| Author |
Message |
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
 TWOKJ Picks: Finest Female - Winner Inside! (p. 3) The final round. After a large mess in the other few rounds, I've finally gotten it together. Ten candidates each received two votes (what was needed. I planned to include ten, and, it happened to be that ten was the cut off) and will be competing to earn the title of WOKJ's Finest Female (in the Entertainment World).
The nominees (in order of votes)
1. Keira Knightley
2. Natalie Portman
3. Scarlett Johansson
4. Jennifer Garner
5. Jennifer Connely
6. Katie Holmes
7. Kirsten Dunst
8. Jessica Alba
9. Elisha Cuthbert
10. Britney Spears
Vote for your favorite via PM or mention it in the thread. Votes are due by the 14th 
Last edited by torrino on Wed Feb 16, 2005 6:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
| Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:59 pm |
|
|
|
BacktotheFuture
I'm Batman
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm
Posts: 5554
Location: Long Island
|
How many do we pick?
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:00 am |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
BacktotheFuture wrote: How many do we pick? One. Solely your favorite
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:01 am |
|
|
|
BacktotheFuture
I'm Batman
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm
Posts: 5554
Location: Long Island
|
torrino wrote: BacktotheFuture wrote: How many do we pick? One. Solely your favorite Damn this might take me days deciding between these women.
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:02 am |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
 very hard choice!!
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:03 am |
|
|
|
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
|
No angelina jolie... That sucks
Well here's my choice:
Elisha Cuthbert
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:03 am |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
It was a tough choice....
Natalie Portman
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:07 am |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
Keira Knightley:
Natalie Portman:
Scarlett Johansson:
Jennifer Garner:
Jennifer Connelly:
Last edited by torrino on Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:27 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:20 am |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
I'm going with Scarlett Johansson.
No Angelina?  :???: [-( _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:22 am |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:29 am |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
box_2005 wrote: I'm going with Scarlett Johansson. No Angelina? :???: [-( She only got one nominee...
Anyways, anyone wanna seek out pictures for the other five? 
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:29 am |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:39 am |
|
|
|
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm
Posts: 12821
|
box beat me to it
But the pics he psoted are crappy.
:razz: _________________ Best Actress 2008
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:45 am |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
Rod wrote: box beat me to it But the pics he psoted are crappy. :razz: Post yours too! More images = better! \:D/ _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:47 am |
|
|
|
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm
Posts: 7286
Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Britney Spears > 10 = Once cute, now not.
Jennifer Garner > 9 = too much competition
Kirsten Dunst > 8 - too much competition
Jennifer Connelly > 7 = in the past she would be higher but now the competition is fierce
Katie Holmes > 6 = cute but alittle too young looking
Elisha Cuthbert > 5 = getting hotter
Jessica Alba > 4 = loved her in the first season of Dark Angel.
Keira Knightley > 3 = 1 & 2 are too much.
Natalie Portman > 2 = sexy, pretty but alittle too young looking
Scarlett Johansson > 1 = looks incredible and older than her 20 years.
_________________
*
WARNING*****GOLDIE POSTING****WARNING
**
COVER YOUR EYES
***
HIDE YOUR WOMEN & CHILDREN
****
HIT THE IGNORE BUTTON
*****
BUT REMEMBER*****GOLDIE*****ALWAYS KNOWS THE RIGHT/BETTER ANSWER
******
THIS HAS BEEN A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT BROUGHT TO YOU BY GOLDIE
*******
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 12:58 am |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
*torrino is in heaven*
did you guys think I'd go with anyone OTHER than Scarlett Johansson? :razz:
Goldie, I agree with you. Portman's second for me. Cuthbert would be my third choice, Knightley my fourth, and Holmes my fifth.
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:03 am |
|
|
|
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
|
1: Scarlett (undoubtedly the one that stuck out)
2: Jessica Alba
3: Katie Holmes
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:06 am |
|
|
|
Rod
Extra on the Ordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:50 pm
Posts: 12821
|
When does voting close?
I'm too busy drooling right now to amke a decision.
_________________Best Actress 2008
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:07 am |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
Rod wrote: When does voting close?
I'm too busy drooling right now to amke a decision. Valentine's Day - 14th.
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:13 am |
|
|
|
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
|
torrino wrote: Rod wrote: When does voting close?
I'm too busy drooling right now to amke a decision. Valentine's Day - 14th. That is utterly depressing. _________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:14 am |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
Hey, I wanted to give a full seven days...
If you guys want to keep a suprise, though, feel free to pm/e-mail the votes.
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:21 am |
|
|
|
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
|
KEIRA!!!!!
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 3:21 am |
|
|
|
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
|
JENNIFER GARNER from me.
BTW, its a fucking travesty that Catherine Zeta Jones didnt make the top 10 but oh so look-a-likey Geek Queens Kiera Knightly and Natalie Portman did. I really really think apart from the top two, the list is awful.
A classic beauty, Garner oozes the approchability of a Girl Next Door, with all the charm and innocence of one too. But shes got a dark, sultry, sexy side - and has a habit of leaving interviewers with enigmatic lines to ponder on before they go to press. Her looks are those of deep sophisotcation, and her personality is one fun vibrance. I must say, Garner captures better on film than on camera, and thats saying alot considering how hot she looks on camera.
Garner's lack of mean pretention or fame seeking intent means that her inner beauty shines through - and a raidant, talent actress can go a long way in Hollywood, wether she wants to or not.
My list
1. Jennifer Garner [Stunning, the most gorgeous woman ive ever seen
2. Britney Spears [Airbrushed or not Britneys a beautiful queen of manipulation]
3. Kiera Knightly [Her overexposure has left her looking bland for me. Shes still stunning, but i think her new style makes her look far less attractive than back in 2003]
4. Jessica Alba [Silky skin, cute face and beautiful body, never really liked her till this year]
5. Scarlett Johansson [She oozes sophistocation, although her features are too vanilla, Scarlet has a quality of higher stature, but isnt afraid to show some leg either]
http://jen-garner.net/modules/coppermin ... ags011.jpg for a big picture of her at the SAG awards this year.
_________________
I'm out.
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:28 am |
|
|
|
driveaway
Angels & Demons
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 12:59 pm
Posts: 262
Location: US
|
Gotta go with Jennifer Connelly
_________________
"For my next miracle, I'll be turning water.. into FUNK!"
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:12 am |
|
|
|
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
|
Oh the ones on the list, I go with Keira Knightely. She's a bit young but I have a feeling she's going to get even more good looking as she ages and gets more character on her face.
|
| Tue Feb 08, 2005 11:14 am |
|
|
