Author |
Message |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
 FHM'S 100 SEXIEST WOMEN: Angelina #1, Jennifer Garner #2
1. Angelina Jolie
2. Jennifer Garner
3. Paris Hilton
4. Charlize Theron
5. Halle Berry
6. Alyssa Milano
7. Teri Hatcher
8. Pamela Anderson
9. Scarlett Johansson
10. Lindsay Lohan
11. Keira Knightly
12. Salma Hayek
13. Cameron Diaz
14. Leeann Tweedon
15. Mariah Carey
16. Jessica Simpson
17. Beyonce Knowles
18. Carmen Electra
19. Maria Sharapova
20. Jennifer Love Hewitt
21. Jessica Biel
22. Jessica Alba
23. Brooke Burke
24. Jenna Jameson
25. Heidi Klum
26. Vida Guerra
27. Christina Aguilera
28. Kristin Kreuk
29. Faith Hill
30. Gwen Stefani
31. Jennifer Lopez
32. The Olsen Twins
33. Shania Twain
34. Beth Ostrocky
35. Many Moore
36. Josie Maran
37. Janet Jackson
38. Eva Longoria
39. Adriana Lima
40. Reese Witherspoon
41. Jennifer Aniston
42. Jamie-Lynn DiScala
43. Tara Reid
44. Maggie Grace
45. Elizabeth Hurley
46. Eliza Dushku
47. Kate Hudson
48. Anna Benson
49. Natalie Portman
50. LeAnn Rimes
51. Penelope Cruz
52. Mischa Barton
53. Eva Mendes
54. Jenny McCarthy
55. Katherine Heigl
56. Lucy Liu
57. Jennie Finch
58. Maggie Gyllenhaal
59. Amanda Righetti
60. Kate Bosworth
61. Estella Warren
62. Anna Kournikova
63. Landi Swanepoel
64. Sarah Michelle Geller
65. Gisele Bundchen
66. Neve Campbell
67. Uma Thurman
68. Catherine Zeta-Jones
69. Nicole Kidman
70. Emaa Bunton
71. Kate Beckinsale
72. Katie Holmes
73. Morgan Webb
74. Heather Graham
75. Evangeline Lilly
76. Shakira
77. Rachel Bilson
78. Kaley Cuoco
79. Amanda Beard
80. Sofia Vergara
81. Ashanti
82. Denise Richards
83. Molly Sims
84. Alessandra Ambrosio
85. Kelly Ripa
86. Mayra Veronica
87. Jamie Pressly
88. Jennifer Connelly
89. Monica Bellucci WTH??? TOO LOW!!! [-x
90. Kristi Leskinen
91. Logan Tom
92. Kelly Clarkson
93. Jennifer Hanson
94. Courtney Hansen
95. Alicia Keys
96. Brande Roderick
97. Natalie Gulbis
98. Milla Jovovich
99. Rebecca Romijn Stamos
100. Roselyn Sanchez
http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/200 ... OE=LIFISVA
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:12 am |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
EWWW PARIS HILTON IS SO NOT HOT!
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:13 am |
|
 |
Korrgan
problem?
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am Posts: 15515 Location: Bait Shop
|
Ooohhh!! Glad to see that Milla Jovovich ranked. She is quite hot, and I would certainly turn lesbian for her. 
_________________
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:17 am |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
neostorm wrote: EWWW PARIS HILTON IS SO NOT HOT!
FACE IT!!! she is!!!, she may be trashy and skanky, she is hot!, but i dont agree at are rank
garner is beautiful, but i dont think she deserves to be at #2, Charlize Theron is better looking than her DAMMIT!
Nice to see Kelly Clarkson on the List, she is pretty hot!
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:18 am |
|
 |
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 19373 Location: San Diego
|
Yeah... Paris Hilton is not hot.
There are quite a few near the bottom that should be ranked in at least the top 50.
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:20 am |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
 Re: FHM'S 100 SEXIEST WOMEN: Angelina #1, Jennifer Garner #2
What, exactly, are they smokin'?!
Jesus Christ.
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:23 am |
|
 |
xXVincentxX
La Bella Vito
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 9146
|
Paris Hilton looks like a damn peacock! I cannot believe she made the list. I am happy my baby Angelina was number one, and what's up with Jennifer Garner being #2? I thought this was sexiest woman, not men.
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:28 am |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
Hilton made the list because it's sexiest, not hottest nor cutest. She can flaunt her boobs...
Although Theron might be hotter, she certaintly isn't sexier.
But, yeah, Hilton isn't that attractive. She's got a nice body, I guess, but that's it...
