Author |
Message |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Can us regular folks just crash in a tux and drink the booze and get the gift baskets instead? 
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:01 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
I think it'd be kinda fun to watch a show with zero actors present to accept their awards. Just constant awkward moments.
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:10 pm |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
s snack wrote: I think it'd be kinda fun to watch a show with zero actors present to accept their awards. Just constant awkward moments. It would Plus, no political statements, a big plus.
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:13 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40601
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Wow, I can't believe this is real... just the other day I was looking forward to the Globes, before I realized it's probably not happening.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:14 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Sweet! I don't have to listen to idiots this year!
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:17 pm |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
This has gone past the point of retarded. Neither side is looking all that rosy at this point.
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 8:59 pm |
|
 |
thompsoncory
Rachel McAdams Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am Posts: 14628 Location: LA / NYC
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Magnus wrote: This really doesn't help the WGA I think. It may be the studios fault, but "forcing" actors to not come to awards shows is really just insane.
I mean, what about the fucking production crew people? Don't people realize that they are losing jobs because of this? They are getting screwed the most, and the WGA doesn't give a shit about those people. And that really gives me little to care for the WGA at this point. This is exactly why at this point I've lost all sympathy for the writers in this situation.
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:24 pm |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
I'm upset with the CEO's. I wish they'd just give the writers a fair deal already and let everyone go back to work. It's especially frustrating that the AMPTP is not even attempting to negotiate! They've left the negotiating table and are letting the entire industry suffer. It's horrible, and I really can't believe it.
Peace, Mike
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:17 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
alright i've written speeches for every movie and actor so if the GG is reading this post. I am willing to take the hit and accept the awards for the actors. They dont even need to pay me. Just give me booze and watch me go.
|
Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:21 pm |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Magnus wrote: Obviously everyone is pissed at the producers still. But everyone is pretty pissed at the writers as well. They have been offered deals and rejected them. Eventually, you just have to give in. It sucks, but that's business. But the thing is they haven't been offered anything resembling a deal. They've been told to drop all of their important requests (a lot of which are more than fair) and then the AMPTP left the negotiating table and have been doing nothing to solve the problem for 28 days. I would agree with you if the writers were being petty; if the AMPTP had offered a reasonable deal and the WGA had simply rejected it because the AMPTP didn't bow down to all of their demands. But that simply isn't the case. This is why I'm so frustrated with the CEOs. There being a disagreement between them is one thing, but the AMPTP has merely walked away and is doing nothing. I just can't believe they are sitting around and letting this drag on. The WGA desperately wants to negotiate, but the AMPTP is refusing to do so. Once the AMPTP starts negotiating, then I can start pressuring the writers to finally end it. Anyways, sorry to be so long winded. I realize this discussion shouldn't really be here, it's the Golden Globes thread. I'm not sure why I'm so passionate about this. I respect your opinion, as I definitely love awards shows like the rest of you. Cheers. Peace, Mike
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:24 am |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
What's VH1 gonna do? They've been marketing this like crazy.
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:40 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
*sigh*
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:05 am |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Eh, I can still live without the Globes (I actually deliberately skipped them 3 years ago in favor of getting the winners from online commentary at OscarWatch), and the fact that it has come to this fills me more with a glee for absolute Hollywood Anarchy of sorts. Nothing like this is probably gonna happen again for a long while, so I'm trying to take it all in, hee.
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:12 am |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
I think the most frustrating thing about this, for me at least, is it is happening during an ultra-rare year where American cinema is actually relevant again. No Country, Assassination of Jesse James, Eastern Promises, There Will Be Blood, I'm Not There, Into the Wild, Ratatouille, Zodiac, Sweeney Todd, Juno, Knocked Up, Michael Clayton, The Bourne Ultimatum... years like this don't just happen regularly in American movies. It's a shame that it is looking like these films won't have their chances in the limelight, and the only thing the majority of the public will know is that Spider-Man III came out this year.
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:18 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40601
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Positive* Jon wrote: Eh, I can still live without the Globes (I actually deliberately skipped them 3 years ago in favor of getting the winners from online commentary at OscarWatch), and the fact that it has come to this fills me more with a glee for absolute Hollywood Anarchy of sorts. Nothing like this is probably gonna happen again for a long while, so I'm trying to take it all in, hee. Except the upcoming acting and directing strikes. 
