Why has he been banned?

His pictures didn't even display a nude person, but only an uncovered bodypart, which isn't any different from displaying an uncovered finger, hand or face. Please cover your face and hands, loyalfromlondon, your flamboyant exposure of both upsets me to no end. This makes reason #2 obsolete as well, since Argos is the embodiment of Il Conformista.

now now .. no reason to lock it.

however, scream and say what you want in here. i'm not actually listening. hes banned. end of discussion. he will be allowed back in a week ... sadly.

Even tough you aren't listening, could you please tell me what exactly is wrong with posting a picture of a Schniedelwutz? And why will Argos be allowed to come back after 1 week? Who set that exact timeframe?

Guybrush,

We deemed his picture as an intentional violation of our rules. We try to keep this a work safe environment, and we felt that Argos's picture was counter-productive to our rules.

It is our discretion in this situation as to the route we take. There have been similar situations with other posters, and in some cases, a similar act has only warranted a warning. In Argos's case, the Mods and Admins were tired of Argos's general behavior, and when coupled with his past warnings, decided that a week long ban was the best course of action.

To answer your question about the length of the ban, I decided. In most situations, when we deem a temporary ban is required, if this is the persons first ban, we try to keep it on the short side. If Argos breaks the rules again, we may deem that a longer ban is needed. That is fully at the discretion of the Mods and Admins.

I hope this helps,

KJ

It probably would, if you had answered my first question properly and not in this standardized and generic automatic response kind of way, which doesn't even slightly touch the actual matter of the subject, KJ.

How does that not answer the question???

Because I asked what's wrong with posting a Schniedelwutz, not whether it's against their rules or not. What I wanted was an explanation of the nature of that rule and a reason for why that exact rule exists, because personally, I think it's utter bullshit. It's about as sensical as saying "we banned him for intentionally violating our rule of not using the letter "Q", which destroys our work safe environment <- ".

Umm... You said...



And your FIRST question was...



So... Eagle answered your question...

So drop it.

Sorry, but I visit this site at work, and a pic of a penis would get me fired.

I was - obviously - exclusively talking about my 2nd posting and the first question in it, which is "could you please tell me what exactly is wrong with posting a picture of a Schniedelwutz?", seeing as the first posting had already been covered (in an inappropriate way though).
Since Eagle covered questions in my second, my - at that point - current posting, e.g. the ban length subject matter, as well as attempting to answer the aforementioned question - which he failed to do - it was and still is highly obvious, for those that are at least slightly able to think, that this is the posting we're referring to. And either way, the Schniedelwutz-question/problem remains unresolved. Could you solve it instead of Eagle, Chipmunky?




What kind of work would that be? Mussolini's catamite? You should quit that job.

I work somewhere where they do not allow porn. Shocking, I know.

It wasn't porn, it was anatomy. It wasn't even erected, let alone put to sexual/pornographic use.

But my boss walking by and seeing a penis on my monitor is really going to think that.

Are you being purposefully obtuse?

That would be your boss being obtuse. Not purposefully though, I'm afraid. This also leads back to what I assumed first (regarding this sub-conversation, Chipmunky, not in my very first post in this thread or my first post at KJ).
But to answer your question: This is me purposefully and, of course, justfiably scrutinizing, instead of acting in the subservient way that you seem to prefer so dearly.

Guess that public apology to the FIA has really depressed Brushy. Don't worry brushy I know you didn't mean to be a cheating piece of shit at heart.

Following on, since Brushy has been involved in such espionage should he explain past innovations????

Explain that 3rd braking system Brushy, im curious

Since this thread has become a mockery, it is now closed.

Unbanned.