Author |
Message |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40232
|
 Re: The Contenders III
300 for best screenplay. 
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:56 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: The Contenders III
i nominated 300 for everything
|
Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:04 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Those Walk Hard posters are BRILLIANT!!!
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:08 pm |
|
 |
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm Posts: 4110 Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
 Re: The Contenders III
I love the Walk Hard FYCs. 
_________________ This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:23 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: The Contenders III
FYC Visual Effects for Atonement??????
|
Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:37 pm |
|
 |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
 Re: The Contenders III
s snack wrote: FYC Visual Effects for Atonement?????? war scenes probably
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:25 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Raffiki wrote: s snack wrote: FYC Visual Effects for Atonement?????? war scenes probably I know Gullimont's been talking about a 7 minute long tracking shot through WWII, I'm sure that was mostly digital trickery.
|
Mon Dec 03, 2007 3:11 am |
|
 |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
 Re: The Contenders III
MovieDude wrote: Raffiki wrote: s snack wrote: FYC Visual Effects for Atonement?????? war scenes probably I know Gullimont's been talking about a 7 minute long tracking shot through WWII, I'm sure that was mostly digital trickery. Actually, no. That was a live action shot. That's why it will be a strong contender for art direction and cinematography. The only digital trickery in that scene was color grading. I would imagine VFX could have been used for the planes in the few war scenes and maybe to recreate WWII London.
|
Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:37 am |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
 Re: The Contenders III
loyalfromlondon wrote: Hmm, somehow they couldn't fit in Best Documentary and Best Animated Feature Nor, apparently, the entirety of Keira Knightley's head.
|
Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:59 am |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Levy wrote: MovieDude wrote: Raffiki wrote: s snack wrote: FYC Visual Effects for Atonement?????? war scenes probably I know Gullimont's been talking about a 7 minute long tracking shot through WWII, I'm sure that was mostly digital trickery. Actually, no. That was a live action shot. That's why it will be a strong contender for art direction and cinematography. The only digital trickery in that scene was color grading. I would imagine VFX could have been used for the planes in the few war scenes and maybe to recreate WWII London. Yup thats right. The whole scene was filmed in an English town called Redcar and I believe alot of locals where used as extras.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:14 am |
|
 |
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm Posts: 4110 Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
 Re: The Contenders III
For this whole race, Atonement has reminded me a lot of The English Patient. Presumably pretty good WWII drama with a nice cast that could win and a bunch of technical categories with additional potential. Plus, I don't think people would look back on its way very knidly down the road, but talk about how a Coen Brothers movie (this time No Country for Old Men) should have won.
_________________ This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:22 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: The Contenders III
am i the only one that feels like atonement is basically a bigger version of Cold Mountain.
|
Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:51 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Atonement is now on Metacritic with seven reviews, four 100s and an average of 84. Sweet. Juno is also up with five reviews and a 78, no 100s yet (Ebert is guaranteed at least).
|
Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:37 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Jim Halpert wrote: am i the only one that feels like atonement is basically a bigger version of Cold Mountain. Nope, you're not. I feel pretty much the same way, except I think that Atonement will end up nominated in a year that is not so strong anyway.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:13 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Formal reviews from James Berardinelli on some of the contenders: Atonement: Quote: McEwan's novel isn't the easiest to adapt but, by employing occasional, targeted changes and by not jettisoning the essence of the ending (wherein lies the book's full, brutal power), Wright and screenwriter Christopher Hampton succeed in making a motion picture that is faithful in many ways to its source material. The film is gorgeous to look at, well paced (especially during the first half), and by turns touching and sad. The ending packs an emotional punch, which is what one would expect from any movie developed from a McEwan novel. McEwan may be many things, but he's no Jane Austen. Atonement is a period piece (is Knightley ever in anything else these days?) but it shows growth for Wright as he moves into darker territory.
Quote: Kiera Knightley gets star billing, but Cecilia is the least important character of the main trio. Consequently, Knightley doesn't have the opportunity to shine the way she did in Pride and Prejudice. Briony is played by three actresses: Saorise Ronan as a 13-year old, Romola Garai as an 18-year old, and Vanessa Redgrave as an old woman. Great care is taken to make Ronan and Garai look alike and have similar mannerisms. Redgrave doesn’t appear much like either, but she's like Meryl Streep or Glenn Close - if you can get her in a movie, you don't sweat the details.
Juno: Quote: If one was to categorize Juno, it would fall into the hybrid coming-of-age/teen romantic comedy category. But, as movies like Superbad have shown, such labels aren't necessarily negatives. Juno, directed by Jason Reitman (Thank You for Smoking) is smart, witty, and engaging - three ingredients that, when applied to any film, comprise a recipe for success. Juno has a great heroine and is blessed by a screenplay that doesn't try to do too much and finds the perfect ending. It's a little odd that this is the third comedy this year to focus on pregnancy. I enjoyed both Knocked Up and Waitress, but Juno gets my vote for the best of the three.
