Author |
Message |
Biggestgeekever
I heet the canadian!
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 12:58 am Posts: 5192 Location: The Great _______
|
 Re: District 9
|
Sat Aug 22, 2009 5:38 pm |
|
 |
MARVEL_ROCKS
Forum General
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm Posts: 8202
|
 Re: District 9
hmmm I will avoid your avatar review.
|
Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:03 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: District 9
Another thought that came to mind after watching this: When Aliens and the mothership landed in Africa like 10 years ago and the Government is shuffling them out of the ship down to the surface, where was the Quarantine factor for humans with a dangerous organism from another planet blending in with one another??? It was never really mentioned just like how humans were able to understand Alien language that consisted of grunting and snorting when they spoke??? How the hell do you decipher any language through grunting and snorting???
|
Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:37 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
 Re: District 9
MR. GREEN wrote: It was never really mentioned just like how humans were able to understand Alien language that consisted of grunting and snorting when they spoke??? How the hell do you decipher any language through grunting and snorting??? You match the sounds made to the behaviour, look for patterns, then come up with an outline of the structure of their language. For example: An alien says "click-clo-click" while observing a new object The alien then bites the object, says "lick-clo-click", and throws the object away. The alien moves on to a new object, a can of food, says "click-clo-click" again, bites the object, and gets to the food. The alien then says "nick-clo-click" You've observed that scenario, and now you try to make a guess as to what those sounds mean. For example: "Click-clo-click" = "Is this food? I want food" "Lick-clo-click" = "No, this is not food/I don't want this object" "Nick-clo-click" = "Yes, this is food/I want this food" Then you test it out. You take a can of food, then yell "Click-clo-click" to the alien. The alien looks up, approaches you, looks at the can, asks "Nick-clo-click", you say "Nick-clo-click". So, "This is food"; "Is this really food?", "Yes, this is food" If you play around with the language, you can try to guess that "click-" means "I want" or "Is this?", that "lick" means "no/not", that "nick" means "yes." The alien eats it, and says "Ick-Ock", and goes away. You make a guess that "Ick-Ock" means "thank you" or "I am satisfied" Next time, an alien gives you an object. You say "Ick-Ock", and the alien looks happy. So it seems "Ick-Ock" really does mean something like "thank you" And so on.
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:01 pm |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
 Re: District 9
Box wrote: MR. GREEN wrote: It was never really mentioned just like how humans were able to understand Alien language that consisted of grunting and snorting when they spoke??? How the hell do you decipher any language through grunting and snorting??? You match the sounds made to the behaviour, look for patterns, then come up with an outline of the structure of their language. For example: An alien says "click-clo-click" while observing a new object The alien then bites the object, says "lick-clo-click", and throws the object away. The alien moves on to a new object, a can of food, says "click-clo-click" again, bites the object, and gets to the food. The alien then says "nick-clo-click" You've observed that scenario, and now you try to make a guess as to what those sounds mean. For example: "Click-clo-click" = "Is this food? I want food" "Lick-clo-click" = "No, this is not food/I don't want this object" "Nick-clo-click" = "Yes, this is food/I want this food" Then you test it out. You take a can of food, then yell "Click-clo-click" to the alien. The alien looks up, approaches you, looks at the can, asks "Nick-clo-click", you say "Nick-clo-click". So, "This is food"; "Is this really food?", "Yes, this is food" If you play around with the language, you can try to guess that "click-" means "I want" or "Is this?", that "lick" means "no/not", that "nick" means "yes." The alien eats it, and says "Ick-Ock", and goes away. You make a guess that "Ick-Ock" means "thank you" or "I am satisfied" Next time, an alien gives you an object. You say "Ick-Ock", and the alien looks happy. So it seems "Ick-Ock" really does mean something like "thank you" And so on.  This post made me really laugh LOLOL
|
Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:47 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
 Re: District 9
hA! Great stuff Box.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Sun Aug 23, 2009 7:21 am |
|
 |
nghtvsn
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm Posts: 11016 Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
|
 Re: District 9
for Fantastic Fantasy Fiction Film
_________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
|
Sun Aug 23, 2009 8:31 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: District 9
Box is a brilliant man!!!
