Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 11:55 am



Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
 Britney goes topless...reveals "rocky" marriage 
Author Message
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post Britney goes topless...reveals "rocky" marriage
Damage control of sorts towards the chokes-on-dick i mean lollipop thread;


Britney talks to Allure about her marriage where photos of her topless are featuring in the March 2005 issue
Image
OOPS she did it...already

Image
"We hit a little bit of reality, hardcore, after the first three weeks. But we handled it fine and now things are starting to go really smooth," said Britney.

Britney said adjusting to living with Kevin, her backup dancer, after knowing him for a few months was to blame.

"Before we got married we were on tour, and we were like kids, ordering room service, saying, 'Lets go out tonight.' And then all of a sudden you have this home, you have the kids, you have the diapers, get the dogs to the vet. It's this whole reality, you know," Britney told Allure.

Hubby Kevin told Access Hollywood's Billy Bush their marriage would always be a work in progress.

_________________
I'm out.


Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:54 pm
Profile WWW
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
Image

Better ways to sleep...with Britney Spears

_________________
I'm out.


Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:56 pm
Profile WWW
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
I don't consider those photos topless. I mean yeah she's technically not wearing a top but you don't see any more than you would if she was on a beach wearing an ordinary bikini.


Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:57 pm
Profile WWW
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
The media does
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&lr=&r ... 98168.html

_________________
I'm out.


Tue Mar 08, 2005 4:02 pm
Profile WWW
Draughty

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
Post 
Yeah I know the media does, that was my point, that the media is puritanical and silly to use the word topless for photos like that.


Tue Mar 08, 2005 4:04 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post 
Archie Gates wrote:
Yeah I know the media does, that was my point, that the media is puritanical and silly to use the word topless for photos like that.


It's not puritanism, it's sensationalism.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Tue Mar 08, 2005 4:18 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:22 pm
Posts: 2226
Location: Pearl River, Mississippi
Post 
she's like mould

_________________
Image


Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:48 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post Re: Britney goes topless...reveals "rocky" marriag
Michael wrote:
Image


this is a pretty old photo.....


Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:53 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1906
Location: Middle Of Nowhere
Post 
nice photos.


Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:48 am
Profile ICQ WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post Re: Britney goes topless...reveals "rocky" marriag
matatonio wrote:
Michael wrote:
Image


this is a pretty old photo.....


Christ, just pose for Playboy and get it over with will ya?? :-k It's obvious she wants to be Nude so get it over with and let Heff offer you some $$$ in doing so..

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:13 am
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:22 pm
Posts: 3285
Location: WA state baby!
Post 
what a attention whore. I would never let a little girl near her.

_________________
I claim matatonio as mine!!! a.k.a my sweets


Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:09 am
Profile YIM WWW
problem?

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am
Posts: 15515
Location: Bait Shop
Post 
Because she's an attention whore, you wouldn't let a young girl near her? I guess no woman should go near a young girl then. Including myself. It's not like she's going to preach sluthood to her. Atleast not in person. She'd just pop in a DVD of all her videos and let it go from there. :razz:

I really don't think Britney's that bad in real life. Only in her videos and when she needs to put on a show for the paparazzi and magazines is she a tramp.

_________________
Image


Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:16 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:22 pm
Posts: 3285
Location: WA state baby!
Post 
Korrgan wrote:
Because she's an attention whore, you wouldn't let a young girl near her? I guess no woman should go near a young girl then. Including myself. It's not like she's going to preach sluthood to her. Atleast not in person. She'd just pop in a DVD of all her videos and let it go from there. :razz:

I really don't think Britney's that bad in real life. Only in her videos and when she needs to put on a show for the paparazzi and magazines is she a tramp.


Its the image she gives. I don't like that okay. I don't like how she dresses and little girls look upto her and this is what she does? I'm sure shes a nice person but who do you think buys her music? alot of girls 15 and under really look up to her.

_________________
I claim matatonio as mine!!! a.k.a my sweets


Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:46 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
^^^you are saying that like the girls are the victims here, where are there parents that suppose to be protecting the kids from the things they see on tv or magazines


Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:07 pm
Profile
problem?

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am
Posts: 15515
Location: Bait Shop
Post 
Yep, you can't put the entire blame on Britney. Not at all. It's just as much the parent's responsibility as it is Britney's or Christina's, who I think is far sluttier, IMO.

_________________
Image


Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:42 pm
Profile
Speed Racer

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 9:56 pm
Posts: 140
Location: Not at BOM
Post 
Mold Yes
I like "attention whore" kind of the new millenium way of saying there is no such thing as bad publicity.