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:35 am |
|
 |
Bell
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:02 am Posts: 1906 Location: Middle Of Nowhere
|
feels good to know that Scarlett is on the top 10.
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:18 am |
|
 |
Joker's Thug #3
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am Posts: 11130 Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
|
Hatcher, Hilton, and Garner in the top 10? [-(
_________________ "People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 4:43 am |
|
 |
Algren
now we know
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm Posts: 68237 Location: Seattle, WA
|
 Re: FHM'S 100 SEXIEST WOMEN: Angelina #1, Jennifer Garner #2
box_2005 wrote: 1. Angelina Jolie SHOULDN'T BE NUMBER 1 2. Jennifer Garner I CAN-NOT BELIEVE IT, HOW THE...WHAT THE......FFS! 3. Paris Hilton NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 4. Charlize Theron 5. Halle Berry THATS ABOUT RIGHT. 6. Alyssa Milano SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 7. Teri Hatcher 8. Pamela Anderson 9. Scarlett Johansson 10. Lindsay Lohan 11. Keira Knightly SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 12. Salma Hayek 13. Cameron Diaz 14. Leeann Tweedon 15. Mariah Carey 16. Jessica Simpson 17. Beyonce Knowles 18. Carmen Electra 19. Maria Sharapova 20. Jennifer Love Hewitt SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 21. Jessica Biel 22. Jessica Alba SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 23. Brooke Burke 24. Jenna Jameson LOL 25. Heidi Klum 26. Vida Guerra 27. Christina Aguilera 28. Kristin Kreuk 29. Faith Hill 30. Gwen Stefani SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 31. Jennifer Lopez SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 32. The Olsen Twins WHY THE FUCK ARE THEY EVEN ON THE LIST! 33. Shania Twain 34. Beth Ostrocky 35. Many Moore 36. Josie Maran 37. Janet Jackson 38. Eva Longoria SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 39. Adriana Lima SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER!!!!!!!!!!! 40. Reese Witherspoon 41. Jennifer Aniston 42. Jamie-Lynn DiScala 43. Tara Reid 44. Maggie Grace 45. Elizabeth Hurley 46. Eliza Dushku 47. Kate Hudson 48. Anna Benson 49. Natalie Portman 50. LeAnn Rimes 51. Penelope Cruz SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 52. Mischa Barton 53. Eva Mendes SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 54. Jenny McCarthy 55. Katherine Heigl 56. Lucy Liu SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 57. Jennie Finch 58. Maggie Gyllenhaal 59. Amanda Righetti 60. Kate Bosworth 61. Estella Warren 62. Anna Kournikova 63. Landi Swanepoel 64. Sarah Michelle Geller 65. Gisele Bundchen 66. Neve Campbell SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 67. Uma Thurman 68. Catherine Zeta-Jones 69. Nicole Kidman 70. Emaa Bunton 71. Kate Beckinsale SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER!!!!! 72. Katie Holmes 73. Morgan Webb 74. Heather Graham 75. Evangeline Lilly 76. Shakira 77. Rachel Bilson SHOULD BE MUCH HIGHER 78. Kaley Cuoco 79. Amanda Beard 80. Sofia Vergara 81. Ashanti 82. Denise Richards 83. Molly Sims 84. Alessandra Ambrosio 85. Kelly Ripa 86. Mayra Veronica 87. Jamie Pressly 88. Jennifer Connelly 89. Monica Bellucci WTH??? TOO LOW!!! [-x 90. Kristi Leskinen 91. Logan Tom 92. Kelly Clarkson 93. Jennifer Hanson 94. Courtney Hansen 95. Alicia Keys 96. Brande Roderick 97. Natalie Gulbis 98. Milla Jovovich 99. Rebecca Romijn Stamos 100. Roselyn Sanchez
_________________STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE FREE TIBET LIBERATE HONG KONG BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 7:23 am |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
What a terrible list. Paris Hilton? Uma? No Julia?
I'm glad Faith and Shania both made the list, however.
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:00 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Paris Hilton at #3?
This is the end of the world as we know it.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:26 am |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
The list is based on who is in the news right just as much as it is based on attractiveness level. As long as Paris Hilton gets alot of press, she will be high on the list.
This year's list is better then last years, given FHM it is not that bad.
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:57 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Ripper wrote: The list is based on who is in the news right just as much as it is based on attractiveness level. As long as Paris Hilton gets alot of press, she will be high on the list.
Yep, it is based on popularity.
I remember I bought the British film magazine Empire some months ago and they had a list of 100 sexiest film stars ever (men and women mixed).
