Author |
Message |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21896 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Way too early to tell, I men it had close to 8000, the day before it was released. When it gets to 50,000.
I went with 4 people with different views, they all liked it, but none of them shit their pants over it. It'll fall below 8 on imdb soon enough.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:54 pm |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: Cloverfield
on Sunday, it was only at 4500 reviews and an 8.1
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:54 am |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Magnus wrote: billybobwashere wrote: IMDB Nuff said. their top 2007 movies are (in order): There Will Be Blood, No Country for Old Men, Juno, Ratatouille, The Bourne Ultimatum, Sweeney Todd, American Gangster, The Man From Earth (?), and 3:10 to Yuma. That's not too shabby if you ask me.
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:56 am |
|
 |
Rob_tha_Job
Newbie
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:35 pm Posts: 4
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Libs wrote: Yeah. As successful as Cloverfield is, it can never compare to the phenomenon that was The Blair Witch Project. I seem to recall that opening to like $30M when it went wide (and "wide" was 1,000 theaters). Of course, when the backlish/competition from The Sixth Sense hit, it nosedived, but whatever. 1999 was a crazy ass summer at the box office. We haven't had one like that since then. Cloverfield will have a bigger impact on the way films are made than The Blair Witch Project did. The Blair Witch Project was boring, not scary in the least bit, and only made so much money and attention because it was the first big blockbuster to be shot using a handheld cam. Since then, there haven't really been any other movies to use the handheld cam technique, which in my opinion shows that the directors and studios didn't like the concept. However, I think with Cloverfield things will change. The movie was legitimately scary, not things popping out at you scary, but plotline scary. I have never in my life had such a realistic and interactive experience with a movie as I did in Cloverfield, which is why I think more and more movies will now start to use similar technique. And to all you idiots complaining about the script - there's a monster tearing apart Manhatten, what would YOU say? And keep in mind swearing needs to be practically non-existent for the movie to categorize at PG13, or 14+.
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:30 pm |
|
 |
Rob_tha_Job
Newbie
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:35 pm Posts: 4
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Clearly.
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:38 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40592
|
 Re: Cloverfield
A better question is, are you goldie
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:54 pm |
|
 |
Rob_tha_Job
Newbie
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:35 pm Posts: 4
|
 Re: Cloverfield
No, I am not 'goldie', this is my first account on this site.
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:57 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Inc
Veteran
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:50 am Posts: 3350
|
 Re: Cloverfield
B+. The film was fantastic. A lot of fun and very suspenseful. It's not shit your pants amazing, but it does what I wanted it to do and nothing more. The characters were alright, the only recognizable actress was Lizzy Caplan from Mean Girls, who was great. Hud is the best character obviously, adding a lot of comic relief. The little monsters were better than the actual monster. The first half though, especially when it brings a lot of emotions. It strikes a cord since a lot of it is eerily similar to 9/11. I would have prefered one ending, instead of like the 3 or 4 "endings" until the final one. Overall a lot of fun, but it's a love hate.
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:53 pm |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: Cloverfield
loyalfromlondon wrote: so this is the enormous batcave everyone talks about?
seriously, 7 entire posts on Cloverfield's 5th day of release.
This thread should tap out around another page or two. i'm sure it would get a ton of talk on a Tuesday when everyone returns to their work schedule and the market gets flooded with tons of other huge events (Oscar nominations, a tragic death, the primaries, etc...) if Cloverfield was honestly getting a page a day on a day like yesterday or today, that would be pretty ridic.
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:55 pm |
|
 |
Korrgan
problem?
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:52 am Posts: 15515 Location: Bait Shop
|
 Re: Cloverfield
I seriously hope the handheld cam "being held by a character in the movie" gimmick is not the wave of the future. It's fine for one or two films, but please.. no more.
_________________
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:37 pm |
|
 |
nghtvsn
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm Posts: 11016 Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Mr. Inc wrote: B+. The film was fantastic. A lot of fun and very suspenseful. It's not shit your pants amazing, but it does what I wanted it to do and nothing more. The characters were alright, the only recognizable actress was Lizzy Caplan from Mean Girls, who was great. Oh, I knew she was kind of familiar. Her hair not all straight down really makes a difference. She did do a good job. Hud is the best character obviously, adding a lot of comic relief. The little monsters were better than the actual monster. The first half though, especially when it brings a lot of emotions. It strikes a cord since a lot of it is eerily similar to 9/11. I would have prefered one ending, instead of like the 3 or 4 "endings" until the final one. Overall a lot of fun, but it's a love hate.
