If you can't read letters than put those dusty glasses on (or use a zoom function).

If you don't understand - the "nominees" are the predicted ones - bolded ones are actual nominees, then you have a number that says how many of 5 nominees have been guessed right, and then if not all are right you have the one that got in but wasn't predicted... Understand know?

Wow, bitchy much? You're the one who stuck your post in tiny, unreadable font.

Well you could point out the same for Atonement, I forgot the exact date but I think the last time a GG Drama winner missed BP was like 1965? That's why I couldn't leave out it or Wild, the latter for the reason you mentioned among others (acting branch support among them). And Atonement killed the BAFTAs.

I'm going out on a limb picking against Blood, right now I just think Clayton has showed up in too many places, with its 3 acting noms and having PGA/DGA/WGA I would be shocked if it didn't get in and Blood is clearly the type of film that is usually Oscar repellent.

I think Diving Bell has a legitimate shot to miss too, it's no lock. At the end of the day it's still a foreign film with no box-office, and Atonement, Clayton, Wild, and Blood all have lots going for them to say the least. And then there's Juno... I'm not feeling it and have it lagging way behind in 7th, but I guess it's still around.

Well, I completely eat my crow pie for being so wrong on Into the Wild. Apparently, the Globes - an organization that I thought was becoming more and more irrelevant - is still relevant. And the SAG, which is a guild that is supposed to be relevant, wasn't.

Peace,
Mike