Author |
Message |
Steve
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:09 pm Posts: 1890
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
It's too bad, I feel like something is wrong in the Actress categories..... Every year it seems like the Lead Actor and Supporting Actor categories are awash with potential candidates, and then the Lead/Supporting Actress categories always feel ho-hum, less memorable..... probably something to do with the general sexist bent of most commerce/art/movie-making. I'm pretty sure women are just as capable of acting as men.
When viewing movies, how often do I think to remember, "Wow, that chick had a really solid supporting role in her 23 minutes of screentime!"
For this year off the top of my head: Patricia Arquette, Boyhood ( I actually did make a mental note of her performance ) Saiorse Ronan, Grand Budapest ( she's damn good, sweet and true ) the daughter, Interstellar Birdman's wife, Birdman's daughter, Birdman Imelda Staunton, Taking Woodstock (or since that didn't come out this year..... Pride)
As far as Tilda Swinton in Snowpiercer..... I do remember my face doing a "what the fuck?" motion when I first saw she was nominated by some critics groups..... felt like a ridiculous farce of a performance..... but it WAS memorable and distinct. I may have to revisit that film, when I can get myself to do so.
_________________ how am I not myself?
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 9:45 pm |
|
 |
Steve
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:09 pm Posts: 1890
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Haven't seen Gone Girl yet, so can't comment on Carrie Coon. (though if the score is anywhere near as memorable, throbbing electro human emotional as Social Network..)
_________________ how am I not myself?
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 9:49 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Though I generally would agree, the leading actress category is actually really strong this year. Not only have at least our of the nominees delivered really strong performances (I have yet to see Still Alice), but we have also had Mia Waskikowska with a terrific turn in Tracks and Essie Davis doing a great job in The Babadook as wel as Hilary Swank actually being damn great in The Homesman. While several of them have not been in contention, I for myself, can easily find many worthy leading actress performances.
It goes without saying that leading actor is overstuffed too.
However, as far as supporting actor is concerned - I think it is equally weak this year to supporting actress or maybe just slightly stronger. Norton and Simmons obviously deserve to be there and I guess I would have nominated Duvall, but certainly not Hawke. I haven't see Foxcatcher yet, but seriously, outside of these no one else really comes to my mind as deserving.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 10:09 pm |
|
 |
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 19407 Location: San Diego
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
the Best Actress category this year is very, very solid. Pike and WItherspoon's performances both seem like they'd win in less competitive years.
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 10:20 pm |
|
 |
Steve
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:09 pm Posts: 1890
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Dr. Lecter wrote: Though I generally would agree, the leading actress category is actually really strong this year. Not only have at least our of the nominees delivered really strong performances (I have yet to see Still Alice), but we have also had Mia Waskikowska with a terrific turn in Tracks and Essie Davis doing a great job in The Babadook as wel as Hilary Swank actually being damn great in The Homesman. While several of them have not been in contention, I for myself, can easily find many worthy leading actress performances. Good point. I haven't seen ANY of these movies yet, that might be a factor. Yet still: Actor considerations tend to be from highly visible movies, Actress nominations less-so (Still Alice? Badabook? Homesman? Tracks? Wild? Two-Days One Night? versus: American Sniper, Foxcatcher, Birdman, Grand Budapest, Genius-homo/Genius-invalid movies, sorry I love movies but don't live in a big city nor do I keep up to date on worthwhile performances) Dr. Lecter wrote: However, as far as supporting actor is concerned - I think it is equally weak this year to supporting actress or maybe just slightly stronger. Norton and Simmons obviously deserve to be there and I guess I would have nominated Duvall, but certainly not Hawke. I haven't see Foxcatcher yet, but seriously, outside of these no one else really comes to my mind as deserving. I do think Simmons is IDEAL and deserving material here, Norton also very very good, but Hawke was only 'expectedly solid,' he's done better work elsewhere. Haven't seen the other performances.
_________________ how am I not myself?
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 10:22 pm |
|
 |
Steve
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:09 pm Posts: 1890
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
publicenemy#1 wrote: the Best Actress category this year is very, very solid. Pike and WItherspoon's performances both seem like they'd win in less competitive years. I admit my ignorance in discussing this now, I really need to see GG and Wild.
_________________ how am I not myself?
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 10:23 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Steve wrote: Genius-homo/Genius-invalid movies All-time classic 
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 10:27 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Actresses that I made a mental note of in 2014 were Sally Field, Essie Davis, Mia Wasikowska, Rosamund Pike, and Lorelei Linklater. All the rest were just 'actresses in films', and the nominees for Best Actress and Supporting Actress in this year's Oscars were just 'actresses in Oscar films'. Nothing special for me, unless I hadn't seen them yet.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:41 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Your love for The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is weird, dude.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:43 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
I have my reasons.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:45 pm |
|
 |
Steve
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:09 pm Posts: 1890
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Algren wrote: and Lorelei Linklater. YES! That one occurred to me and happenchance I forgot to list her previously. That'd make my 5: Pat Arquette and Lorelei Linklater, Boyhood Saiorse Ronan, Grand Budapest Hotel Mackenzie Foy, Interstellar Amy Ryan and Emma Stone, Birdman
_________________ how am I not myself?
|
Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:58 pm |
|
 |
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Patricia Arquette, Boyhood Dorothy Atkinson, Mr. Turner Marion Bailey, Mr. Turner Sandrine Kiberlain, Violette Melanie Lynskey, Happy Christmas
_________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:33 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Algren wrote: I have my reasons. Does Marc Webb have some private gay orgy photos of yours?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:56 am |
|
 |
movies35
Forum General
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm Posts: 8627 Location: Syracuse, NY
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
I actually think the line up in quite strong. The only one I feel is undeserving is Laura Dern.
1. Emma Stone 2. Meryl Streep 3. Keira Knightley 4. Patricia Arquette 5. Laura Dern
_________________ Top 10 Films of 2016
1. La La Land 2. Other People 3. Nocturnal Animals 4. Swiss Army Man 5. Manchester by the Sea 6. The Edge of Seventeen 7. Sing Street 8. Indignation 9. The Lobster 10. Hell or High Water
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:31 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Knightley did absolutely NOTHING in The Imitation Game. I like her a lot, but she was a non-factor in her film.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:35 am |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Knightley is a terrible actress. I haven't seen the film, but I presume she's just included because the film is respected, not because of her performance.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:37 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
That's it, David is not gonna bottom for you for the next three months. Enough is enough.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:39 am |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
I'm already on a 2-monther for hating The Zero Theorem. 
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:45 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Damn man, time to pull out those shirtless Sly pics again, it's jerk-off-time.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:47 am |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Mod gave me permission to post porn! That^ was just a teaser. 
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:10 am |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 11:11 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
You must have shot your load several times before you were physically able to press "submit" 
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:36 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Sharon Stone and Kurt Russell turn me off.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Sun Jan 18, 2015 6:33 pm |
|
 |
zwackerm
Hold the door!
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:26 pm Posts: 21549 Location: West Chester, Pennsylvania
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Keira Knightley is damn gorgeous though. Too bad she smokes.
|
Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:06 pm |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68321
|
 Re: Best Supporting Actress: who SHOULD win?
Gorgeous for a 16-year old boy.
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:26 pm |
|
|