|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
 The Honeymooners
The Honeymooners Quote: The Honeymooners is a 2005 family comedy film directed by John Schultz, which, unlike the original television series, stars an African American cast featuring Cedric the Entertainer, Gabrielle Union, Mike Epps, and Regina Hall. It is based on the TV series of the same name (at the time of the film's release, Paramount Pictures, the film's distributor, was a sister company to CBS, which owns the rights to the series). The film was panned by critics (though Roger Ebert was one of the few to give it a positive review).
Last edited by zingy on Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Thu Jun 09, 2005 9:07 pm |
|
 |
movies35
Forum General
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm Posts: 8627 Location: Syracuse, NY
|
Looks pretty dumb. I'll rent it, probably. If I do see it in theaters, it will because I already saw everything that's playing and I'm bored. I don't see myself seeing it in theaters because I still need to see MADAGASCAR, LONGEST YARD, MR. AND MRS. SMITH and SHARK BOY AND LAVA GIRL IN 3-D.
_________________ Top 10 Films of 2016
1. La La Land 2. Other People 3. Nocturnal Animals 4. Swiss Army Man 5. Manchester by the Sea 6. The Edge of Seventeen 7. Sing Street 8. Indignation 9. The Lobster 10. Hell or High Water
|
Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:55 am |
|
 |
coolmoviedude999
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 3:20 pm Posts: 1108
|
Not everybody at once now.
It's much too difficult to keep up with all these reviews.
|
Wed Jun 15, 2005 3:01 am |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
There's only a couple things that can make a man chuckle in this abomination. One - the first five minutes. Cedric can sorta dance to some 70s music. Two - Oprah. Gabrielle Union apparently has a fat momma who looks just like Ms. Winfrey. She ate all six of her kids. Three - the audience. The audience gave me more laughs than the 90-ish minutes on the screen. For some, a Coke is the perfect sanctuary. One white guy (who laughed about ten times overall) delt with the movie by slurping his Coke. When no Coke (or ice) was left, he still slurped. The noise, I gather, brought more excitement to him than Mike Epps' dry performance. The movie is a series of bits that have no connection to each other. Each tries to serve up some laughs with facial expressions, stereotypes, and bad, bad one-liners (and, no. Being black doesn’t help you here). If you can take movies without a plot (oh, and a flawed screenplay that makes Cedric's intelligence waver like a zombie), this baby's for you. Otherwise, the only plus is seeing the audience try to sit through it, a few funny bits, and the shexy Gabrielle Union. F+
Read More Here: http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9770
|
Thu Jun 23, 2005 1:11 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Quote: The Honeymooners (WOKJ Review) By: Zingaling
"Is this the best you can do, Hollywood? The best thing you could come with is an unwanted remake of a 1950s sitcom? If this is a sign of things to come, books might be the only thing we have left. For the record, I've never seen the original sitcom. And, from what I've heard, the sitcom was never anything to brag about." Yow! Zingaling!?! I haven't seen this remake yet, but in reading your official WOKJ review, I am shocked at your second hand dismissal of one of the cornerstones of classic sitcom history. The pairing of comic legend Jackie Gleason and Academy Award winner Art Carney is one of the all time funniest comedy teams of the 20th century. You are certainly welcome to your opinion, but I highly urge you to either do your own research, or get a better source of information from which to get your opinions. This does not match the quality of your usually well written material on this site! :down:
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 8:24 am |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
bradley witherberry wrote: Quote: The Honeymooners (WOKJ Review) By: Zingaling
"Is this the best you can do, Hollywood? The best thing you could come with is an unwanted remake of a 1950’s sitcom? If this is a sign of things to come, books might be the only thing we have left. For the record, I’ve never seen the original sitcom. And, from what I’ve heard, the sitcom was never anything to brag about." Yow! Zingaling!?! I haven't seen this remake yet, but in reading your official WOKJ review, I am shocked at your second hand dismissal of one of the cornerstones of classic sitcom history. The pairing of comic legend Jackie Gleason and Academy Award winner Art Carney is one of the all time funniest comedy teams of the 20th century. You are certainly welcome to your opinion, but I highly urge you to either do your own research, or get a better source of information from which to get your opinions. This does not match the quality of your usually well written material on this site! :down:
Good catch
Unlike today, where you need about 100 episodes.
The Honeymooners, with only about 30 episodes to be revolved, have been playing on tv for over 50 years.