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:24 am |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Magnus wrote: makeshift wrote: years like this don't just happen regularly in American movies Yeah. They usually are much better than this year  Oh, you're right. I forgot Christopher Nolan didn't have the chance to shit out two bricks of corn-riddle mediocrity.
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:25 am |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Magnus wrote: makeshift wrote: Oh, you're right. I forgot Christopher Nolan didn't have the chance to shit out two bricks of corn-riddle mediocrity. A. Nolan is British B. DON'T YOU DARE MOCK THE GREATEST DIRECTOR OF THIS DECADE!!!! Though I did just realize that this actually was a better-than-average year for American cinema, but a below-average year for cienma in general. But I really don't pay attention to domestic/forigen anymore. If the film is good, it's good. Don't care if an American or a British or a French made it. Shoddy filmmaking knowns no countries. I would say it was an above average year for movies in general, and a startlingly exceptional year for American filmmakers. The foreign filmmakers were really bring the weak sauce this year, though I haven't seen The Diving Bell yet.
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:41 am |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Magnus wrote: makeshift wrote: Shoddy filmmaking knowns no countries. I would say it was an above average year for movies in general, and a startlingly exceptional year for American filmmakers. The foreign filmmakers were really bring the weak sauce this year, though I haven't seen The Diving Bell yet. Diving Bell is the only film I think could change my mind about international films. Hot Fuzz was the only overseas film I really liked. I just liked 2005 and 2006 better compared to this. This year, except maybe No Country, didn't have any masterpieces to me, whereas 2005/2006 had a few each. Persepolis could maybe sway me a bit, too. 2006 had only two movies I would even consider maybe applying "masterpiece" to, and it'd be a big stretch (The Black Dahlia and Miami Vice). 2005 had The New World and (to a lesser extent) A History of Violence. From what I've seen this year, I'd say there are two absolute masterpieces, and a couple others that are toeing the line.
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:52 am |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
No Nolan movie aside (this makes Squee a sad panda  ) this was actually one of the best years for movies EVER!
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:54 am |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
makeshift wrote: 2006 had only two movies I would even consider maybe applying "masterpiece" to, and it'd be a big stretch (The Black Dahlia and Miami Vice).
Whoa, that wouldn't be a big stretch. A ginormous stretch is more like it.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:55 am |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
makeshift wrote: 2005 had The New World and (to a lesser extent) A History of Violence. No Munich? *Just finished reading review thread from two years ago*
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 1:59 am |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Positive* Jon wrote: makeshift wrote: 2005 had The New World and (to a lesser extent) A History of Violence. No Munich? *Just finished reading review thread from two years ago* Munich is one of those movies I loved two years ago, but merely like a lot now. You see more (hopefully better) movies, your tastes evolve. I've seen some pretty embarrassing shit I've written about certain movies in my three years here.
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:10 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40601
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Squee wrote: makeshift wrote: 2006 had only two movies I would even consider maybe applying "masterpiece" to, and it'd be a big stretch (The Black Dahlia and Miami Vice).
Whoa, that wouldn't be a big stretch. A ginormous stretch is more like it. Miami Vice?  But to be honest, I can also find myself trapped on the outside of my own reviews. It's pretty shameful to be super raving for a couple weeks and then a month later downgrade it to merely good. I just don't like exposing myself that way. I feel silly.  It becomes like the down syndrome child you want to hide from everyone. I gave movies like Ratatouille, Transformers, American Gangster A+ this year, and while they remains hanging around somewhere in my top 10, I realized later they were slightly flawed enjoyable blockbusters that have since been surpassed by a number of movies. PS Have you guys seen The Lives of Others? Or are you all counting it as a 06 movie.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:30 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40601
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Oh, and Munich's boring. And way too long. 
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:31 am |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
 Re: Golden Globe Noms (It's Official: Actors Will NOT Attend)
Shack wrote: Oh, and Munich's boring. And way too long.  Munich is damn fine at its current length.  ...Well, IMO four hours after watching it. *Fears the preordained hyperbole* 
|
Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:34 am |
|
|