Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri May 09, 2025 7:24 pm



Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
 Wait, but, okay. Dreamgirls: What the heck happened? 
Author Message
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post Wait, but, okay. Dreamgirls: What the heck happened?
My theory is... not enough #1 placements. Then again, that theory could be used for a lot of things.

So what happened?


Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:43 pm
Profile WWW
Award Winning Bastard

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am
Posts: 15310
Location: Slumming at KJ
Post 
The same thing that happened to Walk the Line last year. It just wasn't a masterpiece to most in the academy. It had great performances, but that's where the greatness really ended. I gave it a B+, but never saw it as being so good that it would be in the race. Actually, I even picked LMS to beat it at the GG.

It just didn't have support beyond the performances, a la Walk the Line. It did have more tech support, but it just wasn't strong enough. I'm actually a bit surprised. I thought it *probably* would get a BP nomination, but when it came down to it, Clint and Steven have a lot more influence and bumped it right out of there.


Tue Jan 23, 2007 2:51 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
Maverikk wrote:
The same thing that happened to Walk the Line last year. It just wasn't a masterpiece to most in the academy. It had great performances, but that's where the greatness really ended. I gave it a B+, but never saw it as being so good that it would be in the race. Actually, I even picked LMS to beat it at the GG.

It just didn't have support beyond the performances, a la Walk the Line. It did have more tech support, but it just wasn't strong enough. I'm actually a bit surprised. I thought it *probably* would get a BP nomination, but when it came down to it, Clint and Steven have a lot more influence and bumped it right out of there.


Walk the Line, though, was on much more tenuous ground with its lack of Guild support. Although it seems odd, as Walk the Line was a big hit with the public, I don't feel like it ever garnered the amount of Oscar buzz that Dreamgirls did this year.

I never thought that Dreamgirls was worthy of a BP nom (it's not a bad film, I'm just not a huge fan), but I also never thought that it wouldn't receive one.

I don't know. I found this pretty shocking.


Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:04 pm
Profile WWW
Top Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm
Posts: 5812
Post 
Most Oscar followers got caught up in the theater experience with all the cheering and applause after each song influencing their judgment of the film. Whereas most Oscar voters saw screeners in their own home.

Also, Dreamworks probably decided that Letters was its horse moreso than Dreamgirls (ala Gladiator over Almost Famous).

I wonder if United 93 was in 6th place ahead of Dreamgirls...


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:02 pm
Profile WWW
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40261
Post 
I hate to be the one to say this, but...

Maybe if all the characters were white it would've been nominated.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:21 pm
Profile
Some days I'm a super bitch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
Post 
I knew the Academy wouldn't overlook Eastwood.


Bunch of old dinosaurs.


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:36 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
It just wasn't good enough, that's it. All those talk about the reviews are unimportant was dead wrong. Reviews are as important as the guilds, because most Academy voters agree with the majority of the reviews. I'm going out on a limb and say that Dreamgirls wasn't even #6, that went probably to U93. I'm not even sure if it had the upper hand against Blood Diamond or some of the others


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:45 pm
Profile
Begging Naked
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm
Posts: 14737
Location: The Present (Duh)
Post 
I Am Jack's... wrote:
Of course it's shocking.

I'm not going to point fingers but anyone who's saying they knew it wouldnt be nominated isn't really telling the truth. They may have wished and wanted it not to be nominated. But to say they knew it wouldn't be, is a lie. You can't claim credit for something that wasn't supposed to happen.

Look at every credible Oscar site. They all had Dreamgirls listed as a BP nominee. And I'm sure rival studios and people in the industry expected it to be nominated. Hell, looking at its nominations, I think members of the AMPAS expected it to be nominated.


THANK. YOU.


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:45 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
I Am Jack's... wrote:
Of course it's shocking.

I'm not going to point fingers but anyone who's saying they knew it wouldnt be nominated isn't really telling the truth. They may have wished and wanted it not to be nominated. But to say they knew it wouldn't be, is a lie. You can't claim credit for something that wasn't supposed to happen.

Look at every credible Oscar site. They all had Dreamgirls listed as a BP nominee. And I'm sure rival studios and people in the industry expected it to be nominated. Hell, looking at its nominations, I think members of the AMPAS expected it to be nominated.


