So you don’t misunderstand me, I’m not saying that believing the “plot” is immature or childish to my species, or that taking it literally is immature or childish; I’m saying that taking it seriously whatsoever, or giving any objective credibility whatsoever to its intended meaning is immature or childish. Being interested in its intended meaning, or human (Homo Sapien) cultural or human interests, is completely immature and childish to my species. Being interested in any human relationships in context of the intended meaning of the “plot” is also immature and childish to my species.

Your post also is a perfect example of your complete ignorance of my species and our “human nature”, if it can even ultimately be called that. Your criticism is completely irrelevant as concerns me or my species, you don’t understand why I allow myself to make mistakes, or why I try when I do. In my experience, Homo Sapien takes almost everything out of context, and essentially always misinterprets what I do or say based on their own experience, perspective, or premises.

You can also disagree with 2+2= 4, and you can test it if you want, but you should be lying to yourself if you have any doubts about the results. Obviously it easy to predict with a simple calculation, but most things Homo Sapien says, may not be obvious and simple to them, but are to me (that’s probably why I like Box Office predictions; although I never really tried (I always wanted to post for fun, although you guys annoy and stress me out), it is sufficiently complex; most complex topics Homo Sapien has historically studied have been like Mathematics, and Physics, without human interaction). Anyway, my species can also even understand complex topics without doubt, but that’s not relevant to any current discussion on the internet. Or the future as concerns any other species.

If you think it’s predictable that I tell you that you have no right to disagree, it’s because I’m right, and the right answer to a simple problem should be unsurprising, even obvious. If you want to continue to deny and continue to double down when you should be obviously wrong, it’s either your mistake, or it’s inhuman (or inhumane) to expect to you admit you’re wrong and accept reality. Either way, you need to disengage and end the conversation in any form.

So you don’t misunderstand me, I’m not saying that believing the “plot” is immature or childish to my species, or that taking it literally is immature or childish; I’m saying that taking it seriously whatsoever, or giving any objective credibility whatsoever to its intended meaning is immature or childish. Being interested in its intended meaning, or human (Homo Sapien) cultural or human interests, is completely immature and childish to my species. Being interested in any human relationships in context of the intended meaning of the “plot” is also immature and childish to my species.

Your post also is a perfect example of your complete ignorance of my species and our “human nature”, if it can even ultimately be called that. Your criticism is completely irrelevant as concerns me or my species, you don’t understand why I allow myself to make mistakes, or why I try when I do. In my experience, Homo Sapien takes almost everything out of context, and essentially always misinterprets what I do or say based on their own experience, perspective, or premises.

You can also disagree with 2+2= 4, and you can test it if you want, but you should be lying to yourself if you have any doubts about the results. Obviously it’s easy to predict with a simple calculation, but most things Homo Sapien says, may not be obvious and simple to them, but are to me (that’s probably why I like Box Office predictions; although I never really tried (I always wanted to post for fun, although you guys annoy and stress me out), it is sufficiently complex; most complex topics Homo Sapien has historically studied have been like Mathematics, and Physics, without human interaction). Anyway, my species can also even understand complex topics without doubt, but that’s not relevant to any current discussion on the internet. Or the future as concerns any other species.

End: Human relations based on the narratives, rules, or structures of any other species (such as Homo Sapien), besides my own.

I don’t really see what you even want to argue about besides some silly blame game at this point. As if you imply that you’ll try to keep responding to every topic I mention, but claim that I’m trying to continue the “debate” forever rather than you. You want me to also explain 2+2=4? It’s simple: the problem is that you’re trying to challenge what I said despite being warned. It will end whether you like it or not, or whether you want it or not.

If you try to continue I will next remove your right and ability to claim or believe that your irrational morality deserves any tolerance, is good in any way whatsoever, is not completely inferior, and deserves to be permitted or deserves survival.

You will stop this conversation because you do not want this consequence. It would not be foolish or gullible of you to avoid rejection of my pity and patience. Your alibi of permanent immaturity by the standards of my species will not be rejected. No possible response, challenge, disagreement, or opinion of yours will ever possibly be equal, sufficient, tolerable, or acceptable. I am right, and you are wrong in every possible relevant way including every possible relevant way that could be considered “moral”. I am right, and kind, and objectively morally right in every possible and relevant way, and you are wrong, foolish, disgusting, and abusive in every possible and relevant way. Only objective and true morality matters, and your subjective morality is not permitted. Your feelings that fail to comply are irrelevant in every way but your own self-interest.

TLDR: Your feelings, opinions, and morality are completely subjective and selfish. You lack the ability to know the difference between right and wrong in any objective sense. I am right to be angry. The only possible reason you don’t deserve to be hated is that you permanently lack the ability to demonstrate the required maturity. You can’t be responsible for something you are completely unable to address.

Every possible reason you could fail to comply with what I’ve said is foolish. Your every possible claim, argument, knowledge, and awareness, you think you have, in relation to me, my species, or the truth, fails, and definitively will never do anything but fail. You’re not qualified or capable whatsoever to debate me on any serious matter. You completely, totally, permanently, and definitively lack the ability to comprehend my serious content in any serious, relevant, or significant way,

Well, I’ll say this: he certainly cares a lot more about the “people”, the “United States”, or democracy than I do. His ego also needs it: he needs the attention, ratings, and votes.

If you offered me the presidency for free, I’d reject it. I always could have taken it if I really wanted to, but I reject it. Not only that, but I’d rather ultimately go to war. Not only because it’s right, and because compromise is completely unacceptable, unrealistic and untenable, but because it’s what “the people” deserve. Opinions that oppose have no future whatsoever.