Author |
Message |
STROKER ACE
Speed Racer
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 7:07 pm Posts: 199
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Why is it an unfair criticism?
How exactly am I expecting WAAAAY too much from a kid's flick?
Coherence. They rarely are...kids like em' anyway.
|
Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:40 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
STROKER ACE wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Why is it an unfair criticism?
How exactly am I expecting WAAAAY too much from a kid's flick? Coherence. They rarely are...kids like em' anyway.
Flawed way of thinking there. I can run off 100 children films that are coherent. The "oh well, kids will like it anyway" argument doesn't really work. It's not as if an 8 year old can drive themselves to a movie theater.
|
Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:48 pm |
|
 |
STROKER ACE
Speed Racer
Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 7:07 pm Posts: 199
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: STROKER ACE wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Why is it an unfair criticism?
How exactly am I expecting WAAAAY too much from a kid's flick? Coherence. They rarely are...kids like em' anyway. Flawed way of thinking there. I can run off 100 children films that are coherent. The "oh well, kids will like it anyway" argument doesn't really work. It's not as if an 8 year old can drive themselves to a movie theater.
Fair enough. I just think, more fundamentally, that a kid's flick can be incoherent and still be good as far as kid's flicks go. I'd never watch this movie at a theater anyway, but apparently some people are enjoying it. The consistent BO#s have surprised me---I thought this would be a Honeymooners-like bomb. If it holds up--another Herbie installment might not be out of the question.
|
Fri Jul 01, 2005 10:06 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
You can never tie box office to quality.
|
Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:21 am |
|
 |
imtim83
The Dark Knight
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 5:55 pm Posts: 780
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: STROKER ACE wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Why is it an unfair criticism?
How exactly am I expecting WAAAAY too much from a kid's flick? Coherence. They rarely are...kids like em' anyway. It's not as if an 8 year old can drive themselves to a movie theater.
They can but I wouldn't allow my son or daughter to. To many sick people in the world today.
_________________ Trust No One
Always be proactive
Animals are gods
|
Sat Jul 02, 2005 6:56 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
I figured the only way a Herbie thread would get over 50 replies would be if over 70% of them was arguing...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:14 pm |
|
 |
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21230 Location: Massachusetts
|
The good news: I saw Herbie: Fully Loaded for free.
The bad news: I saw Herbie: Fully Loaded
I just walked out of a screening with about 400 kids and their parents. Most of them clapped. I was expecting that. For children, I can see how this was a pretty cool movie. Herbie is cute, climbs up walls, and spits oil in the face of the bad guy. Fine. This is perfect for a young child, and anyone who felt nostalgic towards the original films. I don't fit into both of those categories.
For people such as me, it's pretty unbearbale. I will admit at first I thought the film was kind of funny, and somewhat clever. That was during the opening credits with the flashbacks of Herbie. Then the film pretty much goes down hill from here. With one exception, which has been brought up many times in this thread. I'm not sure if it's just bad filmmaking by director Angela Robinson, but how does no one realize Max is Maggie? The see through face shield doesn't help matters, and sometimes her hair even flows out of her helmet. Whatever caused this, it did have me cracking up/pissed off somewhat. Of course I did see it for free though, so I am not too aggrevated. For those of you who paid for this. I laugh  at you.
I don't even want to bring up the awful '80s soundtrack, and the awful CGI effects, mostly because this is what you can expect from a Disney film now, or at least it just seems that way.
The film clearly wasn't made for me, and kids will like it, but still, it's pretty fucking awful.
D
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:01 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
jmart007 wrote: The film clearly wasn't made for me, and kids will like it, but still, it's pretty fucking awful.
D
That should be part of Disney's ad campaign.
The Max/Maggie storyline strikes again.
|
Tue Jul 05, 2005 9:22 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
It had a feel like it was being entertaining, but nothing stood out as ACTUALLY entertaining.
And... am I the only one who thought the most hilarious scene of the entire movie was when Herbie seemingly got turned on by staring at Lindsay Lohan's ass?
Grade: D-
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:38 pm |
|
 |
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm Posts: 28110 Location: Awaiting my fate
|
I think I'm the only one who liked it.
No, it wasn't as good as previous remake entries such as Freaky Friday, however it was still enjoyable. Lindsay Lohan was good, as usual, but also not up to previous efforts by her.
Overall, enjoyable but not as good as it could have been.
B
_________________ See above.
|
Tue Jul 12, 2005 7:10 pm |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
Call me a loser, a person with a VERY BAD taste in movies or whatever you want but i actually enjoyde it. BUT by any means this is a good movie, its quite awful, but its very fun.
C+

|
Mon May 01, 2006 4:36 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
D
And the worst thing is that I paid full price.
|
Wed May 03, 2006 12:41 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40237
|
C-
Yeah, bad movie.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Wed May 03, 2006 1:01 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
C+
I am in the same camp as matatonio. I enjoyed it much more than I imagined to. Lindsay Lohan does a decent job and the film, while immensly stupid and technicaly sub-par is still a lot of fun.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed May 03, 2006 4:37 pm |
|
 |
DIB2
All Star Poster
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:57 am Posts: 4669 Location: Anchorage, AK
|
I thought this fillm was pretty enjoyable
B-
_________________My Most anticipated films of 2015 
|
Sun Sep 10, 2006 5:10 am |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
This thread is kinda funny.
|
Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:20 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
Zingaling wrote: This thread is kinda funny.
page 2 got rough. And fast.
|
Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:26 pm |
|
|