Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 7:17 pm



Reply to topic  [ 560 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 23  Next
 WALL·E 

What grade would you give this film?
A 83%  83%  [ 107 ]
B 9%  9%  [ 11 ]
C 3%  3%  [ 4 ]
D 2%  2%  [ 3 ]
F 3%  3%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 129

 WALL·E 
Author Message
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
The Dark Knight wrote:
Munk-E wrote:
We need to hit 80 A's before TDK hits 70!!!

COME ON!!!



TDK is going to pass WALL-E. I've made peace with it because TDK is an incredible film.


Only because more people will see it :tears:

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:55 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
80 A's!!!

Up by 6 over TDK!!!

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:27 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32629
Location: the last free city
Post Re: WALL-E
Munk-E wrote:
80 A's!!!

Up by 6 over TDK!!!


took TDK only 3 days to get to 76 A's. ;)

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:28 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
Rev wrote:
Munk-E wrote:
80 A's!!!

Up by 6 over TDK!!!


took TDK only 3 days to get to 76 A's. ;)


3 times as many people saw it in one weekend than Wall-E's first weekend...

:tears:

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:30 pm
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11622
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post Re: WALL-E
"Too true, too true" - Dr. Teeth

_________________
Image


Mon Jul 21, 2008 10:50 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40592
Post Re: WALL-E
I agree with most of what Box said. I loved the first half, between the stuff on earth, and then the original scenes in the ship, from Wall-E's entrance on the assembly line to the introduction of the captain to the dancing scene, which is the best in the film... and even the random two humans who end up holding hands are done well. But almost immediately after "define dancing", when the Captain makes that speech and then when Auto goes Hal-3000 and the movie rolls out a standard run from the bad guys climax, the magic was lost on me. It really feels like Pixar is trying to have their cake and eat it too, the difference between the beautiful scenes of just Wall-E and Eve complimented music instead of dialogue, and the plotline involving the Captain overthrowing Auto, is staggering. Simply put, using Pixar as a comparison, the first one is Ratatouille and the second is Cars. And I dunno... aside from the dancing scene, I guess I just wasn't enough in love with the dialogue-less parts to really forgive the rest of the film. I think I wanted more of it, the first 30 minutes went by amazingly fast, and then the great Wall-E/Eve dynamic was more scattered throughout the rest.

The comparison of the visuals pretty much match the plot, too. The shots of earth and the attention to detail to every piece of garbage, and the dust, and the ground, it simply amazing. It feels real, it's by far the most impressive CGI work I've ever seen. But then the humans, their buildings, and the Axiom in general just feels totally cartoony and lazy in comparison, Pixar on autopilot. The Axiom world itself wasn't nearly as fleshed out as I wanted, just seeing the billboards and the pool didn't do enough for me.

Oddly enough, despite Wall-E's Earth scenes being more visually impressive, I thought as a whole Ratatouille broke a lot more borders for animation. I came out of that film so impressed at how they animated in the style of a live action film, and the tracking movements of Remy as he crawled along stuff was just incredible, along with the cooking, escape on the streets, etc.. And I liked how for the first time the human characters felt like real humans with real relationships with one another. Here, they did not, although that may have been the point.

It's an enjoyable, sweet Pixar film, but to be honest I feel it's more of a Tier 2 in their filmography, with Monsters, Inc., The Incredibles, and A Bug's Life.

3.5/5

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:54 pm
Profile
Kypade
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:53 pm
Posts: 7908
Post Re: WALL-E
yer crazy shack


Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:00 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
kypade wrote:
yer crazy shack

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:09 am
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32629
Location: the last free city
Post Re: WALL-E
Munk·E wrote:
Rev wrote:
Munk·E wrote:
80 A's!!!

Up by 6 over TDK!!!


took TDK only 3 days to get to 76 A's. ;)


3 times as many people saw it in one weekend than Wall-E's first weekend...

:tears:


it took Wall-E a little over 16 days to gross TDK's opening weekend. :(

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:13 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
TDK will pass Wall-E's FINAL total by Friday :tears: :tears: :tears:

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:14 am
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11622
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post Re: WALL-E
I think the film needed to develop the second half more, the whole movie felt too fast paced and it felt like there was so much more story to tell. I'm starting to already forget about the movie sadly. I still am firm on my "A" stance though because it does have quality, but it needed more, well I guess more for that masterpiece level four other Pixar films I give credit to. Sorry Munk.

