Author |
Message |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days sequel being written
"Paramount Pictures has tapped screenwriters Keith Merryman and David A. Newman to pen How to Lose It All, a sequel to the hit romantic comedy How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days, according to The Hollywood Reporter."
FULL STORY HERE
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Well, seeing how Failure to Launch has performed, I suppose here's another romcom hit for McConaughey.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:24 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Well...
This is either (a) bad because it only exists because the first one made money or (b) awesome because I looooooved the first one.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:39 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40246
|
Woot.
Even though it is just a money grab, I'll be there for sure.
_________________Shackâs top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:04 pm |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15497 Location: Everywhere
|
I liked it quite a bit actually. I'll be there.
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:06 pm |
|
 |
tina_als_girl
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 3:43 pm Posts: 2252 Location: Wellsville, MO
|
Well, I know who'll be seein' it: my sister. She LOVES that movie. In fact, she almost went as far as purchasing a dress for her prom that looked very similar to Kate's yellow dress from the near-end of the movie...
Yeah, I can't wait to see her reaction when I tell her about this sequel.
Joy
|
Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:38 pm |
|
 |
Bell
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 12:02 am Posts: 1906 Location: Middle Of Nowhere
|
is this sequel needed?
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 2:43 pm |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
Romantic Comedy Sequels? Oh yeah because that's worked so well in the past.
It's almost never been done before.
MMchardtospell must really have no shame in his career. He just takes his shirt off in lots of schmucky romantic comedies.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:34 pm |
|
 |
AlexGTX
Speed Racer
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:16 pm Posts: 192
|
Jesus Christ!
Who would make a sequel to this piece of shit?!

_________________
See Hard Candy!
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:26 pm |
|
 |
movies35
Forum General
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm Posts: 8627 Location: Syracuse, NY
|
The first was alright. I'll see the second if Kate returns.
_________________ Top 10 Films of 2016
1. La La Land 2. Other People 3. Nocturnal Animals 4. Swiss Army Man 5. Manchester by the Sea 6. The Edge of Seventeen 7. Sing Street 8. Indignation 9. The Lobster 10. Hell or High Water
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 7:18 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
Bell wrote: is this sequel needed? Apparently, a sequel to this is one of the best ideas in the history of sequels. If I was a studio head, I would greenlight it. Libs: Quote: This is either (a) bad because it only exists because the first one made money or (b) awesome because I looooooved the first one. Shack: Quote: I'll be there for sure. DP07: Tina: Quote: Well, I know who'll be seein' it: my sister. movies: Quote: The first was alright. I'll see the second if Kate returns.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:02 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
I wish the first one never happened. Now this?
I've come to a terribly relevant realization. Heterosexual romcoms are almost always the bane of my existence. I must truly be hetrophonic.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:11 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
I can't support romantic comedies because love, romance and comedy is all a lie, an illusion.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:14 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
andaroo wrote: I can't support romantic comedies because love, romance and comedy is all a lie, an illusion.
Love's an illusion....
You and your sorry pessimism. Then again, considering the rest of civilization gobbles up this stuff might stave off any hope left in your dismal, dreary little soul.
But, wait, Pride & Prejudice was a romantic comedy. And its adorable. Therefore, you are WRONG.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:17 pm |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
andaroo wrote: I can't support romantic comedies because love, romance and comedy is all a lie, an illusion.
I love it when you talk dirty.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:22 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
makeshift wrote: andaroo wrote: I can't support romantic comedies because love, romance and comedy is all a lie, an illusion. I love it when you talk dirty.
Does it excite you?
I'm quite aroused but Harry Potter is on Disney Channel. Darn. Gotta scoot.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:23 pm |
|
 |
andaroo1
Lord of filth
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:47 pm Posts: 9566
|
BTW, I loved Pride & Prejudice.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:26 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
andaroo wrote: BTW, I loved Pride & Prejudice.
I bought it and watched it with the family.
My mother was too disinterested to give an opinion, while my stepfather found it to be excruciating. I think he called it "one of those movies you watch in 12th grade under the supervision of an old, festering Lit teacher".
It was (and still is) the most fun I've had at the movies in ages. I get so wrapped up in the imagery, score, and the Keira.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:30 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
I'd see it if it had most of the original talent involved again.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:35 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
Archie Gates wrote: I'd see it if it had most of the original talent involved again.
Not you, too. 
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 9:37 pm |
|
 |
Terminator1997
George A. Romero
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:30 pm Posts: 9773 Location: Enjoying a cold pint
|
how to lose a guy in 11 days?
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:00 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48677 Location: Arlington, VA
|
Yes, I can fully admit I love chick flicks. Especially feather-light ones like this.
I'm wondering about a sequel to this. For example, Legally Blonde is easily in my top 15 favorites ever. The sequel, however, was one of the worst moves released in this decade so far.
|
Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:48 pm |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
SEQUELS defeat the purpose of the original.
In a romcom, at the end they fall in love and live happily ever after and have nice, clean, suburban babies and everything is wonderful and sparkly.
end of story. A sequel means that there was something wrong with the happily ever after...
_________________ I'm out.
|
Sun Apr 16, 2006 4:56 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
Felicity Titwank wrote: SEQUELS defeat the purpose of the original. In a romcom, at the end they fall in love and live happily ever after and have nice, clean, suburban babies and everything is wonderful and sparkly.
end of story. A sequel means that there was something wrong with the happily ever after...
True. Even more successful romcoms haven't been sequelized. I mean the makers of My Big Fat Greek Wedding, Hitch, What Women Want, Pretty Woman and My Best Friend's Wedding had all (monetary) reasons to make sequels to their films, yet they didn't.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:37 pm |
|
|