Flat out bad best picture nominees
Author |
Message |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Flat out bad best picture nominees
that you've seen. not "pretty good but not bp material," not even "ok,"...movies that you genuinely disliked.
o Tootsie - Columbia - Sydney Pollack and Dick Richards o Field of Dreams - Universal - Lawrence Gordon, Charles Gordon o The Sixth Sense - Hollywood Pictures - Frank Marshall, Kathleen Kennedy, Barry Mendel * 2000 Gladiator - DreamWorks & Universal * 2005 Crash - Lions Gate - Paul Haggis, Cathy Schulman o Babel - Paramount Vantage - Alejandro González Iñárritu, Steve Golin, Jon Kilik o The Reader - MGM, The Weinstein Company - Nominees to Be Determined
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:28 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Crash
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:28 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Babel, yes. I really couldn't stand that movie. And I actually liked Crash! It's like they took all of the worst parts of Crash and magnified them by a million percent.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:31 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Does a C-grade equal dislike?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:32 pm |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
you know what's really odd. As movies have gotten better, in my estimation anyway, from the 80's to 90's to 00's, the Best Picture nominees have gotten progressively worse.
There's such a huge disconnect. You have truly amazing films like Before Sunset, Eternal Sunshine, Once, Children of Men, Kill Bill Volumes 1 and 2, and yet we get Best Picture nominees like Capote, Babel, Seabiscuit, The Reader, and Crash.
Odd.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:38 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Dr. Lecter wrote: Does a C-grade equal dislike? I guess it depends. Dislike means dislike. For me, it's D grades. C is average.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:43 pm |
|
 |
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am Posts: 16163 Location: Croatia
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
2008 - Juno 2006 - Babel, Queen 2005 - Crash 2002 - Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers 1998 - La vita e bella
All of these were horrid. I haven't seen a lot of the older nominees. I suppose there are a lot of stinkers in the crop.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:43 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Juno Crash The Cider House Rules Shine Forrest Gump Scent of a Woman Awakenings Ghost Rain Man Tootsie
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:47 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:49 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:54 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40602
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Babel Benjamin Button
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:56 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Mr. Joseph X wrote: Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods. They're not bad movies, though. Undeserving, maybe. But not out-and-out bad.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:58 pm |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Mr. Joseph X wrote: Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods. How many films in just this decade were nominated based on a single performance Juno The Reader The Queen Capote Ray Lost in Translation A Beautiful Mind Erin Brockovich Frost/Nixon it's a bit insane.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:58 pm |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Hmm...there a number of mediocre movies that have been nominated, but the Academy tends to not nominate flat-out bad movies as much as average ones that are so much weaker than the movies they ignore. Babel, which I give a C-/D+ to, is probably the lowest grade I've given a BP nom. But I liked it when I first saw it; it took a second viewing a year later to discover its really weak qualities.
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:59 pm |
|
 |
junio
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 2:23 pm Posts: 1778 Location: Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Gladiator and Babel come to mind.
I haven't seen it but how in the world did The Towering Inferno get itself nominated? And Crossfire?
_________________
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:06 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
loyalfromlondon wrote: Mr. Joseph X wrote: Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods. How many films in just this decade were nominated based on a single performance Juno The Reader The Queen Capote Ray Lost in Translation A Beautiful Mind Erin Brockovich Frost/Nixon it's a bit insane. I'd take Lost in Translation, Juno and A Beautiful Mind off of there (but then wtf was A Beautiful Mind nominated for?)
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:08 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
I genuinely disliked Capote other than Philip Seymour Hoffman and Catherine Keener's performances. That's the only film I can think of from recent memory, though. I usually at least like/admire the Best Picture nominees on at least some level even if I'm not a huge fan (see: Frost/Nixon, The Queen, Finding Neverland, Gangs of New York).
Oh, just kidding, I thought The Thin Red Line was devastatingly dull. I guess that counts.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:10 pm |
|
 |
Alex Y.
