Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Jul 21, 2025 7:46 pm



Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 Flat out bad best picture nominees 
Author Message
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Flat out bad best picture nominees
that you've seen. not "pretty good but not bp material," not even "ok,"...movies that you genuinely disliked.

o Tootsie - Columbia - Sydney Pollack and Dick Richards
o Field of Dreams - Universal - Lawrence Gordon, Charles Gordon
o The Sixth Sense - Hollywood Pictures - Frank Marshall, Kathleen Kennedy, Barry Mendel
* 2000 Gladiator - DreamWorks & Universal
* 2005 Crash - Lions Gate - Paul Haggis, Cathy Schulman
o Babel - Paramount Vantage - Alejandro González Iñárritu, Steve Golin, Jon Kilik
o The Reader - MGM, The Weinstein Company - Nominees to Be Determined


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:28 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Crash

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:28 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Babel, yes. I really couldn't stand that movie. And I actually liked Crash! It's like they took all of the worst parts of Crash and magnified them by a million percent.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:31 pm
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Does a C-grade equal dislike?

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:32 pm
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
you know what's really odd. As movies have gotten better, in my estimation anyway, from the 80's to 90's to 00's, the Best Picture nominees have gotten progressively worse.

There's such a huge disconnect. You have truly amazing films like Before Sunset, Eternal Sunshine, Once, Children of Men, Kill Bill Volumes 1 and 2, and yet we get Best Picture nominees like Capote, Babel, Seabiscuit, The Reader, and Crash.

Odd.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:38 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Does a C-grade equal dislike?


I guess it depends. Dislike means dislike. For me, it's D grades. C is average.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:43 pm
Profile
The Wall
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 16163
Location: Croatia
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
2008 - Juno
2006 - Babel, Queen
2005 - Crash
2002 - Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
1998 - La vita e bella

All of these were horrid. I haven't seen a lot of the older nominees. I suppose there are a lot of stinkers in the crop.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:43 pm
Profile WWW
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Juno
Crash
The Cider House Rules
Shine
Forrest Gump
Scent of a Woman
Awakenings
Ghost
Rain Man
Tootsie

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:47 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
trixster wrote:
Tootsie


thank you.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:49 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:54 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40602
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Babel
Benjamin Button

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:56 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Mr. Joseph X wrote:
Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods.

They're not bad movies, though. Undeserving, maybe. But not out-and-out bad.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:58 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Mr. Joseph X wrote:
Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods.


How many films in just this decade were nominated based on a single performance

Juno
The Reader
The Queen
Capote
Ray
Lost in Translation
A Beautiful Mind
Erin Brockovich
Frost/Nixon

it's a bit insane.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:58 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Hmm...there a number of mediocre movies that have been nominated, but the Academy tends to not nominate flat-out bad movies as much as average ones that are so much weaker than the movies they ignore. Babel, which I give a C-/D+ to, is probably the lowest grade I've given a BP nom. But I liked it when I first saw it; it took a second viewing a year later to discover its really weak qualities.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 6:59 pm
Profile WWW
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 2:23 pm
Posts: 1778
Location: Guaynabo, Puerto Rico
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
Gladiator and Babel come to mind.

I haven't seen it but how in the world did The Towering Inferno get itself nominated? And Crossfire?

_________________
Image


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:06 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Mr. Joseph X wrote:
Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods.


How many films in just this decade were nominated based on a single performance

Juno
The Reader
The Queen
Capote
Ray
Lost in Translation
A Beautiful Mind
Erin Brockovich
Frost/Nixon

it's a bit insane.


I'd take Lost in Translation, Juno and A Beautiful Mind off of there (but then wtf was A Beautiful Mind nominated for?)


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:08 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
I genuinely disliked Capote other than Philip Seymour Hoffman and Catherine Keener's performances. That's the only film I can think of from recent memory, though. I usually at least like/admire the Best Picture nominees on at least some level even if I'm not a huge fan (see: Frost/Nixon, The Queen, Finding Neverland, Gangs of New York).

