| Author |
Message |
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Posts: 21547
Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: AFI Top 10 I'm not saying HP should have been nominated for BP. I'm simply saying that SW having 90% at RT means absolutely nothing for its Oscar prospects.
|
| Fri Dec 18, 2015 8:32 am |
|
|
|
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
|
Re: AFI Top 10 I kind of wonder if Potter had come out in November or December if it could have scored a BP nomination. I kind of think it got forgotten that year.
|
| Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:15 pm |
|
|
|
Biggestgeekever
I heet the canadian!
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:58 am
Posts: 5192
Location: The Great _______
|
Re: AFI Top 10 It probably wouldn't be hard to justify that Potter should have gotten a BP nom in the year that saw War Horse and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close get in.
|
| Fri Dec 18, 2015 11:25 pm |
|
|
|
BJ
Killing With Kindness
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
|
Re: AFI Top 10 zwackerm wrote: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 had 96% at RT and 87% at Metacritic. With a higher (8.3) average rating. So if you think Star Wars is going to get nominated, it's purely because of the box office? Of course Star Wars is "essential American cinema" or whatever, and it's the "first franchise" but Empire Strikes Back couldn't even get a nomination, and the is widely considered the high watermark of the franchise. The Force Awakens has an 8.3 (95% vs 96%, not much of a difference) as well. H8ta gotta do some research. I consider Potter7.1and7.2s lack of nomination yet an other stain on the asscar rep. _________________The Force Awakens
|
| Sat Dec 19, 2015 4:39 pm |
|
|
|
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
|
Re: AFI Top 10 Did Potter make the AFI top 10 that year?
|
| Sat Dec 19, 2015 6:27 pm |
|
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Posts: 21547
Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
Re: AFI Top 10 BJ wrote: zwackerm wrote: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 had 96% at RT and 87% at Metacritic. With a higher (8.3) average rating. So if you think Star Wars is going to get nominated, it's purely because of the box office? Of course Star Wars is "essential American cinema" or whatever, and it's the "first franchise" but Empire Strikes Back couldn't even get a nomination, and the is widely considered the high watermark of the franchise. The Force Awakens has an 8.3 (95% vs 96%, not much of a difference) as well. H8ta gotta do some research. I consider Potter7.1and7.2s lack of nomination yet an other stain on the asscar rep. It had an 8.2 rating when I checked. It went up. So it has an equal average rating, but a higher overall percentage, and at MC. It doesn't matter, because I think DH2 is an overall superior film in every respect, mainly because its not a glorified remake.
|
| Sat Dec 19, 2015 10:42 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: AFI Top 10 zwackerm wrote: BJ wrote: zwackerm wrote: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 had 96% at RT and 87% at Metacritic. With a higher (8.3) average rating. So if you think Star Wars is going to get nominated, it's purely because of the box office? Of course Star Wars is "essential American cinema" or whatever, and it's the "first franchise" but Empire Strikes Back couldn't even get a nomination, and the is widely considered the high watermark of the franchise. The Force Awakens has an 8.3 (95% vs 96%, not much of a difference) as well. H8ta gotta do some research. I consider Potter7.1and7.2s lack of nomination yet an other stain on the asscar rep. It had an 8.2 rating when I checked. It went up. So it has an equal average rating, but a higher overall percentage, and at MC. It doesn't matter, because I think DH2 is an overall superior film in every respect, mainly because its not a glorified remake. It's also not actually a movie, but simply one large showdown without a beginning or a middle. Had DH been one movie, its chances would have been better. _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Sat Dec 19, 2015 10:46 pm |
|
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Posts: 21547
Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
Re: AFI Top 10 Dr. Lecter wrote: zwackerm wrote: BJ wrote: zwackerm wrote: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 had 96% at RT and 87% at Metacritic. With a higher (8.3) average rating. So if you think Star Wars is going to get nominated, it's purely because of the box office? Of course Star Wars is "essential American cinema" or whatever, and it's the "first franchise" but Empire Strikes Back couldn't even get a nomination, and the is widely considered the high watermark of the franchise. The Force Awakens has an 8.3 (95% vs 96%, not much of a difference) as well. H8ta gotta do some research. I consider Potter7.1and7.2s lack of nomination yet an other stain on the asscar rep. It had an 8.2 rating when I checked. It went up. So it has an equal average rating, but a higher overall percentage, and at MC. It doesn't matter, because I think DH2 is an overall superior film in every respect, mainly because its not a glorified remake. It's also not actually a movie, but simply one large showdown without a beginning or a middle. Had DH been one movie, its chances would have been better. Just like Empire doesn't have a beginning or end.
|
| Sat Dec 19, 2015 10:47 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Re: AFI Top 10 zwackerm wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: zwackerm wrote: BJ wrote: zwackerm wrote: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 had 96% at RT and 87% at Metacritic. With a higher (8.3) average rating. So if you think Star Wars is going to get nominated, it's purely because of the box office? Of course Star Wars is "essential American cinema" or whatever, and it's the "first franchise" but Empire Strikes Back couldn't even get a nomination, and the is widely considered the high watermark of the franchise. The Force Awakens has an 8.3 (95% vs 96%, not much of a difference) as well. H8ta gotta do some research. I consider Potter7.1and7.2s lack of nomination yet an other stain on the asscar rep. It had an 8.2 rating when I checked. It went up. So it has an equal average rating, but a higher overall percentage, and at MC. It doesn't matter, because I think DH2 is an overall superior film in every respect, mainly because its not a glorified remake. It's also not actually a movie, but simply one large showdown without a beginning or a middle. Had DH been one movie, its chances would have been better. Just like Empire doesn't have a beginning or end. And your point is? Was ESB nominated for Best Picture? _________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:02 pm |
|
|
|
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm
Posts: 21547
Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
Re: AFI Top 10 Dr. Lecter wrote: zwackerm wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: zwackerm wrote: BJ wrote: zwackerm wrote: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 had 96% at RT and 87% at Metacritic. With a higher (8.3) average rating. So if you think Star Wars is going to get nominated, it's purely because of the box office? Of course Star Wars is "essential American cinema" or whatever, and it's the "first franchise" but Empire Strikes Back couldn't even get a nomination, and the is widely considered the high watermark of the franchise. The Force Awakens has an 8.3 (95% vs 96%, not much of a difference) as well. H8ta gotta do some research. I consider Potter7.1and7.2s lack of nomination yet an other stain on the asscar rep. It had an 8.2 rating when I checked. It went up. So it has an equal average rating, but a higher overall percentage, and at MC. It doesn't matter, because I think DH2 is an overall superior film in every respect, mainly because its not a glorified remake. It's also not actually a movie, but simply one large showdown without a beginning or a middle. Had DH been one movie, its chances would have been better. Just like Empire doesn't have a beginning or end. And your point is? Was ESB nominated for Best Picture? No but TFA apparently will be. I really hope Mad MAx gets in over TFA. Even if I found Star Wars more interesting overall, Mad Max is far more artful in its action and visuals than TFA, besides the cool creatures.
|
| Sun Dec 20, 2015 12:33 am |
|
|
|
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm
Posts: 4110
Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
Re: AFI Top 10 Not gonna lie: I mixed these ones up with the NBR Top 10, so I was wondering why a thread from three weeks ago had suddenly morphed into another zwack debate about Star Wars.  At any rate, though, I'm surprised by how well Straight Outta Compton has done thus far. I enjoyed it quite a bit, but I didn't think it would get any awards season support whatsoever.
_________________
This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
| Sun Dec 20, 2015 1:17 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
