Author |
Message |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
 Maverikk
Maverikk hasn't learned his lesson yet, as he has instigated two attacks this weekend. One with Goldie in the neo_wolf's Water Cooler thread, another with neo_wolf in the V For Vendetta thread in Everyone's a Critic.
This near-40-year-old lacks the maturity ("Girls laugh at your small dick, Goldie" or "You're a bad christian, neo_wolf, even though I have no idea you were the one who posted that F!") to be a member of this forum.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:36 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Torri,
You speak of immaturity and personal attacks, and then in reporting you show both that you are still immature and launch into personal attacks of your own. In the future, please report a problem responsibly. I should not have to edit the title of a thread due to personal attacks, especcially when you are reporting them.
As for the Mav attacks, that I will leave to Krem and Scott.
_________________
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:45 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
agreed
the ducky has quekked!
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:49 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
Way to change the focus, guys.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:53 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
It really doesn't surprise me that ONCE AGAIN, torrino is trying to start trouble with me. He does it all the time.
My comment to Goldie was a joke, and everyone knew it.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:53 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
Once again, you're trying to change the topic.
Why don't you, for once, focus on yourself and NOT OTHER PEOPLE? Maybe we do treat you like crap, but you shouldn't worry about it so much, because as you've proven in the past, worrying about it just makes you angry, and when you're angry, you attack viciously and do inappropriate things.
And, why don't you take responsibility for what you did do?
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:55 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
da torri wrote: Once again, you're trying to change the topic.
Why don't you, for once, focus on yourself and NOT OTHER PEOPLE? Maybe we do treat you like crap, but you shouldn't worry about it so much, because as you've proven in the past, worrying about it just makes you angry, and when you're angry, you attack viciously and do inappropriate things.
And, why don't you take responsibility for what you did do?
Said the teenager who started this thread?
And for the record, I DID know that neo_wolf gave that F grade, and he even admitted it. It doesn't take a genius to notice it.
Take a look.
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13611
That's just one example.
By the way, besides trying to start trouble (AGAIN), what have you done here today? I spent a few hours updating the movie release schedule for the members here. And you did what?
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 2:58 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
That doesn't mean he gave it the F. What if I gave it the F, Maverikk?
See, your response to my message proved, once again, that you can't ever claim responsibility for what you do. It doesn't matter if I tried to start trouble or not, you need to consider what I've said as a sign that maybe your behavior is unacceptable. The way I said it doesn't make it invalid.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:04 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Maverikk wrote: It really doesn't surprise me that ONCE AGAIN, torrino is trying to start trouble with me. He does it all the time.
My comment to Goldie was a joke, and everyone knew it.
Not that I really care as this is Mav being Mav.
But when is a joke not a personal attack.
***********************************************************
9. Personal Attacks: Flame wars are a part of forums. The moderators and administrators will keep a check on any disagreements taking place between certain members here. The moderators will encourage ways to sort out the problems. As long as the discussion pertains to the subject at hand, the discussion is fine. If a moderator notices that a purely healthy discussion is turning into attacks on a person’s character or issues that are in no way relevant to the topic at hand, the moderators will step in and warn users from engaging in this type of behavior. Bottom line: Do not attack a person’s character, looks, and/or social life if it has no connection at all to the topic at hand.
***********************
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:09 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
I don't understand what's the big deal if someone gives a movie an F in the poll. If someone wants to do it, let them. It shouldn't affect anyone's life or good time on the board if someone exercises their right to vote in a poll they way they choose.
If neo_wolf did it, congratulations to him.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:11 pm |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
I fucking love this thread.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:19 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
Zingaling wrote: I don't understand what's the big deal if someone gives a movie an F in the poll. If someone wants to do it, let them. It shouldn't affect anyone's life or good time on the board if someone exercises their right to vote in a poll they way they choose.
If neo_wolf did it, congratulations to him.
Exactly.
There's no justification for calling someone a "bad christian," just for voting "F."
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:20 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
da torri wrote: That doesn't mean he gave it the F. What if I gave it the F, Maverikk?