_________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
|
Wed Jan 23, 2008 11:47 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Rob_tha_Job wrote: Libs wrote: Yeah. As successful as Cloverfield is, it can never compare to the phenomenon that was The Blair Witch Project. I seem to recall that opening to like $30M when it went wide (and "wide" was 1,000 theaters). Of course, when the backlish/competition from The Sixth Sense hit, it nosedived, but whatever. 1999 was a crazy ass summer at the box office. We haven't had one like that since then. Cloverfield will have a bigger impact on the way films are made than The Blair Witch Project did. The Blair Witch Project was boring, not scary in the least bit, and only made so much money and attention because it was the first big blockbuster to be shot using a handheld cam. Since then, there haven't really been any other movies to use the handheld cam technique, which in my opinion shows that the directors and studios didn't like the concept. However, I think with Cloverfield things will change. The movie was legitimately scary, not things popping out at you scary, but plotline scary. I have never in my life had such a realistic and interactive experience with a movie as I did in Cloverfield, which is why I think more and more movies will now start to use similar technique. And to all you idiots complaining about the script - there's a monster tearing apart Manhatten, what would YOU say? And keep in mind swearing needs to be practically non-existent for the movie to categorize at PG13, or 14+. Well then, welcome to the party. You've already been de-virginzied with regard to attacks.
_________________
|
Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:27 am |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: Cloverfield
nghtvsn wrote: Mr. Inc wrote: B+. The film was fantastic. A lot of fun and very suspenseful. It's not shit your pants amazing, but it does what I wanted it to do and nothing more. The characters were alright, the only recognizable actress was Lizzy Caplan from Mean Girls, who was great. Oh, I knew she was kind of familiar. Her hair not all straight down really makes a difference. She did do a good job. Hud is the best character obviously, adding a lot of comic relief. The little monsters were better than the actual monster. The first half though, especially when it brings a lot of emotions. It strikes a cord since a lot of it is eerily similar to 9/11. I would have prefered one ending, instead of like the 3 or 4 "endings" until the final one. Overall a lot of fun, but it's a love hate. I remember looking at promo pics (before the movie's release) and I thought Lizzy Caplan was Tina Holmes (the hairstyle). Of course, only a few indie geeks here would know who Tina Holmes is. 
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:06 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22212 Location: Places
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Liked it for the last 10 minutes...everything from when the helicopters bitten till the end was aweful...but the directors and actors have obvious talent.
ill go with a b
but how did that marlena girl die and i guess lily lived?
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:12 am |
|
 |
The Mr Pink
What would Jesus *not* do?
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:55 am Posts: 829 Location: Going Up the Down Escalator
|
 Re: Cloverfield
I officially hate JJ Abrhams and I've never met the man. This has to be one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated upon the movie going public. He sold us a monster movie and gave us a shaky as shit crappy love story instead. Over half of this movie deals with some douche bag named Rob who was dumb enough to dump his smoking hot girlfriend and then get pissed off when she shows up at his goodbye party with another dude, and then realizes he f'ed up and wants her back after the piss-poorly rendered and designed non-believable so called monster begins attacking the city. We were promised carnage and chaos and were given nausea by the horrendous story telling and acting. Abrhams knew he had a stinker and thats why he shook shit out of the camera so as to cover up his lack of creativity and talent. There is no story, there is no plot, there is no credible or decent actor to be found, the monster is lame, there is no way cHuds battery lasted that long or the camera was built that reliable, there is no concievable reason I can think of to have green lit this utter disaster(pun intended).
Still not as bad as Meet the Spartans
Grade F+
_________________ Top ten of 2008, Updated!
1. Slumdog Millionaire 2. Wall-E 3. Dark Knight 4. In Bruges 5. Tropic Thunder 6. Young @ Heart 7. Mongol 8. The Band's Visit 9. Visitor 10. Iron Man
|
Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:44 am |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: Cloverfield
aww man...I was thinking your Meet the Spartans review was legit.
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:51 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Cloverfield
The Mr Pink wrote: I officially hate JJ Abrhams and I've never met the man. This has to be one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated upon the movie going public. He sold us a monster movie and gave us a shaky as shit crappy love story instead. Over half of this movie deals with some douche bag named Rob who was dumb enough to dump his smoking hot girlfriend and then get pissed off when she shows up at his goodbye party with another dude, and then realizes he f'ed up and wants her back after the piss-poorly rendered and designed non-believable so called monster begins attacking the city. We were promised carnage and chaos and were given nausea by the horrendous story telling and acting. Abrhams knew he had a stinker and thats why he shook shit out of the camera so as to cover up his lack of creativity and talent. There is no story, there is no plot, there is no credible or decent actor to be found, the monster is lame, there is no way cHuds battery lasted that long or the camera was built that reliable, there is no concievable reason I can think of to have green lit this utter disaster(pun intended).
