Author |
Message |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 RATE! RATE!
F for Fake
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:57 am |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32635 Location: the last free city
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
A for J Ai Ho! 
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
Last edited by Rev on Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:02 am |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
Bits that worked:
The Reader in the opening The group of actors presenting The running time The stage design Comedy contage (sort of)
Bits that didn't work:
Animation/Action/Romance montages The rest of the opening tribute to Musicals
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:02 am |
|
 |
O
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm Posts: 12197
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
loyalfromlondon wrote: Bits that worked:
The Reader in the opening The group of actors presenting The running time The stage design
Bits that didn't work:
Comedy/Animation/Action/Romance montage The rest of the opening tribute to Musicals Bit that didn't work most for me was the singing during the In Memorium part. It just didn't work and was the lowpoint for the night. Otherwise overall I thought it was pretty good.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:06 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
The whole thing was a mess.
They need to hire people that know what the fuck they're doing
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:07 am |
|
 |
Keyser Söze
Quality is a great business plan
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 9:21 pm Posts: 6787
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
I would give it a B. Group of ex-winners presenting the awards was an excellent idea.
_________________ The world is all about mind and matter, I don't mind and U don't matter
I used to be shawman.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:08 am |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
that was a fabulous show. Not looking at the actual winners, but the ceremony and the nominations presentations and the speeches... it blew away anything that I'd seen before (but I'd say the first time I watched and was really aware of what was going on was Chicago's year).
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:13 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
Ew.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:14 am |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
which recent year would you deem better, and why?
Having five winners give a personal speech to each nominee > one person reading a short description of their characters. Having Queen Latifah sing live during In Memorium > some old sappy music playing in the background The numerous musical numbers > the bad Best Song performances (even though we had those as well this year) Pineapple Express stoned cast laughing at The Reader > Some dramatic actor praising The Reader's "artistry" etc...
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:15 am |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40602
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
One part that really bugged me was cutting to Latifah and the moving camera during the dead montage, I couldn't read some of the names and positions.
Clips > actor descriptions. By far.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:19 am |
|
 |
Magic Mike
Wallflower
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:53 am Posts: 35249 Location: Minnesota
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
The ceremony was alright. Not great. I miss the clips for performances. I certainly miss the way they used to do it.
On this scale I'd give it a B (my actual rating is a B-).
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:19 am |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
loyalfromlondon wrote: Bits that worked:
The Reader in the opening The group of actors presenting The running time The stage design
Bits that didn't work:
Comedy/Animation/Action/Romance montage The rest of the opening tribute to Musicals agreed on all counts, though i thought the comedy montage was a bit more charming - certainly more than the rest! ugh!
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:21 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
The In Memorium section was a total disaster.
The show started strong but ended weakly. The new presenters were stupid. Where were DDL and Javier?
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:22 am |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
zennier wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Bits that worked:
The Reader in the opening The group of actors presenting The running time The stage design
Bits that didn't work:
Comedy/Animation/Action/Romance montage The rest of the opening tribute to Musicals agreed on all counts, though i thought the comedy montage was a bit more charming - certainly more than the rest! ugh! I'll actually pull back on Comedy, it was the better of the 4 and was actually produced vs thrown together.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:24 am |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
i dont want actors telling me how great the performance was. I want to see clips from the movie to show me how great the performance was.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:25 am |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
trixster wrote: The In Memorium section was a total disaster.
I'd agree with this in that it was quite frustrating, the way it was filmed and all. Watching it streaming over the net, I found it quite difficult to see many of the names. Did I just miss it, or was Heath not in this? Was he in last years? I forget - do they do this by calendar year or by "year" related to when the show broadcasts? Granted, BSA was Heath's memorial, but still. And, to emphasize, that stage design was gorgeous. Absolutely stunning.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:27 am |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
Nite Owl wrote: i dont want actors telling me how great the performance was. I want to see clips from the movie to show me how great the performance was. Why, so we can have an awkward, decontextualized + dragging "reminder" of their work? I much prefer the actors, if only for the spectacle of their entrance alone. Sexy!
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:28 am |
|
 |
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
The "In Memoriam" segment was poorly done, without a doubt. I thought most of the changes were superb and LOVED Hugh's hosting (voted A on the poll), but they should have left the "In Memoriam" presentation alone. Clips set to sentimental music. Using different cameras to film television screens showing the clips was a strange and nasty idea. I have a feeling it was done, at least in part, to incorporate Queen Latifah's presence and singing more ("See, we're not just playing music, we brought in a celebrity performer!"). Meh.
_________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:30 am |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
I'm in the "speeches about the actors rather than the work we're supposedly honoring" = worst decision of life camp. It made literally no sense, no sense at all.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:30 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
zennier wrote: trixster wrote: The In Memorium section was a total disaster.
I'd agree with this in that it was quite frustrating, the way it was filmed and all. Watching it streaming over the net, I found it quite difficult to see many of the names. Did I just miss it, or was Heath not in this? Was he in last years? I forget - do they do this by calendar year or by "year" related to when the show broadcasts? Granted, BSA was Heath's memorial, but still. And, to emphasize, that stage design was gorgeous. Absolutely stunning. Heath was in last year's, as he died in January. But yeah, the moving camera + multiple screens made the whole thing impossible to watch and downright ugly.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:31 am |
|
 |
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am Posts: 34865 Location: Maryland
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
zennier wrote: Nite Owl wrote: i dont want actors telling me how great the performance was. I want to see clips from the movie to show me how great the performance was. Why, so we can have an awkward, decontextualized + dragging "reminder" of their work? I much prefer the actors, if only for the spectacle of their entrance alone. Sexy! I agree. I enjoyed the new way of presenting. Robert De Niro's introduction of Sean Penn, for example, was a lot more interesting and charming than a 10-second clip of him yelling "I'M HARVEY MILK AND I'M HERE TO RECRUIT YOU!" would have been.
_________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:31 am |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
There was something Superman-like when past winners were standing on stage presenting the nominees. Reminded me of that scene when the Krypton tribunal was sentencing General Zod, Ursa, and Non.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:31 am |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
I'm still bothered that they didn't think it was appropriate to have 5 directors on stage. Who the fuck directs the actors?
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:32 am |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
Furthermore, the presentation of the acting awards completely decontextualized the process for the audience, especially considering most viewers haven't seen the performances being honored, and reduced it, then, to merely a masturbation to starpower and sappiness.
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:33 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: RATE! RATE!
How about when Alan Arkin called PSH "Seymour Philip Hoffman"? Or Christopher Walken mumbling through his lines?
I'll take clips, please.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:33 am |
|
|