See, your response to my message proved, once again, that you can't ever claim responsibility for what you do. It doesn't matter if I tried to start trouble or not, you need to consider what I've said as a sign that maybe your behavior is unacceptable. The way I said it doesn't make it invalid. Uh...how about the fact that I saw the F appear just as his name was the newest to appear? Do you still want to continue debating for the sake of causing more trouble now? And you just came off a banning for doing the stupidest thing in the history of forums when you tried to crash the boards for no good reason, so don't start trying to be an authority on acceptable behavior. Your own troublemaking in this very thread is just one example of the sorry attempt to try to stand on a moral soapbox when you have other agendas at work here. Hell, after you did that STUPID crash attempt (and everybody take notice that I never once said a word about it until now, but we know torrino would have barked and barked about it if it was me) you tried to direct the negativity at me. da torri wrote: I'm expecting one of 'dem "official" warnings I used to threaten Maverikk with every week.
Not only was that a flat out lie, but it was antagonistic, unprovoked, and a perfect example of the real issue at work here.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:22 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
This thread is not about me, Maverikk, it is about you. That is why the title is "Maverikk." The title is NOT "torrino." If you want to make a separate "torrino" thread, you can make a separate "torrino" thread, where we can discuss torrino's behavior.
Now, let me ask, again: Why, exactly, do you think it's appropriate to call neo_wolf a "bad christian"?
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:30 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Zingaling wrote: I don't understand what's the big deal if someone gives a movie an F in the poll. If someone wants to do it, let them. It shouldn't affect anyone's life or good time on the board if someone exercises their right to vote in a poll they way they choose.
If neo_wolf did it, congratulations to him.
What responsibility from the head mod. Why even waste time with polls, if that's the attitude. Congratulations to anyone who taints the polls. Why would Krem have even bothered with taking the time to have that thread showing the best reviewed movies if that was the case. I seriously doubt anybody else is wanting to support and congratulate the practice of voting F grades in the polls. Others have even confused the "I don't plan to see this film" option with the F option and made mention of it, so I'm not the only one who doesn't like that, obviously.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:32 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
All I can say is for both to freaking let it go and not single out each other all the time. I am on good standings with both participants and I think the whole thing is stupid. But if you can't bury the hatchet, at least let it go and ignore each other. Personal attacks happen on these boards on daily basis. ON DAILY BASIS. And most of it is ignored, it is only brought up when it benefits one party in a personal feud.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:34 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
Maverikk wrote: Zingaling wrote: I don't understand what's the big deal if someone gives a movie an F in the poll. If someone wants to do it, let them. It shouldn't affect anyone's life or good time on the board if someone exercises their right to vote in a poll they way they choose.
If neo_wolf did it, congratulations to him. What responsibility from the head mod. Why even waste time with polls, if that's the attitude. Congratulations to anyone who taints the polls. Why would Krem have even bothered with taking the time to have that thread showing the best reviewed movies if that was the case. I seriously doubt anybody else is wanting to support and congratulate the practice of voting F grades in the polls. Others have even confused the "I don't plan to see this film" option with the F option and made mention of it, so I'm not the only one who doesn't like that, obviously.
Doesn't make it okay to call someone a bad Christian... 
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:35 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Goldie wrote: Maverikk wrote: It really doesn't surprise me that ONCE AGAIN, torrino is trying to start trouble with me. He does it all the time.
My comment to Goldie was a joke, and everyone knew it. Not that I really care as this is Mav being Mav. But when is a joke not a personal attack.*********************************************************** 9. Personal Attacks: Flame wars are a part of forums. The moderators and administrators will keep a check on any disagreements taking place between certain members here. The moderators will encourage ways to sort out the problems. As long as the discussion pertains to the subject at hand, the discussion is fine. If a moderator notices that a purely healthy discussion is turning into attacks on a person’s character or issues that are in no way relevant to the topic at hand, the moderators will step in and warn users from engaging in this type of behavior. Bottom line: Do not attack a person’s character, looks, and/or social life if it has no connection at all to the topic at hand. ***********************
I am not surprised that I got no responses from Mav or MOD Z.
Mav - since there is no way to explain that remark or the answer to the above question
MOD Z - your history of ignoring insults toward me continue
But I hope the ADM's give a decent answer to what kind of personal attacks, insults or gutter talk / language they want to allow on this trying to be respectable forum before they just end up closing this thread.
Last edited by Goldie on Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:35 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
da torri wrote: This thread is not about me, Maverikk, it is about you. That is why the title is "Maverikk." The title is NOT "torrino." If you want to make a separate "torrino" thread, you can make a separate "torrino" thread, where we can discuss torrino's behavior.
Now, let me ask, again: Why, exactly, do you think it's appropriate to call neo_wolf a "bad christian"?
Isn't it funny how both Eagle and bABA also made it about you? Perhaps they both recognize the real problem. I know I do, and I think the others here are intelligent enough to know that you are the real issue here, not me. I've got better things to do than to look for drama. Obviously, you don't.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:36 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Goldie wrote: I am not surprised that I got no responses from Mav or MOD Z.
