Planet of the Apes (1968)
Planet of the Apes (1968)
Author |
Message |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
 Planet of the Apes (1968)
Planet of the Apes Quote: Planet of the Apes is a 1968 American science fiction film directed by Franklin J. Schaffner, based on the 1963 novel La planète des singes by Pierre Boulle. The film stars Charlton Heston, Roddy McDowall, Kim Hunter, Maurice Evans, James Whitmore, James Daly and Linda Harrison. It was the first in a series of five films made between 1968 and 1973, all produced by Arthur P. Jacobs and released by 20th Century Fox. A remake and reboot followed in 2001 and 2011.
The original 1968 film tells the story of an astronaut crew who crash-land on a strange planet in the distant future. Although the planet appears desolate at first, the surviving crew members stumble upon a society in which apes have evolved into creatures with human-like intelligence and speech. The apes have assumed the role of the dominant species and humans are mute creatures wearing animal skins.
The script was originally written by Rod Serling but had many rewrites before eventually being made. Directors J. Lee Thompson and Blake Edwards were approached, but the film's producer Arthur P. Jacobs, upon the advice of Charlton Heston, chose Franklin J. Schaffner to direct the film. Schaffner's changes included creating a more primitive ape society, instead of the more expensive idea of having futuristic buildings and advanced technology. Filming took place between May–August 1967, mostly in California and Arizona, with the opening scene shot at Lake Powell, Utah. The film's budget was around $5,800,000.
Planet of the Apes was released on February 8, 1968 in the United States and was a commercial success, gaining $32,589,624 at the international box office. The film was groundbreaking for its prosthetic makeup techniques by artist John Chambers, and was well received by critics and audiences, launching a film franchise, including four sequels, as well as a short-lived television show, animated series, comic books, various merchandising, and eventually a remake in 2001 and a reboot in 2011. In particular, Roddy McDowall had a long-running relationship with the Apes series, appearing in four of the original five films (absent, apart from a brief voiceover, from the second film of the series Beneath the Planet of the Apes in which he was replaced by David Watson in the role of Cornelius), and also in the television series.
In 2001, Planet of the Apes was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant".
Last edited by zingy on Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Mar 23, 2005 11:51 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Thanks, Zing!
Reserved for review.
|
Wed Mar 23, 2005 11:56 pm |
|
 |
BacktotheFuture
I'm Batman
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm Posts: 5554 Location: Long Island
|
I'm waiting for your review Mav.
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 12:59 am |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
I didnt like the movie. It was architectually wrong. Felt like I was @ York University.
C-
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:03 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
BacktotheFuture wrote: I'm waiting for your review Mav.
I will try to get it up tomorrow. :wink:
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:08 am |
|
 |
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm Posts: 28110 Location: Awaiting my fate
|
This was simply a terrible movie. Just bad overall. The story was good, at least in the concept. The writing was terrible though and the acting wasn't great either. The "surprise twist" was so contrived it simply confounded an already mediocre film. Towards the end the pacing was so slow there was almost nothing that occured. One of the worst "classic" films ever, and hardly deserving of its "classic" status. 4.4/10 (C-)
_________________ See above.
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 1:29 am |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
Well, good memories, that's all. The film ain't much, but what do I care? It's the experience that counts, and the film made an impression.
You know, I had never heard of it before I watched the film, so the ending was a complete secret.
It was wonderful 
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:05 am |
|
 |
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm Posts: 4684 Location: Toronto
|
box_2005 wrote: Well, good memories, that's all. The film ain't much, but what do I care? It's the experience that counts, and the film made an impression. You know, I had never heard of it before I watched the film, so the ending was a complete secret. It was wonderful 
Perosnally i liked the Simpsons spoof better 
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:06 am |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
Oh, the Simpsons one is a classic man!
I *heart* The Simpsons!
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:07 am |
|
 |
BacktotheFuture
I'm Batman
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm Posts: 5554 Location: Long Island
|
Maverikk wrote: BacktotheFuture wrote: I'm waiting for your review Mav. I will try to get it up tomorrow. :wink:
Awesome. \:D/
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:07 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Though I'm a big fan of the original's style and melodrama (4 out of 5.), I am also a fan of the Simpson's musical version: "I love every ape I see, from Chimpan-a to Chimpanzee..."
\:D/
|
Mon Mar 28, 2005 7:55 am |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
SOME FILMS STAND THE TEST OF TIME. This is one of them.
This comment may contain spoilers ***
Does contain spoilers!
