Author |
Message |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
 Here Is Some CGI FX Footage From "MEG" or JAWS 5..
http://www.flowlines.info/vfxreel.html
Click on this link and go to the "MEGOLODON" Quicktime Footage.. It's not coming up for me, but you might have better luck.. The Posters at CHUD said it looks Amazing for being CGI.. Any truth to this??
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:04 am |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
hmmm....i think it looks a little cartoony, but when it jump out of the water it look freaking sweet 
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:18 am |
|
 |
gardenia.11/14....
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:43 am Posts: 1241 Location: the south
|
A big shark..........
_________________ -------------------------------------------------------- My book>hollywoodatemybrain.com<... True?!..
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:25 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
matatonio wrote: hmmm....i think it looks a little cartoony, but when it jump out of the water it look freaking sweet 
What exactly does it show and how long is the footage?? Can any pics be posted?? When it jumps out of the water, does it look really big and more importantly, does it look like this will at LEAST be better than the Direct To Video movies like SHARK ATTACK 3 or The SHARKHUNTER?? 
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:11 am |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21856 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
I think the effects look good, even though you can really tell its CGI ( I could see the cartoony aspect too) but the thing I find interesting is that the shark can go faster than a helecopter more or less going 100 mph.
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:35 am |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:48 am |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
now that i look at it more, it does look pretty bad.... needs some fixing i guess
.. dont know
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 3:49 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
COLOR ME EXTREMELY IMPRESSED!!! I'm not seeing the discerning eye for recognizing this is CGI and looks pretty damn impressive for what something like this would look like at 70 Foot.. These pics give me great hope this will look far better than any of those Direct To DVD movies based on this..
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:30 am |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
I believe I read somewhere (perhaps on Steve Alten's site) that they were making MEG a bit smaller.
I don't care how big or small she is. The 3 books were fantastic, and a fourth is coming out in conjunction with the film.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:39 am |
|
 |
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
|
ManicForMunich wrote: I believe I read somewhere (perhaps on Steve Alten's site) that they were making MEG a bit smaller.
I don't care how big or small she is. The 3 books were fantastic, and a fourth is coming out in conjunction with the film.
I think they said the shark would be 60 foot in the movie.. I've only read the 1st Novel "MEG" and while it was a good summer thriller, I'm hoping and praying the movie doesn't have the ending of the 1st Novel being HIGHLIGHT FOR SPOILER: They take a page from the Bible with "Jonah and the Whale" and have Dr. Jonas Taylor aim straight for the MEG'S Mouth with his submersible sub and he enters the monster.. Once inside, he proceeds to take the MEG Tooth he carries with him for luck and cut out the shark's beating heart causing the MEG to instantly die.. Problem with this scenario is your expecting the audience to by the theory that a Man could survive the digestive juices of this Shark and that it wouldn't eat through his wet suit and kill him.. Better to just kill this thing in the movie with a Torpedo cause in real life, that's the ONLY way it could be done.. The audience will laugh if they use the ending of the 1st novel in the movie..
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:58 am |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
I'm in. Looks pretty damn cool to me as well. When is this set to release?
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:56 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
heres the thing
i hate the premise. a shark found at the bottom of the ocean now all the way to the top. the pressure would kill it. this fish shouldn't have any physical characteristics they're showing.
now all i need to do is get over that premise because that footage is awesome
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:59 am |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
bABA wrote: heres the thing
i hate the premise. a shark found at the bottom of the ocean now all the way to the top. the pressure would kill it. this fish shouldn't have any physical characteristics they're showing.
now all i need to do is get over that premise because that footage is awesome
the book explains that away (sort of). 
