't been made.

Quote:
People will never spend their money and time on a movie simply by default.

Sure they do. In fact, teenagers are the demographic that is marketed to most specifically because they do tend to see more films than the average 30 year old AND they tend to be more receptive to marketing.

Quote:
So I ask, what's the evidence that the young audience will come see the movie.

DP07, if we are going to turn this around and ask the people who asked the original question, then ask your own end, because it hasn't provided the reason.

As it is, this is not an effective arguing technique.

Quote:
Yes, a movie can succeed without every demographic. However, it's no coincidence that nearly every major blockbuster tends to appeal to an extremely wide audience.

And so does Walk the Line. It definately does not appeal strictly to the Mystic River deep heavy drama audience. It's marketing is very middle ground.

Quote:
Only 4 of those opened with 30m, and none over 40m.

As I said above, I think 26 million would be a fantastic opening, I'm not expecting Walk the Line to break records and in no way am I supporting a 40 million opening.

Quote:
They also tend to have big stars (which seems to matter more to older audiences then younger ones).

I would say that Walk the Line has some pretty big stars. I mean we argue routinely that Recee is capable of selling a movie... They aren't Russell Crowe or Tom Cruise.

Quote:
However, most importantly none of them were dramas, or at least they were not advertised as such.

And Walk the Line is being marketed as a light musical.

Quote:
Based on what do you say this? Did Mystic River open with huge numbers? Insert about any other critically praised drama or indie from recent years.

Mystic River opened in 13 theaters... Few "Oscar dramas" open this wide and with this much advertising. Even Ray didn't hit it has hard as 20th Century Fox is with Walk the Line.

Quote:
Good marketing is much more important, and polls prove this as far more moviegoers base their decisions on ads then critics.

Which I would argue this film has HAD.

Quote:
I say what I said above. The audience needs a reason to see it, not a reason not to avoid seeing it.

The problem is we supply you with reasons, this entire topic is filled with reasons... It has music, it has popular younger actors who sell motion pictures, it has good word coming out, it has great advertising, it looks middle-of the road and not too challenging, and you overlook all of those issues.

Quote:
L 49 had good special effects, and it played up on the whole hero aspect of the story. That might sound dumb, but those can each make a huge difference.

It does sound dumb.

Quote:
I’d give others like Fun with Dick and Jane a much better shot. In fact, I don’t see how it can get far past 100m unless it is not released on DVD in Feb, and it does extremely well at the Oscars (winning best pic).

No, that's just short sightedness on your part. The runner-up Best Picture candidates end up doing surprisingly well... and four of them last year ended northward of $70 million, and that was considered a bad year for Oscar Box Office.

Walk the Line is not an art house film, it is a populist Oscar contender, many of those films excel. Whether or not Walk the Line makes 15 million or 30 million this weekend, I feel completely confident in the chances of films like this to excel at the box office.

My prediction, my confidence completely relies on this being a contendor, and being that the reviews stay about the same.

I don't know what else to say, 30 million isn't really a lot of money at this time of year, and I'm not even expecting it to do exactly that much.


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:27 am
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40267
Post 
Final prediction:

Opening: 23.5 mil
Total: 81.9 mil

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:32 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
My final one:

Opening weekend - $18.4 million

Totzal gross - $74.5 million

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:33 am
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Shack wrote:
Final prediction:

Opening: 23.5 mil
Total: 81.9 mil

After all of that... this entire topic... your opening day prediction and mine are 2.5 million apart.

Fantastic.


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:35 am
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40267
Post 
andaroo wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Yeah, exactly. Except you should look at 2 Fast 2 Furious and Seabiscuit. Each skewed strongly to a specific audience, and each did well with it. However on opening weekend the results were very different; each film ended up in the same range, but they had different way of getting there. Jarhead was able to open like it did largely because its audience was the type to show up on opening weekend. WTL might end up with a similar total, but take a different path (BTW, I do expect WTL to make more overall).


I strongly disagree with this. The audiences for Jarhead and Walk the Line are not vastly different, and I think they share the same core of adult "drama" fans.


Jarhead relied heavily on the teens and especially young males. I'd say it had more in the teens and young males than in the adults WTL skews like Maverikk. The war thing, Jesus Walks playing the spots, Jake G. bringing in some females. It ended up being a lot younger-based than WTL is.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Last edited by Shack on Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:40 am, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:37 am
Profile
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post 
This is what I don't get:
Shack wrote:
Final prediction:

Opening: 23.5 mil
Total: 81.9 mil

"I think it'll need 24-25 mil to have a shot at 100 total."


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:37 am
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40267
Post 
I suppose I should have said 'at least' or 'even have' in that sentence, my mistake. What I meant is that if it opens to 21 mil, its pretty much dead. It needs like 24 mil or higher to have any chance, even though in my personal opinion displayed by the prediction with 24 mil it still won't.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Last edited by Shack on Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:42 am, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:41 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
andaroo wrote:
Shack wrote:
Final prediction:

Opening: 23.5 mil
Total: 81.9 mil

After all of that... this entire topic... your opening day prediction and mine are 2.5 million apart.

Fantastic.


But you predicted $35 million for the opening.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:42 am
Profile WWW
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post 
But even if it opens to 25m you dont think it has a good chance? Just "a" chance?


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:42 am
Profile
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
andaroo wrote:
Shack wrote:
Final prediction:

Opening: 23.5 mil
Total: 81.9 mil

After all of that... this entire topic... your opening day prediction and mine are 2.5 million apart.

Fantastic.


But you predicted $35 million for the opening.

Where? I've been saying $26ish for a week or so now. I did make an "example" of $35 million.


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:44 am
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Oh way back on page 18ish in early Nov. Yeah, the theater counts tempered it a bit.

I'm now in the 26-27 million range, and I think it will do 95ish.

I guess you could call that my "final" prediction.


Last edited by andaroo1 on Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:48 am, edited 1 time in total.



Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:47 am
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40267
Post 
Well yeah, it has a good chance. Thats what it needs. Thats what I'm saying. I'm say it almost needs to be 24 mil+, which IMPO wouldn't be enough anyways. But it would give it a shot. With 21 mil though, it'd be tough. Its have a chance, as all movies do, but not that big.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:47 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 871 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 35  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.