Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 6:29 pm



Reply to topic  [ 278 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
 Cloverfield 

What grade would you give this film?
A 61%  61%  [ 34 ]
B 21%  21%  [ 12 ]
C 11%  11%  [ 6 ]
D 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
F 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 56

 Cloverfield 
Author Message
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21896
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Cloverfield
Way too early to tell, I men it had close to 8000, the day before it was released. When it gets to 50,000.

I went with 4 people with different views, they all liked it, but none of them shit their pants over it. It'll fall below 8 on imdb soon enough.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:54 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Cloverfield
on Sunday, it was only at 4500 reviews and an 8.1

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:54 am
Profile WWW
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Cloverfield
Magnus wrote:
billybobwashere wrote:
IMDB


Nuff said.
their top 2007 movies are (in order): There Will Be Blood, No Country for Old Men, Juno, Ratatouille, The Bourne Ultimatum, Sweeney Todd, American Gangster, The Man From Earth (?), and 3:10 to Yuma. That's not too shabby if you ask me.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:56 am
Profile WWW
Newbie

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:35 pm
Posts: 4
Post Re: Cloverfield
Libs wrote:
Yeah. As successful as Cloverfield is, it can never compare to the phenomenon that was The Blair Witch Project. I seem to recall that opening to like $30M when it went wide (and "wide" was 1,000 theaters). Of course, when the backlish/competition from The Sixth Sense hit, it nosedived, but whatever. 1999 was a crazy ass summer at the box office. We haven't had one like that since then.


Cloverfield will have a bigger impact on the way films are made than The Blair Witch Project did. The Blair Witch Project was boring, not scary in the least bit, and only made so much money and attention because it was the first big blockbuster to be shot using a handheld cam. Since then, there haven't really been any other movies to use the handheld cam technique, which in my opinion shows that the directors and studios didn't like the concept. However, I think with Cloverfield things will change. The movie was legitimately scary, not things popping out at you scary, but plotline scary. I have never in my life had such a realistic and interactive experience with a movie as I did in Cloverfield, which is why I think more and more movies will now start to use similar technique.

And to all you idiots complaining about the script - there's a monster tearing apart Manhatten, what would YOU say? And keep in mind swearing needs to be practically non-existent for the movie to categorize at PG13, or 14+.


Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:30 pm
Profile
Newbie

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:35 pm
Posts: 4
Post Re: Cloverfield
Clearly.


Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:38 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40592
Post Re: Cloverfield
A better question is, are you goldie

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:54 pm
Profile
Newbie

Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:35 pm
Posts: 4
Post Re: Cloverfield
No, I am not 'goldie', this is my first account on this site.


Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:57 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 3350
Post Re: Cloverfield
B+. The film was fantastic. A lot of fun and very suspenseful. It's not shit your pants amazing, but it does what I wanted it to do and nothing more. The characters were alright, the only recognizable actress was Lizzy Caplan from Mean Girls, who was great. Hud is the best character obviously, adding a lot of comic relief. The little monsters were better than the actual monster. The first half though, especially when it brings a lot of emotions. It strikes a cord since a lot of it is eerily similar to 9/11. I would have prefered one ending, instead of like the 3 or 4 "endings" until the final one. Overall a lot of fun, but it's a love hate.


Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:53 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Cloverfield
loyalfromlondon wrote:
so this is the enormous batcave everyone talks about?

seriously, 7 entire posts on Cloverfield's 5th day of release.

This thread should tap out around another page or two.
i'm sure it would get a ton of talk on a Tuesday when everyone returns to their work schedule and the market gets flooded with tons of other huge events (Oscar nominations, a tragic death, the primaries, etc...) if Cloverfield was honestly getting a page a day on a day like yesterday or today, that would be pretty ridic.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:55 pm
Profile WWW
problem?

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am
Posts: 15515
Location: Bait Shop
Post Re: Cloverfield
I seriously hope the handheld cam "being held by a character in the movie" gimmick is not the wave of the future. It's fine for one or two films, but please.. no more.

_________________
Image


Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:37 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 11016
Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
Post Re: Cloverfield
Mr. Inc wrote:
B+. The film was fantastic. A lot of fun and very suspenseful. It's not shit your pants amazing, but it does what I wanted it to do and nothing more. The characters were alright, the only recognizable actress was Lizzy Caplan from Mean Girls, who was great. Oh, I knew she was kind of familiar. Her hair not all straight down really makes a difference. She did do a good job. Hud is the best character obviously, adding a lot of comic relief. The little monsters were better than the actual monster. The first half though, especially when it brings a lot of emotions. It strikes a cord since a lot of it is eerily similar to 9/11. I would have prefered one ending, instead of like the 3 or 4 "endings" until the final one. Overall a lot of fun, but it's a love hate.

