The 'Two and a Half Men' Thread (Season 3)
Author |
Message |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Maverikk wrote: Mr. X, since you decided to decline my advice in my PM to delete that above nonsense, I'm going to offer you some advice of my own. (1)First, shut up with the advice that you decided to offer 4 hours after the fact when everything was over, and spare everybody the psycho analysis you decided to conduct. (2) You're not exactly the best person to analyze anybody's faults. (3) I doubt you'd like me to conduct an analysis of you for past conduct, so refrain from doing things like that in the future, and know when it's best to keep your mouth shut. For instance, four hours after something is over. (4)Think first, then act. You seem to struggle with that sometimes.
Mav, please delete that post! I'm sorry, I'm sorry!
Okay, Mav. If THAT is what you wanted to hear for saying that, then you might as well stop now. Otherwise, I'm going to comment on a few things that you said.
1. You have this odd fascination with not allowing someone to talk about ANYTHING in the past, even if it happened ten minutes prior to the posting. Excuse me, Mav, I'll be sure to contact a psychic next time to see what you're going to post in the near-future and comment then.
2. Never said I was. Never boasted about being actual help. Just gave advice. You didn't handle too well. I'm sensing that now!
3. Do so all you want. You have no problem commenting about my past, by saying things like you did in my second bolded point from your post, so go ahead if you got anything else. I, unlike you, can take criticism of my postings and learn from my mistakes.
4. Again, comments about the past from someone who won't allow others to comment about the past. Quit living in the past, if no one else can, Maverikk.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:13 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Mr. X wrote: Mav, please delete that post! I'm sorry, I'm sorry!
Okay, Mav. If THAT is what you wanted to hear for saying that, then you might as well stop now. Otherwise, I'm going to comment on a few things that you said.
1. You have this odd fascination with not allowing someone to talk about ANYTHING in the past, even if it happened ten minutes prior to the posting. Excuse me, Mav, I'll be sure to contact a psychic next time to see what you're going to post in the near-future and comment then. It was longer than 10 minutes. Next time, use some common sense before deciding to derail a thread that's about a TV show, and don't play Dr. Phil, ok? Mr. X wrote: 2. Never said I was. Never boasted about being actual help. Just gave advice. You didn't handle too well. I'm sensing that now! Actually, I handled it well and tried to talk to you via PM, but you were too stubborn to see that you were actually WRONG! I'd say you didn't handle it well, because if you did, this wouldn't be going on, and it would have ended hours ago. I don't need any advice from you, and I doubt the others did either. Mr. X wrote: 3. Do so all you want. You have no problem commenting about my past, by saying things like you did in my second bolded point from your post, so go ahead if you got anything else. I, unlike you, can take criticism of my postings and learn from my mistakes. Like I said, your stubborness to even see where you were wrong proves otherwise, as I tried to handle this privately, but you wouldn't hear it. It's obvious that you do what you want when you want, and haven't learned from past mistakes. You speak before you think. You also continue to make a fool of yourself. When you ever start an apology thread about something you did, lecture me on how I take criticsm, understand? Mr. X wrote: 4. Again, comments about the past from someone who won't allow others to comment about the past. Quit living in the past, if no one else can, Maverikk.
Someone who won't allow others to comment about the past? Dude, use fucking common sense, and quit trying to turn it around on others when you don't. Is that clear enough for you? Now drop it, so this thread doesn't get ruined. I dropped it 5 hours ago for that purpose, but you obviously couldn't comprehend the wisdom present.
|
Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:27 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Maverikk wrote: It was longer than 10 minutes. Next time, use some common sense before deciding to derail a thread that's about a TV show, and don't play Dr. Phil, ok? Yeah, alrighty Mav. If I have to let something go in the past, that's LONG gone, then let go all your arguments with Michael. If he reads this, then do the same Michael. There, problem solved, right? I doubt it. Maverikk wrote: Actually, I handled it well and tried to talk to you via PM, but you were too stubborn to see that you were actually WRONG! I'd say you didn't handle it well, because if you did, this wouldn't be going on, and it would have ended hours ago. I don't need any advice from you, and I doubt the others did either. The pot and the kettle. I can see when I'm wrong, and heck Mav, I'm wrong a LOT! If you want a list, PM me and I'll give you a list. I gave some advice, and I'll admit, I should have consulted all three of you privately, but my mistake. If I wanted to get into you giving me unnecessary advice, I would, but I'll accept YOUR advice, unlike you denying me the right to give YOU advice. Maverikk wrote: Like I said, your stubborness to even see where you were wrong proves otherwise, as I tried to handle this privately, but you wouldn't hear it. It's obvious that you do what you want when you want, and haven't learned from past mistakes. You speak before you think. You also continue to make a fool of yourself. When you ever start an apology thread about something you did, lecture me on how I take criticsm, understand? Excuse me, I handled it in the private message. YOU chose to continue this, long after it was over. Looks like we're both stubborn, right? If you thought before you spoke, you wouldn't make hypocritical statements. You're commenting right now about the past, when it's over and done with, supposedly. Again, I finished this through PM, you chose to dig it back up when I didn't comply with your request. Sorry if people don't say "No" to you a lot, but I felt no need to do so. Maverikk wrote: Someone who won't allow others to comment about the past? Dude, use fucking common sense, and quit trying to turn it around on others when you don't. Is that clear enough for you? Now drop it, so this thread doesn't get ruined. I dropped it 5 hours ago for that purpose, but you obviously couldn't comprehend the wisdom present.
