Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 11:20 am



Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 Jarhead 

What grade would you give this film?
A 41%  41%  [ 18 ]
B 30%  30%  [ 13 ]
C 18%  18%  [ 8 ]
D 7%  7%  [ 3 ]
F 5%  5%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 44

 Jarhead 
Author Message
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
Libs wrote:
Wow, a total failure? It didn't suceed at one thing? Hmph.

I still don't understand why the film is being faulted for unlikeable characters. They were supposed to be likeable? I didn't even feel great measures were taken to really make Swoff the hero either.


Total failure is a bit of an exaggeration. I do think that if the characters were more likable, we would have actually cared that Swoff's girlfriend was cheating on him and we would have cared about what's his name dying, but I don't think it was a total failure. I wasn't bored watching these characters, I just didn't come to love any of them.


Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:05 pm
Profile
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
Joe wrote:
I with bABA. The more I think back to the film the more I detest it. The characters were all extremely unlikeable A-holes and despite a decent performance by Sarsgaard (he was the only halfway likeable character, and that was only sometimes), the film is a dull mess that seems to think it's being profound but really, it's not saying anything that hasn't been said by past films on similar subjects.

New Grade: F


Well .. thats not really why I didn't like the movie though ...


Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:25 pm
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:21 am
Posts: 4694
Location: Cambridge, England.
Post 
bABA wrote:
Joe wrote:
I with bABA. The more I think back to the film the more I detest it. The characters were all extremely unlikeable A-holes and despite a decent performance by Sarsgaard (he was the only halfway likeable character, and that was only sometimes), the film is a dull mess that seems to think it's being profound but really, it's not saying anything that hasn't been said by past films on similar subjects.

New Grade: F


Well .. thats not really why I didn't like the movie though ...


:hahaha: love the av. . . ./...

_________________
Image


Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:32 pm
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
hans wrote:
bABA wrote:
Joe wrote:
I with bABA. The more I think back to the film the more I detest it. The characters were all extremely unlikeable A-holes and despite a decent performance by Sarsgaard (he was the only halfway likeable character, and that was only sometimes), the film is a dull mess that seems to think it's being profound but really, it's not saying anything that hasn't been said by past films on similar subjects.

New Grade: F


Well .. thats not really why I didn't like the movie though ...


:hahaha: love the av. . . ./...


:biggrin:


Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:56 pm
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
At the end of the day, I really didn't care about any of the characters.


Sun Nov 06, 2005 10:45 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
ooo... lets complain about realistic characters... good job guys... :nonono:

I saw it with an army buddy of mine... of course he loved it... I loved it... most of the audience loved it... really great film

9.2/10

A-

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:53 pm
Profile
Post 
Don't Enlist For Jarhead

Interesting beginning, extremely zzzzzzzzzz middle, and oddly engaging epilogue.

C-

full review soon.

So the shit streak continues. When Mendes can't deliver, be afraid. Be very afraid.


Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:50 am
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11614
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post 
It was very good acting wise, but the story was week.

B+

_________________
Image


Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:58 am
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
I loved it, although on some level I can see why some people wouldn't. A-


Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:22 am
Profile
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
bABA wrote:
Joe wrote:
I with bABA. The more I think back to the film the more I detest it. The characters were all extremely unlikeable A-holes and despite a decent performance by Sarsgaard (he was the only halfway likeable character, and that was only sometimes), the film is a dull mess that seems to think it's being profound but really, it's not saying anything that hasn't been said by past films on similar subjects.

New Grade: F


Well .. thats not really why I didn't like the movie though ...


I wasn't talking about that. I was just referring to how you came to hate it the more you thought about it.


Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:49 am
Profile
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post 
Libs wrote:
Joe wrote:
I with bABA. The more I think back to the film the more I detest it. The characters were all extremely unlikeable A-holes and despite a decent performance by Sarsgaard (he was the only halfway likeable character, and that was only sometimes), the film is a dull mess that seems to think it's being profound but really, it's not saying anything that hasn't been said by past films on similar subjects.

New Grade: F


Wow, a total failure? It didn't suceed at one thing? Hmph.

I still don't understand why the film is being faulted for unlikeable characters. They were supposed to be likeable? I didn't even feel great measures were taken to really make Swoff the hero either.


Ever heard of difference of opinion? For me it was the most unenjoyable moviegoing experience of the year other than 'The Devil's Rejects.' If there isn't one character worth caring about, that is characterized as a big problem IMO.


Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:52 am
Profile
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
Joe wrote:
bABA wrote:
Joe wrote:
I with bABA. The more I think back to the film the more I detest it. The characters were all extremely unlikeable A-holes and despite a decent performance by Sarsgaard (he was the only halfway likeable character, and that was only sometimes), the film is a dull mess that seems to think it's being profound but really, it's not saying anything that hasn't been said by past films on similar subjects.

New Grade: F


Well .. thats not really why I didn't like the movie though ...


I wasn't talking about that. I was just referring to how you came to hate it the more you thought about it.


Aaaah


Mon Nov 07, 2005 12:19 pm
Profile WWW
2.71828183

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm
Posts: 7827
Location: please delete me
Post 
Lacking in character devleopment, but I still liked it, the movie made me very interested to read the book, when nomally once I see the movie I have no desire to read the book.

A-


Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:16 pm
Profile
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:20 pm
Posts: 491
Location: seattle
Post 
andaroo wrote:

The movie is about nothing, and nothing happening, yet it wants to have that angle of WAR IS HELL. Or does it? .



No, I didnt get that at all. Remember they we're only in actual combat for what..the last 20 minutes of the movie? If you want to call it that.

