Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 11:56 pm



Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 "Herbie: Fully Loaded" poster 
Author Message
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 4:35 am
Posts: 1255
Post "Herbie: Fully Loaded" poster
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/topnews.php?id=7955


Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:17 am
Profile WWW
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post Re: "Herbie: Fully Loaded" poster
mary wrote:
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/topnews.php?id=7955


BOMB!!! I mean, this was fine back in the 70's when I was kid for good wholesome fun and all, but is there REALLY a place for this movie in today's market audience??? Really??? :-k Quick, someone cue the Mushroom Cloud Explosion cause that's what I'm seeing for this right now...

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Mon Jan 17, 2005 7:37 am
Profile WWW
We had our time together
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 13299
Location: Vienna
Post 
Why Lindsay Lohan decided to make this movie is beyond me.. It has bomb written all over it.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:48 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11028
Post 
What a shitty poster.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:58 am
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
Riggs27 wrote:
Why Lindsay Lohan decided to make this movie is beyond me.. It has bomb written all over it.


I don't think Lohan makes any decisions by herself.. :wink:

Anyhow, her star status will probably rescue the movie from completely bombing. I don't see it making less than 50 Million


Mon Jan 17, 2005 8:59 am
Profile
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
Maybe Lindsay Lohan will go away after this one goes bye bye. Shes flashing those fakies under 20 layers of slap in every magazine, newspaper and news channel you watch now a days.

The poster is some very generic 70's effects you could learn of the internet, and Lindsay Lohan vectorised looks creepy.

_________________
I'm out.


Last edited by Michael. on Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:03 am, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:02 am
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
Whats the budget?


Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:03 am
Profile WWW
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
Five dollars, and that was just so Lindsay Lohan would keep her clothes ON.

No but with a cast that includes Michael Keaton, Matt Dillon and the already overpriced Lohan as well as the Nascar setting, id say $35m minimum. Being a BV Disney picture you can bet your bottom dollar its budget will be inflated.

_________________
I'm out.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:07 am
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
Naturalflux7 wrote:
Five dollars, and that was just so Lindsay Lohan would keep her clothes ON.

I find it hypocritical that you write a whole rant about bitching and whining about people trashing Garner and then are slinging shit at Lindsay Lohan.

I like the poster. I don't like Lindsay Lohan and will not see the movie. But it is a clever poster. It doesn't matter if the effect is easy, but it gets the message across, and is different from anything else that's out there at the moment.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:40 am
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
I doubt it will bomb. After Freaky Friday's excellent performance two years ago, I see a similar performance, but slightly smaller final result, for this film. $25 million opening, $90 million total.

_________________
See above.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:44 am
Profile
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
andaroo wrote:
Naturalflux7 wrote:
Five dollars, and that was just so Lindsay Lohan would keep her clothes ON.

I find it hypocritical that you write a whole rant about bitching and whining about people trashing Garner and then are slinging shit at Lindsay Lohan.

I like the poster. I don't like Lindsay Lohan and will not see the movie. But it is a clever poster. It doesn't matter if the effect is easy, but it gets the message across, and is different from anything else that's out there at the moment.


well said ...


Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:53 am
Profile WWW
Lord of filth

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm
Posts: 9566
Post 
I also think it is fantastic that they are using the classic style VW bug and haven't seen the need to update it to the new Beetle.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:03 am
Profile WWW
Vagina Qwertyuiop
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
Post 
Much better poster than many that are out there at the moment. I don't know how the film will turn out, but I certainly like the tone and style being put across here.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:19 am
Profile
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Token Brown Dude wrote:
andaroo wrote:
Naturalflux7 wrote:
Five dollars, and that was just so Lindsay Lohan would keep her clothes ON.

I find it hypocritical that you write a whole rant about bitching and whining about people trashing Garner and then are slinging shit at Lindsay Lohan.

I like the poster. I don't like Lindsay Lohan and will not see the movie. But it is a clever poster. It doesn't matter if the effect is easy, but it gets the message across, and is different from anything else that's out there at the moment.


well said ...


I agree.

_________________
See above.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:20 am
Profile
Hot Fuss

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 8427
Location: floridaaa
Post 
I like it. It's going to do just fine. Atleast 50 million. :)


Mon Jan 17, 2005 11:43 am
Profile YIM WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
Freaky Friday was a hit, and before it came out, one would have wondered how it would have found an audience. This probably will be no different. Not as big, but I think it will bring in the usual Lohan business (which is all over the place, but I think around $70 million is possible).