Top Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm Posts: 5824
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
for the past four years, there has been one Oscar nominee that makes my worst 3 films of the year:
BP nominees I disliked from this decade: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (C) Michael Clayton (C-) The Queen (C-) Babel (C) Brokeback Mountain (C) Capote (C-) A Beautiful Mind (D+) Gosford Park (D)
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:10 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40602
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
I'm getting closer to putting ABM on my "bad" list. The more I think about Ron Howard turning schitzophrenia into "Adventures with my 3 imaginary friends" while vastly censoring the Nash story, the more angry I get. Crowe's brilliant performance aside.
Oh and the Thin Red Line is horrible
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:11 pm |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
snack wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Mr. Joseph X wrote: Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods. How many films in just this decade were nominated based on a single performance Juno The Reader The Queen Capote Ray Lost in Translation A Beautiful Mind Erin Brockovich Frost/Nixon it's a bit insane. I'd take Lost in Translation, Juno and A Beautiful Mind off of there (but then wtf was A Beautiful Mind nominated for?) ABM was a baity biopic set in a AMPAS-friendly time period. I don't think Juno or Lost in Translation would have been nominated without Murray or Page.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:12 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
trixster wrote: Mr. Joseph X wrote: Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods. They're not bad movies, though. Undeserving, maybe. But not out-and-out bad. No, I don't think they were bad movies either. I just think when you're talking in terms of the five best movies of the year, they don't even make the honorable mentions. But, when has the Academy really nominated the five best movies of any given year?
I love Juno and Lost in Translation, but yeah... much of my love is due to Page and Murray, respectively.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:30 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
loyalfromlondon wrote: snack wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Mr. Joseph X wrote: Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods. How many films in just this decade were nominated based on a single performance Juno The Reader The Queen Capote Ray Lost in Translation A Beautiful Mind Erin Brockovich Frost/Nixon it's a bit insane. I'd take Lost in Translation, Juno and A Beautiful Mind off of there (but then wtf was A Beautiful Mind nominated for?) ABM was a baity biopic set in a AMPAS-friendly time period. I don't think Juno or Lost in Translation would have been nominated without Murray or Page. I don't think we would even know what Juno was without Page.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:31 pm |
|
 |
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm Posts: 16020
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
ABM was well done, I thought.
Maybe I was really taken by Crowe's performance (Denzel should've won in '00 instead of Crowe...and Crowe should've won in '01 instead of Denzel)...but I think schizophrenia is a rougher topic to portray...and for that movie to click worldwide, when it's really just about a loony mathematician? Even more impressive.
Not to mention, LOTR:FOTR couldn't win (imagine the backlash if The Two Towers was crap?), Moulin Rouge! was polarizing, and Gosford Park and In the Bedroom didn't deserve financing from the get-go.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:36 pm |
|
 |
MadGez
Dont Mess with the Gez
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am Posts: 23386 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
loyalfromlondon wrote: you know what's really odd. As movies have gotten better, in my estimation anyway, from the 80's to 90's to 00's, the Best Picture nominees have gotten progressively worse.
There's such a huge disconnect. You have truly amazing films like Before Sunset, Eternal Sunshine, Once, Children of Men, Kill Bill Volumes 1 and 2, and yet we get Best Picture nominees like Capote, Babel, Seabiscuit, The Reader, and Crash.
Odd. Good point. Absolutely agree that movies have gotten better from the 80s to the 90s and then to the 00s yet some of the oscar choices have been baffling to say the least. For example, imagine how great it would have been if the 2004 noms were; Before Sunset Sideways Eternal Sunshine The Aviator Kill Bill Vol 2 Instead the Academy gave us; Million Dollar Baby Finding Neverland Ray The Aviator Sideways  I guess its a product of the increasing influence of studio (yeah you Harvey) lobbying and campaigning.
_________________
What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @
http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:52 pm |
|
 |
snack
Extraordinary
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm Posts: 12159
|
 Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
^at first I thought you took out Sideways there. I was gonna cut you.
|
Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:53 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|