| Author |
Message |
|
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
|
 The Pentagon. I posted this link on another forum. It's very stunning in a way power of media.
http://www.nixtro.com/pentagon121.swf
Think it's real?
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 3:36 pm |
 
|
|
|
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
|
Just liberals trying to taint the bush administration.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 3:46 pm |
|
|
|
Amer
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:35 pm
Posts: 1912
Location: Texas
|
rusty wrote: Just liberals trying to taint the bush administration. Ok....But tell me why we should not believe that, if they proved their point pretty well.
_________________
The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.....
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:05 pm |
|
|
|
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
|
Yeah. It's really well proven. I've checked more websites about this and everyoen seems to agreee that an airplane did not hit the pentagon but that it was a missile.
Some websites even say that the missile was from the US gov't and that it was strategically hit in an area that was under construction.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:08 pm |
|
|
|
Amer
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:35 pm
Posts: 1912
Location: Texas
|
neostorm wrote: Yeah. It's really well proven. I've checked more websites about this and everyoen seems to agreee that an airplane did not hit the pentagon but that it was a missile.
Some websites even say that the missile was from the US gov't and that it was strategically hit in an area that was under construction. OK..Lets say that happened, why would the US Gov want to shoot the Pentagon?
_________________
The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.....
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm |
|
|
|
MGKC
---------
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
|
Amer wrote: OK..Lets say that happened, why would the US Gov want to shoot the Pentagon? Yeah, that makes no sense. I don't understand how that could be coordianted so fast....
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:38 pm |
|
|
|
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
|
well the US gov't is a far fetched idea.. But why conceil it was a misile?
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:40 pm |
|
|
|
Coasterman2002
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 6:23 pm
Posts: 1010
Location: New Yawk
|
yeah i posted a video about the pentagon plane crash and it looks like amissle and there hasnt been any accounts that it was a 757...it could be either a missle or a small plane nothing else.
_________________
Michael Savage's "The Savage Nation" On Radio Monday through Friday 8pm-11pm (Eastern Time)
Liberalism is a Mental Disorder - BUY THE BOOK NOW!!! On New York Times Best Seller List 9 Weeks in a Row
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:45 pm |
|
|
|
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
|
Amer wrote: neostorm wrote: Yeah. It's really well proven. I've checked more websites about this and everyoen seems to agreee that an airplane did not hit the pentagon but that it was a missile.
Some websites even say that the missile was from the US gov't and that it was strategically hit in an area that was under construction. OK..Lets say that happened, why would the US Gov want to shoot the Pentagon? Exactly. Why would they either A) need to hit the pentagon or B) even want to hit the pentagon.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
Amer
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:35 pm
Posts: 1912
Location: Texas
|
rusty wrote: Amer wrote: neostorm wrote: Yeah. It's really well proven. I've checked more websites about this and everyoen seems to agreee that an airplane did not hit the pentagon but that it was a missile.
Some websites even say that the missile was from the US gov't and that it was strategically hit in an area that was under construction. OK..Lets say that happened, why would the US Gov want to shoot the Pentagon? Exactly. Why would they either A) need to hit the pentagon or B) even want to hit the pentagon. But I still think that the Video has good evidence. I mean, why would they not release the Security Camera videos?
_________________
The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.....
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 5:56 pm |
|
|
|
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
|
Amer wrote: rusty wrote: Amer wrote: neostorm wrote: Yeah. It's really well proven. I've checked more websites about this and everyoen seems to agreee that an airplane did not hit the pentagon but that it was a missile.
Some websites even say that the missile was from the US gov't and that it was strategically hit in an area that was under construction. OK..Lets say that happened, why would the US Gov want to shoot the Pentagon? Exactly. Why would they either A) need to hit the pentagon or B) even want to hit the pentagon. But I still think that the Video has good evidence. I mean, why would they not release the Security Camera videos? Would you release security camera videos of the pentagon being hit... National security reasons buddy.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:09 pm |
|
|
|
Amer
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:35 pm
Posts: 1912
Location: Texas
|
rusty wrote: Amer wrote: rusty wrote: Amer wrote: neostorm wrote: Yeah. It's really well proven. I've checked more websites about this and everyoen seems to agreee that an airplane did not hit the pentagon but that it was a missile.
Some websites even say that the missile was from the US gov't and that it was strategically hit in an area that was under construction. OK..Lets say that happened, why would the US Gov want to shoot the Pentagon? Exactly. Why would they either A) need to hit the pentagon or B) even want to hit the pentagon. But I still think that the Video has good evidence. I mean, why would they not release the Security Camera videos? Would you release security camera videos of the pentagon being hit... National security reasons buddy. What kind? I mean if we see the WTC getting hit and falling, then why not the Pentagon?
_________________
The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.....
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:13 pm |
|
|
|
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
I could answer why the US would do something. But with bsolutely nothing to back me up on this, I'd rather refrain. Needless to say, the thought of the US doing this has never been a far fetched idea in the minds of many people.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:34 pm |
|
|
|
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
|
Amer wrote: What kind? I mean if we see the WTC getting hit and falling, then why not the Pentagon? We saw the WTC getting hit and falling because it's a tourist attraction and there were hundreds upon hundreds of people there.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:32 pm |
|
|
|
Amer
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:35 pm
Posts: 1912
Location: Texas
|
rusty wrote: Amer wrote: What kind? I mean if we see the WTC getting hit and falling, then why not the Pentagon? We saw the WTC getting hit and falling because it's a tourist attraction and there were hundreds upon hundreds of people there. And when you go to D.C, you never take a glimpse of the Pentagon?
_________________
The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous.....
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:58 pm |
|
|
|
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
|
Amer wrote: rusty wrote: Amer wrote: What kind? I mean if we see the WTC getting hit and falling, then why not the Pentagon? We saw the WTC getting hit and falling because it's a tourist attraction and there were hundreds upon hundreds of people there. And when you go to D.C, you never take a glimpse of the Pentagon? how many visitors are there at the pentagon at that time in the morning? New York is very different from DC.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:14 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
I can't believe you people are still discussing this idocy.
First of all, Pentagon is not in DC, it's outside of it.
Second, there were plenty of witnesses who saw the plane hit the building.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:55 pm |
|
|
|
rusty
rustiphica
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
|
Krem wrote: I can't believe you people are still discussing this idocy.
First of all, Pentagon is not in DC, it's outside of it.
Second, there were plenty of witnesses who saw the plane hit the building. well sorry for not knowing my american geography 
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:57 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
I can't believe you people are still discussing this idocy.
First of all, Pentagon is not in DC, it's outside of it.
Second, there were plenty of witnesses who saw the plane hit the building.
|
| Sat Oct 16, 2004 8:58 pm |
|
|
|
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
|
Tons of eye witnesses see the Yeti, ghosts, miracles, and aliens as well.
|
| Sun Oct 17, 2004 2:03 pm |
|
|
