Author |
Message |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Top actress earners
http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0 ... 98,00.html
Nicole Kidman is officially the highest paid female actor in Hollywood, with an earning power of $17m (£8.6m) a movie. The Moulin Rouge star topped the Hollywood Reporter's annual earning list for the first time. Last year's winner, Julia Roberts, did not make the top 10 after a quiet 12 months spent caring for her infant twins.
Kidman was followed on the chart by Reese Witherspoon. Winner of this year's best actress Oscar for Walk the Line, Witherspoon now commands up to $15m (£7.6m) a picture.
The top five was rounded out by Renee Zellweger, Drew Barrymore and Cameron Diaz. Halle Berry, Charlize Theron, Angelina Jolie, Kirsten Dunst and Friends graduate Jennifer Aniston completed the top 10.
------------
Sorting out the above, it looks like this
Kidman - 17m
Witherspoon - 15m
Zellweger - 15m
Barrymore - 15m
Diaz - 15m
Berry - 14m
Theron - 10m
Jolie - 10m
Dunst - 8-10m
Aniston - 8m
Added on edit: found another article on the subject
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061130/ap_ ... ple_kidman
Added info from it to the above list.
|
Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:51 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
Didn't Witherspoon recently get paid $20+ million to do a horror film?
|
Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:30 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21856 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Diaz was getting 25 million a picture, good to see shes not getting as high anymore, and I would say Roberts is probably right outside it still.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:39 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Drew Barrymore is an odd one. Is she riding on Charlie's Angels success? I like her and all, but 15mill?
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:11 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Where is Jodie Foster?!
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21856 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
Mr. X wrote: Drew Barrymore is an odd one. Is she riding on Charlie's Angels success? I like her and all, but 15mill?
Shes a producer so she knows how to manage money, but shes stayed in the public eye, there was 50 First Dates which was huge and Fever Pitch and Curious George which both did decent to good business.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:23 pm |
|
 |
Raffiki
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 12:14 am Posts: 9966
|
Were she to headline a big movie again, Julia could have it open to a larger audience and gross more than just about every actress on that list with maybe the exception of Witherspoon and Kidman. And when I mean a movie, I mean what she used to do, not her animated voice-over/supporting roles of late.
_________________ Top Movies of 2009 1. Hurt Locker / 2. (500) Days of Summer / 3. Sunshine Cleaning / 4. Up / 5. I Love You, Man
Top Anticipated 2009 1. Nine
|
Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:51 pm |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/852/
Hehe. Predicts Kirsten Dunst's career to be over soon and that Kidman should pay studios to hire her (what she says about her is true though).
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:31 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
I'd actually say that after Jodie Foster and the currently-not-starring Julia Roberts, Kidman is the next top female draw. I mean her movies might not be doing too great, but she did manage to open The Stepford Wives, Bewitched and The Interpreter above $20 million. Cold Mountain and The Others passed $90 million. As long as she stars in commercial projects, she is a draw. Once it gets to artsy stuff, not so much...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:17 pm |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
the reason the actresses seem to fluctuate in pay is because there are so many sources that print different things.
This list is the most sensible of the lot.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:20 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
Dr. Lecter wrote: I'd actually say that after Jodie Foster and the currently-not-starring Julia Roberts, Kidman is the next top female draw. I mean her movies might not be doing too great, but she did manage to open The Stepford Wives, Bewitched and The Interpreter above $20 million. Cold Mountain and The Others passed $90 million. As long as she stars in commercial projects, she is a draw. Once it gets to artsy stuff, not so much...
Uh, Reese? Yeah, Just Like Heaven disappointed and Vanity Fair disappeared, but It's not much worse than Kidman.
|
Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:42 am |
|
|