In response to the Playboy question: simple Answer: they did not offer her enough money

As for the "When": Dont worry after 2 more CD's and marriages and cancelled tours, she'll release a best-of or a live collection and when it tanks, and sells like 9000 copies in its first week, on the Billboard top 1023, she will make her comeback via Playboy. The boob thing worked for Janet.

_________________
Signature goes here


Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:04 am
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:22 pm
Posts: 3285
Location: WA state baby!
Post 
matatonio wrote:
^^^you are saying that like the girls are the victims here, where are there parents that suppose to be protecting the kids from the things they see on tv or magazines


Yes its a huge part of the parents resposibility to watch what their kids watch. But Spears 5yrs ago or whenever she started looked like the sweet neighbore girl next door. Now shes not and no matter how hard you try kids will always find away to see or do something.

Korrgan wrote:
Yep, you can't put the entire blame on Britney. Not at all. It's just as much the parent's responsibility as it is Britney's or Christina's, who I think is far sluttier, IMO.


I agree with you there.

_________________
I claim matatonio as mine!!! a.k.a my sweets


Thu Mar 10, 2005 12:50 am
Profile YIM WWW
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
I do find it funny how Britney Spears is pinned with the problems of pop culture as a whole - mostly thanks to the way the media are doing what they do to every artist that gets too big - they are trying to pull Spears off the top of her game. [which isnt really working Her record sales were way up from her third album in 2004/2005 inspite of the hundreds of unflattering paparazzi pics of her literally everywhere.]

Mothers band together to slam her "outrageous" behaviour. Shes a stunningly attractive, hot bodied singer; and shes the queen of maniuplating one fact

SEX SELLS.

Make no mistakes that Britney Spears is a very smart woman in that respect - she runs multi million dollar industries off her sex appeal. She knows how to launch her career to new heights even when creatively she may be in a rut.
Even in the beginning with her virginal look - she dressed as a schoolgirl and made every teenage boy in the world discover a new level of masturbation with one video; shes based her career on a mixture of sex appeal, imaginative videos and brilliant pop songs.

But as for Spears being this bad example? When she released her third album "Britney" and it did....not so great across the globe, it became clear that going with the bubblepop angle wasn't going to work any more - the sales were sliding, the singles were bombing and her fanbase had grown up and it was time for her sound to grow up too.

So "In the Zone" and its singles were such big hits [considering everything that was pitted against it ie a cancelled tour, only 3 singles as a result of injury and lack of global promotion] and stopped the sliding of Spears' sales because she presented a more grown up image of herself, and a more grown up sound to go with it; lots of RnB overtones and i cant remember the last time i went into a club and heard Britney Spears until 2004 when it seems everywhere was playing her "in the zone" songs.

Sure her sexy new image may not be to the tastes of five year olds or their moms, but its certainly more appealing to her original fanbase who are now in their late teens and in a world where sex is far more important than it ever has been.
Lets just say i saw about 2 kids at her latest "Onyx Hotel" tour where she simulated masturbation, threesomes and lesbian action. Its not exactly PG13 stuff, nor is her new music or image.

_________________
I'm out.


Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:19 pm
Profile WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32580
Location: the last free city
Post 
Y'all let me know when she's really topless. ;)

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:26 pm
Profile
Star Trek XI
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:44 am
Posts: 341
Post 
I really cannot stand her idiot husband. Why do I think he's an idiot? Well, besides the hundreds of pics of him with about 100 lopsided hats it's the way he speaks.

http://www.thesuperficial.com/archives/000731.html


Fri Mar 11, 2005 4:32 pm
Profile WWW
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
The husband MUST go.
Everyone knows that since Jennifer Lopez got one it became unfashionable!

_________________
I'm out.


Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:23 pm
Profile WWW
now we know
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:31 pm
Posts: 68230
Location: Seattle, WA
Post 
I wish she'd stop with the whole "look at me, i'm fabulous" thing..it lame. She is ugly. And 'yes' she should do Playboy, Porn, snuff...anything just to get her out of out valuble reading space on pages of the newspaper...

_________________

STOP UIGHUR GENOCIDE IN XINJIANG
FIGHT FOR TAIWAN INDEPENDENCE
FREE TIBET
LIBERATE HONG KONG
BOYCOTT MADE IN CHINA



Sat Mar 12, 2005 6:37 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 22 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.