Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jun 08, 2025 5:16 am



Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines 

What grade would you give this film?
A 39%  39%  [ 12 ]
B 45%  45%  [ 14 ]
C 13%  13%  [ 4 ]
D 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 31

 Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines 
Author Message
The Antichrist
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:04 am
Posts: 1742
Location: Calisota
Post 
(Damn US, I can't post a quick reply when your avatar is the last of the page :tongue: )

I'm glad to see so many people liked it a lot. This movie wasn't treated well by our critics when it came out, and I do really think that time they made a big mistake. It's a very funny flick which has a great merit: it mocks the whole series with irony without making the film fall into a comedy. Great special effects and stunning ending, but unfortunately I can't say the same about the acting. Still, a surprisingly good movie, which definitely deserves many views.
A-- or 9/10

_________________
Image


Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:08 am
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21863
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Just watched it again recently. My Rankings go like this

Terminator 2- A+ one of the best films ever made
The Terminator A+ A kick ass science fiction horror movie
Terminator 3 Solid A

It holds up well. I do hope one day that they release it with the additional 15 minutes of footage. Its a little too short for being so epic, but whats there is awesome, and a great ending which is already said. Yes Cameron should have directed it, but its a solid installment in the franchise, I just hope part four without Arnold doesnt suck

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Wed Oct 03, 2007 9:08 pm
Profile
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
i still think the T-X was the best terminator.

_________________
I'm out.


Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:11 pm
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Michael. wrote:
i still think the T-X was the best terminator.



Really? I liked the evolution of the T-X but i remember that when they came out with the T-1000, that entire concept was so unique and allowed for so much creativity. The T-X really didn't add a new dimension.

Then again, i guess i'm being unfair. there really wasn't much more they could do with the robot.


Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:52 pm
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21863
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
bABA wrote:
Michael. wrote:
i still think the T-X was the best terminator.



Really? I liked the evolution of the T-X but i remember that when they came out with the T-1000, that entire concept was so unique and allowed for so much creativity. The T-X really didn't add a new dimension.

Then again, i guess i'm being unfair. there really wasn't much more they could do with the robot.


My only problem with the TX, who was a good villain, it almost seemed as though Arnold always had the upper hand. The T1000 took out Arnold in almost every fight, He seemed more Obsolete against him than the TX, but I suppose thats more in Cameron's intense fight scenes and very graphic violence.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Sun Oct 07, 2007 3:30 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Thegun wrote:
bABA wrote:
Michael. wrote:
i still think the T-X was the best terminator.



Really? I liked the evolution of the T-X but i remember that when they came out with the T-1000, that entire concept was so unique and allowed for so much creativity. The T-X really didn't add a new dimension.

Then again, i guess i'm being unfair. there really wasn't much more they could do with the robot.


My only problem with the TX, who was a good villain, it almost seemed as though Arnold always had the upper hand. The T1000 took out Arnold in almost every fight, He seemed more Obsolete against him than the TX, but I suppose thats more in Cameron's intense fight scenes and very graphic violence.


I agree with that. TX was a stepdown from T-1000 as far as indestructability goes.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:16 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
The T-1000 would have never gotten off the giant magnet.


Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:40 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21863
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
The Dark Shape wrote:
The T-1000 would have never gotten off the giant magnet.


If its liquid, Im pretty sure its not magnetized.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:01 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
The T-X's liquid metal was being sucked off.


Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:48 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21863
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
The Dark Shape wrote:
The T-X's liquid metal was being sucked off.


Yes, but it was getting away, She had a plain endoskeleton underneath as it was shown, thats how it held the weapons inside. T1000 was just liquid metal, so if anything the liquid could have went in shorted the wires out.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Mon Oct 08, 2007 3:58 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
The liquid metal was being sucked into the magnet. Since that's all the T-1000 was, he wouldn't have been able to take form (or T-X would have). She was only able to get away because she had the endoskeleton.


Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:04 pm
Profile
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Mindless Fun, but in terms of the Terminator mythology it wasn't needed.