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sun Aug 23, 2009 11:57 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: District 9
Chip Munkington wrote: Box is a brilliant man!!! Yeah, he's so brilliant that he gave me a half ass answer for a question that really was legit.. DISTRICT-9 is a damn good movie, I'll give it that, but it does have a plot hole here and there, 2 of which I've mentioned, but Box is too much of a puss to give an actual answer and instead, has to mock my questions as a result and because of that, this makes you pathetic..
|
Mon Aug 24, 2009 4:09 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: District 9
That post made LESS sense than Box's post.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:05 pm |
|
 |
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm Posts: 21572
|
 Re: District 9
MR. GREEN wrote: Chip Munkington wrote: Box is a brilliant man!!! Yeah, he's so brilliant that he gave me a half ass answer for a question that really was legit.. DISTRICT-9 is a damn good movie, I'll give it that, but it does have a plot hole here and there, 2 of which I've mentioned, but Box is too much of a puss to give an actual answer and instead, has to mock my questions as a result and because of that, this makes you pathetic..Well they had 20 years to decipher the language so it wouldnt be so hard as putting 1 and 1 together. Their culture is more evolved than human beings and if humans are able to communicate with chimps and gorillas through sign language, I guess its possible to make out sounds from one another. Maybe that Michael Scott guy had a very good ear
|
Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:32 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: District 9
I thought it was a mess.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:36 am |
|
 |
2001
Another You
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:38 am Posts: 4556
|
 Re: District 9
Original sci-fi story + Aliens that feel + humans to deeply hate and care for + bodies blowing up + African gangsters + crazily cool alien guns + breathtaking alien ship shots + docu style + awesome CGI/action = BEST FILM OF THE YEAR
Every aspect of this was really stunning, the only "good" part I'd consider was when Wikus combined with the robot. It also succeeds in becoming unpredictable with the help of strategic marketing. It was worth the long wait for me to see a straight up awesome film for this year.
A
|
Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:01 pm |
|
 |
Argos
Z
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm Posts: 7952 Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
|
 Re: District 9
4/10.
Edit: It got worse.
_________________ "Der Lebenslauf des Menschen besteht darin, dass er, von der Hoffnung genarrt, dem Tod in die Arme tanzt." - Arthur Schopenhauer
Last edited by Argos on Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:46 am |
|
 |
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am Posts: 6245
|
 Re: District 9
is this the new version of CCOBB for the snobs?
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:38 am |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: District 9
please do not use acronyms for forgotten movies
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:40 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: District 9
trixster wrote: I thought it was a mess. The above reviews are quoted in their entirety. I find it interesting how all the negative reviews for this film are so short... Jesus Christ wrote: Goktor Who wrote: Sorry for late review, but I liked it too much to let the thread rest undisturbed! Two weeks ago, I walked out of District 9 feeling elated, since I was convinced that I had just witnessed the "completion" of science fiction. Not in terms of sci-fi cinema, but in terms of the genre itself. Wing Commander, Dune, Space Invaders, Red Mars... you name it; I felt that it had all been a dry run for District 9. In retrospect, that might be a bit much  but I mention it as an indication of how thoroughly I enjoyed this film, and just how hyped-up I was when I left the cinema. In the cold light of day, a lot of the story seems seriously hokey. The implausible plot points and sequel-baiting finale, nine times out of ten, would have been a deal breaker for me. The human-shaped prawns, admittedly, weren't as bad as the blue guys out of the Avatar trailer, but giving them recognisable father/son-style relationships should have lost me. In fact, now that the buzz has worn off, it's almost hard for me to believe just how impressed and engaged I was during the film, since (on paper at least) it's