Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 4:55 pm



Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
 Alba Talks Fantastic Four 2 
Author Message
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Alba Talks Fantastic Four 2
"We start 'Fantastic Four 2' in August," said Alba. "The four of us learn that there are other people out there with superpowers, and the Silver Surfer appears as a villain/hero. And another villain comes in as well. My character, Susan Storm, has another love triangle and may use a power people haven't seen before. She's the most powerful of the four."

FULL STORY HERE

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

I really hope this will turn out better than the last.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:17 am
Profile WWW
Newbie

Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 3:31 pm
Posts: 2
Location: Orlando
Post 
they'd be hard-pressed to make it much WORSE than the first one. Wow, what a debacle. Even a smashingly good-looking Alba couldn't come close to saving it. :wacko:


Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:09 pm
Profile WWW
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Alba Talks Fantastic Four 2
Dr. Lecter wrote:
My character, Susan Storm, has another love triangle and may use a power people haven't seen before. She's the most powerful of the four."

PMS?


Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:28 pm
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
I just have a feeling it may pull off a Tomb Raider 2. Incidently both of the sequels to their follow up was only 2 years apart and the original did good on dvds


Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:36 pm
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post 
Bret Ratner is the best wrote:
I just have a feeling it may pull off a Tomb Raider 2.

That's a complicated response. What do you mean by this? Tomb Raider 2 audience is split down the middle between "marginally better" and "slightly worse".


Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:21 pm
Profile WWW
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
It was better.

_________________
I'm out.


Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:22 pm
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
andaroo.temp wrote:
Bret Ratner is the best wrote:
I just have a feeling it may pull off a Tomb Raider 2.

That's a complicated response. What do you mean by this? Tomb Raider 2 audience is split down the middle between "marginally better" and "slightly worse".

I mean ticket receipts but at least no one is going to defend the movie here in the forums except BKB :)


Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:42 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40611
Post 
Yeah, I think box-office wise the 2007 sweepstakes will kind of kill it. I'll say 39/84 for now. The legs will be horrific.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Thu Jun 01, 2006 2:54 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
If the marketing will be as kick-ass as for the first one, it will still break $120 million.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:07 pm
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
I think the reason why Fantastic Four was a fluke was because marketting was geared towards letting us know about each character. I guess the mystique is gone now an they will be concentrating on the villian which would take away the interest already from the movie. I could see it pulling a TR2 meaning about 80 million gross but I cant see it going higher than 120 million


Thu Jun 01, 2006 3:14 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post 
I can only hope for a better film.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:05 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23386
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post 
Good point Ratner - the character introductions helped it - but I think the 2005 marketing has done enough to get people to watch a sequel. It did well among kids and families - so I think its still good for $100-$120m. Competition is fierce in Summer 07 but it has the benefit of being in the weakest (which is still good) month of summer 07 - June!

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:50 pm
Profile
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32636
Location: the last free city
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
If the marketing will be as kick-ass as for the first one, it will still break $120 million.


yep :D had teh best marketing of 2005.

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:14 pm
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Here's the thing with this movie: In order to REALLY do this justine, to do it right, FOX is going to have to up the budget BIG TIME to make GALACTUS even look remotely realistic that the audience will buy as well as The SILVER SURFER who will probably be Villain in the beginning and hero at the end if he turns on GALACTUS or vice versa. I'd say anything less than 200 Million for the budget FX wise and this will look Polarizing..


Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:07 pm
Profile WWW
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post 
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Here's the thing with this movie: In order to REALLY do this justine, to do it right, FOX is going to have to up the budget BIG TIME to make GALACTUS even look remotely realistic that the audience will buy as well as The SILVER SURFER who will probably be Villain in the beginning and hero at the end if he turns on GALACTUS or vice versa. I'd say anything less than 200 Million for the budget FX wise and this will look Polarizing..

How about using the budget to give the Thing a CGI look instead of looking like a halloween costume like Doctor Doom?Will some guy wear a big tin head and call himself GALACTUS?


Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:23 pm
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post 
Bret Ratner is the best wrote:
BKB_The_Man wrote:
Here's the thing with this movie: In order to REALLY do this justine, to do it right, FOX is going to have to up the budget BIG TIME to make GALACTUS even look remotely realistic that the audience will buy as well as The SILVER SURFER who will probably be Villain in the beginning and hero at the end if he turns on GALACTUS or vice versa. I'd say anything less than 200 Million for the budget FX wise and this will look Polarizing..

How about using the budget to give the Thing a CGI look instead of looking like a halloween costume like Doctor Doom?Will some guy wear a big tin head and call himself GALACTUS?


I totaly agree with this and I said that since day 1 before the 1st film was even released.. They should've went with an all CGI THING and for the love of God, MADE HIM BIGGER...


Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:33 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 16 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 89 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.