I have no idea how this thread transformed into it. But it appears anything mildly related with the actress online is transformed into stupid immaturity. Although i cant say im surprised considering who started it

Comparing these actresses on the same level is wrong, Julia Roberts is a far far bigger star.
Suggesting that Miss Garner may fill Robert's gap in Hollywood soon is not wrong - her career continues to blossom despite a setback which has faded and left to real risidual bad PR on her hands.
Pointing out the similarities between Julia Roberts and Jennifer Garner is not wrong - The same megawatt smile, the same comedic aptness and [from what ive seen] the same versatility. But Jennifer Garners still a $5-10m a picture actress; wheras julia gets $25m and a percentage.... so yeah.

And PinkPanther - ill keep your kind and wholy mature remarks in mind when i see another thread about Hillary Duff or Christina Aguleria, who i dont particularly like =;

I think thats how it got started. : )

lets not turn this into another garner thread please.

That is fine because you are entitled to your own opinion, and so am I. I don't have to praise Jennifer Garner like she is Jesus or something.

Nor do you have to imply she has a penis then take a hissy fit when i say christina aguleria sounds like shes got whale in her. Two ways buddy.

Im more than happpy not to - for its like a bad movie - same formula, same suspects stir up with the same remarks.

Then the same people [me] get pissed of and flip out.

I am so sick of every single thread on here turning into a fight between two members. I'm about ready to just leave. Yeah, and I mean it.

I can imply whatever I want to, and there is nothing you can do about it, so shut up.

I have no idea what your problem is, you message me on aol acting all friendly then i get people messaging me telling me you like bitch about me to them over the messaging program.

Whats your beef with me? I really dont know/want to know you after that whole trickery fiasco back at BOM so just steer clear, yeah?

I think it would cause less tension on the forums.

Back to topic, who's directing Charlotte's Web?

Gary Winick, who also helmed 13 Going on 30.

I hope that wasn't towards me. [-(

I've seen that one.

I hope Henson's Creature Shop does the animatronics.

Wait...

Is this live action or animation?

Of course not. I like you. :wink:

Ok. :wink:

I believe it is live action. Charlotte will be CGI though most likely, as I hear they are having some trouble getting the spiders to cooperate on set.

It's live action with animatronics.

Animatronics? So no CGI? That'd be awesome. It'd be like Labyrinth all over again!

Its animated live action .. its like sooo far out ... to even try to understand this cause your brain to decombust.

It'll be a blend I'm sure.

CGI might even be cheaper than traditonal animatronics at this point. I don't know the cost comparison of full time puppeteers to computer animaters.

Isn't that Waking Life or Polar Express? :razz:

No, damnit! NO!

Labyrinth.... Dark Crystal....

Jim? Where are you Jim?

:laugh: :laugh: Thats just priceless

But seriously get rid of Oprah. She will eat Wilbur and she stuffs 300 porkchops a year I heard. Not exactly the type of role model to do these types of movies. There was a rumor where she ate the original pig who played Babe and all his stunt doubles

It's the new official "watch two posters go at it" picture.

no