Funnily enough, Johnny Depp (#5), Keira Knightley (#1) and Orlando Bloom (#3) all landed in the TOP 5 while almost the entire cast of LOTR made the list somewhere 
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 8:59 am |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
Ripper wrote: The list is based on who is in the news right just as much as it is based on attractiveness level. As long as Paris Hilton gets alot of press, she will be high on the list.
This year's list is better then last years, given FHM it is not that bad.
You got it. They basically excluded everyone who is not well-known in the US, and those that are less popular are at the bottom (Bellucci???? Come on...).
Aiswarya Rai, for example, is not even present. Now, I don't know about you, but between her and Paris Hilton, well...that ain't even a match ; ).
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:31 am |
|
 |
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
|
box_2005 wrote: Ripper wrote: The list is based on who is in the news right just as much as it is based on attractiveness level. As long as Paris Hilton gets alot of press, she will be high on the list.
This year's list is better then last years, given FHM it is not that bad. You got it. They basically excluded everyone who is not well-known in the US, and those that are less popular are at the bottom (Bellucci???? Come on...). Aiswarya Rai, for example, is not even present. Now, I don't know about you, but between her and Paris Hilton, well...that ain't even a match ; ).
Precisely, this is not a ocntest of hwo is really the most attractive, though Jolie is a damn good choice. I think lastyear they picked Jessica SImpson, attractive yes, but hottest I do not think so. This is a populairty contest like voting for prom queen in high school. Bellucci ranked much higher when the Matrix was out, and she was in alot of films, now she is home taking care of a baby so she drops 50 spots..puh-lease. Rai may have a reputation as a bit of a bitch, but she bloody one of the most gorgeous women alive.
This counts tabloid press and numebr of stories on ET as much as it counts one's looks if not moreso.
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:02 am |
|
 |
Spidey
Teenage Dream
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:13 pm Posts: 10678
|
Jennifer Garner is not Top 10 material. Why is she #2?
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:22 pm |
|
 |
Tyler
Powered By Hate
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm Posts: 7578 Location: Torrington, CT
|
Connelly only #88?!
Paris Hilton and Diaz in the Top 20?!
Pamela Anderson #8?
_________________ It's my lucky crack pipe.
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:31 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
Ripper wrote: The list is based on who is in the news right just as much as it is based on attractiveness level. As long as Paris Hilton gets alot of press, she will be high on the list.
This year's list is better then last years, given FHM it is not that bad.
yup
forget fhm, even GQ and all other magazines put a disclaimer actually stating that the lists are based upon whos in and whos out right now as well .... so yea .. its not just about looks ..
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 1:08 pm |
|
 |
TonyMontana
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am Posts: 16278 Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
|
 Re: FHM'S 100 SEXIEST WOMEN: Angelina #1, Jennifer Garner #2
2. Jennifer Garner =D>
3. Paris Hilton  ick
45. Elizabeth Hurley
46. Eliza Dushku
51. Penelope Cruz :mirrorbow:
58. Maggie Gyllenhaal :Kiss:
64. Sarah Michelle Geller :grin:
71. Kate Beckinsale :2up: (wayyyy too low!!!)
76. Shakira =P~
89. Monica Bellucci - :woo: FHM is on crack... also way too low.
_________________
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:23 pm |
|
 |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
Hilton? Pam Anderson? ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:24 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Interesting list. Don't shoot me, I'm glad to see Garner up there.  But, then again, Paris Hilton at 3? Oh well... at least some of us aren't alone on thinking Garner is sexy! :wink: Eliza Dushku should be higher, but oh well.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:28 pm |
|
 |
tombraider17
Mr. and Mrs. Smith
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:21 pm Posts: 457
|
Out of the Top 10:
1. Angelina Jolie
2. Jennifer Garner
These two are perfect where they are
3. Paris Hilton
She doesn't even belong on the list
4. Charlize Theron
5. Halle Berry
Gorgeous, they deserve to be in the top 10
6. Alyssa Milano
I'm indifferent towards her, personally
7. Teri Hatcher
Switch her with Eva Longoria
8. Pamela Anderson
Doesn't belong on the list
9. Scarlett Johansson
10. Lindsay Lohan
Scarlett is good there. Lindsay is more like top 75, not top 10
_________________
The Skeleton Key: Best Horror Thriller of the Year
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:31 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Eek... I read that Pam was there, but didn't bother finding her on the list. Number 8?! Weird list... some good (Garner, Scarlett), some bad (Pam, Paris). I guess sex tapes help, eh? Eh?!... ehhh...
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Thu Mar 24, 2005 2:41 pm |
|
|