_________________
2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion
Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00
[b]FREE KORRGAN

45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP
#MAGA #KAG!
10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm


Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:47 pm
Profile
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post Re: Cloverfield
Rob_tha_Job wrote:
Libs wrote:
Yeah. As successful as Cloverfield is, it can never compare to the phenomenon that was The Blair Witch Project. I seem to recall that opening to like $30M when it went wide (and "wide" was 1,000 theaters). Of course, when the backlish/competition from The Sixth Sense hit, it nosedived, but whatever. 1999 was a crazy ass summer at the box office. We haven't had one like that since then.


Cloverfield will have a bigger impact on the way films are made than The Blair Witch Project did. The Blair Witch Project was boring, not scary in the least bit, and only made so much money and attention because it was the first big blockbuster to be shot using a handheld cam. Since then, there haven't really been any other movies to use the handheld cam technique, which in my opinion shows that the directors and studios didn't like the concept. However, I think with Cloverfield things will change. The movie was legitimately scary, not things popping out at you scary, but plotline scary. I have never in my life had such a realistic and interactive experience with a movie as I did in Cloverfield, which is why I think more and more movies will now start to use similar technique.

And to all you idiots complaining about the script - there's a monster tearing apart Manhatten, what would YOU say? And keep in mind swearing needs to be practically non-existent for the movie to categorize at PG13, or 14+.


Well then, welcome to the party.

You've already been de-virginzied with regard to attacks.

_________________
Image


Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:27 am
Profile WWW
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post Re: Cloverfield
nghtvsn wrote:
Mr. Inc wrote:
B+. The film was fantastic. A lot of fun and very suspenseful. It's not shit your pants amazing, but it does what I wanted it to do and nothing more. The characters were alright, the only recognizable actress was Lizzy Caplan from Mean Girls, who was great. Oh, I knew she was kind of familiar. Her hair not all straight down really makes a difference. She did do a good job. Hud is the best character obviously, adding a lot of comic relief. The little monsters were better than the actual monster. The first half though, especially when it brings a lot of emotions. It strikes a cord since a lot of it is eerily similar to 9/11. I would have prefered one ending, instead of like the 3 or 4 "endings" until the final one. Overall a lot of fun, but it's a love hate.


I remember looking at promo pics (before the movie's release) and I thought Lizzy Caplan was Tina Holmes (the hairstyle).

Of course, only a few indie geeks here would know who Tina Holmes is. :unsure:

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:06 pm
Profile
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22212
Location: Places
Post Re: Cloverfield
Liked it for the last 10 minutes...everything from when the helicopters bitten till the end was aweful...but the directors and actors have obvious talent.

ill go with a b

but how did that marlena girl die and i guess lily lived?

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:12 am
Profile
What would Jesus *not* do?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 829
Location: Going Up the Down Escalator
Post Re: Cloverfield
I officially hate JJ Abrhams and I've never met the man. This has to be one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated upon the movie going public. He sold us a monster movie and gave us a shaky as shit crappy love story instead. Over half of this movie deals with some douche bag named Rob who was dumb enough to dump his smoking hot girlfriend and then get pissed off when she shows up at his goodbye party with another dude, and then realizes he f'ed up and wants her back after the piss-poorly rendered and designed non-believable so called monster begins attacking the city. We were promised carnage and chaos and were given nausea by the horrendous story telling and acting. Abrhams knew he had a stinker and thats why he shook shit out of the camera so as to cover up his lack of creativity and talent. There is no story, there is no plot, there is no credible or decent actor to be found, the monster is lame, there is no way cHuds battery lasted that long or the camera was built that reliable, there is no concievable reason I can think of to have green lit this utter disaster(pun intended).

Still not as bad as Meet the Spartans

Grade F+

_________________
Top ten of 2008, Updated!

1. Slumdog Millionaire
2. Wall-E
3. Dark Knight
4. In Bruges
5. Tropic Thunder
6. Young @ Heart
7. Mongol
8. The Band's Visit
9. Visitor
10. Iron Man


Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:44 am
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Cloverfield
aww man...I was thinking your Meet the Spartans review was legit.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:51 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Cloverfield
The Mr Pink wrote:
I officially hate JJ Abrhams and I've never met the man. This has to be one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated upon the movie going public. He sold us a monster movie and gave us a shaky as shit crappy love story instead. Over half of this movie deals with some douche bag named Rob who was dumb enough to dump his smoking hot girlfriend and then get pissed off when she shows up at his goodbye party with another dude, and then realizes he f'ed up and wants her back after the piss-poorly rendered and designed non-believable so called monster begins attacking the city. We were promised carnage and chaos and were given nausea by the horrendous story telling and acting. Abrhams knew he had a stinker and thats why he shook shit out of the camera so as to cover up his lack of creativity and talent. There is no story, there is no plot, there is no credible or decent actor to be found, the monster is lame, there is no way cHuds battery lasted that long or the camera was built that reliable, there is no concievable reason I can think of to have green lit this utter disaster(pun intended).