common-or-garden sci-fi. However, I have still given it an A, since that's the only sincere mark I can give it. In fact, it's in my all-time top ten. I don't find it hard to justify this to myself, because at the end of the day, the heart wants what the heart wants. Very few other films have astonished and affected me this much. Ultimately, it isn't the narrative that makes District 9 special, so the plot holes aren't about to sink the boat. The grist of the film is the astonishing lead performance, which elevates sci-fi staples from The Fly, Enemy Mine, and even - I'm thinking of the alien weapons and immigration angle here - parts of Men in Black to the level of superb cinema. I'm not a "crier", but I teetered on the edge of tears at the giant robot suit scene towards the end. Equally, I had a lump in my throat during the much earlier (technically fairly silly) weapons test, and that's purely because of Sharlto Copley's performance ("no sir, I will not"). The emotional punch stuns you to the point where you are unlikely to think, "Why don't they just chop the alien's hands off and use them to operate the guns, if it's about the DNA?" - or even, returning to the first example, "Wow, how cheesy is a giant robot suit?" It's not a con. I don't mean to suggest that the emotional journey distracts you from otherwise fatal plot holes. It's simply that the film is the emotional journey. Watching District 9 for a watertight narrative is like watching Eraserhead for the acting. It's simply not what the film is about. Ebert complained that, "despite its creativity," District 9 "remains space opera and avoids the higher realms of science-fiction." He thinks that the third act is "standard shoot-out action." He's missed the point. The success of the film is proving that space opera and standard shoot-out action, when directed properly and acted well, can be as emotionally rich as anything else you care to mention. Compare and contrast with "standard shoot-out action" like Transformers 2, Independence Day, or War of the Worlds. Neill Blomkamp and Sharlto Copley between them have raised b-movie subject matter to the level of great cinema. So ultimately, I'm not going to lose any sleep over how the ship remained airborne for twenty years. I just hope they don't make the sequel they've been hinting at. In fact, if I absolutely had to criticise something about this film, it would be the fact that it ends in a kind of expectant limbo. I don't want to take a gamble on a sequel to get closure. The universe of District 9 isn't coherant enough to survive being extended into a trilogy. By the way - judging from my peer group, this film has struck a chord with people who don't give a crap about sci-fi. i didn't read your review but i think you are lying. that said, i think the movie has still not been censored and only god knows why, but he will only tell me if i ask him and i won't because i'm busy right now. i'm drinking lemonade and typing this mesage so please god, don't interrupt me with my wishes because i'm very busy don't you thjink? BY THE WAY i hope that this movie will not win an oscar for any catergory such as best movie of all time or best schraubenzieher because it does not deserve it. it only deserves to be banned from the cinema in peru because they cannot show it completely because their screen was covered with daddy long legs, a whole living wall of daddy long legs, crawling like a carpet across the screen and therefore it (the movie) cannot be shown there because you would only be able to see half of it and we, the people of toronto, don't want this to happen because the movie is short. and of course one time the movie will be seen in the imax theater by many kids andthey will appear and cheer but that day the cinema will close because it cannot handle the noise, the neighbors called the police and said "HEY, MISTER, THEY ARE TOO FUCKIN' LOUD, IT IS ALMOST AS LOUD AS IN THE POMMESBUD WHEN THE OIL SPRINKLES VERY LOUD IN THE FRITTOISE! COME HERE AND STOP THEM WITH YOUR POLICE POWER FORCE AND WITH YOUR STICKS WE CANNOT HEAR OUR OWN WORDS OF HONOR WE WERE WATCHING TV, THE SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN STARRING LEE MAJORS AS THE BIONIC SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN (by the way six million dollar would not be enough for bionic equipment these days, it's alot more pricey now, probably even 6 billion) AND THEY WERE SO LOUD WE COULD NOT HEAR THE SOUND OF LEE MAJORS RUNNING IN SLOW MOTION WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE EXTREMELY FAST, THE ECHO WHOOSH SOUND SO TO SPEAK, SO COME HERE AND ARREST THEM ALL AND CLOSE THE CINEMA OR WE WILL CALL THE