C+

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:43 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
This is the best Terminator movie.

Very fun and actually the plot here is the strongest of the three. TS is just noise and is irrelevant.

I know people are nostalgic or whatever or are okay liking T1/2 because it's critically acclaimed or whatever but to me, at least the first one, had a plot that would be ripped to shreds in this day and age.

Now, sequels, as I have said, are easier to forgive in a sense because they don't have to develop the character as much but you think they have because well, of all the previous flicks, so I have no qualms about anything that happened in T3.

And for all the hoo-ha about Cameron, well, if people are so critical of him now, he hasn't changed all that much. Avatar was Pocahontas and Ferngully, and Terminator is a plot hole. It's special effects masking up his deficiencies once again only it's 30 years later and special effects aren't so special anymore.

The action in his films, especially T2 is pretty memorable and stand-out, but let's not throw so much praise that it was a well-told story or anything. Since I have no attachment at all, and have just watched all three films in the past 2 weeks, I can say that I enjoyed this the most and not be disappointed or whatever.

_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m


Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:17 pm
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
The plot here is basically just a rehash of T2, with a ballsier ending. How does that make it the strongest?

And the first one has an airtight plot. It's only once you get into the sequels and "changing the future" that things get dicey.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:12 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
T1's plot is great. The issue is that some people, for whatever reason, can't wrap their heads around the fact it's a circle. John Connor never had a father who wasn't Kyle Reese.


Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:09 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
I think we can all agree that The Sarah Connor Chronicles is the best part of the Terminator franchise!

... no?

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:39 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
No.

Though the last five or so episodes of season two were really, really great.


Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:01 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
The Dark Shape wrote:
No.

Though the last five or so episodes of season two were really, really great.


Agreed. Too bad the rest of the show wasn't that good. Had the potential to be too.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:42 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
trixster wrote:
The plot here is basically just a rehash of T2, with a ballsier ending. How does that make it the strongest?

And the first one has an airtight plot. It's only once you get into the sequels and "changing the future" that things get dicey.


Maybe I got ahead of myself. It and T2 are on par.

T1's plot is:

Terminator/Reese goes back in time to kill/save Sarah Connor, mother of John Connor. Sarah is not pregnant and would be in the blast zone once Judgment Day goes off.

John Connor, in the future, knows Reese is to be his father. Wait, what?

So, if everything goes to plan, the actual timeline is:

Sarah Connor gives birth to John, Judgment Day happens, John is leader, sends Reese back.

How does John get born when Reese hasn't been sent back the first time round?

This also doesn't take into account that the romance is so artificial. Reese loves a picture. Talk about a loser. It's like Avatar's romance, or typical Hollywood/superhero trope of needing a romantic sub-plot which is half-baked.

_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m


Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:52 am
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
There is no "first time round". There is only one timeline, in which Reese gets sent back to protect Sarah Connor and impregnates her. He is always John Connor's father.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:26 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
trixster wrote:
There is no "first time round". There is only one timeline, in which Reese gets sent back to protect Sarah Connor and impregnates her. He is always John Connor's father.


This.

T2 muddles this with 'no fate but what we make' (which isn't part of Reese's message), but in T1 it's always a circle. There's no first time through. Reese goes back and fathers John, while at the same time leaving the Terminator for Cyberdyne to develop from.


Thu Aug 25, 2011 1:22 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
I specifically remember him being sent back by John Connor though.

The photo he has of her, for example, is given to him by John.

So, if he's not sent back by John the first time he goes back through the timeline, then who sends him back and why does he have the picture?

_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m


Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:52 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
There is no first time.

Again, it's a circle. He always went back in time to father John. Sarah was always grieving for Reese when that picture was taken. John gives the picture to Reese knowing he's his father.

Around and around it goes. There's no beginning point.


Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:55 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Back to the Future really fucked up time travel narratives, didn't it?

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:12 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
Seriously. Even Terminator Salvation plays by the BTTF rules for no apparent reason.


Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:06 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.