Author |
Message |
FILMO
The Original
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am Posts: 9808 Location: Suisse
|
 Re: Iron Man
Well for me it was very entertaining but something was missing a bit to make a really great movie. I hoped for a bit more action and less machine tuning I guess.
7.5/10
_________________Libs wrote: FILMO, I'd rather have you eat chocolate syrup off my naked body than be a moderator here.
|
Sun May 04, 2008 4:47 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: Iron Man
Bradley Witherberry wrote: Finally! A summer blockbuster we don't need to be ashamed of!!! Ironman is a man's story, not a boy's story like Spider-Kid or Toddlers of the Caribbean. It's a well told tale from start to finish, and Robert Downey Jr. brings the requisite game to the table - - he shows us what it means to be reborn. ...and the supporting actors - - C'mon!!! - - it's mind-blowing! Gwyneth Paltrow (yup! that Gwyneth Paltrow) as Pepper Potts - - that's just plain dream casting. Jeff Bridges soars as the bad guy. Terrence Howard as the side kick with room to grow. And of course, in a spectacular post-credits scene: Samuel L. Jackson as Nick ("I'm here to speak to you about the Avenger Initiative") Fury! Ironman stands as a great statement on war, weapons, and woopie - - yup! - - finally a superhero movie that didn't forget the humor. Let me get down on my knees and thank God/Stan Lee... My special kudos goes out to director Jon Favreau, who brought this all together so perfectly. All that, plus the best ending line in ages: "Truth is... ... (looks at cards) ... ... I am Ironman." 21 out of 5. (Can't wait for the sequel!!!!!!!) Dude, that post-end credits scene is stuff for every comic book geek's orgasm. Loved that. Plus the War Machine and SHIELD references in the movie. Robert Downey, Jr. is just wonderful. This was a great, fun flick.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Sun May 04, 2008 5:36 pm |
|
 |
TonyMontana
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am Posts: 16278 Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
|
 Re: Iron Man
I found Iron Man to be good, but not great. The action, special effects, and touches of humor were all strong points. Robert Downey Jr. definitely helped the movie a lot.
I don't like Gwenyth much, and I found any time she was on screen I was largely bored.
As Filmo pointed out, I did think there was a little too much tinkering with machine work also. Overall the story was decent, but there were a few inconsistant or unbelievable moments (within the framework of the film). For example, Jeff Bridges couldn't crush Iron Man at the end by stomping on him or squeezing him, but the minute Stark's helmet fell off, he picked that up and squashed it without a problem. I also questioned Stark building this super sophisticated suit in a week in a cave.
Overall it felt like a mix between Robocop and Transformers, which wasn't all bad. It was enjoyable, and I'll give it a B
_________________
|
Sun May 04, 2008 6:51 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: Iron Man
I loved it. Very entertaining and smart. Robert Downey Jr is one of the best "superheroes" in recent memory, and he is ably supported by a fine cast including Gwyneth Paltrow, Terrence Howard, and Jeff Bridges. Good times. A-
|
Sun May 04, 2008 8:21 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: Iron Man
Seriously though, as much as I loved this... the Iron Monger was way too laaaame (and obscure) to be the first villain in the franchise.
Was that Hilary Swank in the casino with Tony Stark? I swear it looked like her...
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Sun May 04, 2008 8:32 pm |
|
 |
nghtvsn
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm Posts: 11016 Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
|
 Re: Iron Man
TonyMontana wrote: I found Iron Man to be good, but not great. The action, special effects, and touches of humor were all strong points. Robert Downey Jr. definitely helped the movie a lot.
I don't like Gwenyth much, and I found any time she was on screen I was largely bored.
As Filmo pointed out, I did think there was a little too much tinkering with machine work also. Overall the story was decent, but there were a few inconsistant or unbelievable moments (within the framework of the film). Exhibit AFor example, Jeff Bridges couldn't crush Iron Man at the end by stomping on him or squeezing him, but the minute Stark's helmet fell off, he picked that up and squashed it without a problem. Exhibit BI also questioned Stark building this super sophisticated suit in a week in a cave.
Overall it felt like a mix between Robocop and Transformers, which wasn't all bad. It was enjoyable, and I'll give it a B Exhibit A Response : When he was being stomped on the suit was still fully functional and IM was resisting. When IM was being squeezed there was a glimpse of Pressure failure or something to that effect but he escaped that with the flares. When the helmet was crushed it was not functioning. Exhibit B Response : Stark is able to create a miniaturized Arch reactor and you're questioning him building a metallic suit? Nonetheless, the person was a genius as evidenced by his multiple robots, engineering skills and AI computer program Jarvis that he probably created. I think it's safe to assume he's Maguyver on steroids with billions in cash.