Quote: While plenty of credit can be heaped upon director Reitman and his collaborator Diablo Cody (the stripper-turned-screenwriter), the lead actress deserves as much praise as either of them, if not more. I'm not of the opinion that this is a star-making turn for Ellen Page - that distinction went to last year's searing Hard Candy - but Juno confirms that she is much more than a flash in the pan. She's someone to watch. She may not get a Best Actress nomination for her role here (that depends too much on politics for a prediction at this time), but if one comes in her direction, it's no fluke. She gets able support from a strong cast. Superbad's Michael Cera creates the kind of genuine, timid guy who's too rarely seen in teen films. Allison Janney and J.K. Simmons are the parents every pregnant girl would love to have (although they wish for a school suspension instead of the "bun in the oven" news). Jennifer Garner is perfectly sincere and not at all like we have seen her before, and Jason Bateman portrays the most human character he has played in a while. However, all of these actors, as good an experienced as they may be, are simply orbiting Page's star. This is her film from start to finish.
Diving Bell and the Butterfly: Quote: The acting, as one might expect, is top-notch. Mathiew Almaric (Munich) provides a portrayal of Jean-Do as both the pre-stroke womanizer and the man whose force of personality shines through his useless husk of a body. It is crucial that we empathize with Jean-Do but not pity him, and Almaric's acting provides a cornerstone for that emotional response. The women in his life - Emmanuelle Seigner, Marie-Josée Croze, Anne Consigny - fill their roles ably, each offering a slightly different prism through which to see the main character. Max von Sydow's work here is as moving as anything he has done in the last 20 years.
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly triumphs because of its honesty and its refusal to allow the character to wallow in self-pity. Approached differently, this could have been a downer, but Schnabel wanted the film to act as an affirmation of life. He wants us to leave the theater appreciating what we have and what we can experience. Do not be dissuaded by the subject matter. This is a special motion picture that achieves its higher agenda of doing much more than idly plucking at a few heartstrings.
Although giving them all 3.5 stars, JB sounded much more enthusiastic with Juno than Atonement, and given he already has 19 films from 2007 rated 3.5 stars, I don't think Atonement will make his top 10. Juno is very much in contention for his top spot until he reviews TWBB and Sweeney Todd.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:41 pm |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: The Contenders III
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/charlie ... /?show=allfirst four reviews officially in for Charlie Wilson's War, all positive. however, compared to Sweeney Todd's first four reviews, they are solid, whereas ST's are raves. I'm guessing this'll turn out well, but miss out on major Oscar categories.
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:42 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: The Contenders III
billybobwashere wrote: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/charlie_wilsons_war/?show=all
first four reviews officially in for Charlie Wilson's War, all positive.
however, compared to Sweeney Todd's first four reviews, they are solid, whereas ST's are raves. I'm guessing this'll turn out well, but miss out on major Oscar categories. It reminds me of Catch Me If You Can, almost to a T, in terms of Oscar. And they both have two of the same cast members (Tom Hanks and Amy Adams). Heh. It will probably even get nominated in the same exact major category that CMIYC did (Best Supporting Actor). Unless Tom Hanks can also pull out a nomination.
|
Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:55 pm |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: The Contenders III
I'm sure Hoffman's good here, but he was so fantastic in The Savages and I've heard he's even better in BTDKYD that it would probably be very difficult for him to top those in this film, where he gets less of a focus.
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:04 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: The Contenders III
billybobwashere wrote: I'm sure Hoffman's good here, but he was so fantastic in The Savages and I've heard he's even better in BTDKYD that it would probably be very difficult for him to top those in this film, where he gets less of a focus. He's lead in those two movies, though. Since CWW is his only supporting performance, he will probably get in by default.
|
Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:06 pm |
|
 |
Webslinger
why so serious?
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:24 pm Posts: 4110 Location: Stuck In A Moment I Can't Get Out Of
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Hoffman is outstanding in Before the Devil Knows You're Dead, but the lead actor category is really too crowded at this point. His best shot is in supporting for Charlie Wilson's War.
_________________ This Post Has Brought to You by Your Friendly Neighborhood Webslinger.
|
Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:20 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40232
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Atonement's at 87% with 39 fresh 6 rotten, 7.5/10 avg. If we seperate the 21-0 europe start and the America reviews, it's at 18-6 for 75%, or 78% if Slant is discounted. Not sure how fair that is, but anyways.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:42 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Juno's average is back up to 7.8, with 8.1 COTC.
The more time goes by, the more amazing NCFOM's average looks. 8.6. I mean, that's Lord of the Rings level. Only the old classics get average in the 8.7-9.0 range, and it's with fewer reviews.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:51 pm |
|
 |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
 Re: The Contenders III
Shack wrote: Atonement's at 87% with 39 fresh 6 rotten, 7.5/10 avg. If we seperate the 21-0 europe start and the America reviews, it's at 18-6 for 75%, or 78% if Slant is discounted. Not sure how fair that is, but anyways. not fair. just think about how many Brits are in the Academy.
|
Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:20 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Atonement's chances at a win don't really look rosy at the moment, to be frank.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:25 pm |
|
 |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
 Re: Re:
loyalfromlondon wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Atonement's chances at a win don't really look rosy at the moment, to be frank. Personally, I would love for Atonement to go the route of Cold Mountain and free up a BP spot for a better film. there is none.
|
Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:50 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|