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Mon Jan 17, 2005 12:42 pm
Profile
La Bella Vito
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
Post 
I love the poster! It's really cool looking. There's no way this is going to be a bomb. I see at least $50 million for this, and maybe even more than that depending on the marketing, reviews, and buzz.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:21 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
I think it should do even more then that. Its a family film with a hot star and a sequel (?) to a popular 1970's franchise. There will be a lot of familes that go to see it, and many older viewers who go for the nostalgia. There is no way it will make less then $20 million opening weekend, and I'd expect more around $25-$30 million.

_________________
See above.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:52 pm
Profile
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
andaroo wrote:
Naturalflux7 wrote:
Five dollars, and that was just so Lindsay Lohan would keep her clothes ON.

I find it hypocritical that you write a whole rant about bitching and whining about people trashing Garner and then are slinging shit at Lindsay Lohan.

I like the poster. I don't like Lindsay Lohan and will not see the movie. But it is a clever poster. It doesn't matter if the effect is easy, but it gets the message across, and is different from anything else that's out there at the moment.


Hey don't come slaming me. I actually like Lindsay Lohan as an actress, shes effective, pretty and was very good in Freaky Friday. The Parent Trap is one of my guilty pleasures of all time and i must have seen it maybe 12 times now; so its not like im anti-lohan.

I just dont appreciate the way she goes out to self-promote herself, and sings pretty b-grade popsongs about being annoyed by the paparazzi on an album done only around the time she starred in Mean Girls; when she wasn't even hugely notable. I just prefer my actresses keeping low-key outside their careers.

_________________
I'm out.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:02 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
........ :-k ...its OK!, very diferent for sure!.....i dont know it doesnt look like a poster for a movie!....but its not that bad!


Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:32 pm
Profile
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
Well I dont think it would really bomb if you look at the line up for summer 2005. With the exception of Madagascar and Willie Wonka, there really isnt any lineup for family films. I still must say the Herbie series back in the 70s shouldnt warrant any sequels sinc I never liked them back when I was a toddler


Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:40 pm
Profile
Hot Fuss

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 8427
Location: floridaaa
Post 
I see something like this for old' Herb

22/64 ish

somwhere right around a 20m opener, 3x multiplier, and a finish in the mid 60s :)


Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Naturalflux7 wrote:
andaroo wrote:
Naturalflux7 wrote:
Five dollars, and that was just so Lindsay Lohan would keep her clothes ON.

I find it hypocritical that you write a whole rant about bitching and whining about people trashing Garner and then are slinging shit at Lindsay Lohan.

I like the poster. I don't like Lindsay Lohan and will not see the movie. But it is a clever poster. It doesn't matter if the effect is easy, but it gets the message across, and is different from anything else that's out there at the moment.


Hey don't come slaming me. I actually like Lindsay Lohan as an actress, shes effective, pretty and was very good in Freaky Friday. The Parent Trap is one of my guilty pleasures of all time and i must have seen it maybe 12 times now; so its not like im anti-lohan.

I just dont appreciate the way she goes out to self-promote herself, and sings pretty b-grade popsongs about being annoyed by the paparazzi on an album done only around the time she starred in Mean Girls; when she wasn't even hugely notable. I just prefer my actresses keeping low-key outside their careers.


Either way, don't try and do a little stand up gig about Lindsay Lohan's breasts. As if it weren't already flogging a dead horse, it's simply not funny. :razz:

And honestly, I like the poster too, they have a really cool retro style going on. When you look back on it, Lindsay is batting 2 for three for movies that were big hits that everyone said would bomb (Mean Girls, Freaky Friday, Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen). I don't even like her that much, though I don't mind her body. :wink:


Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:42 pm
Profile
rustiphica

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:59 pm
Posts: 8687
Post 
I usualy like the whole 70s themes in things but that is just badly done. God awful poster.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:03 pm
Profile
Angels & Demons
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 5:19 pm
Posts: 270
Location: Pleading my case before the jury
Post 
My question is how involved will NASCAR actually be in this film? Endorsement, I hope not. As a NASCAR fan and afficianado, the film isn't going to work on several levels:
1. A Volkswagon Bug does not meet NASCAR strict requirements for size, weight and shape of the vehicle. It worked in the original because Beetles WERE used as road racers.
2. True NASCAR fans are going to be insulted by this.
3. The "Lohan" fan crowd and the NASCAR fan crowd aren't exactly a cross-polinated group. While this film may bring out the Lohan crowd. NASCAR fans will stay away in droves.

_________________
No representation is made opinions expressed are better than others. MSRP. WAC. Limited Time. Some Restrictions Apply. All Rights Reserved. Not FDA approved. Results not typical. Close cover before striking. Mileage may vary. Void where prohibited.


Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:50 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.