Dude, quit turning this around on me.
Well, that's what you said to me, and it didn't really make a lot of sense. You can debate, but I can't. I see. I understand, my good sir!
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
Last edited by Mister Ecks on Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:40 pm |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
Arrested Development is a much better show then Two and a Half Men. That being said, that doesn't mean its a bad show. I've always liked Charlie Sheen. Hot Shots, Navy SEALS, Platoon, Major League. The guy was an awesome late 80's/early 90's member of the Sheen clan.
Oh, and you two, keep up the arguement. Very enjoyable.
|
Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:40 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
KidRock69x wrote: Oh, and you two, keep up the arguement. Very enjoyable.
No thanks.

|
Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:44 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Me and Mav are having a difference of opinions. In the end, I hope he can see past it, like I intend to do. I don't want to create a heated atmosphere between us, so sorry to burst the bubble KidRock.
As for Charlie Sheen, he has such a dry wit, that I love. I've heard people say he always gives a wooden performance, but I think he does comedy better than many people. He delivers perfectly.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:47 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Mr. X wrote: Me and Mav are having a difference of opinions. In the end, I hope he can see past it, like I intend to do.
It's cool, Mr. X. I'm fine with agreeing to disagree and ending it peacefully. 
|
Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:12 am |
|
 |
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm Posts: 8687
|
Maverikk wrote: Mr. X wrote: Me and Mav are having a difference of opinions. In the end, I hope he can see past it, like I intend to do. It's cool, Mr. X. I'm fine with agreeing to disagree and ending it peacefully. 
You know it's not peaceful with you. You want to continue it don't ya. You feel it in you. Charlie ShEeEeeNnNNn. Start name calling somebody!
p.s. This show sucks. Bad replacement for raymond.
|
Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:25 am |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
This thread is hillarious.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:58 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
hahaha...now THAT is comedy! 
|
Mon Sep 26, 2005 9:09 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
I watched it tonight.
Not a fan, honestly. It all seemed very stale to me.
And does anyone else think Charlie Sheen is, like, the crappiest actor in the world?
The other guy is pretty good, though.
|
Mon Sep 26, 2005 11:54 pm |
|
 |
AgentX
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:29 pm Posts: 2303 Location: 905
|
Tonight's wasn't as good as last weeks. It didn't really get going until Charlie let the masseuse in to his Brother's office.
Last edited by AgentX on Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Tue Sep 27, 2005 12:06 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40589
|
Another just ok episode. HIMYM was better again.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Tue Sep 27, 2005 1:43 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Last night wasn't so great; Dk, this wasn't a good night to start watching.
The show is best when the female supporting characters (Holland Taylor, Conchata Ferrell, Melanie Lynskey, Marin Hinkle) are on for more than just a few seconds.
|
Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:56 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
This show is at it's best when it drops all the sexual double entendres and gets on other subjects. Sex talk is a bit over done by now on sitcoms, we need a little break from it, or at least toned down, so it can be fresh again some day.  One thing I like about this show is the kid is realistic, he isn't one of those unnaturally smart kids that are usually on shows.
|
Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:49 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40589
|
The episode last night was ok done, but the Alan-Judith together idea has already been done so many times in the episodes leading up to this. Nothing really made this stand-out, it was identical to a bunch of episodes done before, with them together or not or together or not and so forth. At least Rose reappeared, she hadn't been in there for a while. I was worried they dropped her or something, but returned in high fashion. Her rant was excellent.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:57 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
My biggest worry about this show is that it's not going to be able to survive once the kid's voice starts changing.
|
Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:33 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
I don't know, guys. I just don't know...
Twas better than the last one I saw, but I sure didn't laugh much.
And Charlie Sheen still blows.
|
Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:53 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40589
|
Season 3 is alot worse than before so far. Even the 'Bertha episode' didn't work that well, it was riddled with a much more serious than usual Alan vs Charlie storyline, that didn't have room for too many laughs. I think they might need some more characters. If they decided to do a Bertha episode, they should've done it where it revolved around her rather than the same-old Charlie and Alan 80% screentime. Maybe Bertha goes to the mall or something.
And they need more Rose and Holland Taylor. Much more.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:04 am |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
I think the problem with this show is they are making them look too bummy. They should emphasize more their jobs. Charlie is a professional musician/jingle writer, they should show him working a lot more. As it is, they are playing Charlie as if he's Charlie Sheen, not a working musician.
|
Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:24 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40589
|
Much better episode tonight, finally a good Season 3-er. Charlie Sheen was actually surprisngly excellent as well, especially when he was opening up to his mom about stuff.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:43 am |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Great scene > When the mother walked in to pick them up for the Halloween party dressed as The Wicked Witch and saw Charlie's witch / girlfriend.
|
Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:43 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40589
|
Good, but I wish it was just a regular episode instead of the Halloween curses idea. The tattooed girl was great. Cryer was really good in the scene where hes shaving in the bathroom.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:46 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
Funny episode in which the Halloween theme actually worked pretty well. "Have you seen that bitch?" was by far the best line of many hilarious lines. It was one of the season's best episodes.
|
Tue Oct 25, 2005 2:14 am |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
Not bad, got better towards the end. But overall Charlie seems more of a jerk this season than previously.
|
Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:31 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|