Still not as bad as Meet the Spartans

Grade F+



:ban:

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:55 pm
Profile
I just lost the game
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 pm
Posts: 5868
Post Re: Cloverfield
EDIT:

Why can't we delete posts in the Critic forum?

_________________
Image


Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:23 am
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32629
Location: the last free city
Post Re: Cloverfield
Image

:sideroll:

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:43 am
Profile
What would Jesus *not* do?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 829
Location: Going Up the Down Escalator
Post Re: Cloverfield
Munk·E wrote:
The Mr Pink wrote:
I officially hate JJ Abrhams and I've never met the man. This has to be one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated upon the movie going public. He sold us a monster movie and gave us a shaky as shit crappy love story instead. Over half of this movie deals with some douche bag named Rob who was dumb enough to dump his smoking hot girlfriend and then get pissed off when she shows up at his goodbye party with another dude, and then realizes he f'ed up and wants her back after the piss-poorly rendered and designed non-believable so called monster begins attacking the city. We were promised carnage and chaos and were given nausea by the horrendous story telling and acting. Abrhams knew he had a stinker and thats why he shook shit out of the camera so as to cover up his lack of creativity and talent. There is no story, there is no plot, there is no credible or decent actor to be found, the monster is lame, there is no way cHuds battery lasted that long or the camera was built that reliable, there is no concievable reason I can think of to have green lit this utter disaster(pun intended).

Still not as bad as Meet the Spartans

Grade F+



:ban:


Your sign should say BAAAAAAAAAA. How does it feel to be a mindless sheep?

_________________
Top ten of 2008, Updated!

1. Slumdog Millionaire
2. Wall-E
3. Dark Knight
4. In Bruges
5. Tropic Thunder
6. Young @ Heart
7. Mongol
8. The Band's Visit
9. Visitor
10. Iron Man


Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:58 am
Profile
Another You
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:38 am
Posts: 4556
Post Re: Cloverfield
A mini-WotW here in terms of my how I was amazed. Some of the reaLLy intense moments were right before they went down into the subway, the whoLe night vision scene, the twin towers, and MarLena. Though even if they Looked satisfying and reaListic enough, the monster attack sequences vs. the miLitary and the whoLe heLicopter scene up to the monster confrontation feLt Like a GodziLLa 2. And my very compLaint about the acting is that they feeL Like sooo good peopLe (which I found very unreaListic) that they even don't know how to use the word fuck (or maybe I'm just deaf) when there's the monster and expLosions right in their faces. StiLL, an amazing fiLm overaLL but couLd have been the best fiLm ever if they tried to do something that has never been done in any monster/disaster fiLms, ever.

A


Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:30 am
Profile
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post Re: Cloverfield
2001 wrote:
A mini-WotW here in terms of my how I was amazed. Some of the reaLLy intense moments were right before they went down into the subway, the whoLe night vision scene, the twin towers, and MarLena. Though even if they Looked satisfying and reaListic enough, the monster attack sequences vs. the miLitary and the whoLe heLicopter scene up to the monster confrontation feLt Like a GodziLLa 2. And my very compLaint about the acting is that they feeL Like sooo good peopLe (which I found very unreaListic) that they even don't know how to use the word fuck (or maybe I'm just deaf) when there's the monster and expLosions right in their faces. StiLL, an amazing fiLm overaLL but couLd have been the best fiLm ever if they tried to do something that has never been done in any monster/disaster fiLms, ever.

A

You know, amazingly, some people's first instinct isn't too shout the f-word.


Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:07 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Cloverfield
meh, I'm 100% sure that one of the four 18 year olds would've used that word a few times...it was one of the prices they had to pay to keep the thing PG-13. Blair Witch, which was very R-rated, was more realistic in terms of how characters reacted to the crazy stuff, since they had the ability to swear with more than just "shit"

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:59 am
Profile WWW
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post Re: Cloverfield
Saw cloverfield today as part of a double header and it was quite an experience.

I dont have much to say apart from that it was a really different experience and I was more scared in this movie than ive been by any movie since The Ring.

The monster[s] were actually terrifying. The acting was great and the filming style whilst slightly annoying sometimes, also added a fantastic quality to it. The characters were kind of irritating sometimes though.

Solid.

B / B+

_________________
I'm out.


Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:31 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Cloverfield
I don't swear.

Well, on here I swear. But in actual REAL life, I don't.

And I'm pretty sure my reaction to a monster wouldn't be to swear. It would be to run as fast as I can away from it.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:36 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 278 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.