I remember recently having an argument at work with my boss who vehemently argued that 1968's Planet of the Apes is head and shoulders above Tim Burton's version. I had just come back from seeing Burton's and was quite impressed. And even though I had never seen this one, I argued the other way. I am not sure why I did this, perhaps it was just to play Devil's Advocate, maybe it was just cause I'm an ass at times or maybe I really thought that this version couldn't be better than the new one. After all, Burton's post apocalyptic futuristic ape world was inhabited by apes that were intelligent enough to form societies and create laws but they were too stupid to realize that the world they live in is big enough for both humans and animals. It went to great lengths ( or so I thought) to show man's, and conversely apes ignorance when it comes to the welfare of anything that is considered lower in intellect. In short, I felt that Burton's Planet of the Apes touched on many issues that are important to me. I couldn't really see how a film made 30 some years ago could top that.
Boy was I wrong!
I rated 2001's POTA an 8.5 based mostly on it's theories and because of the action in the film (and because I have a soft spot for Michael Clarke Duncan). If that is true, and I do feel that way, then 1968's POTA is easily worth a ten and that is what I am giving it. Very few films make you feel something. Let me re-phrase that. A good film will entertain you, an even better one can enlighten you. But only a very few precious films can keep you entertained and fill your head with a plethora of thought provoking ideas and "what-ifs" at the very same time. Planet of the Apes is one of those films. JFK, and all of it's pseudo-theories about the assassination of the president left me feeling exhausted and afraid of the world we live in. Films like The Matrix (you're a disease, Mr. Anderson") and T-2 ("it's in your nature to destroy yourselves") and Instinct ("these are the takers") gave me similar premonitions. You can add Planet of the Apes to that select breed of films that gave me a similar feeling.
This is a film that takes its time to tackle such weighty issues as evolution, human rights, animal rights, racism, religious ambiguity, military strong arms and many other issues. The screenplay was skillfully adapted by Rod Serling of Twilight Zone fame from a book by Pierre Boulle. And although I have not read the book, I have read that the film is different in quite a few ways. For instance, the book and subsequently Burton's version, has the apes very technologically advanced. But because of technological inferiority in 1968 the film took the apes and had them living in a primitively built city/village. They had buildings made of rock but not concrete. The had guns but not automatic weapons. And although Burton's version hasn't introduced them to guns, the apes are much stronger, much higher up on the evolutionary scale. But in this POTA, there seems to be a missing link. Certain apes have theories that apes really evolved from man and yet the humans in this world cannot speak. They seem to understand some things, but they cannot comprehend what is being said to them all of the time, kind of like the way our animals are today. This opens up a plethora possibilities. Are these humans mutants, are they a cross between man and ape? Have they been scientifically altered by some medical Nazi-like experiment and over time, generations have adapted to these experiments? There are many weighty issues open for discussion. Other reviewers bring up the possibility of a nuclear war and one of Taylor's observations was that there may have been a nuclear shower or meteor storm that devastated humans, just like the dinosaurs before them. And doesn't that make Heston's speech at the beginning of Armageddon ( it happened once it'll happen again.. it's just a matter of time) all the more chilling?
Contains major spoilers in the next few paragraphs. Please, do not read if you plan on seeing the film soon for the first time!!!! You have been warned!
2001's version of POTA was quite impressive because of technology first and the story second. While it did think about things such as animal rights and such, it did not hold it as important as this version does. This is a film that you could watch over and over again and still have it give you that sinking feeling in your stomach every time. The ending alone is enough to open up discussion for months to come. And I have a theory. So bear with me.
If what he sees at the end of the film on the beach is really the whole thing sitting there, and not just the head ( meaning that the rest of it is buried some 200 feet in the sand, then this presents a whole slew of possibilites. Dr Zaius has discovered the cave where he believes there is sufficient enough evidence that there were intelligent human occupants before apes. The basis of his evidence is that on different levels of the earth, buried in the sand and clay there are artifacts to support his claim. One one level he found reading glasses and deeper still, he finds false teeth and in another level, even deeper he found a babies doll that talks. Proof that evolution granted man the ability to talk. But when Taylor is left to "find his destiny" what he finds is the thing that may be buried so deep in the earth from thousands of years of stagnancy. What if what he is seeing is really all in tact, just buried some 200 feet under the earth? If they could dig that far down, what would they find? Would they find dishes or the remains of houses? Would they find subway tunnels, sewage pipes, bones of sewer rats, bones of CHUD like people? The possibilities are endless. This could turn the ape world upside down and it would create a division in those that are ardent followers of the ape religion and those that believe in evolution. Doesn't this kind of sound similar to situations here in our time?