_________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
|
Sun May 04, 2008 8:49 pm |
|
 |
2001
Another You
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:38 am Posts: 4556
|
 Re: Iron Man
FILMO wrote: Well for me it was very entertaining but something was missing a bit to make a really great movie. I hoped for a bit more action and less machine tuning I guess.
7.5/10 My thoughts exactLy. Some f/x scenes were beyond cooL, Like Transformers-cooL but there were very few of these scenes to make it a great fiLm. RDJ was great in his roLe though, and I guarantee the sequeL to be the best comic-book movie ever. B+
|
Sun May 04, 2008 9:53 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Iron Man
It was a fun old film that it is better then your typical superhero film. The story was very good and the acting was well done. This is 100x better then Spiderman 3 and the action was short but good. The movie's appeal was not really the action but the story and the acting, like in X-men 2.
Easily it is one of the better superhero films like X-men 2 and Batman Begins.
B+
Perhaps the first film of the year I actually loved.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Sun May 04, 2008 11:02 pm |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23385 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
 Re: Iron Man
Did anyone else catch the visual reference to The Iron Giant? I thought that was a nice little touch.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Mon May 05, 2008 12:49 am |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Iron Man
there were a lot of funny references like to Julius Ceaser and to the current war in Afghanistan and Iraq.
It was not your typical mindless comic book film for sure.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Mon May 05, 2008 9:19 am |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Iron Man
I think Iron Man and Batman Begins are pretty much on the same level. Hard to distinguish between them since one took a serious route and the other a comic comedy route.
And a question, for those of you who saw the movie:
Am I retarded, or was Paltrow's character wearing a gold wedding ring?
_________________
|
Mon May 05, 2008 10:26 am |
|
 |
Grill
Forum General
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am Posts: 8684
|
 Re: Iron Man
Eagle wrote: I think Iron Man and Batman Begins are pretty much on the same level. Hard to distinguish between them since one took a serious route and the other a comic comedy route.
And a question, for those of you who saw the movie:
Am I retarded, or was Paltrow's character wearing a gold wedding ring? agree but wondering if Iron Man can go as far as Batman will. As some people will say, well we already saw him in that suit, what else can he do?
|
Mon May 05, 2008 10:51 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Iron Man
Grill wrote: agree but wondering if Iron Man can go as far as Batman will. As some people will say, well we already saw him in that suit, what else can he do? I heard they're waiting to show Batman in his suit till the third movie...
|
Mon May 05, 2008 11:19 am |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21896 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
 Re: Iron Man
TonyMontana wrote: I found Iron Man to be good, but not great. The action, special effects, and touches of humor were all strong points. Robert Downey Jr. definitely helped the movie a lot.
I don't like Gwenyth much, and I found any time she was on screen I was largely bored.
As Filmo pointed out, I did think there was a little too much tinkering with machine work also. Overall the story was decent, but there were a few inconsistant or unbelievable moments (within the framework of the film). For example, Jeff Bridges couldn't crush Iron Man at the end by stomping on him or squeezing him, but the minute Stark's helmet fell off, he picked that up and squashed it without a problem. I also questioned Stark building this super sophisticated suit in a week in a cave.
Overall it felt like a mix between Robocop and Transformers, which wasn't all bad. It was enjoyable, and I'll give it a B I dont have a problem with your critique, but it said he was in the cave for 3 months, so it wasn't a week, 3 months is a little more believable, especially if this guy supposedly built a circuit board at age 4. My only real flaw is that Jeff Bridges motivation for killing him in the beginning is kind of never explained, until Tony is captured one could say they were great allies and both wanted the same things (In the Movie anyway)
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Mon May 05, 2008 11:36 am |
|
 |
Grill
Forum General
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am Posts: 8684
|
 Re: Iron Man
Bradley Witherberry wrote: Grill wrote: agree but wondering if Iron Man can go as far as Batman will. As some people will say, well we already saw him in that suit, what else can he do? I heard they're waiting to show Batman in his suit till the third movie... OK but I think that other super-heroes have more than can do in and out of their suits.
|
Mon May 05, 2008 11:39 am |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Iron Man
@Thegun
He was in the cave for months, but when he finally accepted to work on the missile they gave him a week. Remember after they kidnapped him - he needed a surgery, time to recover, then he refused to make the missile...
The timeline during his stay at the cave wasn't really clear, but the bald guy clearly stated something along the lines "You have a week to make me a jericho missile."
That being said, I don't find it strange that he made the suit in a week. It's a comic book movie, plus he's a genius and they both worked very hard on the suit. They didn't even finish it completely if I'm not mistaken.
|
Mon May 05, 2008 12:37 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: Iron Man
be.redy wrote: @Thegun
He was in the cave for months, but when he finally accepted to work on the missile they gave him a week. Remember after they kidnapped him - he needed a surgery, time to recover, then he refused to make the missile...
