Author |
Message |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 20348 Location: Where they shot Knock at the Cabin
|
Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
I’d say Charlie’s Angels. It looks so bad.
|
Sun Jul 07, 2019 12:51 pm |
|
|
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 18880 Location: San Diego
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
Terminator probably has a huge budget.
If Charlie's Angels cost more than $100m Sony is stuuuupid.
I think it all depends on budgets but I can see Angels being a big flop if it's pricey and does less than 200m WW.
|
Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:00 pm |
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 21890 Location: Places
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
They seriously may have been better off just not calling it Charlies Angels. There is zero nostalgia for that brand for whatever reason. Very similar to Power Rangers, Men in Black, etc
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:21 pm |
|
|
Barrabás
llegó a la casa vía marítima
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm Posts: 6139 Location: la gran casa de la esquina
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
Excel wrote: They seriously may have been better off just not calling it Charlies Angels. There is zero nostalgia for that brand for whatever reason. Very similar to Power Rangers, Men in Black, etc Hollywood still thinks that brand recognition = butts in seats.
_________________ .
|
Sun Jul 07, 2019 4:00 pm |
|
|
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 18880 Location: San Diego
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
I mean... if this was a generic movie it'd probably do Spy Who Dumped Me numbers. I think with a push it should at least do $55m+ domestic.
|
Sun Jul 07, 2019 4:14 pm |
|
|
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21152 Location: Massachusetts
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
Terminator
I don’t expect either one to do well, but Terminator probably has the bigger budget. I also don’t think CA looks that bad, whereas Terminator... They need a new trailer soon.
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Sun Jul 07, 2019 5:21 pm |
|
|
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 22681 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
Hopefully both tanking will help November films like Ford V Ferrari, Doctor Sleep, ABTitN, Midway and Knives Out.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Sun Jul 07, 2019 7:59 pm |
|
|
lesterg
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:40 am Posts: 1339
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
I don't know how much it would have helped box office wise, but I don't know why they didn't bring in Drew Barrymore to fill the Elizabeth Banks role in Charlie's. Seems like a no brainer.
_________________
|
Mon Jul 08, 2019 2:14 pm |
|
|
lilmac
Veteran
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 12:07 am Posts: 3130
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
Charlie's Angels...not even close. You saw the trailer, right?
I think T:DF will do well actually.
_________________ I believe in God as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
I was blind, but now I see.
|
Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:34 pm |
|
|
nghtvsn
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm Posts: 11015 Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
At least I have a history with Terminator and a willingness to check it out.
Angels looks like trash compared to Terminator
_________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
|
Thu Jul 11, 2019 8:42 am |
|
|
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 38018
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
I can't pick cause they're both bombing. Charlie's Angels I'll say.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu Jul 11, 2019 11:09 am |
|
|
Dil
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:48 pm Posts: 8942 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
I can definitely see both bombing big time, but if the rumors are true that Dark Fate has a $150-$200M budget than that should win by a landslide. I doubt this new Charlie's Angels has that big of a budget, but I could see it performing similar to the new MIB.
|
Thu Jul 11, 2019 2:37 pm |
|
|
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21641 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
It's kind of sad that CA looks like Transporter refueled and probably has a budget of 110. Terminator at least has international numbers to fall back on, but I actually see it outgrossing Salvation and Genisis stateside. I feel there is such low expectations it'll surprise. CA on the other hand should be lucky to hit 60 million.
_________________Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Thu Jul 11, 2019 9:20 pm |
|
|
lilmac
Veteran
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 12:07 am Posts: 3130
|
Re: Terminator vs Charlie’s Angels: the bigger bomb?
Cameron is to Dark Fate what Kevin Feige is to the new Sony Spidey movies. This will have his DNA and will see good legs I think.
_________________ I believe in God as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.
I was blind, but now I see.
|
Thu Jul 11, 2019 9:36 pm |
|
|