Author |
Message |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
Jesus why am I ALWAYS gone when they announce something?
From that list:
1. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
2. Superman Returns
3. Poseidon
4. X-Men The Last Stand
5. Casino Royale
6. Eragon
7. Night at the Museum
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:18 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
I think Casino Royale can sneak in. They will want to show some appreciations for a film with 95% RT rating.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 4:24 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
I assume X3 will be submitting the Golden Gate Bridge sequence for the 15 minute clip.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:01 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22208 Location: Places
|
superman reutns bullet in eye shot wins visual effect shot of the year from academy!
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:01 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
excel wrote: superman reutns bullet in eye shot wins visual effect shot of the year from academy!
In your dreams.
I really can't see POTC2 not winning, especially since the first lost to the Juggernaut Known As Return of the King.
And Poseidon should get in thanks to the Water FX they so very much love. They've never had much appreciation for X-Men anyway.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 5:14 pm |
|
 |
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am Posts: 12119 Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
I'd disagree with that.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:23 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11033
|
The whole plane scene from superman was the best sfx scene i have seen all year.
Supes
Pirated 2
Night
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 6:37 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22208 Location: Places
|
Awards Czar Jon wrote: excel wrote: superman reutns bullet in eye shot wins visual effect shot of the year from academy! In your dreams.
it already happened.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 9:49 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22208 Location: Places
|
The Dark Shape wrote: I'd disagree with that.
have you ever seen a human octopus? obviously not, so how da hell would you know if it looked real or not?
have you ever seen a man? hell yes, so itd be instantly obvious if a flying man in a movie looked fake, hence why supermans were a much greater challenge( and far more impressive).
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 9:51 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
excel wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: I'd disagree with that. have you ever seen a human octopus? obviously not, so how da hell would you know if it looked real or not? have you ever seen a man? hell yes, so itd be instantly obvious if a flying man in a movie looked fake, hence why supermans were a much greater challenge( and far more impressive).
We heard you the last 82 times you said that.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:24 pm |
|
 |
MikeQ.
The French Dutch Boy
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 8:28 pm Posts: 10266 Location: Mordor, Middle Earth
|
excel wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: I'd disagree with that. have you ever seen a human octopus? obviously not, so how da hell would you know if it looked real or not? have you ever seen a man? hell yes, so itd be instantly obvious if a flying man in a movie looked fake, hence why supermans were a much greater challenge( and far more impressive).
Technically, your comparison doesn't work. Yeah, we've never seen a human octopus, but we've also never seen a flying man, because just like there is no such thing as a human octopus, there is no such thing as a man who can fly. You can't keep the "human" and "octopus" together, and then separate the ability to fly from the man, and say "have you ever seen a man?" We've never seen a flying man, so technically there's no wrong way to make Superman fly. Heh.
I just think your argument is a little silly. One is being perfectly reasonable if they believe that the human octopus was better conceptualized and created in terms of visual effects than the flying man.
Peace,
Mike.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:15 pm |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
I don't know... wouldn't a flying man and a skydiver look kind of similar?
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:20 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22208 Location: Places
|
Zingaling wrote: excel wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: I'd disagree with that. have you ever seen a human octopus? obviously not, so how da hell would you know if it looked real or not? have you ever seen a man? hell yes, so itd be instantly obvious if a flying man in a movie looked fake, hence why supermans were a much greater challenge( and far more impressive). We heard you the last 82 times you said that.
oh so your just to dumb to understand it then?
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:44 pm |
|
 |
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm Posts: 36662
|
excel wrote: Zingaling wrote: excel wrote: The Dark Shape wrote: I'd disagree with that. have you ever seen a human octopus? obviously not, so how da hell would you know if it looked real or not? have you ever seen a man? hell yes, so itd be instantly obvious if a flying man in a movie looked fake, hence why supermans were a much greater challenge( and far more impressive). We heard you the last 82 times you said that. oh so your just to dumb to understand it then?
Insult me properly foooool, that made no sense.
WE GET THE POINT. IT'S NOT A GOOD POINT, BUT WE GET IT.
|
Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:46 pm |
|
 |
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
|
Pirates, Casino and Superman
Obviously Casino doesn't deserve a Visual FX nod, but they often just nominate the movies they like the most.
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 5:25 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
I don't know if it's fair to say Casino Royale doesn't deserve a nomination. Sure it wasn't as flashy as Supes, Pirates, or X3, but there was never a point where I didn't believe what I was watching on screen, and there was a lot of pretty impossible stuff. It's like Batman Begins last year - many didn't give it's effects credit, which was bullshit because there were a LOT of effects people just didn't realize weren't real.
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 5:29 am |
|
 |
Alex Y.
Top Poster
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm Posts: 5824
|
 Re: Visual Effects Oscar In Consideration List
Predicts:
“Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chestâ€Â
“X-Men The Last Standâ€Â
“Night at the Museumâ€Â
With "Casino Royale", not "Superman Returns", as the spoiler.
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:09 am |
|
 |
Price
Gamaur's sex slave
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm Posts: 8889 Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
|
Predicts:
Pirates of the Caribbean: DMC
Superman Returns
Eragon (I think the director is a VFX artist himself, so he may have support for a nomination, but not the win)
_________________
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:53 am |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
MovieDude is thinking along the right lines. People need to remember that not all effects are digital. Car wrecks, explosions, collapsing buildings are all practical, and that's where Casino probably has some support... I think I saw one obvious CG sequence (the airport pick up the cop car and throw it). It's still kind of a weird choice for this category.
Poseidon's CG is awful but the practical effects are great, but I would chalk most of it up to great sets (which the film did have). That's not gonna happen... ILM is not getting two nominations probably.
Pirates
Supes
X3
The sure thing is Pirates. It's brilliant and is the only film listed that seems to make any sort of advancement. Plus Pirates has a ton of models/practical/etc. effects which make it an all around package. Eragon is not happening... ILM and some Weta. ILM has Pirates, Weta has (partially) X3. Night at the Museum could still happen.
The "why aren't they there" ie Matrix Sequels Award(tm) goes to Eastwoods film(s). Flags had the effects needed to at least be considered in the short-list. Don't know about Iwo Jima... could this be a signal that Eastwood's films don't have very broad technical support? Only time will tell...
|
Sun Dec 17, 2006 4:51 pm |
|
 |
android
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:44 am Posts: 2913 Location: Portugal
|
“Night at the Museumâ€Â
“Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chestâ€Â
“Superman Returnsâ€Â
|
Wed Jan 10, 2007 12:31 pm |
|
|