Author |
Message |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
 What are the WORST Oscar wins ever? Summary on Page # 4
What are the WORST Oscar wins ever?
List that bad choice or also what you felt should have won in its place.
Last edited by Goldie on Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sat Nov 20, 2004 9:08 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Guess no one has had any problems with any past Oscar winners, Maybe this year there will be some complaints.
|
Sun Nov 28, 2004 9:52 pm |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
Ok, how about A Beautiful Mind. It's not a bad movie but I thought The Fellowship Of The Ring, Moulin Rouge!, and Gosford Park were all better.
|
Sun Nov 28, 2004 10:49 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Braveheart.
|
Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:58 am |
|
 |
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm Posts: 6499 Location: Down along the dixie line
|
LOTR:ROTK
_________________
|
Mon Nov 29, 2004 2:33 pm |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
Titanic
|
Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:31 pm |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
Titanic
|
Mon Nov 29, 2004 4:31 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
The English Patient :Sleep:
|
Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:11 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Shakespeare in Love (a great movie) winning Best Picture over Saving Private Ryan (a masterpiece).
|
Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:28 pm |
|
 |
Chris
life begins now
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:09 pm Posts: 6480 Location: Columbus, Ohio
|
Libs wrote: Shakespeare in Love (a great movie) winning Best Picture over Saving Private Ryan (a masterpiece).
Agreed.
Also, Braveheart winning over Fargo.
|
Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:40 pm |
|
 |
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 19368 Location: San Diego
|
Sean Penn winning for Mystic River. (ALL 4 of the other nominees were better)
Beautiful Mind winning over Moulin Rouge! and Fellowship.
|
Mon Nov 29, 2004 9:30 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
Chris wrote: Libs wrote: Shakespeare in Love (a great movie) winning Best Picture over Saving Private Ryan (a masterpiece). Agreed. Also, Braveheart winning over Fargo.
It was actually The English Patient that won over Fargo. :wink:
And while I enjoyed Braveheart, its win is proof that the Academy just loves its good ol' epics.
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:17 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Dkmuto wrote: Chris wrote: Libs wrote: Shakespeare in Love (a great movie) winning Best Picture over Saving Private Ryan (a masterpiece). Agreed. Also, Braveheart winning over Fargo. It was actually The English Patient that won over Fargo. :wink: And while I enjoyed Braveheart, its win is proof that the Academy just loves its good ol' epics.
Also, that year had one confusing lineup and no frontrunners all along. It's also one of the weakest years ever in term of which films are nominated. The two strongest pictures coming in were Appolo 13 and Sense and Sensibility, and neither was able to get its director nominated, probably because there was still bias toward Ron Howard and Ang Lee. What else? Babe was an animated film, and Il Postino was a foreign language film. So if you analyze the field after the nominations, you have to say Braveheart was the logical choice for the academy members. That's why I wouldn't choose Braveheart as the most undeserving given what they nominated that year.
As for which films they should've nominated that year, I'd pick The Usual Suspects, Toy Story, Dead Man Walking, and Leaving Las Vegas, and if Braveheart had beaten them, then I'd say it's definitely undeserving.
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:31 am |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
I would have taken any of the winners that year. I would rather have seen Howard win for Apollo (a much, much better film than A Beautiful Mind).
Babe should have won that year though.
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:38 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
For me, the worst win in recent years is Gladiator. No surprise, considering how I felt about Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. I also agree on Shakespear in Love over Saving Private Ryan and English Patient over Fargo. If we go way back, there is also The Greatest Show on Earth, probably the worst Oscar winner ever, over High Noon.
Last edited by xiayun on Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:40 am |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
andaroo wrote: I would have taken any of the winners that year. I would rather have seen Howard win for Apollo (a much, much better film than A Beautiful Mind).
Babe should have won that year though.
I'd choose Apollo 13 too, but without a best director nod and with Tom Hanks the 2-time reigning Best Actor, I knew they wouldn't go for Apollo 13.
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:42 am |
|
 |
Miruvor
Veteran
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:08 pm Posts: 3165 Location: New Zealand
|
lovemerox wrote: LOTR:ROTK
Blasphemy!!
Of course you entitled to your opinion. It's because I was in the film right? lol
_________________ 'The stars in the sky... Bring tears to my eyes... They're lighting my way... tonight.
And I haven't felt so alive.. In years.'
MOS

|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 1:12 am |
|
 |
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm Posts: 6499 Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Mirûvor wrote: lovemerox wrote: LOTR:ROTK Blasphemy!! Of course you entitled to your opinion. It's because I was in the film right? lol
lol, nah. Mystic River was more deserving. I think ROTK was good, but not that good. I also think 12 grams and Monster should have been nominated
_________________
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:02 am |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11028
|
Libs wrote: Shakespeare in Love (a great movie) winning Best Picture over Saving Private Ryan (a masterpiece).
I agree.I was so pissed when it won over SPR. :evil:
Others that didnt deserve to win:
The english patient
Gladiator
A beautiful mind
Chicago
Chariots of fire
Kramer Vs Kramer
The Sting
|
Tue Nov 30, 2004 4:39 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
With the Oscars coming up, any other bad wins come to mind?
_________________ *
WARNING*****GOLDIE POSTING****WARNING
**
COVER YOUR EYES
***
HIDE YOUR WOMEN & CHILDREN
****
HIT THE IGNORE BUTTON
*****
BUT REMEMBER*****GOLDIE*****ALWAYS KNOWS THE RIGHT/BETTER ANSWER
******
THIS HAS BEEN A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT BROUGHT TO YOU BY GOLDIE
*******
|
Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:22 am |
|
 |
Riggs
We had our time together
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am Posts: 13299 Location: Vienna
|
andaroo wrote: Braveheart.
Serious?
|
Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:04 pm |
|
 |
Riggs
We had our time together
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am Posts: 13299 Location: Vienna
|
Worst Oscar Win Ever: Chicago
|
Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:05 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Let's hope that none get added to this list tommorrow night!
Know what I mean? hehe
_________________ *
WARNING*****GOLDIE POSTING****WARNING
**
COVER YOUR EYES
***
HIDE YOUR WOMEN & CHILDREN
****
HIT THE IGNORE BUTTON
*****
BUT REMEMBER*****GOLDIE*****ALWAYS KNOWS THE RIGHT/BETTER ANSWER
******
THIS HAS BEEN A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT BROUGHT TO YOU BY GOLDIE
*******
|
Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:58 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Annie Hall beating Star Wars.
|
Sat Feb 26, 2005 10:05 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
Geez, I may not always disagree with the Oscar winners, but usually the winner at least deserves the award, even if there was a better film that year in my opinion. I mean, "Shakespeare in Love" is a very good film that no one would be whining about if it "Saving Private Ryan" had been released a year later.
To me, undeserved Oscar winners are those that shouldn't even have been nominated. Films that you just go "What kind of studio pressure got this film considered?" because there is no other reason for it to be there. Mostly, I'd say that was the case in the mid years of Oscar, where crappy big budget studio films like "Around the World in 80 Days", "The Greatest Show on Earth" and "Gigi" won.
In the last 30 years though, I'd have to say the snore-fests "Chariots of Fire" and "Kramer verses Kramer" would be high on my list of "Why were these even nominated?" (espeially since they beat out "Raiders of the Lost Ark" and "Apocalypse Now" -- I mean, does anyone even watch those two Oscar winners any more?)
And this doesn't even go into the films that should have been nominated and never even were, like "2001" (which lost to "Oliver!"...)
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:09 pm |
|
|