End of spoilers
POTA is the one of the best Science Fiction films I have ever seen and this would easily crack my top 100 films ever made. And that is after 2 viewings. I want to go back and watch this film a few more times so I can really understand it. It is a rare film that entertains and poses some very interesting and provocative questions. And as I said earlier, there are very few films that can do something like that. Films like American Pie or Raiders of the Lost Ark and The Godfather are great because they entertain and make you laugh or cheer. POTA is in a class with other films like T-2 and Aliens. These are films that also entertain but they force you to examine who we are and where we have come from and where we could possibly go. Is it possible that man will one day become so unbearable that some divine intervention will occur so that we are not the inferior species? A film like this makes you think and wonder? What if......?
10 out 0f 10-- This is one of the best films I have ever seen and it is one that I am going to get my kids to watch someday. Burton's is fun and thought-provoking. This one is simply mind blowing and intellectually stimulating. This is a must see for any generation.
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Thu Mar 31, 2005 10:24 am |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Maverikk wrote: BacktotheFuture wrote: I'm waiting for your review Mav. I will try to get it up tomorrow. :wink:
Bummer - we're still waiting for this - would have liked to read.
|
Thu Mar 31, 2005 10:27 am |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Nice review, baumer!
I was sidetracked for a few days, but things will get back to normal soon, so I'll get to this. Sorry about the wait.
|
Fri Apr 01, 2005 4:13 am |
|
 |
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am Posts: 3014 Location: Kansai
|
I watched this for the first time in about twenty years and it's still a great movie. It occasionally feels dated like when the young chimpanzee says to never trust anyone over thirty but for the most part it still holds up. Like most good science fiction, this uses impossible (or borderline plausible) situations and storylines to raise questions. I really enjoyed watching it again and plan on watching the whole series again.
Even though Michael Moore has tried to paint Charleton Heston as a bufoon, there's no doubt he's been in some great movies. Along with Ben Hur and The Ten Commandments, this is a classic. My grade: A-.
|
Fri Apr 29, 2005 1:16 am |
|
 |
movies35
Forum General
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm Posts: 8627 Location: Syracuse, NY
|
I didn't love the original PLANTET OF THE APES but it was better than the terrible original. It was a good movie for what it was but no way a great movie.
7/10 (B-)
_________________ Top 10 Films of 2016
1. La La Land 2. Other People 3. Nocturnal Animals 4. Swiss Army Man 5. Manchester by the Sea 6. The Edge of Seventeen 7. Sing Street 8. Indignation 9. The Lobster 10. Hell or High Water
|
Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:18 am |
|
 |
jb007
Veteran
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm Posts: 3917 Location: Las Vegas
|
This movie is ok. The 2001 remake turned out to be garbage making this look a little better.
C
_________________ Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006 The Greatest Actor Ever. Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.
|
Fri Apr 29, 2005 7:09 pm |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
ok
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
Last edited by baumer72 on Fri Jul 28, 2006 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:30 pm |
|
 |
BacktotheFuture
I'm Batman
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:53 pm Posts: 5554 Location: Long Island
|
Puts Tim Burton's remake to shame. Heston is great as the smug human, and the makeup and sets are great even by today's standards. Contains one of the best twist ending, and a couple of lines I hear quoted everyday.
A
|
Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:08 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11613 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
A classic, powerful and entertaining, with a great ending, one of Charlton's best.
B+
_________________
|
Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:12 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
I'm disappointed by the low grades here... This is a science fiction classic, pure and simple. It's got a great concept, but then it builds on that with stylish, bizarre direction, a terrific score, and any number of underlying themes. The trial scene can be read as a metaphor for several different social dilemmas and problems. Plus it's got the best twist ending of all time. What's not to like?
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
Last edited by trixster on Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:38 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
As has been written elsewhere - it is the bestest Twilight Zone episode ever thanx to Rod Serling's screenplay...
|
Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:31 am |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Planet of the Apes (1968)
It is this movie and Solyent Green where the melodramatic nature of Charleston Heston's acting show it greatness.
Come on the only reason we like the film is because of that one line and the OVER THE TOP melodrama at the end. It was just great and it is really well done and memorable.
The film mostly sort of sucks but the ending is just amazing and one of the best ever. Heston really does a great job with his method of acting in that scene...
B-
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Mon May 26, 2008 11:33 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Planet of the Apes (1968)
I have always enjoyed Planet of the Apes. I really need to see it again though, it's been ages.
B+
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Tue May 27, 2008 2:28 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: Planet of the Apes (1968)
|
Tue May 27, 2008 7:01 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|