POLICE!", and then the police came in an ambulance (don't know why it was probably a trick) and officer marshmoses will step out of the car and SCREAM "HEY KIDS, COME ON OR YOU WILL BE RAPED" and then he holds up a puppet with the big penis and the kids will be scared and run to aserbaidjan, where they are shot by the military police led by yusuf marmeladesjan, but that's another story, they kids are shot and the cinema is closed by marshmoses and his gang of rapists and THEREFORE i think that the movie should be banned from theaters because this shall never happen again, neither in this world nor in any other, such as the moon, vega or hcoasdln. I gotta tell ya, District 9 really surprised me in it's relationship to outmoded political thought too! Just when I thought it was safe to go back in the theatre, I ended up being bombarded with neo-classical existentialistic crap like this. Even though I saw it over a month ago now, in the distant twinkle of August, it only just now came to me as I was walking down the boulevard next to my local coffee shop. The depths to which the director sinks here is a monument narcisstic ennui! To say that it's an underestimate of the verity of this scenario, is itself an underestimation - - it is Kubrickian in it's misrepresentation of the reality herein involved. And then, didn't I go and dig into an underutilized corner of my cortex and find a nugget of unvarnished you-whotitude. It was there waiting to be discovered and I only just realized that the scope of this picture is modelled on the original schema of The Maltese Falcon (not the Humphrey Bogart version). It is all laid clear for anyone with half a wit of sense to see - - the origin of subconscious wishes, the foundation of alien tropes, the roots of science fiction weather representations on extra-solar planets - - Yep! - - it's a monumental ironic coup... If only if all films were this transparent in their drive for goodness and light. What a world we'd share! But I digress, I must return to the main thrust of my missive: the shocking manner in which District 9 was purveyed upon an unsuspecting public. Honestly, it's just madness that such a travesty is permitted in our so-called free society. Why would the producers receive permission from the theatre companies to purportedly screen their product unseen? Who was in charge of this? Why did it slip by the corporate media watchdogs? Where were the interests of the powerless in our democratic society? When will the retribution ever commence? It all certainly bears witness to the fact that logic has become an outmoded means of reasoning nowadays. It is situations like this District 9 debacle which illuminate the background and allow the foreground to drop to the literal ground. It is a shining example of hierarchy debunked and deflowered in the cause of a wisdomectomy. We shall henceforth walk forward with pride and hope for the future mornings when we shall be free to saunter, nay lope towards the rising sun of certitude. We will take wing as a flock of true believers and fly the seemingly random patterns of the predator escaping species we have become. Not until the last telephone wire, nor the last fiberoptic communication cable have been sullied will we rest. This is a clarion call to action to everyone who has seen District 9 - - do not be misled - - this is the time to move! Resort to retort, if need be. Don't allow yourself or your compatriots to be silenced. Speak, whether you have been spoken to or not. Reply globally. Bring your words to the table and speak with your mouth full. It's not rude when it's in the service of a cause as critical as the one before us all. Send forth thy vowels and consonants in a neverending flow that shall rise to be a tidal wave of verbiage! Talk the talk... Without this type of resolve, this problem will only fester and continue to get worse until we have to amputate the withered limb. But if worse comes to worst, be strong and bite down on the proffered wad of cloth, while the surgeon goes about his work. For even then shall we hobble forth in our righteous quest. If need be, we will drag forward our devastated remains in a neverending crawl towards ultimate victory. Rest no more, fellow KJer's - - don't let this District 9 situation be repeated ad infinitum with future film enthusiasts. Without us all focusing our psychic energy on the goal before us, we will perish. It is the final turtle in the stack. One false move and it all topples. Keep your balance and we will all be the upright citizens that we know we can be in the perfect World of King James. Fight the good fight, dig in your heals, and go with the flow-ers.
