Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2025 4:56 pm



Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 Happy with the noms? 
Author Message
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Happy with the noms?
Because overall...

I am?


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:31 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Suck it

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:31 am
Profile WWW
Jordan Mugen-Honda
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am
Posts: 13403
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
I'm happy with In Bruges and Frozen River getting screenplay noms.

_________________
Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:33 am
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
I'm still not happy about Wall-E getting Screenplay noms, but I can't have everything, right?


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:33 am
Profile WWW
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Yeah, but you lost about 200 pounds. A lot of that had to be hate.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:34 am
Profile
New Server, Same X
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28301
Location: ... siiiigh...
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
roo wrote:
I'm still not happy about Wall-E getting Screenplay noms, but I can't have everything, right?


You should make an appointment with Dr. Myfist, sometime immediately.

_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:35 am
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48678
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Generally, yes. I mean, I would obviously be much happier if TDK got nominated.

But I think a lot of the acting nominations have gone to good people and good actors.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:35 am
Profile
Confessing on a Dance Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am
Posts: 5578
Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
I am. Without Songs, stupid Slumdog is in no better shape than Milk which makes me happy.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:35 am
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
The only thing that makes me mad is no Sally Hawkins. Anything else I would have liked really didn't seem possible anyway, so I can't get mad at what I'd been expecting.

I'll take this funny Reader controversy over TDK any day.

_________________
k


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:37 am
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
no. Two incredible movies that could've broken down some big Oscar barriers both missed out in favor of two of the most conventional Oscar bait ever (The Reader, Frost/Nixon). I'm happy Ben Button and Milk did well, and am fine with Slumdog's success I guess, but overall, this should have gone much better.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:38 am
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 3350
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
No. My dislike for Ben Button (Ben Lyons has something to do with this, im sure ) has grown even more now and it's just sad that Rev Road went to unnoticed this whole year. Shame, shame, shame.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:38 am
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
billybobwashere wrote:
no. Two incredible movies that could've broken down some big Oscar barriers both missed out in favor of two of the most conventional Oscar bait ever (The Reader, Frost/Nixon). I'm happy Ben Button and Milk did well, and am fine with Slumdog's success I guess, but overall, this should have gone much better.

Slumdog is less conventional than The Dark Knight is to be quite honest.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:40 am
Profile WWW
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
roo wrote:
billybobwashere wrote:
no. Two incredible movies that could've broken down some big Oscar barriers both missed out in favor of two of the most conventional Oscar bait ever (The Reader, Frost/Nixon). I'm happy Ben Button and Milk did well, and am fine with Slumdog's success I guess, but overall, this should have gone much better.

Slumdog is less conventional than The Dark Knight is to be quite honest.


Slumdog is about the most conventional thing possible. Despite its exotic setting, Hinglish, amauteur acting, and random slo-mo, it's as A.B.C. as they come.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:47 am
Profile
Rachel McAdams Fan

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:13 am
Posts: 14628
Location: LA / NYC
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
No. The supporting categories are fine, but the fact that The Dark Knight didn't get in over The Reader really disgusts me. And not to mention Revolutionary Road being essentially shut out aside from the (wonderful) surprise Michael Shannon nomination. It's so depressing that it went unnoticed this year.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:49 am
Profile YIM
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Rorschach wrote:
The core of Slumdog that people are falling in love with is convential. India and shit is different, but the reason why the film is a succuess is the core convential story about a fairly-tale "I'll do anything to find you" love story.


Slumdog honestly reminds me of something Disney would have produced circa 1996 with brown frogs or some shit.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:51 am
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Rorschach wrote:
The core of Slumdog that people are falling in love with is convential. India and shit is different, but the reason why the film is a succuess is the core convential story about a fairly-tale "I'll do anything to find you" love story.

But you could make the same arguments about The Dark Knight on a different scale. How it's just Heat or a mobster movie with a slight twist.

Otherwise the cast is extremely high pedigree, it's polished and expensive. If it didn't have a guy in a rubber suit in it it would be 100% conventional.

It's never been a great example of the "comic film genre" because it's so outside the norms on that level. Iron Man is much closer to a comic book film at heart.

That's my take at least.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:52 am
Profile WWW
King Albert!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:04 pm
Posts: 11838
Location: The Happiest City on Earth
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Well, I am a bit shocked with some of the nominations, but I don't take them personally at all. I like to see surprizes, it brings more variety in the results, and especially the responses from easily offended fanboys.

_________________
Visit My Youtube Account and here is what you will see.
Image Image Image and many more.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:53 am
Profile WWW
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Rorschach wrote:
The core of Slumdog that people are falling in love with is convential. India and shit is different, but the reason why the film is a succuess is the core convential story about a fairly-tale "I'll do anything to find you" love story.


Slumdog honestly reminds me of something Disney would have produced circa 1996 with brown frogs or some shit.


Yeah, I love that scene in Mulan where Mulan has her eyeballs fucking burned out.

Kidding aside, I hear what you're saying and kind of agree.

_________________
k


Last edited by Johnny Dollar on Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.



Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:53 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
no....

The Reader getting in not only over Dark Knight but other far more worthy films just goes to show the Academy is still stuck in its own fucked up universe.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:54 am
Profile
"no rank"

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm
Posts: 24502
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
yoshue wrote:
loyalfromlondon wrote:
Rorschach wrote:
The core of Slumdog that people are falling in love with is convential. India and shit is different, but the reason why the film is a succuess is the core convential story about a fairly-tale "I'll do anything to find you" love story.


Slumdog honestly reminds me of something Disney would have produced circa 1996 with brown frogs or some shit.


Yeah, I love that scene in Mulan where Mulan has her eyeballs fucking burned out.

Kidding aside, I hear what you're saying and kind of agree.


:funny:


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:55 am
Profile
Forum General

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 8684
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Really glad for Frost/Nixon - especially considering all the experts hearing saying it wouldn't get picture. (Mostly before they saw it?)

So nothing for Clint? Boo.


and on Doubt. Don't really understand how a movie can get all the acting awards, 3, plus the screenplay award and that equals nothing for the picture or director???


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:58 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
I'm elated!
.
.
.
.
.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:59 am
Profile
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Grill wrote:
and on Doubt. Don't really understand how a movie can get all the acting awards, 3, plus the screenplay award and that equals nothing for the picture or director???

There wasn't a lot to choose from this year to be quite honest.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:01 am
Profile WWW
invading your spaces
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 6194
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
I'm not saying The Dark Knight is 100% conventional. I agree with your assessment. I'm playing Devil's Advocate. I'm just saying that perspective is needed.

If you step back to 2008 this month and say, "This fairy-tale-ish film, released in mid-October, directed by Danny Boyle with no stars, a large cast of non-Americans, set in India and mostly non-English will be nominated for Best Picture and most likely to win against the huge Hollywood films with 13 nominations", you would be looked at as the odd man out.

To be honest, there were people banging the drum for The Dark Knight all the way back to it's trailer release. This is not a sudden thing.

So the case I'm trying to make is that from that vantage, The Dark Knight was much more of an expected player than Slumdog ever was up until almost its release.

That saying Slumdog Millionaire is not "conventional" Oscar-faire when compared to something like Frost/Nixon or The Reader is absurd.


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 am
Profile WWW
The Dark Knight

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 5:11 pm
Posts: 777
Post Re: Happy with the noms?
Anyone else think 13 noms for a movie is a little excessive?


Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:10 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 75 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.