Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 10:29 am



Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 Something about The Reader we didn't think of... 
Author Message
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Dr. Lecter wrote:
billybobwashere wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Yeah and I agree, but with both not nominated there's no way to tell which exactly was snubbed. These two both look possible.
Considering TDK missed out on Screenplay and Wall-E had the Animated Feature barrier, I wouldn't be surprised if our sixth place movie was something like Revolutionary Road or Doubt, boring as that sounds. It doesn't seem like TDK/Wall-E came that close to sneaking in.


We'll never know.


But considering Revo Road didn't get a screenplay nod or a Best Actress nod, that's unlikely.


Considering TDK and WALL-E got 8 and 6 noms respectively...I'd say they were definitely #6 and #7.
Your point on Rev. Road is good, but not your one on TDK/Wall-E. Just because they got a lot of noms doesn't make them the movies just outside Best Picture. Each of those movies only received one major nomination (two if you count Animated Feature, but it's not like Bolt was #8 in the BP voting...), compared to a movie like Doubt, which received five. I'd say Doubt was probably close to a nom than they were. Though I'd love for the reality to be otherwise.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:13 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big ... or-sc.html

Quote:
As you may have noticed, when the academy announced "The Reader's" nomination, it had a big "TBD" sign next to the film, meaning that the academy hasn't settled the issue of which of the film's four listed producers are eligible to accept the Oscar if the film were to win. Upset over the scrum of producers who showed up on stage when "Shakespeare in Love" won for best picture a decade ago, the academy has a bizarre rule limiting a film to three producers, a rule that caused a furor when the academy arbitrarily disqualified two of the five "Little Miss Sunshine" producers when that film was up for best picture in 2007.

"The Reader's" producer credit issue is even more sensitive, since two of its four producers--filmmakers Anthony Minghella and Sydney Pollack--died last year before the film's release. The other two producers are Donna Gigliotti (one of the scrum of producers who won for "Shakespeare in Love" and a former USA Films production chief who made "Traffic" and "Gosford Park") and Redmond Morris, a veteran line producer and production manager who is a longtime Neil Jordan collaborator. After a lengthy vetting process, the Producers Guild recently recommended to the academy that all four producers share credit. But the academy isn't taking the PGA's advice, insisting that one of the four be excluded. Insiders say Morris will be the one to go, with Gigliotti and her late colleagues remaining the producers of record.

Interestingly, Morris didn't initially have a producer credit. But after Rudin took his name off the picture, Morris went to the Producers Guild and requested the credit, with Rudin's backing. Believing Morris had done ample work to merit the credit, the PGA approved him. By the time "The Reader" was released in December, his name was in the producer's credit box along with Gigliotti, Minghella and Pollack. As it stands, "The Reader" will end up as a true rarity--a film with three producers, all of whom have won Oscars.


So we have 3 Oscar winners as credited producers, 2 of which are dead.

Could Heath be one of several nominees receiving a posthumus Oscar?


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:29 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
The Academy has some damn weird rules. Only three producers allowed to be recognized, only one composer allowed for a Best Score nod, and God only knows what fucked up rule they have about Best Song, because I refuse to believe they didn't think Springsteen deserved a nomination for The Wrestler.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:36 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Blame Shakespeare in Love. It's the sole reason they changed the Producer credit rule.



Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:38 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Cut Harvey and Zwick, case closed.

Can't believe no one did that at the time. No-brainer.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:44 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
press release from the AMPAS

Quote:
Because four producers were listed on the credits form submitted for Oscar® consideration and Academy rules allow for only three producers – except in “a rare and extraordinary circumstance” – to be nominated and potentially receive Oscar statuettes, a meeting of the executive committee was necessary. In the end, the committee determined that the circumstances of “The Reader” – in which the two original producers (Minghella and Pollack) both died partway through the process – met its definition of “rare and extraordinary” and that all four submitted individuals should be named as nominees.


Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:58 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Boo

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:59 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
loyalfromlondon wrote:
press release from the AMPAS

Quote:
Because four producers were listed on the credits form submitted for Oscar® consideration and Academy rules allow for only three producers – except in “a rare and extraordinary circumstance” – to be nominated and potentially receive Oscar statuettes, a meeting of the executive committee was necessary. In the end, the committee determined that the circumstances of “The Reader” – in which the two original producers (Minghella and Pollack) both died partway through the process – met its definition of “rare and extraordinary” and that all four submitted individuals should be named as nominees.


They only allowed that because they know that it won't win anyway and even if it did, only two would walk up the stage and waste their time.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Tue Jan 27, 2009 8:37 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/files/2 ... rt-ac.html

Quote:
In addition to continuing to share with you my regular updates from the Academy member we're calling "Deep Vote" -- see memo one, memo two, memo three and memo four -- I am continuing to reach out to numerous other voters with whom I interact to try to get some new and hard data on the Oscar race as it enters its final days. While I openly acknowledge that it would take a much larger sample of conversations than I -- or anyone -- is having in order to formulate any statistically sound conclusions from these interactions, I still find them immensely interesting, and I hope you do too.

BRANCH: Acting
AGE: 60 to 70
NOTES: "I do not understand one winner -- how do you make that choice? ... I think it's unfortunate we have to choose one..., I always heard that A-list people often give their ballot to their publicists or whatever who get together at lunch and say, 'Who do we like? Well, he was very nice to me at the party,' and that's how they vote. It's garbage."