_________________
Image


Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:54 am
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32629
Location: the last free city
Post Re: WALL-E
Munk·E wrote:
TDK will pass Wall-E's FINAL total by Friday :tears: :tears: :tears:


OMG! :wacko:

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:20 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
:tears:

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:49 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: WALL-E
You know what's funny? Everyone here is complaining about what happens AFTER leaving earth, whereas I think that part would've entertained kids much more than that slow opening. I think that the opening took a lot of people out of it, even though it is definitely the best part.

so Pixar simply didn't have a way past it; sacrifice quality for money? No sir!

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:46 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
Yes, the 2nd half was weaker.

But it's ONLY because the 2st half was so phenominal and we all wanted MORE of that. Despite the fact that some of the movies BEST parts were in the 2nd half.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:26 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am
Posts: 25990
Post Re: WALL-E
billybobwashere wrote:

so Pixar simply didn't have a way past it; sacrifice quality for money? No sir!



They have to do that. They're a company that must remain profitable.

_________________
In order of preference: Christian, Argos

MadGez wrote:
Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation.


My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/


Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:27 pm
Profile WWW
Too Brilliant for Introductions
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:45 am
Posts: 3073
Post Re: WALL-E
Easily (well, not really) the best Pixar film to date and the best film I've seen in the past couple of years. In fact, it's only the seventh film I've anointed an A+ to. Yeah, it's that good.

A+

_________________
Image


Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:41 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
Eventine wrote:
Easily (well, not really) the best Pixar film to date and the best film I've seen in the past couple of years. In fact, it's only the seventh film I've anointed an A+ to. Yeah, it's that good.

A+

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:04 pm
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: WALL-E
Munk·E wrote:
Eventine wrote:
Easily (well, not really) the best Pixar film to date and the best film I've seen in the past couple of years. In fact, it's only the seventh film I've anointed an A+ to. Yeah, it's that good.

A+

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Wall-E was terrific. It's also dead, and the pop culture wheel of relevance has moved on. I suggest you do the same. Don't waste your most vibrant, prosperous years of pestering and psuedo-trolling on this dead horse. I hear the "Up" picture is promising!

I tell you this as a concerned onlooker.

_________________
k


Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:06 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
yoshue wrote:
Munk·E wrote:
Eventine wrote:
Easily (well, not really) the best Pixar film to date and the best film I've seen in the past couple of years. In fact, it's only the seventh film I've anointed an A+ to. Yeah, it's that good.

A+

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Wall-E was terrific. It's also dead, and the pop culture wheel of relevance has moved on. I suggest you do the same. Don't waste your most vibrant, prosperous years of pestering and psuedo-trolling on this dead horse. I hear the "Up" picture is promising!

I tell you this as a concerned onlooker.


Snob.

Wall-E will live on!

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:30 pm
Profile
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post Re: WALL-E
WALL-E was blatantly incredible. Ties or just edges out FINDING NEMO and RATATOUILLE for me.

_________________
I'm out.


Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:20 pm
Profile WWW
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
Post Re: WALL-E
Wall-E didn't have enough to entertain ordinary people. We should be celebrating what is basically an arthouse film grossing $200m.

_________________
(hitokiri battousai)


Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:31 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
83 A'S!!!

Almost 90%!!!

:twisted:

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:54 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: WALL-E
I just watched the Incredbiles.

It has reminded me that we should not get caught up in the moment.

I thought Wall-E was one of pixars best, but after watching that and Ratatouille and Finding Nemo only 4 months ago, Wall-E is a great film but not pixar's best.


However any film that is great and from Pixar is an all time great film.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Fri Jul 25, 2008 6:37 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: WALL-E
Manny...

You are an odd person.

You put too much into re-watchability and how you view a film later.

A film doesn't have to be re-watchable to be great.

And how one perceives a film when they first see it should ALWAYS be taken into account when grading it at a later date.

I don't think I know ANYONE that changes their grades for films more than you.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Fri Jul 25, 2008 6:41 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 560 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 23  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.