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:35 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
ManicForMunich wrote: bABA wrote: heres the thing
i hate the premise. a shark found at the bottom of the ocean now all the way to the top. the pressure would kill it. this fish shouldn't have any physical characteristics they're showing.
now all i need to do is get over that premise because that footage is awesome the book explains that away (sort of). 
send me the book. explanations are always good. lack of explanations with acknowledgement to the issue (example: How is this even possible. this is how it should be) is also good. that puts my worrys to rest.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:46 am |
|
 |
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm Posts: 19747
|
Impressive considering the FX isn't even final yet.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:35 am |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
The xplanation for something like that was actually given in the novel JAWS. Hooper says that because the fish survived so long at the bottom of the ocean, doesn't mean that they were never higher up. The pressure would therefore not kill them because they have adapted over time to the bottom of the ocean. Therefore because they are adpaptable creatures, they could survive near the top but would not need to as the food chain near the bottot of the ocean is abundant enough to negate the need to surface.
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:45 am |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
baumer72 wrote: The xplanation for something like that was actually given in the novel JAWS. Hooper says that because the fish survived so long at the bottom of the ocean, doesn't mean that they were never higher up. The pressure would therefore not kill them because they have adapted over time to the bottom of the ocean. Therefore because they are adpaptable creatures, they could survive near the top but would not need to as the food chain near the bottot of the ocean is abundant enough to negate the need to surface.
so meg is a fish that may have lived closer to the surface, then moved all the way down about 29000 feet and then came all the way back up?
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:48 am |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
bABA wrote: baumer72 wrote: The xplanation for something like that was actually given in the novel JAWS. Hooper says that because the fish survived so long at the bottom of the ocean, doesn't mean that they were never higher up. The pressure would therefore not kill them because they have adapted over time to the bottom of the ocean. Therefore because they are adpaptable creatures, they could survive near the top but would not need to as the food chain near the bottot of the ocean is abundant enough to negate the need to surface. so meg is a fish that may have lived closer to the surface, then moved all the way down about 29000 feet and then came all the way back up?
Not the actual fish in the movie, but the species of it, yes.
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:01 pm |
|
 |
bABA
Commander and Chef
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am Posts: 30505 Location: Tonight ... YOU!
|
baumer72 wrote: bABA wrote: baumer72 wrote: The xplanation for something like that was actually given in the novel JAWS. Hooper says that because the fish survived so long at the bottom of the ocean, doesn't mean that they were never higher up. The pressure would therefore not kill them because they have adapted over time to the bottom of the ocean. Therefore because they are adpaptable creatures, they could survive near the top but would not need to as the food chain near the bottot of the ocean is abundant enough to negate the need to surface. so meg is a fish that may have lived closer to the surface, then moved all the way down about 29000 feet and then came all the way back up? Not the actual fish in the movie, but the species of it, yes.
not completely satisfied but i'll let it pass.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:14 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
I PRAY that they keep the opening scene from the book in the film.
MEG takes out a T-Rex that wanders too close to waters edge.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:18 pm |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
ManicForMunich wrote: I PRAY that they keep the opening scene from the book in the film.
MEG takes out a T-Rex that wanders too close to waters edge.
Is that for real? Because that would get everyone into the theaters right away. Tell me you are not BSing us...and how do i get the book and what is it called?
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:49 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
baumer72 wrote: ManicForMunich wrote: I PRAY that they keep the opening scene from the book in the film.
MEG takes out a T-Rex that wanders too close to waters edge. Is that for real? Because that would get everyone into the theaters right away. Tell me you are not BSing us...and how do i get the book and what is it called?
When the book first came out, the quote that made the media rounds was
Jurassic Shark
There are three books
MEG (first and still the best)
The Trench (good, adds a new aquatic monster, and a Blofeld type villian.
Primal Waters (great follow-up, has a reality show spin)
The opening with the T-Rex BTW in MEG, is not present day (not to confuse anyone). It just sets up how 65 Million years ago, the T-Rex definitely wasn't the apex hunter.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:55 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
Pretty good stuff. I love this sort of stuff... hehe. 
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:58 pm |
|
 |
Anonymous
|
I hope they land Dennis Quaid for the lead. I know I know, he was in JAWS 3D.
But Dr. Jonas Taylor screams Dennis Quaid.
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:02 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
I hate Dennis Quad. He ruined Jaws 3D
(No, it wasn't the fact that it was a crappy second sequel with a low budget and shit production values)
|
Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:21 pm |
|
|