Still not as bad as Meet the Spartans
Grade F+ 
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:55 pm |
|
 |
insomniacdude
I just lost the game
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 pm Posts: 5868
|
 Re: Cloverfield
EDIT:
Why can't we delete posts in the Critic forum?
_________________
|
Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:23 am |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32629 Location: the last free city
|
 Re: Cloverfield
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:43 am |
|
 |
The Mr Pink
What would Jesus *not* do?
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:55 am Posts: 829 Location: Going Up the Down Escalator
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Munk·E wrote: The Mr Pink wrote: I officially hate JJ Abrhams and I've never met the man. This has to be one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated upon the movie going public. He sold us a monster movie and gave us a shaky as shit crappy love story instead. Over half of this movie deals with some douche bag named Rob who was dumb enough to dump his smoking hot girlfriend and then get pissed off when she shows up at his goodbye party with another dude, and then realizes he f'ed up and wants her back after the piss-poorly rendered and designed non-believable so called monster begins attacking the city. We were promised carnage and chaos and were given nausea by the horrendous story telling and acting. Abrhams knew he had a stinker and thats why he shook shit out of the camera so as to cover up his lack of creativity and talent. There is no story, there is no plot, there is no credible or decent actor to be found, the monster is lame, there is no way cHuds battery lasted that long or the camera was built that reliable, there is no concievable reason I can think of to have green lit this utter disaster(pun intended).
Still not as bad as Meet the Spartans
Grade F+  Your sign should say BAAAAAAAAAA. How does it feel to be a mindless sheep?
_________________ Top ten of 2008, Updated!
1. Slumdog Millionaire 2. Wall-E 3. Dark Knight 4. In Bruges 5. Tropic Thunder 6. Young @ Heart 7. Mongol 8. The Band's Visit 9. Visitor 10. Iron Man
|
Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:58 am |
|
 |
2001
Another You
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:38 am Posts: 4556
|
 Re: Cloverfield
A mini-WotW here in terms of my how I was amazed. Some of the reaLLy intense moments were right before they went down into the subway, the whoLe night vision scene, the twin towers, and MarLena. Though even if they Looked satisfying and reaListic enough, the monster attack sequences vs. the miLitary and the whoLe heLicopter scene up to the monster confrontation feLt Like a GodziLLa 2. And my very compLaint about the acting is that they feeL Like sooo good peopLe (which I found very unreaListic) that they even don't know how to use the word fuck (or maybe I'm just deaf) when there's the monster and expLosions right in their faces. StiLL, an amazing fiLm overaLL but couLd have been the best fiLm ever if they tried to do something that has never been done in any monster/disaster fiLms, ever.
A
|
Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:30 am |
|
 |
MGKC
---------
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm Posts: 11808 Location: Kansas City, Kansas
|
 Re: Cloverfield
2001 wrote: A mini-WotW here in terms of my how I was amazed. Some of the reaLLy intense moments were right before they went down into the subway, the whoLe night vision scene, the twin towers, and MarLena. Though even if they Looked satisfying and reaListic enough, the monster attack sequences vs. the miLitary and the whoLe heLicopter scene up to the monster confrontation feLt Like a GodziLLa 2. And my very compLaint about the acting is that they feeL Like sooo good peopLe (which I found very unreaListic) that they even don't know how to use the word fuck (or maybe I'm just deaf) when there's the monster and expLosions right in their faces. StiLL, an amazing fiLm overaLL but couLd have been the best fiLm ever if they tried to do something that has never been done in any monster/disaster fiLms, ever.
A You know, amazingly, some people's first instinct isn't too shout the f-word.
|
Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:07 pm |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: Cloverfield
meh, I'm 100% sure that one of the four 18 year olds would've used that word a few times...it was one of the prices they had to pay to keep the thing PG-13. Blair Witch, which was very R-rated, was more realistic in terms of how characters reacted to the crazy stuff, since they had the ability to swear with more than just "shit"
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:59 am |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
 Re: Cloverfield
Saw cloverfield today as part of a double header and it was quite an experience.
I dont have much to say apart from that it was a really different experience and I was more scared in this movie than ive been by any movie since The Ring.
The monster[s] were actually terrifying. The acting was great and the filming style whilst slightly annoying sometimes, also added a fantastic quality to it. The characters were kind of irritating sometimes though.
Solid.
B / B+
_________________ I'm out.
|
Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:31 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Cloverfield
I don't swear.
Well, on here I swear. But in actual REAL life, I don't.
And I'm pretty sure my reaction to a monster wouldn't be to swear. It would be to run as fast as I can away from it.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:36 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|