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:14 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: District 9
trixster wrote: I thought it was a mess. The above reviews are quoted in their entirety. I find it interesting how all the negative reviews for this film are so short and undescriptive without any explanation as to why they thought it was such a bad movie... Jesus Christ wrote: Goktor Who wrote: Sorry for late review, but I liked it too much to let the thread rest undisturbed! Two weeks ago, I walked out of District 9 feeling elated, since I was convinced that I had just witnessed the "completion" of science fiction. Not in terms of sci-fi cinema, but in terms of the genre itself. Wing Commander, Dune, Space Invaders, Red Mars... you name it; I felt that it had all been a dry run for District 9. In retrospect, that might be a bit much  but I mention it as an indication of how thoroughly I enjoyed this film, and just how hyped-up I was when I left the cinema. In the cold light of day, a lot of the story seems seriously hokey. The implausible plot points and sequel-baiting finale, nine times out of ten, would have been a deal breaker for me. The human-shaped prawns, admittedly, weren't as bad as the blue guys out of the Avatar trailer, but giving them recognisable father/son-style relationships should have lost me. In fact, now that the buzz has worn off, it's almost hard for me to believe just how impressed and engaged I was during the film, since (on paper at least) it's common-or-garden sci-fi. However, I have still given it an A, since that's the only sincere mark I can give it. In fact, it's in my all-time top ten. I don't find it hard to justify this to myself, because at the end of the day, the heart wants what the heart wants. Very few other films have astonished and affected me this much. Ultimately, it isn't the narrative that makes District 9 special, so the plot holes aren't about to sink the boat. The grist of the film is the astonishing lead performance, which elevates sci-fi staples from The Fly, Enemy Mine, and even - I'm thinking of the alien weapons and immigration angle here - parts of Men in Black to the level of superb cinema. I'm not a "crier", but I teetered on the edge of tears at the giant robot suit scene towards the end. Equally, I had a lump in my throat during the much earlier (technically fairly silly) weapons test, and that's purely because of Sharlto Copley's performance ("no sir, I will not"). The emotional punch stuns you to the point where you are unlikely to think, "Why don't they just chop the alien's hands off and use them to operate the guns, if it's about the DNA?" - or even, returning to the first example, "Wow, how cheesy is a giant robot suit?" It's not a con. I don't mean to suggest that the emotional journey distracts you from otherwise fatal plot holes. It's simply that the film is the emotional journey. Watching District 9 for a watertight narrative is like watching Eraserhead for the acting. It's simply not what the film is about. Ebert complained that, "despite its creativity," District 9 "remains space opera and avoids the higher realms of science-fiction." He thinks that the third act is "standard shoot-out action." He's missed the point. The success of the film is proving that space opera and standard shoot-out action, when directed properly and acted well, can be as emotionally rich as anything else you care to mention. Compare and contrast with "standard shoot-out action" like Transformers 2, Independence Day, or War of the Worlds. Neill Blomkamp and Sharlto Copley between them have raised b-movie subject matter to the level of great cinema. So ultimately, I'm not going to lose any sleep over how the ship remained airborne for twenty years. I just hope they don't make the sequel they've been hinting at. In fact, if I absolutely had to criticise something about this film, it would be the fact that it ends in a kind of expectant limbo. I don't want to take a gamble on a sequel to get closure. The universe of District 9 isn't coherant enough to survive being extended into a trilogy. By the way - judging from my peer group, this film has struck a chord with people who don't give a crap about sci-fi. i didn't read your review but i think you are lying. that said, i think the movie has still not been censored and only god knows why, but he will only tell me if i ask him and i won't because i'm busy right now. i'm drinking lemonade and typing this mesage so please god, don't interrupt me with my wishes because i'm very busy don't you thjink? BY THE WAY i hope that this movie will not win an oscar for any catergory such as best movie of all time or best schraubenzieher because it does not deserve it. it only deserves to be banned from the cinema in peru because they cannot show it completely because their screen was covered with daddy long legs, a whole living wall of daddy long legs, crawling like a carpet across the screen and therefore it (the movie) cannot be shown there because you would only be able to see half of it and we, the people of toronto, don't want this to happen because the movie is short. and of course one time the movie will be seen in the imax theater by many kids andthey will appear and cheer but that day the cinema will close because it cannot handle the noise, the neighbors called the police and said "HEY, MISTER, THEY ARE TOO FUCKIN' LOUD, IT IS ALMOST AS