Oh, just kidding, I thought The Thin Red Line was devastatingly dull. I guess that counts.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:10 pm
Profile
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5824
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
for the past four years, there has been one Oscar nominee that makes my worst 3 films of the year:

BP nominees I disliked from this decade:
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (C)
Michael Clayton (C-)
The Queen (C-)
Babel (C)
Brokeback Mountain (C)
Capote (C-)
A Beautiful Mind (D+)
Gosford Park (D)


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:10 pm
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40602
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
I'm getting closer to putting ABM on my "bad" list. The more I think about Ron Howard turning schitzophrenia into "Adventures with my 3 imaginary friends" while vastly censoring the Nash story, the more angry I get. Crowe's brilliant performance aside.

Oh and the Thin Red Line is horrible

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:11 pm
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
snack wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Mr. Joseph X wrote:
Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods.


How many films in just this decade were nominated based on a single performance

Juno
The Reader
The Queen
Capote
Ray
Lost in Translation
A Beautiful Mind
Erin Brockovich
Frost/Nixon

it's a bit insane.


I'd take Lost in Translation, Juno and A Beautiful Mind off of there (but then wtf was A Beautiful Mind nominated for?)


ABM was a baity biopic set in a AMPAS-friendly time period.

I don't think Juno or Lost in Translation would have been nominated without Murray or Page.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:12 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
trixster wrote:
Mr. Joseph X wrote:
Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods.

They're not bad movies, though. Undeserving, maybe. But not out-and-out bad.


No, I don't think they were bad movies either. I just think when you're talking in terms of the five best movies of the year, they don't even make the honorable mentions. But, when has the Academy really nominated the five best movies of any given year?

I love Juno and Lost in Translation, but yeah... much of my love is due to Page and Murray, respectively.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:30 pm
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
loyalfromlondon wrote:
snack wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Mr. Joseph X wrote:
Yeah, Capote and The Queen (and perhaps The Reader) rely on that one big performance, from Hoffman and Mirren (And Winslet) respectively. Without those performances, and even with those performances, they don't deserve BP nods.


How many films in just this decade were nominated based on a single performance

Juno
The Reader
The Queen
Capote
Ray
Lost in Translation
A Beautiful Mind
Erin Brockovich
Frost/Nixon

it's a bit insane.


I'd take Lost in Translation, Juno and A Beautiful Mind off of there (but then wtf was A Beautiful Mind nominated for?)


ABM was a baity biopic set in a AMPAS-friendly time period.

I don't think Juno or Lost in Translation would have been nominated without Murray or Page.


I don't think we would even know what Juno was without Page.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:31 pm
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
ABM was well done, I thought.

Maybe I was really taken by Crowe's performance (Denzel should've won in '00 instead of Crowe...and Crowe should've won in '01 instead of Denzel)...but I think schizophrenia is a rougher topic to portray...and for that movie to click worldwide, when it's really just about a loony mathematician? Even more impressive.

Not to mention, LOTR:FOTR couldn't win (imagine the backlash if The Two Towers was crap?), Moulin Rouge! was polarizing, and Gosford Park and In the Bedroom didn't deserve financing from the get-go.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:36 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23386
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
loyalfromlondon wrote:
you know what's really odd. As movies have gotten better, in my estimation anyway, from the 80's to 90's to 00's, the Best Picture nominees have gotten progressively worse.

There's such a huge disconnect. You have truly amazing films like Before Sunset, Eternal Sunshine, Once, Children of Men, Kill Bill Volumes 1 and 2, and yet we get Best Picture nominees like Capote, Babel, Seabiscuit, The Reader, and Crash.

Odd.


Good point. Absolutely agree that movies have gotten better from the 80s to the 90s and then to the 00s yet some of the oscar choices have been baffling to say the least.

For example, imagine how great it would have been if the 2004 noms were;

Before Sunset
Sideways
Eternal Sunshine
The Aviator
Kill Bill Vol 2

Instead the Academy gave us;

Million Dollar Baby
Finding Neverland
Ray
The Aviator
Sideways

:sleeping:

I guess its a product of the increasing influence of studio (yeah you Harvey) lobbying and campaigning.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:52 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Flat out bad best picture nominees
^at first I thought you took out Sideways there. I was gonna cut you.


Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:53 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.