_________________
yearsago's homepage


Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:54 pm
Profile WWW
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:20 pm
Posts: 491
Location: seattle
Post 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
I too am docking the movie from a C/C+ to a C now. The movie somewhat pisses me off. I guess its because the soldiers were cheering at the wrong situations like when they were watching Apocalypse Now and cheering at the soldiers bombing the civilians. Way too many "Lets kick some Iraqi ass" and laughing at that one guy's wife cheating on him on tape. I dont know if the movie really wanted us to care for what happens to the soldiers and the supposed hardship they have to endure by waring the gas mask in the hot weather


Wait. You are docking the movie a grade. For realism?

Now thats classic.

_________________
yearsago's homepage


Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:55 pm
Profile WWW
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 11:20 pm
Posts: 491
Location: seattle
Post 
bABA wrote:

oh i was refering to everyone in general.


You must have forgot the one soldier from texas, that wanted to talk about the truth..and freedom of the press.

And wanted to know what the pills did, and why should he sign a waiver, before he signed the waiver.

yeah, everyone was brainwashed.

_________________
yearsago's homepage


Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:57 pm
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
yearsago wrote:
Wait. You are docking the movie a grade. For realism?

Now thats classic.

According to the woman who is the mother of Troy, who is now really upset at Swofford for what he wrote in the book, realism is obviously a subjective experience.


Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:51 pm
Profile WWW
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post 
uh...

i just dont really have the drive, or feel like putting in any effort to discussing this movie, but i really did enjoy it a lot. nice, after like 3 huge disappointments in a row.


Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:54 pm
Profile
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
yearsago wrote:
bABA wrote:

oh i was refering to everyone in general.


You must have forgot the one soldier from texas, that wanted to talk about the truth..and freedom of the press.

And wanted to know what the pills did, and why should he sign a waiver, before he signed the waiver.

yeah, everyone was brainwashed.


never said anyone was to be honest .. i was refering just to the fact that everyone goes through that in the beginning of the film .....


Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:06 pm
Profile WWW
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
I'm not changing my grade from a B, but I actually like it a bit more upon reflection. I definitely don't see how anybody could hate it, and before you decide to ask me if I've ever heard of a difference of opinion, Joe, don't.


Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:13 pm
Profile
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
yearsago wrote:
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:
I too am docking the movie from a C/C+ to a C now. The movie somewhat pisses me off. I guess its because the soldiers were cheering at the wrong situations like when they were watching Apocalypse Now and cheering at the soldiers bombing the civilians. Way too many "Lets kick some Iraqi ass" and laughing at that one guy's wife cheating on him on tape. I dont know if the movie really wanted us to care for what happens to the soldiers and the supposed hardship they have to endure by waring the gas mask in the hot weather


Wait. You are docking the movie a grade. For realism?

Now thats classic.


Im docking the movie a grade because it doesnt take side even when it tries to offer realism. The realism either is supposed to make us hate the soldiers or like them even better, the movie seems to suggest that we are supposed to be rooting for them because they were in this so called hot temperature and suffering all this hardship but it doesnt sway you if you are going to offer so many evil falws of the soldiers. Thats my grip. If it was something like Platoon, I would understand thats shows good soldiers mixed in with bad soldiers

And like what Andaroo said about realism when in fact Troy died in a car accident while the movie made it look like he was involved in some kind of crime that lead to his death

A movie could have all the realism it can but if it offers no storyline or a message about, its a mess.


Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:15 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts: 16061
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
El_Masked_esteROIDe_user wrote:

Im docking the movie a grade because it doesnt take side even when it tries to offer realism.



You know, I did that for Gunner Palace. Not that it was realism, which I was expecting from a documentary, but its complete ambiguity and sort of superficial treatment of subject. I found the directors condescending tear stories about being able to hop on a plane and go home when the boys couldn't to be utterly unprofound. I found his inability to condemn or condone anyone's actions to do the entire story of our tropps a complete disservice. I found it completely decontextualized in its desire to adhere to "real-time" trueism, and I found the soundtrack worse than all of the above issues combined.


Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:33 pm
Profile
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:48 am
Posts: 409
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Post 
I can't decide on if I like the movie or not like it. It mostly just confuses me because they don't really do much. The one thing that I was looking forward to when they hinted at it was the little sniper action towards the end. But, that ended so abruptly, and cheesy I might add, that it ruined most of the ending. I also didn't like the fact, and Ididn't really get this, that they were bummed that they didn't get to fire there guns but were having a party about the ending of a two day war that didn't show them one bit of action...? They were all hyped to go to war and they were happy that they got to sit in a desert and walk through oil?? Maybe they were happy they got to end the boredem, maybe not. Thats why I don't know if I like the movie or not, I have no idea why many of the soldiers acted the way they did or fealt the way they did. Also, I really hate the blatent rip off of Full Metal Jacket. Your not going to top that movie so don't try. Did they have to take the "rifle" saying right from FMJ or is this something the marines always say? Since im up in arms, I will give it a C.


Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:31 am
Profile
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post 
Cleric wrote:
Since im up in arms, I will give it a C.
around here that is "highly disliked/pretty much hated"...you should probably give it more like B/B+. FYI.


Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:25 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
Kypade wrote:
Cleric wrote:
Since im up in arms, I will give it a C.
around here that is "highly disliked/pretty much hated"...you should probably give it more like B/B+. FYI.


From his description, I'd give a C as well. I'm using Yahoo's wording in my grading, so B means "Good" and B+ means "memorable", and C is average/mediocre.


Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:29 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.