LOUD AS IN THE POMMESBUD WHEN THE OIL SPRINKLES VERY LOUD IN THE FRITTOISE! COME HERE AND STOP THEM WITH YOUR POLICE POWER FORCE AND WITH YOUR STICKS WE CANNOT HEAR OUR OWN WORDS OF HONOR WE WERE WATCHING TV, THE SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN STARRING LEE MAJORS AS THE BIONIC SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN (by the way six million dollar would not be enough for bionic equipment these days, it's alot more pricey now, probably even 6 billion) AND THEY WERE SO LOUD WE COULD NOT HEAR THE SOUND OF LEE MAJORS RUNNING IN SLOW MOTION WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE EXTREMELY FAST, THE ECHO WHOOSH SOUND SO TO SPEAK, SO COME HERE AND ARREST THEM ALL AND CLOSE THE CINEMA OR WE WILL CALL THE POLICE!", and then the police came in an ambulance (don't know why it was probably a trick) and officer marshmoses will step out of the car and SCREAM "HEY KIDS, COME ON OR YOU WILL BE RAPED" and then he holds up a puppet with the big penis and the kids will be scared and run to aserbaidjan, where they are shot by the military police led by yusuf marmeladesjan, but that's another story, they kids are shot and the cinema is closed by marshmoses and his gang of rapists and THEREFORE i think that the movie should be banned from theaters because this shall never happen again, neither in this world nor in any other, such as the moon, vega or hcoasdln. I gotta tell ya, District 9 really surprised me in it's relationship to outmoded political thought too! Just when I thought it was safe to go back in the theatre, I ended up being bombarded with neo-classical existentialistic crap like this. Even though I saw it over a month ago now, in the distant twinkle of August, it only just now came to me as I was walking down the boulevard next to my local coffee shop. The depths to which the director sinks here is a monument narcisstic ennui! To say that it's an underestimate of the verity of this scenario, is itself an underestimation - - it is Kubrickian in it's misrepresentation of the reality herein involved. And then, didn't I go and dig into an underutilized corner of my cortex and find a nugget of unvarnished you-whotitude. It was there waiting to be discovered and I only just realized that the scope of this picture is modelled on the original schema of The Maltese Falcon (not the Humphrey Bogart version). It is all laid clear for anyone with half a wit of sense to see - - the origin of subconscious wishes, the foundation of alien tropes, the roots of science fiction weather representations on extra-solar planets - - Yep! - - it's a monumental ironic coup... If only if all films were this transparent in their drive for goodness and light. What a world we'd share! But I digress, I must return to the main thrust of my missive: the shocking manner in which District 9 was purveyed upon an unsuspecting public. Honestly, it's just madness that such a travesty is permitted in our so-called free society. Why would the producers receive permission from the theatre companies to purportedly screen their product unseen? Who was in charge of this? Why did it slip by the corporate media watchdogs? Where were the interests of the powerless in our democratic society? When will the retribution ever commence? It all certainly bears witness to the fact that logic has become an outmoded means of reasoning nowadays. It is situations like this District 9 debacle which illuminate the background and allow the foreground to drop to the literal ground. It is a shining example of hierarchy debunked and deflowered in the cause of a wisdomectomy. We shall henceforth walk forward with pride and hope for the future mornings when we shall be free to saunter, nay lope towards the rising sun of certitude. We will take wing as a flock of true believers and fly the seemingly random patterns of the predator escaping species we have become. Not until the last telephone wire, nor the last fiberoptic communication cable have been sullied will we rest. This is a clarion call to action to everyone who has seen District 9 - - do not be misled - - this is the time to move! Resort to retort, if need be. Don't allow yourself or your compatriots to be silenced. Speak, whether you have been spoken to or not. Reply globally. Bring your words to the table and speak with your mouth full. It's not rude when it's in the service of a cause as critical as the one before us all. Send forth thy vowels and consonants in a neverending flow that shall rise to be a tidal wave of verbiage! Talk the talk... Without this type of resolve, this problem will only fester and continue to get worse until we have to amputate the withered limb. But if worse comes to worst, be strong and bite down on the proffered wad of cloth, while the surgeon goes about his work. For even then shall we hobble forth in our righteous quest. If need be, we will drag forward our devastated remains in a neverending crawl towards ultimate victory. Rest no more, fellow KJer's - - don't let this District 9 situation be repeated ad infinitum with future film enthusiasts. Without us all focusing our psychic energy on the goal before us, we will perish. It is the final turtle in the stack. One false move and it all topples. Keep your balance and we will all be the upright citizens that we know we can be in the perfect World of King James. Fight the good fight, dig in your heals, and go with the flow-ers.