Then call me a liar, but I for one had never ever Dreamgirls in my major predictions. I openly stated it in here and you were all ready to let me have it, so don't take that away from me. I stated the reasons for it time and time again. The signs were all over the place, look at the WGA, the PGA loss, the so-so reviews, I have no idea why each and every single Oscar site and forum user chose to completely ignore the signs. They all called it a lock, to me it would always have been lucky to slip in at #5, it never ever was a lock


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:49 pm
Profile
Some days I'm a super bitch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
Post 
Levy wrote:
It just wasn't good enough, that's it. All those talk about the reviews are unimportant was dead wrong. Reviews are as important as the guilds, because most Academy voters agree with the majority of the reviews. I'm going out on a limb and say that Dreamgirls wasn't even #6, that went probably to U93. I'm not even sure if it had the upper hand against Blood Diamond or some of the others


That's not true at all. The guilds and the Globes are usually WAAAY better indicators than reviewers.


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:51 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
Cotton wrote:
Levy wrote:
It just wasn't good enough, that's it. All those talk about the reviews are unimportant was dead wrong. Reviews are as important as the guilds, because most Academy voters agree with the majority of the reviews. I'm going out on a limb and say that Dreamgirls wasn't even #6, that went probably to U93. I'm not even sure if it had the upper hand against Blood Diamond or some of the others


That's not true at all. The guilds and the Globes are usually WAAAY better indicators than reviewers.


but to totally ignore it was just wrong. It wasn't like Crash where you had avid followers and haters. It was okayish reviewed all over the place.


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:53 pm
Profile
htm
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm
Posts: 10316
Location: berkeley
Post 
I Am Jack's... wrote:
Of course it's shocking.

I'm not going to point fingers but anyone who's saying they knew it wouldnt be nominated isn't really telling the truth. They may have wished and wanted it not to be nominated. But to say they knew it wouldn't be, is a lie. You can't claim credit for something that wasn't supposed to happen.

Look at every credible Oscar site. They all had Dreamgirls listed as a BP nominee. And I'm sure rival studios and people in the industry expected it to be nominated. Hell, looking at its nominations, I think members of the AMPAS expected it to be nominated.


I was shocked, too. And I don't hold your club against you know... honestly, until this morning, I was sure it had the best shot at winning BP.

Shack, I don't think it would have been nominated if it had a white cast... that's pretty damn foolish considering the supporting nominations (and likely wins) and tech support. People liked it, but the passion didn't translate to a BP win. It's kind of odd. Then again, the huge number of nominations is HIGHLY inflated by the fact that it got THREE song nominations.... heh..


Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:57 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
I Am Jack's... wrote:

You got lucky Levy, it happens. You and anyone else who truly disliked Dreamgirls got lucky. No more, no less.


No, I was convinced. My pride doesn't go as far as endangering my picks by just going after what I like or dislike.


Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:13 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
I Am Jack's... wrote:
Then in that case, you are leaps and bounds beyond anyone who followed the race this year, amatuers and professionals alike.

You should have phoned Geffen. Or at the very least, text'd him.


First, I had my share of success with the Oscars the last few years as you very well know. Second, if Dreamgirls would have get the big ones you would have ridiculed me for my stance that it won't get Picture, Screenplay and Director. So at least have the dignity to give that one to me.
Just because not many others predicted it, doesn't mean I got lucky. I was actually more surprised by the fact that Letters snuck in instead of U93 than by the fact that Dreamgirls didn't get in. I made enough mistakes in my predictions for you to mock me about, but don't try to jump on me for Dreamgirls just because you can't imagine anyone would have predicted that


Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:32 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
I Am Jack's... wrote:
Actually, no.

If you look back, it was other people who recently mentioned your name mockingly (I may have done it once or twice). A "Suck It Levy" thread probably would have happened today but not under my direction.


but as lead actor ;)


Tue Jan 23, 2007 5:42 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am
Posts: 6502
Post 
LA Times article on the subject:

http://www.calendarlive.com/printeditio ... 3952.story

Pretty much hits everything we've covered.


Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:44 am
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
It's more or less this year's Cold Mountain/Walk the Line mixture.

CM had some guild support and a lot of tech support. WTL and CM were both hits and had two acting noms with one frontrunner for the win. CM also had two Best Song noms like Dreamgirls and it ruled the Globes with 8 noms.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Thu Jan 25, 2007 2:28 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 24 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.