Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:49 pm



Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
 The year's blockbusters 
Author Message
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post The year's blockbusters
So, after the Academy's stunning retreat back into the abyss of geriatric industrial masturbation, we know they aren't giving out anything major to films outside their preconceived notions. But still, TDK grabbed 8 nominations and Wall-E, 6, so they certainly made an impression to some. Iron Man got 2, as well. So how will this year's blockbusters perform?

We have Star Trek getting extremely positive reception and well on its way to restoring some credibility and relevance to the franchise. The most nominated film in the series prior has been The Voyage Home from '86, which got four nominations (Cinematography, Sound, Sound Editing, Score). The rest of the series has also been nominated in Art Direction, Visual Effects and Makeup at one point or another, but has never won a single Oscar. As long as the reception stays where it is and it makes $150 million total (which looks guaranteed now), I can certainly see something like three or four nominations in the techs, maybe Score, but I'm not sure where that is now. Five is really the upper limit, though.

Up should at least manage five barring less-than-great reviews. But I doubt that's happening. I think doubting an annual Screenplay nomination for any Pixar film with universal acclaim is foolish at this point, and they always seem good for the Sound categories as well. I'm not sure if there's a song, though. Giacchino needs to win one of these days.

Transformers 2? The year's POTC2, but I still don't see it winning Visual Effects over Avatar. Three nominations.

Harry Potter...I've noticed it will get a token few nominations as long as the film is considered an improvement over the last. The last one pissed some off, got nothing. Chamber Of Secrets, even I consider it to be far superior to the first, got nothing and was considered slightly worse for...some reason. But as long as Yates tows the line, and with a guy like Delbonnel lensing it, maybe a Cinematography nomination. Art Direction is a possibility, considering the magic-muggle world transition. Visual Effects will be tough, though.

Sherlock Holmes is also an interesting-looking project. As long as Downey keeps away from the extreme mediocrity and hard drugs, I think he'll nab an Oscar and certainly another nomination over the next few years. If it's actually very good, and he charms the shit out of us again, Costume Design and if the competition stumbles enough and the stars align, Actor.

And for the biggie, Avatar. No, it's not getting a Picture nomination. But the Academy DOES love James Cameron. He won 3 Oscars for Titanic, and though it only touched the major categories with an Actress nom, Aliens sort of pulled a Dark Knight and managed to get seven nominations. Don't forget Terminator 2, which won 4 Oscars and was nominated for 6. The only thing limiting it from absolutely devouring the competition in the technical categories is the mysteriousness of the project. None of us actually know what it looks like or exactly what and how tech things are applied in it, so that can definitely limit it to just the Sound categories and Visual Effects (Art Directors could get cold feet on the apparent lack of sets). But of course, to wonder if James Cameron will not deliver on a technical angle is denialism.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sat May 02, 2009 9:07 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Funny People for Best Original Screenplay, perhaps? Public Enemies could maybe pick up a few, although I don't know if any of them will be major categories.

Of the real "blockbusters," Avatar and Star Trek should be the two biggest winners.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Sun May 03, 2009 2:02 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
billybobwashere wrote:
Funny People for Best Original Screenplay, perhaps? Public Enemies could maybe pick up a few, although I don't know if any of them will be major categories.


Oh yeah, forgot Funny People. Could be Apatow's first nomination.

I'm not sold on Public Enemies. Art Direction, Costume Design, sure. But Michael Mann is not a consistent director and the film itself looks...eh.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sun May 03, 2009 2:12 pm
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
The only out-of-band major nomination chance beyond screenplay could be Gambon for supporting for Potter. It is rather juicy role and Gambon is pretty well known and respected. Not that I think it will happen.


Tue May 05, 2009 2:56 pm
Profile WWW
Z
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm
Posts: 7952
Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Gambon is a calamity.

_________________
"Der Lebenslauf des Menschen besteht darin, dass er, von der Hoffnung genarrt, dem Tod in die Arme tanzt."
- Arthur Schopenhauer


Tue May 05, 2009 3:00 pm
Profile WWW
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:28 pm
Posts: 2799
Location: Germany
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
A Calamity Jane

_________________
"Acting is the only thing I'm good at."
- Freddie Prinze jr.


Ator: I love you.
Sunya: And I love you.
Ator: Why can't we marry?
Sunya: Ator, we are brother and sister.
Ator: I'll talk with our father.


Tue May 05, 2009 3:07 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Christ, those Trek reviews are great. Could see six or seven nominations, at this rate.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Wed May 06, 2009 6:34 pm
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Argos wrote:
Gambon is a calamity.

Fits right in with the Oscars then, by my estimation.


Thu May 07, 2009 9:49 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Jon Tyler Lyrik wrote:
Christ, those Trek reviews are great. Could see six or seven nominations, at this rate.


Casino Royale had equally terrific reviews. Well almost. And got zero noms.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu May 07, 2009 5:01 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Jon Tyler Lyrik wrote:
Christ, those Trek reviews are great. Could see six or seven nominations, at this rate.


Casino Royale had equally terrific reviews. Well almost. And got zero noms.


The reviews have gone back down to earth a bit now. Point taken, but Bond films aren't generally technical monsters. Art direction, visual effects are rarely special, and even the sound or editing aren't generally that flashy. This one should be good for Art Direction or something of the ilk at the very least.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Thu May 07, 2009 5:04 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
If it weren't for Avatar, I believe this would have taken the Effects Oscar home (over Transformers 2).

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu May 07, 2009 5:06 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
I think Star Trek will get between Iron Man and TDK in terms of # of nominations.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Thu May 07, 2009 5:20 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Visual Effects
Art Direction
One, MAYBE two sound awards
MAYBE Cinematography
MAYBE Makeup

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Thu May 07, 2009 6:22 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
0


Sun May 10, 2009 1:50 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Not sure about Art Direction. Make-Up was dodgy at some spots, so it'll only get in if competition is weak.


I'm thinking:

Sound Editing
Sound Mixing
Visual Effects

That's probably it.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun May 10, 2009 9:49 am
Profile WWW
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
I don't know if it's considered a blockbuster, but any thoughts on The Wolfman's prospects? Will the fact Rick Baker already won for An American Werewolf in London hurt his chances here?

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sun May 10, 2009 11:28 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Makeup is probable (nothing is a lock in that weird, fucked-up category). Nothing else barring very good reception and box office.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Mon May 11, 2009 12:08 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Funny People is "an award-level thing".

I would be overjoyed if this could sneak into the Picture race. An Original Screenplay nod now sounds very likely.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Sun May 17, 2009 1:58 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Original Screenplay, yeah. Picture, well, maybe if it makes $230 million. The Truman Show didn't get nominated, after all. An Actor/Original Screenplay combo is what it will have to make due with, I guess.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Sun May 17, 2009 2:13 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Maybe Sandler will finally get his due.

Or he'll end up with Carrey... Stuck in comedy forever because they don't get rewarded for their great dramatic roles.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sun May 17, 2009 9:03 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Tyler wrote:
Original Screenplay, yeah. Picture, well, maybe if it makes $230 million. The Truman Show didn't get nominated, after all. An Actor/Original Screenplay combo is what it will have to make due with, I guess.
Truman Show didn't get nominated, but Four Weddings and a Funeral did. I guess it depends a lot on the competition, but it definitely seems to have the makings of the kind of dramedy that the Academy goes for, on the rare occasion that they go for one.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Mon May 18, 2009 10:29 pm
Profile WWW
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: The year's blockbusters
Well, Sandler's playing a dying man. So did Carrey, but Man On The Moon bombed.

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Tue May 19, 2009 2:28 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 22 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.