Mav - since there is no way to explain that remark or the answer to the above question
Goldie, for Christ's sake, please don't act like you didn't keep replying to that thread trying to get a rise out of people. You responded to me by insulting my sexuality, and you don't see anybody saying anything to you about that, either. I really hope this place isn't so uptight that you can't be teased when you intentionally try to tease first.
Was that the answer you were looking for?
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:40 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
Maverikk wrote: da torri wrote: This thread is not about me, Maverikk, it is about you. That is why the title is "Maverikk." The title is NOT "torrino." If you want to make a separate "torrino" thread, you can make a separate "torrino" thread, where we can discuss torrino's behavior.
Now, let me ask, again: Why, exactly, do you think it's appropriate to call neo_wolf a "bad christian"? Isn't it funny how both Eagle and bABA also made it about you? Perhaps they both recognize the real problem. I know I do, and I think the others here are intelligent enough to know that you are the real issue here, not me. I've got better things to do than to look for drama. Obviously, you don't. da torri wrote: This thread is not about me, Maverikk, it is about you. That is why the title is "Maverikk." The title is NOT "torrino." If you want to make a separate "torrino" thread, you can make a separate "torrino" thread, where we can discuss torrino's behavior.
(and, for the record, they were talking about the way in which I created the thread, which isn't what you're going on about)
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:41 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: All I can say is for both to freaking let it go and not single out each other all the time. I am on good standings with both participants and I think the whole thing is stupid. But if you can't bury the hatchet, at least let it go and ignore each other. Personal attacks happen on these boards on daily basis. ON DAILY BASIS. And most of it is ignored, it is only brought up when it benefits one party in a personal feud.
Lecter, do you ever see me having a problem ignoring torriono? It's obvious that you need to have a serious talk with him to help him get some perspective, because this has been going on (and is well documented) for over a year with him and his antagonistic bullshit.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:43 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
Maverikk wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: All I can say is for both to freaking let it go and not single out each other all the time. I am on good standings with both participants and I think the whole thing is stupid. But if you can't bury the hatchet, at least let it go and ignore each other. Personal attacks happen on these boards on daily basis. ON DAILY BASIS. And most of it is ignored, it is only brought up when it benefits one party in a personal feud. Lecter, do you ever see me having a problem ignoring torriono? It's obvious that you need to have a serious talk with him to help him get some perspective, because this has been going on (and is well documented) for over a year with him and his antagonistic bullshit. da torri wrote: This thread is not about me, Maverikk, it is about you. That is why the title is "Maverikk." The title is NOT "torrino." If you want to make a separate "torrino" thread, you can make a separate "torrino" thread, where we can discuss torrino's behavior.
(btw, my name is da torri, not "torriono." Can I call you Mavadikk, then?)
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:48 pm |
|
 |
Goldie
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 12:38 pm Posts: 7286 Location: TOP*SECRET ******************** ******************** ******************** ********************
|
Maverikk wrote: Goldie wrote: I am not surprised that I got no responses from Mav or MOD Z.
Mav - since there is no way to explain that remark or the answer to the above question Goldie, for Christ's sake, please don't act like you didn't keep replying to that thread trying to get a rise out of people. You responded to me by insulting my sexuality, and you don't see anybody saying anything to you about that, either. I really hope this place isn't so uptight that you can't be teased when you intentionally try to tease first. Was that the answer you were looking for?
Mav, what are you talking about - are you a pathalogical liar?????????????
How did I first tease you???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
You made the above penis remark............... and then I asked wondering why you were thinking about it.
*****************************************
Love to see Mav responses when the above is documented by date stamps.
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:49 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Maverikk wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: All I can say is for both to freaking let it go and not single out each other all the time. I am on good standings with both participants and I think the whole thing is stupid. But if you can't bury the hatchet, at least let it go and ignore each other. Personal attacks happen on these boards on daily basis. ON DAILY BASIS. And most of it is ignored, it is only brought up when it benefits one party in a personal feud. Lecter, do you ever see me having a problem ignoring torriono? It's obvious that you need to have a serious talk with him to help him get some perspective, because this has been going on (and is well documented) for over a year with him and his antagonistic bullshit.
But it is a vicious circle, Mav. You always respond to the attacks and quite in a harsh way. If no party is willing to let it go, it will go down the spiral.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Mar 19, 2006 3:51 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|