FINAL BALLOT INFORMATION PROVIDED

BEST PICTURE: "The Reader"
"I thought 'The Reader' was exemplary. I thought it was magnificently shot and directed -- flawlessly. I thought both of those performances are outstanding performances. I think the script -- I love the sophistication. That's a bad word -- the substance of that thing is just... you know, it's not about the flashiness and the money you throw at it. It's individual performances telling a story that is larger than the event. This isn't a Holocaust event; this is the maturation of that entire culture and the healing of that wound.... I think that 'Slumdog' is a marvelous film, beautifully done.... I think it is a Bollywood story in its entirety, sweetly done with very sweet people.... I saw the movie in a theater, I came out, and a number of people -- because they recognized me -- said, 'What'd you think of the picture?' I said, 'Yeah, I liked it.' They said, 'Yeah, it was wonderful! Is India really like that?' We have so little understanding of how people live in this world, and I think that was the revelation.... I think it's wonderful. But 'The Reader' -- his dilemma, his cowardice, his courage to look again and to realize that that judgment and suppression is destroying his ability to be alive, and to take his daughter back to that church, and tell the truth about his own cowardice -- I thought f-ck, that's good."
BEST DIRECTOR: Stephen Daldry ("The Reader")
BEST ACTOR: Sean Penn ("Milk")
"Sean's unique. Mickey, you know, bless his heart -- it's stunning, and it's great, and it's wonderful. But you want to talk about an actor? Sean Penn -- that's an actor. That's a transformation, that's embodying it, that's no holds barred."
BEST ACTRESS: Kate Winslet ("The Reader")
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: Heath Ledger ("The Dark Knight")
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY: David Hare ("The Reader")


Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:22 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Meh, for all we know The Dark Knight came in 7th or 8th for total votes. And for my money, The Reader was better than Frost/Nixon and Milk. Still, I'll be the first to admit to being shocked and dismayed when I first read about this, and Daldry's Best Director nomination is even more astonishing. I can only imagine what it would have been like had the BD nominees been Fincher, Van Sant, Nolan, Aronofsky, and Boyle.


Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:30 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
MovieDude wrote:
Meh, for all we know The Dark Knight came in 7th or 8th for total votes.


But this is an actual vote for Best Picture, not a hypothetical look at what could have been.


Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:32 pm
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
loyalfromlondon wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Meh, for all we know The Dark Knight came in 7th or 8th for total votes.


But this is an actual vote for Best Picture, not a hypothetical look at what could have been.


I'm not sure I follow you. Isn't the whole point of people being up in arms about The Reader that it "stole" The Dark Knight's hypothetical nomination? If the quality is an issue, I already stated that I personally believed it to be better than at least two of the other nominees. Alex Y. thought it was the best of them all!


Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:19 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
MovieDude wrote:
Alex Y. thought it was the best of them all!


yeah, and he's very, very wrong.


Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:22 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
MovieDude wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Meh, for all we know The Dark Knight came in 7th or 8th for total votes.


But this is an actual vote for Best Picture, not a hypothetical look at what could have been.


I'm not sure I follow you.


I prefer The Reader to win at this point. This thread is about it possibly upsetting the frontrunner.


Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:03 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40605
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
I think the Reader has the most meat of the noms and is better overall than Milk and Button. I have no problem with its inclusion

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:13 pm
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Shack wrote:
I think the Reader has the most meat of the noms and is better overall than Milk and Button. I have no problem with its inclusion


I think cock is irrelevant to this discussion.

_________________
k


Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:19 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
If The Reader wins Best Adapted Screenplay, I think it's going to take BP.


Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:24 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Don't be silly, The Reader ain't winning anything except for Actress.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:23 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Don't be silly, The Reader ain't winning anything except for Actress.


BUT if it does win Best Adapted Screenplay...


Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:26 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
That didn't help The Pianist to win Picture. And I'd say Slumdog is a stronger contender even than Chicago was.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:41 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Dr. Lecter wrote:
That didn't help The Pianist to win Picture. And I'd say Slumdog is a stronger contender even than Chicago was.


But it got BD, not a bad trade.


Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:45 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Yeah, I think that's the thing. The Pianist got all that because it was not only more raved over, it was actually a more important film (because it dealt with the Holocaust far more directly) and was coming from Polanski for whom it was a very personal story.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:48 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Something about The Reader we didn't think of...
Harvey on Slumdog

Quote:
I love Danny Boyle's movie. It's breathtaking. It's a shame they're going to come in second.


Quote:
Weinstein’s first salvo was to home in on the Academy’s aging Jewish population. Although he’s been trying to get all voters to see the movie, it’s no coincidence that he has screened The Reader at such Jewish cultural hot spots as the Skirball Center in Los Angeles and the 92nd Street Y in Manhattan, places where one is likely to find older voters with a deep connection to films about the Holocaust. ”When I went to a screening, I was one of about four people who didn’t have blue hair,” says one Academy member and former campaign engineer. ”And I was the only WASP.”

Weinstein also invited Nobel laureate and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel to The Reader’s New York premiere, and courted an endorsement from the Anti-Defamation League, a group whose mission is to call attention to anti-Semitism … Weinstein says, ”It must have been the hand of Anthony Minghella and Sydney Pollack, because Elie Wiesel asked to see me after the screening and he hugged me and said how much he loved the movie.” (Wiesel, through his agent, declined to comment.)


http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,2000787 ... 62,00.html

http://www.incontention.com/?p=4399#more-4399


Fri Feb 06, 2009 10:23 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.