The timeline during his stay at the cave wasn't really clear, but the bald guy clearly stated something along the lines "You have a week to make me a jericho missile."
That being said, I don't find it strange that he made the suit in a week. It's a comic book movie, plus he's a genius and they both worked very hard on the suit. They didn't even finish it completely if I'm not mistaken. Also, I believe he mentioned he was "kidnapped for three months" upon his return... I also like the fact this was set in L.A., given the preference towards the East Coast for these types of flicks/genres.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Mon May 05, 2008 12:41 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Iron Man
be.redy wrote: That being said, I don't find it strange that he made the suit in a week. It's a comic book movie, plus he's a genius and they both worked very hard on the suit. They didn't even finish it completely if I'm not mistaken. Excellent use of movie logic and suspension of disbelief! 
|
Mon May 05, 2008 3:21 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Iron Man
Grill wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: Grill wrote: agree but wondering if Iron Man can go as far as Batman will. As some people will say, well we already saw him in that suit, what else can he do? I heard they're waiting to show Batman in his suit till the third movie... OK but I think that other super-heroes have more than can do in and out of their suits. Just like Batman, Ironman is exploring the nature of justice as it relates to his personal history and motivations - - that's what made this a particularily good superhero movie - - a conflicted protagonist...
|
Mon May 05, 2008 3:25 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21896 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
 Re: Iron Man
Christian wrote: be.redy wrote: @Thegun
He was in the cave for months, but when he finally accepted to work on the missile they gave him a week. Remember after they kidnapped him - he needed a surgery, time to recover, then he refused to make the missile...
The timeline during his stay at the cave wasn't really clear, but the bald guy clearly stated something along the lines "You have a week to make me a jericho missile."
That being said, I don't find it strange that he made the suit in a week. It's a comic book movie, plus he's a genius and they both worked very hard on the suit. They didn't even finish it completely if I'm not mistaken. Also, I believe he mentioned he was "kidnapped for three months" upon his return... I also like the fact this was set in L.A., given the preference towards the East Coast for these types of flicks/genres. Well yes the recovery period took a while, but probably not more than a week. But him refusing to accepting looked like it was the same day. They took him outside after dunking him, then Tony realized he had to do it. The bald guy said you had 24 hours to make a missile. The one week thing was just speculation by Stark that if he didnt start building, he'd be dead in a week and Yensin said "Then This is an important week for you" After they saw he was working, the timeline could have changed. I'm not saying this is absolute or that the timeline is justified, but I've seen worst things by less smart people. When your life is on the line and you have any material you want as well as a brilliant mind in engineering, Im sure he could do it.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Mon May 05, 2008 5:16 pm |
|
 |
Grill
Forum General
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am Posts: 8684
|
 Re: Iron Man
I think he originally had a week and then after a few days, they caught them working on other leg machine so he said by tommorrow.
so I think he built the first Iron Man in about 4/5 days.
|
Mon May 05, 2008 5:22 pm |
|
 |
Nazgul9
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm Posts: 11289 Location: Germany
|
 Re: Iron Man
It was alright, a little too "sassy" for its own good. Didn't manage to really draw me in. Special mention goes to Agent Phil Coulson, i just liked him.  Can't decide, between 6 and 7 out of 10.
_________________
|
Tue May 06, 2008 3:25 pm |
|
 |
JURiNG
ef star star kay
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 7:45 pm Posts: 3016 Location: Cairo, Egypt
|
 Re: Iron Man
Yes, I also think it was overall good but not great. Robert Downey Jr. is absolutely awesome. I can only say that he IS the movie. When most of 'this kind of film' has the key of the greatness being the story, the visionary of its director, some with the visual effect. In Iron Man, the main and foremost key that make the whole thing worked extremely well is its actor, Downey. It delivers the fun, the entertainment in the high level. I just failed to find anything more than that (and may I add, the action wasn't that great).
B+
_________________
|
Tue May 06, 2008 9:37 pm |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Re: Iron Man
JURiNG wrote: Yes, I also think it was overall good but not great. Robert Downey Jr. is absolutely awesome. I can only say that he IS the movie. When most of 'this kind of film' has the key of the greatness being the story, the visionary of its director, some with the visual effect. In Iron Man, the main and foremost key that make the whole thing worked extremely well is its actor, Downey. It delivers the fun, the entertainment in the high level. I just failed to find anything more than that (and may I add, the action wasn't that great).
B+ Your a hard critic to please then cause I really can't imagine what one would really find wrong with this movie, but I suppose if you try hard enough, anyone can find fault...
|
Wed May 07, 2008 8:41 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Iron Man
It's just the backlash against the positive response starting (it's kinda like aftershocks from an earthquake)...
|
Wed May 07, 2008 8:43 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|