| Author |
Message |
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
 Bewitched Teaser Trailer!!
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:18 pm |
|
|
|
Steve
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:09 pm
Posts: 1882
|
Oh...
Oh no...
That is not right, that is not right at all.
_________________
how am I not myself?
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:26 pm |
|
|
|
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm
Posts: 11028
|
That looked so awful! And she couldnt move her nose!all she movved was her lips! 
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:35 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
Will looks too handsome in those pics.
The film will fail. Audiences like an odd Will, not leading man Will.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:38 pm |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
yep looks bad!
that nose!!!
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 4:54 pm |
|
|
|
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm
Posts: 8767
Location: Great Living Standards
|
loyalfromlondon wrote: Will looks too handsome in those pics.
The film will fail. Audiences like an odd Will, not leading man Will. Jumping the gun a bit there, ain't ya Loyal? How do you know that audiences prefer odd Will when this is really only his first try at being leading man Will.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:06 pm |
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
Snrub wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Will looks too handsome in those pics.
The film will fail. Audiences like an odd Will, not leading man Will. Jumping the gun a bit there, ain't ya Loyal? How do you know that audiences prefer odd Will when this is really only his first try at being leading man Will. Just looking into my crystal ball.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:22 pm |
|
|
|
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
|
Bad casting.
Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:25 pm |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
Archie Gates wrote: Bad casting.
Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate. Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old!
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:28 pm |
|
|
|
Atoddr
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 3014
Location: Kansai
|
Hmm....I thought Kidman had the look down really well. And who knows if Will might actually stay handsome throughout the whole movie?
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:46 pm |
|
|
|
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
|
matatonio wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Bad casting.
Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate. Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old! Yeah but you don't hire an Aussie to play someone who was an American sweetheart type. Just like Uma didn't work in as the classic Brit part Emma Peel.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:50 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Archie Gates wrote: matatonio wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Bad casting.
Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate. Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old! Yeah but you don't hire an Aussie to play someone who was an American sweetheart type. Just like Uma didn't work in as the classic Brit part Emma Peel. I don't know. Nicole Kidman has a wide range.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:05 pm |
|
|
|
El Maskado
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
|
Jim Carrey would of worked as Darrell, not Will Farrell. Look at the 60s series and see how Jim Carrey resembles Dick York almost to the T.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:05 pm |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
Jim Carrey is perfect for that role!!!
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:12 pm |
|
|
|
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
|
Libs wrote: Archie Gates wrote: matatonio wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Bad casting.
Jamie Lee Curtis would have been more appropriate. Jamie Lee Curtis?!?!?! :? shes to.......old! Yeah but you don't hire an Aussie to play someone who was an American sweetheart type. Just like Uma didn't work in as the classic Brit part Emma Peel. I don't know. Nicole Kidman has a wide range. Oh I'm sure she's technically capable of it, I'm just questioning whether the public will like it. But then I thought Kate Winslet would have been better in Bridget Jones than Renee Z. so what do I know.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:12 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
|
roidrage wrote: Jim Carrey would of worked as Darrell, not Will Farrell. Look at the 60s series and see how Jim Carrey resembles Dick York almost to the T. I believe Jim Carrey was cast alongside Kidman when the movie was first announced, but he had to drop out and be replaced by Will Ferrell.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:52 pm |
|
|
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 6:56 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie.
I think we're being a little quick to judge here.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:01 pm |
|
|
|
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
|
Eh, I wasn't a big fan of the trailer, but it doesn't look too awful.
_________________My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 7:05 pm |
|
|
|
xXVincentxX
La Bella Vito
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 9146
|
Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. 
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:17 pm |
|
|
|
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am
Posts: 13347
|
Pinkpanther wrote: Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait?
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:26 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48677
Location: Arlington, VA
|
Archie Gates wrote: Pinkpanther wrote: Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait? Yeah, I don't think that, but I do think people shouldn't say the movie itself actually looks "awful" when you haven't really seen anything at all from it. I mean, I'm not saying it looks great, because I haven't seen any actual footage yet.
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:17 pm |
|
|
|
lovemerox
Forum General
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:16 pm
Posts: 6499
Location: Down along the dixie line
|
Libs wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Pinkpanther wrote: Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait? Yeah, I don't think that, but I do think people shouldn't say the movie itself actually looks "awful" when you haven't really seen anything at all from it. I mean, I'm not saying it looks great, because I haven't seen any actual footage yet. I concur _________________
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:19 pm |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
well my only problem with the teaser is Nicole!! she cant move the nose the right way!! eck she doesnt even move the nose, just the mouth!!
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 9:20 pm |
|
|
|
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
|
Libs wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Pinkpanther wrote: Libs wrote: Zingaling wrote: Whoa. That movie looks horrible. But, box-office wise, it might do The Stepford Wives numbers. Come on, we've only seen a teaser that doesn't even feature any scenes from the movie. I think we're being a little quick to judge here. I agree Libs. People are being a little judgemental. They should wait for the full trailer before they state their opinions because that will feature clips from the movie. I thought the teaser was cute too. So you can have an opinion, that it was cute, but people who don't think it looks good should have to wait? Yeah, I don't think that, but I do think people shouldn't say the movie itself actually looks "awful" when you haven't really seen anything at all from it. I mean, I'm not saying it looks great, because I haven't seen any actual footage yet. _________________http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this
|
| Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:35 pm |
|
|
