Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 13, 2025 2:05 am



Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Poseidon running time 
Author Message
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1906
Location: Middle Of Nowhere
Post Poseidon running time
Poseidon running time is only 98 minutes this information i get from my local theatres website. and i was shocked :shocked: i can't believe waht i saw really. i was expecting this movie will be at least 2 hours like TDAT. if this is true. i will be really dissapointed. i just hope this isn't true.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:24 pm
Profile ICQ WWW
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32622
Location: the last free city
Post 
damn O_o it'll get plenty of screens at least.

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:02 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Good, I dont need an overlong disaster film. This makes me wanna see it more, ofcourse thats only if they have it on an IMAX screen here.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:04 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm
Posts: 12096
Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Post 
It is surprising, but I won't complain. I'd rather have a great 98 minute movie than a padded 120 minute one. Sometimes I watch the extended version DVDs and say "Hey, I can see now why they took these scenes out."

A great film is never too long and a bad film is always too long.

_________________
Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com


Image


Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:19 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
lol! thats pretty good to me!

TDAT had very boring parts that really didnt need to be in the movie


Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:21 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
It's 117 minutes long.

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:45 pm
Profile YIM WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
movies35 wrote:
It's 117 minutes long.


...according to who? This sounds more reasonable, actually, but what's your source?


Sat Apr 29, 2006 5:59 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
Post 
That's what most sites are saying :) Fangango has it at 98 minutes, but they also had A LOT LIKE LOVE at like 147 minutes, and NARNIA at 178 minutes, so they can't always be trusted ;)

_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016

1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water


Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:00 pm
Profile YIM WWW
i break the rules, so i don't care
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 20411
Post 
To be honest, it looks like this film may have other problems.


Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:18 pm
Profile
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21890
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
The original was 117 minutes long according to IMDB.com, including credits. The film itself may be 98 minutes, but it may not include credits so it may be closer to 110 when all is said and done.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:32 pm
Profile
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
they probably cut everything with Fergie BEP out when the audience started to vomit uncontrolably every time she was onscreen.

_________________
I'm out.


Sun Apr 30, 2006 1:13 pm
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21890
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post 
Felicity Titwank wrote:
they probably cut everything with Fergie BEP out when the audience started to vomit uncontrolably every time she was onscreen.


Shame shame, fergie is so sexy, I love watching her perform.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Sun Apr 30, 2006 4:27 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post 
Supposedly the movie is pretty short, read it in a review. I don't like it either but oh, well...

_________________
Image


Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:33 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
Does anyone else think that, despite being a disposable summer blockbuster, the movie looks surprisingly boring?

I mean, at least The Day After Tomorrow and Independence Day and its ilk didn't take themselves all that seriously, this looks like they're going for Titanic 2.0.


Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:42 pm
Profile
No Wire Tampons!

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
Post 
well nothing really grabs me about the actual concept.
I mean ive already seen the wave that does it in the trailer. Wheres the rest of the disaster? You know what I mean? Theres not going to be much spectacle and thats something disaster movies need.

_________________
I'm out.


Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:45 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
Michael is on to something. Tight corridors, falls in and out of water, fire, seems very ho-hum.


Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post 
Libs wrote:
I mean, at least The Day After Tomorrow [...] didn't take themselve all that seriously.

It didn't? I remember differently...

_________________
Image


Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:13 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post 
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Michael is on to something. Tight corridors, falls in and out of water, fire, seems very ho-hum.

The meeting of different people, extreme circumstances, working together to reach a common goal, the group dinamic, forming of relationships, tensions, these are all things i like...

_________________
Image


Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:20 pm
Profile
Post 
Nazgul9 wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Michael is on to something. Tight corridors, falls in and out of water, fire, seems very ho-hum.

The meeting of different people, extreme circumstances, working together to reach a common goal, the group dinamic, forming of relationships, tensions, these are things i like...


There won't be much of that in 98 minutes (if the short running time is true). At best, we'll learn all the little quirks and issues in the few minutes before the wave hits.


Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:24 pm
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post 
loyalfromlondon wrote:
There won't be much of that in 98 minutes (if the short running time is true). At best, we'll learn all the little quirks and issues in the few minutes before the wave hits.

These things usually happen after the disaster hits. ;)

_________________
Image


Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:28 pm
Profile
Post 
Nazgul9 wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
There won't be much of that in 98 minutes (if the short running time is true). At best, we'll learn all the little quirks and issues in the few minutes before the wave hits.

These things happen after the disaster hits. ;)


No no no, follow the Irwin Allen model.

Introduce characters (heavy drinker, blind follower, gambler, whore...) disaster hits, people die, people live, insert song.


Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:31 pm
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40566
Post 
I'm actually not really interested either. There's so many other awesome ass blockbusters coming out this summer, I might end up waiting for DVD.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:50 pm
Profile
Team Kris
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm
Posts: 27584
Location: The Damage Control Table
Post 
Will there be a love theme to this version? :unsure:

_________________
A hot man once wrote:
Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.


Sun Apr 30, 2006 6:51 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post 
Christian wrote:
Will there be a love theme to this version? :unsure:

No Jack and Rose, no. At least i don't think so. Difficult to squeeze that in when your movie runs for only 98 minutes.

_________________
Image


Sun Apr 30, 2006 7:00 pm
Profile
Post 
there's got to be a morning after.

I love the South Park episode that used the song.


Sun Apr 30, 2006 7:13 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.