About the deleted posts and topics, they're so distruptive they immediately need to be deleted. That says a lot.

[/b]

LOL.

Notice these were the first comments in the second post. I know I was never fooled by Lecter. Just the same old Lecter.

So Lecter, what are you going to do?

This isn't your web-site, you aren't a MOD but YOU ARE GOING TO DO WHAT MUST BE DONE!!!!!!!

-----------

And Mav, sorry but you are clueless. I love how COMMENTS LIKE LECTER OR others make about me you ignore.

In the other thread, I showed that all the people who started with me, I pushed back.

- Loyal - came into the thread and posted tasteless comments about me.

And go through my posts cause you are an ASS if you think I am only on here to fight - MOst of my talk is about movies.

- Go back to most peoples fight, it started based on their comments. If things are a problem go to the MODS.

But when others start with me, I am not going to take it.

Have I said that I'll do something to you? I don't think so, so back off, psycho.

Clueless, Lecter - That statement has some meaning. Sorry if I caught you.

You're a liar. You have severe mental issues that you better come to terms with and get help.

http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 1&start=25

Show me where anybody said shit to you until you started obsessing over Lecter. There is the proof. Present the proof that I'm clueless about Lecter starting on you.

Leave, Goldie, because it's never going to be a place where you are welcome at ever again, regardless of what the administrator does.

What meaning? Enlighten us.

And, um, what catching? I have repeated the same statement in the following 2 posts.

Again, MAV thinks his shit doesn't stink.

I have never met someone who always is so bossy and pig-headed.

Mav, sorry but this isn't the Movie Forum that you and Lecter as MODS drove into the ground.

AGAIN MAV IS CLUELESS - WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT MONTHS AGO. HEY EAGLE, ISN'T THAT OVER.

Let's go back to Lecter revolution talk at BOM and use that as Lecter's history.

Mav.

In the link you posted, it once again shows exactly what I am talking about.


Goldie started talking about the question ... saying he thought it was to vauge about 'not your true love' because it could be someone you really like, and thus ruins the question. He did it in a stupid way but it was a valid point anyways ... pointless because we all took the question the way goldie wanted it .... but whatever, not disruptive.

Then algren responded, and Lecter said something 'Indeed' and thats what got goldie to respond.

Should goldie have said anything. Nope. What he then says about lecter is disturbing and wrong. Lecter responded to goldie, and goldie jumped all over it. But apart fom Lecter, Loyal, Rouge and you I don't think goldie is a big issue, or a big concern.

I am not saying I don't see a problm here, I just don't think that banning is the right way to handle this. There has to be a better option.

hehe...speaking of clueless, you have no idea what happened at movie-fever, but it doesn't surprise me that you stalked Lecter over there.

Your opinion doesn't mean anything to me, just so you know...

Is there an option in the forum to individually ban people's comments??

That might fix things, thoguh i have never heard about such a function.


Ie... i hate Poster Y so i choose to ban poster Y from my account, so i cannot read his comments?

Thank you. And one big problem is that the people couldn't comprehend that.

LOve to see how MAV replies.

Goldie is the most annoying person on the internet. Yes, that includes the millions of illiterate morons on wireless internet who can't type a single comprehensible word. The only people more annoying on the web are crusty 50-year old perverts who are looking to have webcam sex with an impressionable teenager.

How obsessive can he get anyway? He never changes at all, he just continues his same bullshit: from attacking Lecter at random to spamming. The way he attacks Lecter reads like a 6-year old girl who has a crush on a boy and gives him hell because she likes him. Does this analogy hit at home for you, Goldie?

Is this honestly the best post you could make in the current situation? Insults on top of more insults?

You do realize that what you did in this thread is exactly what I asked you NOT to do right? I pleaded with you not to respond to Lecter and you did it anyways? Why?

Should be installed tonight.

Lecter was getting the thread back on track, and used Algrean's quote to do that. Goldie decided to start attacking Lecter, as he has done over and over and over in the same vain. How can you even defend that? Karl, don't stain your reputation because of him. He is not interested in changing. He's not interested in the rules. If two bannings doesn't convince you, I don't know what will, but I do ask that you let the forum members have a voice. If we can get 100 signatures, that should be enough of a mandate.

Sorry but I am pissed off.

Based on your comments, on the thread that MAV pointed out, was a valid response.

I don't like being held up as a scapegoat for these people.

I think you should do what you did originally - Erase this thread and have people deal with you through PM's.

Good i'm tired of listening to you Karl :razz: :razz: *cough* that was a joke

*hopes he relieved some tension*

*breakdances*

:old:
*walks away*

Mav, your not going to get 100 signitures, trust me on that much.

Massive PM campaign would be in plan then?

As that's the only way you could get 100 signatures here.

Anyway, ignore option coming soon. :-)

I understand that your pissed off, and I am sure that I would be too if I were you. I am trying to keep you a part of these boards, so you are going to have to help me help you.

Unfourtunatly I am not going to erase this thread. I need to know what people think on the issue .. mainly people apart from mav, lecter, and loyal. I know how those 3 feel, it has been noted, and now I need to know how others feel.


Quick question. Goldie if I get an ignore function operational, will you agree to Ignore Lecter's posts and possible Mav, Loyal and Rouge's as well?

What about this remark from Goldie to Loyal. Was it needed AT ALL, Karl?

http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 7&start=25

I will ignore their posts BY NOT QUOTING THEM but not their threads. Look at what I bumped up as I want the opportunity to respond withOUT quoting anyone.

Or if you would prefer I could start a seperate thread voicing my opinion - BUT I WOULD PREFER NOT TO DO THAT.

------------------------

HERE'S ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF GOLDIE GIVING GOOD SUGGESTIONS.

-----------------------

I have seen on some boards a REPORT THIS POST BUTTON. Is that something that could be installed.

Then people would be more accountable.

So now noone is allowed to kid around about someone's grammar? Loyal made a joke right back at him and that was the end of it. It didn't exactly disrupt the thread .... it looks to me like goldie came in to post his own review, and saw that and just made a joke about it ...

If someone can't let something like THAT roll off their chest maybe they shouldn't be on the internet.

Still waiting for reply so

As Lecter wants to talk about - was this needed.

Maybe you should talk to him about this.

So umm ... what did I miss?

What the hell is going on? When did this perma ban thing start and why?