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 8:46 am |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
bradley witherberry wrote: Quote: The Honeymooners (WOKJ Review) By: Zingaling
"Is this the best you can do, Hollywood? The best thing you could come with is an unwanted remake of a 1950s sitcom? If this is a sign of things to come, books might be the only thing we have left. For the record, I've never seen the original sitcom. And, from what I've heard, the sitcom was never anything to brag about." Yow! Zingaling!?! I haven't seen this remake yet, but in reading your official WOKJ review, I am shocked at your second hand dismissal of one of the cornerstones of classic sitcom history. The pairing of comic legend Jackie Gleason and Academy Award winner Art Carney is one of the all time funniest comedy teams of the 20th century. You are certainly welcome to your opinion, but I highly urge you to either do your own research, or get a better source of information from which to get your opinions. This does not match the quality of your usually well written material on this site! :down: I did ask people before writing that, and most agreed with that statement.
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:11 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Zingaling wrote: bradley witherberry wrote: You are certainly welcome to your opinion, but I highly urge you to either do your own research, or get a better source of information from which to get your opinions. This does not match the quality of your usually well written material on this site!
I did ask people before writing that, and most agreed with that statement.
...like I said above, get a better source of information...
(I'll bet if I run a poll in the TV section - the results would show most KJ members (who have seen the show) would vote it as an all-time comedy classic! Wanna make a lttle wager??)
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 6:58 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
bradley witherberry wrote: (I'll bet if I run a poll in the TV section - the results would show most KJ members (who have seen the show) would vote it as an all-time comedy classic! Wanna make a lttle wager??)
I went ahead and created the poll in the TV forum - I invite anyone who has an opinion to pop over and vote!
(PS: Still haven't heard back from Zing regarding an appropriate wager - family honor, perhaps?)
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 7:19 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
Um, I don't wish to make any wagers, nor do I care THAT much about whether some people liked a television show or not.
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:25 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Zingaling wrote: bradley witherberry wrote: Quote: The Honeymooners (WOKJ Review) By: Zingaling
"Is this the best you can do, Hollywood? The best thing you could come with is an unwanted remake of a 1950’s sitcom? If this is a sign of things to come, books might be the only thing we have left. For the record, I’ve never seen the original sitcom. And, from what I’ve heard, the sitcom was never anything to brag about." Yow! Zingaling!?! I haven't seen this remake yet, but in reading your official WOKJ review, I am shocked at your second hand dismissal of one of the cornerstones of classic sitcom history. The pairing of comic legend Jackie Gleason and Academy Award winner Art Carney is one of the all time funniest comedy teams of the 20th century. You are certainly welcome to your opinion, but I highly urge you to either do your own research, or get a better source of information from which to get your opinions. This does not match the quality of your usually well written material on this site! :down: I did ask people before writing that, and most agreed with that statement.
How many people did you ask, what ages etc.?
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:28 pm |
|
 |
BacktotheFuture
I'm Batman
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm Posts: 5554 Location: Long Island
|
The show was one of the greatest ever. Tsk, tsk Zing.
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:29 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Zingaling wrote: Um, I don't wish to make any wagers, nor do I care THAT much about whether some people liked a television show or not.
C'mon, don't get all defensive Zingaling - please note I was complimenting your writing on this site, with just this one point standing out like a sore thumb...
|
Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:33 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Well the vote in the TV forum is currently tied at:
"never anything to brag about" 50% ( 4 ) "an all-time comedy classic" 50% ( 4 )
...and was a lot closer than I would have ever imagined - I admit I was wrong about people's attitudes about this - so I apologize to Zingaling and stand corrected.
:???:
(I'm just glad I didn't ask whether other early movie comedians like Charlie Chaplin or Buster Keaton made "all-time classic comedies" or had any influence on the subsequent history of comedy in film...)
|
Wed Jun 29, 2005 7:26 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Hey - didn't anyone notice how I modeled mature forum debating technique in the post above? I admitted I was wrong and apologized to Zingaling depite his peevish responses to my constructive criticism.
(Of course, by commenting on it now, I have nullified my moral high ground, and shown my inner immature internet persona...)
:umn:
|
Thu Jun 30, 2005 5:20 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
bradley witherberry wrote: Hey - didn't anyone notice how I modeled mature forum debating technique in the post above? I admitted I was wrong and apologized to Zingaling depite his peevish responses to my constructive criticism.
(Of course, by commenting on it now, I have nullified my moral high ground, and shown my inner immature internet persona...)
:umn:
Hehe, that's one of the best posts I have read on here recently.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Jun 30, 2005 10:49 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: Hehe, that's one of the best posts I have read on here recently.
Gee, thanx Doc - coming from you thet really does mean alot!
(qv: above - re: further debasement)
|
Fri Jul 01, 2005 2:10 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40260
|
C
It wasn't that bad. I didn't like the whole dog-racing plotline, but when it wasn't focusing on that it had some funny moments. I don't see what was so bad about what Omar Epps did either, its not like he set out to do some real acting anyways. Hes just just being a comedian.
P.S. The Honeymooners tv show is good Zing. Usually I don't like old material like that, but it actually holds up really nicely. I actually laughed in it, more than I do while watching The War at Home or other things on the air nowadays.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sun Nov 27, 2005 3:13 am |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|