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:15 am |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: District 9
my review is short because I did not see the movie
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:16 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: District 9
snack<3 wrote: my review is short because I did not see the movie Between District 9 and The Hurt Locker, you seem to have plenty of opinions about films you neglected to see - - are you turning into the new BKB? be.redy wrote: 7/10 -> B-
The first 30-40 minutes that heavily featured the quasi-documentary style bored me to death. Not to mention that Wikus is a pretty irritating character and stays irritating throughout the movie. But once the movie shifted to "normality" and started to feature Christopher I quite dug it and gotten into it with ease. By the end it almost redeemed itself for a boring and uninteresting beginning.
The blatant social commentary isn't a big plus in my book. I can respect the notion but the way it was presented was pretty heavy handed and felt a bit awkward. The straightforward action sci-fi stuff redeemed the whole movie for me this time.
Overall I look forward to District 10. Though not directly referencing the comments above, I must bring attention to the thorough ineptitude with which reviewers are examining District 9 - - it is both shocking and reassuring at the same time. Based on the film theory of Laura Mulvey, we can be certain that director Neill Blomkamp was frimly ensconced on the path of neo-turpitude that informed all of the later works of Stephanie Heinrich. It is, however, only through the longitudinal study of psychoanalytic materialism in South African intellectual circles that we can even begin to assess the damage that Sharlto Copley has wrought in his choice in the role of Wikus van de Merwe. Without rhyme or reason he bludgeons his way through the part and severs whatever tenuous link the audience has with Colonel Koobus Venter, not to mention the entire Nigerian gang. What incredible lack of foresight engulfed Copley when he was nursing this part? Why wouldn't Blomkamp have stepped in and provided the necessary background materials for his preparation? These questions are very difficult to answer now in retrospect, but with the proper discipline may be probed by future archeologists. Still, we have to live with the results and it is only through repeated viewings of District 9 that we can approach an acceptable resolution to this problem. The matter of the secondary localized effects provided by Weta are a different story all together. The confused nature of the thematic influences is made solid in latex. And further compounding this issue, is the inorganic source references for the carbonic chains of synthesis. Yipes! What was Peter Jackson thinking when he signed off on that?!? Luckily, we are left with only the tertiary claims that the music of Johann Pachelbel provided an inordinate amount of leverage for the primary theme on the soundtrack. This can be easily dismissed as the ravings of the effete elites behind the musical mafia of Malawi. Those bastards have caused more than their share of trouble, and it is about on par with the ridiculousness of their claims here yet again. Let's revel in the fact that it isn't more universal!
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:18 am |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: District 9
I do not need to see movies to rate them now that Netflix can successfully predict my grades with startling accuracy.
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:23 am |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: District 9
besides, i have heard there are not enough explosions...
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 6:25 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40590
|
 Re: District 9
Fuck. Yeah. Very likely this ends up in my top 3 this year. It's a perfect blend of high octane action, a great on the run thriller, and smart social commentary. I like how the characters actually felt in danger, it was refreshing. I thought Christopher was about to die 3-4 times, and contemplated Blankomp could go with a downer, nihilistic, humans defeat the aliens as usual ending. I also thought it was possible Wikus would go down at some point and Chris would escape himself. The scene of Christopher's partner dieing really set up the danger throughout the piece for both characters
As for the commentary... I love never beats the audience over the head with exposition... it respects their ability to put the message together themselves.
The action is AWESOME. Again not only is the splatter and alien weapons cool, but it maintains a superb amount of tension and suspense throughout now that you're not sure if Wikus and Chris will survive or win. The human villains are fairly one noted and mwhahahah moustache twirling admittedly, but I saw them more as caricatures anyways and as blank and evil as the usual alien villain in these films are
A truly engrossing sci-fi and action blockbuster from start to back. Love it
5/5
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:49 pm |
|
 |
Argos
Z
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm Posts: 7952 Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
|
 Re: District 9
Shack wrote: It's a perfect blend of high octane action, a great on the run thriller, and smart social commentary. I think it is none of it.
_________________ "Der Lebenslauf des Menschen besteht darin, dass er, von der Hoffnung genarrt, dem Tod in die Arme tanzt." - Arthur Schopenhauer
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 2:18 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: District 9
trixster wrote: I thought it was a mess. because it is a mess.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:03 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 54 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|